Monday, June 29, 2015

On The Crazz Files w/ Adam Crazz

Earlier this evening, I was a guest on The Crazz Files, an independent podcast program based in Australia. We discussed a variety of issues, including the alleged Charleston shooting and the plethora of anti-White, un-American agendas being advanced in its aftermath. You can download the entire program here.

Sunday, June 28, 2015

"The tattoo business as we know it was largely created by Jews"

Following the recent Supreme Court ruling federally sanctioning "homosexual marriage," an effort that has been spearheaded and championed by the organized Jewish community from its very inception (headline here says it all, but read the full article for more), an article appearing in the Jewish webzine Tablet highlighted yet another subversive and destructive cultural assault on America and the West emanating from the organized Jewish community: the acceptance and widespread phenomenon of tattoos.

According to Tablet, "The tattoo business as we know it was largely created by Jews," as the article reports.

Every time I read yet another personal essay by a young Jew or Jewess about “how I got a tiny tattoo and my parents are rilly upset but guess what I can still get buried in a Jewish cemetery,” my eyes roll back so far in my head I worry that they will get stuck that way, and I will walk around looking like a zombie extra in a Christopher Lee movie.

A little-known fact: The tattoo business as we know it was largely created by Jews. Lewis “Lew the Jew” Alberts, Charlie Wagner, Brooklyn Joe Lieber, William Moskowitz, Milton Zeis … these are the founding fathers who created the art of American tattooing and the technology that helped establish an industry. [...]
The full article is well worth reading for all the sordid details of the clique of Jews behind what has turned into a $1.65 billion industry today.

Living in Southern California, it is a rare occasion when I encounter someone without a tattoo. (I do not have any tattoos, and do not plan on getting any.) Almost everyone I know or meet has at least one; many have multiple, and eagerly plan their next one. I've heard many people, friends and acquaintances alike, describe tattoos as positively "addicting," where after getting one tattoo they almost immediately want another one.

I will probably ruffle some feathers by saying this, but I don't find tattoos attractive or appealing in any way. Of course, I have met and often see women with tattoos that are quite attractive. However, they would be even more attractive, in my opinion, without tattoos. I tend to view tattoos as subversive, unnatural (obviously), and entirely unnecessary. I'm open to alternative perspectives though, so please let me know what you think in the comments below.

I've often wondered if there is any subversive or destructive ideology, perspective, or cultural norm accepted and promoted in the West today that does not originate in the mind of a Jew. As of this writing, I honestly cannot identify even one. It should be clear to everyone at this point that #WithJewsWeLose - always and forever. It's as simple and straightforward as that folks.

Saturday, June 27, 2015

German perspective of WWII reaching the masses with documentary film

"This time Germany has forced a TOTAL WAR upon the world. As a result, she must be prepared to pay a TOTAL PENALTY. And there is one, and only one, such Total Penalty: Germany must perish forever! In fact - not in fancy! [...] 
The goal of world-domination must be removed from the reach of the German and the only way to accomplish that is to remove the German from the world. [...] 
There remains then but one mode of ridding the world forever of Germanism - and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind." - Theodore Kaufman, Jewish author of Germany Must Perish, published in 1941 
"... the Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word 'German' discharges the gun. We shall not discuss. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German in the day, your day is wasted." - Ilya Ehrenburg, Jewish propagandist for the Soviet Red Army
The crimes committed against the German people - men, women, and children, soldiers, political officials, and civilians alike - during and after WWII is one of history's greatest tragedies.

And yet, for most of the Western world, it is a tragedy that is largely unknown. The war crimes committed by the Allies during and after the war, which included the indiscriminate fire-bombing of countless German cities and industrial centers, the sinking of German civilian ships on the high seas, the torture, starvation, abuse, and murder of millions of disarmed or surrendered German soldiers and National Socialist political officials, and the rape and murder of countless German women and girls, have been covered up and downplayed in the West. Ask any Westerner about the atrocities committed during WWII, and the only response you will likely receive is that "6 million Jews" suffered and died at the hands of "the evil Nazis" during the "Holocaust".

The ignorance of the Western world regarding WWII may change with the release of Hellstorm, a documentary produced by Kyle Hunt of Renegade Broadcasting. The documentary is based on Thomas Goodrich's must-read book thoroughly detailing the utter annihilation of National Socialist Germany during and after WWII entitled Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947.

On May 1st, Hunt released Hellstorm on the official Renegade Broadcasting YouTube channel, which has been viewed well over 250,000 times as of this article's publication. It has been uploaded to other YouTube channels and video sharing websites as well.

"I want to see the honor of the German people restored," Hunt explained in a recent interview with this writer. "I want to see Germany get off its knees, stop paying reparations to the criminal state of Israel, and demand that all previous payments be returned to them. I doubt the Germans would even want or need for the Allied powers to make their own reparation payments for the crimes committed against the German people during and after the war, but the least we could do is understand their suffering and send them our good will. I want for the people of the world, and especially Germans, to realize that they have been lied to about almost everything related to World War II, and that there is absolutely no reason for Germans to feel guilty."

The 90 minute film is simply heart wrenching, vividly describing and showing the horrendous atrocities committed against the Germans. The film is expertly narrated by Sinead McCarthy and includes a number of voice-over contributions as well. Much of the film is taken from archival footage rarely seen in the West. It also includes a number of dramatizations, clips from movies, and still images. Oscar Turner of Omniphi Media contributed "some impressive graphics to make the documentary into a very professional presentation," according to Hunt. "Organizing all of these components together into a complete film took around 7 months to complete, though there were some brief lulls in the production."

"What happened to Germany and her people, both during and after World War II, remains the greatest and darkest crime in world history," noted Goodrich, the author of the book the film was based on. "Never in history have so many been murdered, raped, tortured, and enslaved. And never in history have so few known about it."

Hunt and Goodrich aim to combat the widespread Western ignorance of the true nature of WWII with the release of this powerful film.

"The information contained within Hellstorm is so powerful and game-changing because it finally shows what World War II was like from the loser's perspective," Hunt told me. "Hellstorm shows the real 'holocaust,' which is far more terrifying than anything Jewish and Western propagandists have been able to cook up since. Though the film does not really endeavor to debunk the lies of the alleged Jewish 'Holocaust', most viewers will realize that we have been lied to in a very big way about who the victims and villains of 'The Good War' really were."

"For seventy years we have had only the Allied and Jewish version of that war, and thus, in our name, we are even now allowing the same crimes to be committed around the globe," Goodrich explained. "My hope when I began this book, my hope now, is that if enough men and women of good will read this book, then act upon this book, that never again will an abomination like World War II ever happen again - not in our name, not in our time, not to us, not to anyone. This, I know, is also the great goal of Kyle Hunt and his new film, Hellstorm."

Hunt concluded by explaining that the so-called "Good War" was "not only a travesty for the German people, but for almost everyone involved, excluding the very few at the top who profited greatly from the conflict."

He continued: "Europe lost tens of millions of her bravest and brightest in an insane fratricidal conflict. The Allies defeated Germany so that Jews could run our banks, media, governments, and corporations, brainwash our children to hate themselves, flood our lands with hostiles invaders, and enslave us as their 'goyim.' They are already planning and enacting another 'Hellstorm' in all White countries using their radicalized Communist foot soldiers. We must learn from history, reclaim control of our nations, our identity, our future, and never allow ourselves to be devastated like this ever again."

To order a DVD, please visit

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

"White supremacists" next target in "Global War on Terror"

In the wake of the alleged Charleston shooting, which has all the indicators of yet another Sandy Hook-style media PsyOp, the leaders of the virulently anti-White Southern Poverty Law Center are now arguing that "White supremacists" must be targeted in the next phase of the Jewish concocted and engineered "Global War on Terror."

In an Op-Ed recently published in The New York Times entitled "White Supremacists Without Borders," Morris Dees and J. Richard Cohen, the founder and current president of the SPLC respectively, advance the notion that "racists" and "White supremacists" are using the Internet to organize globally, which is leading to "lone wolf terrorists" committing violence and murder (such as the purported Charleston shooting said to have been carried out by Dylann Storm Roof). Dees and Cohen argue that the "threat" posed by "White supremacists" writing and organizing via the Internet, similar to how ISIS and other alleged Islamic terrorist groups organize, must be confronted.

We knew this was coming.

A VARIETY of clues to the motives of Dylann Storm Roof, the suspect in last week’s mass shooting at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, S.C., have emerged. First, we saw the patches he wore on his jacket in a Facebook photo: the flags of regimes in South Africa and Rhodesia that brutally enforced white minority rule.

Then, a further cache of photos of Mr. Roof — seen in several bearing a Confederate flag — was discovered on a website, Last Rhodesian, registered in his name, together with a manifesto, a hodgepodge of white supremacist ideas. The author (most likely Mr. Roof) calls on whites to take “drastic action” to regain dominance in America and Europe.

These themes, popular among white supremacists in the United States, are also signs of the growing globalization of white nationalism. When we think of the Islamist terrorism of groups like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State, we recognize their international dimension. When it comes to far-right domestic terrorism, we don’t.

Americans tend to view attacks like the mass murder in Charleston as isolated hate crimes, the work of a deranged racist or group of zealots lashing out in anger, unconnected to a broader movement. This view we can no longer afford to indulge.

When, according to survivors, Mr. Roof told the victims at the prayer meeting that black people were “taking over the country,” he was expressing sentiments that unite white nationalists from the United States and Canada to Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Unlike those of the civil rights era, whose main goal was to maintain Jim Crow in the American South, today’s white supremacists don’t see borders; they see a white tribe under attack by people of color across the globe. [...]
It has been pointed out by numerous commentators that the photos of Storm Roof posing with the Confederate flag and with patches of the flags of South Africa and Rhodesia under White rule on his jacket appear to be photoshopped. Storm Roof's alleged manifesto makes a number of accurate arguments regarding racial matters, including the biological differences between Blacks and Whites, the outrageous and underreported phenomenon of Black-on-White violent crime, and the lack of racial consciousness amongst the vast majority of Whites in America (and around the world), but it has not been proven that the manifesto was actually written by Storm Roof, nor does it prove he actually committed this purported mass shooting.

The entire situation in Charleston is extremely bizarre, and it has not been conclusively demonstrated a shooting even took place in the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church resulting in the deaths of 9 individuals. The Obama DOJ is already handing out millions of dollars to the alleged victim family members, many of whom have given incredibly scripted and phony interviews to the mainstream mass media. Do you honestly believe these purported "victim family members" are genuine?

The Op-Ed published by the leaders of the SPLC argue that "White supremacists" (read: racially conscious White people who care about the future of their family, children, communities, and nations) see the White race "under attack by people of color across the globe," a fact which is demonstrated on a daily basis. 

White people are the only people in the entire world who are not allowed to have their own sovereign nation states, political parties and lobbies, schools, neighborhoods, media outlets, and any other exclusively all White organizations. "Diversity" and "multiculturalism" (codewords for White genocide) are state sanctioned and enforced. Millions of non-White immigrations - legal and illegal - are flooding into White nations every year. Whites are violently attacked in their homes and on their streets. They are verbally and psychologically abused and slandered in their schools and history books. The mass media and elite political class are openly hostile to the interests of Whites. 

There is a war being waged on Whites all around the world. And it emanates from the organized Jewish community, who have always been and will always remain hostile to traditional Western civilization. These are facts that are easily verifiable for anyone who takes the time to do it.

Dees and Cohen go on to lament the fact that pro-White activists, intellectuals, writers, and leaders are developing effective public relations strategies (such as "the mantra"), organizing political parties, spreading information via blogs, radio programs, and websites, networking with other nationalist and racially-oriented groups in Europe and elsewhere, and otherwise connecting with individuals via the Internet who care about the future of the White race. How dare White people challenge and resist their own destruction!

The Op-Ed concludes:
The movement is bound to produce more violence, not necessarily from organized groups but from lone wolves like Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian terrorist who killed more than 70 people in his country in 2011 because he wanted “to save Europe from Islam.” Mr. Breivik had ties to American white nationalists as a registered user of Stormfront, a web forum founded by a former Ku Klux Klan leader that has more than 300,000 members (about two-thirds are American).

Europe has also seen the rise of a powerful, far-right political movement that rejects multiculturalism. The anti-Semitic Jobbik Party in Hungary and the neo-fascist Golden Dawn in Greece are prime examples. In Germany, there has been a series of murders by neo-Nazis. Britain, too, is experiencing an upswing of nationalist, anti-immigrant politics.

This month, S.P.L.C. staffers will join activists from the United States and Europe at a conference in Budapest about this transnational white supremacism that is emerging as the world grows more connected by technology. The message of white genocide is spreading. White nationalists look beyond borders for confirmation that their race is under attack, and they share their ideas in the echo chamber of racist websites.

The days of thinking of domestic terrorism as the work of a few Klansmen or belligerent skinheads are over. We know Islamic terrorists are thinking globally, and we confront that threat. We’ve been too slow to realize that white supremacists are doing the same.
The SPLC and other anti-White hate groups expect us to simply accept our displacement and destruction. They are actively attempting to silence us and target us, arguing that we must be viewed as the next "scary boogeyman" in the never ending "Global War on Terror." This is unacceptable, and a sure sign that the enemies of the White race recognize our time is coming - finally. 

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Morris on the alleged Charleston shooting

The YouTube commenter 108Morris108, who I have been criticized and lambasted for citing in the past, recently released a video commentary regarding the alleged Charleston shooting and the agendas the elites are promoting as a result:

I largely agree with Morris' commentary, and also question the officially sanctioned narrative explaining the purported Charleston shooting. The entire situation seems ludicrous to me, and many of the details of the alleged shooting are laughably absurd.

As I wrote in a comment on Aryan Skynet the other day:
Being the “conspiracy theorist” that I am, I wonder whether or not this was a genuine event, at least depicted by the Jews’ media. Given all the deceptions and outrageous fabrications the Jews’ media have perpetrated against the world, I just have a hard time buying this one… In my opinion, this entire event looks like a “Black Sandy Hook,” if you know what I mean.
It should not surprise us that almost immediately, the Jewish controlled mainstream mass media and organized Jewish community called this purported shooting a "hate crime," describing the alleged shooter as a "racist" and a "White supremacist." Jewish pundits and rabbis have published Op-Eds denouncing America as a "racist society" and a country with "incurable racism." It should be obvious how this alleged event will be used by the Jews and their puppets to advance their anti-White, anti-American agenda (more gun-grabbing, more "tolerance" and "diversity", less "hate" and "racism", etc.).

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

"Jewish Earmark" set to double in 2016

As if we needed any more proof that the entire "Homeland Security" paradigm of American domestic security policy operates as a Jewish racket, we have even more courtesy of The Jewish Daily Forward this morning.

According to the Forward, the Senate Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee has "voted to more than double funding for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program to $25 million for the coming year." Virtually all of the funds allocated to the Nonprofit Security Grant Program go to Jewish organizations for "security" purposes. The Forward is even bold enough to admit in its headline that the Grant Program amounts to a "Jewish Earmark".

[...] The increase approved Tuesday by the Senate Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee for Fiscal Year 2016, up from the current $13 million, was actively supported by the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, Agudath Israel of America and the Jewish Federations of North America. The full Senate Appropriations Committee is expected to vote on the funding on Thursday.

Funds from the security grant program are used to assist synagogues, day schools and other Jewish nonprofits in making their buildings more secure.

“We have seen a disturbing rise in threats and attacks on community institutions and, when finalized, the funds provided under the NSGP will not only keep our community safer it will also be a statement of solidarity and support in the face of such threats,” said Nathan Diament, OU executive director for public policy.

The increase in the appropriation for security grants is “a profoundly important development,” said Rabbi Abba Cohen, Washington director of Agudah. “It represents the subcommittee’s understanding that the terrorist risk to American lives is real and continuing and that the safety of these lives rises above political differences — that, in today’s world, more resources need to be devoted to increase the level of protection for our vulnerable institutions and populations, not less,” he said.

William Daroff, senior vice president for public policy and director of JFNA’s Washington Office, noted the importance of the grants. “These funds have been critical in protecting our communities. The increase comes at a time when anti-Semitism in the U.S. has risen by more than 21% between 2013 and 2014, and when terrorist groups like ISIL, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and Hezbollah continue to incite violence against Jews in the West.”
It is truly remarkable how effective the organized Jewish community is at communicating its message, lobbying the government for services and funding, and achieving success, with the government and political establishment eagerly acceding to their demands with very few exceptions.

We see the same tactics utilized by the organized Jewish community time and time again as well. The Jews hysterically hype a perceived "threat" (i.e., the rising tide of "anti-Semitism" or "terrorist attacks" against Jewish organizations) to their well-being and interests as a group, and then demand the government take steps to combat said perceived "threat" (criminalizing thoughts, ideas, and expressions Jews do not like to combat "anti-Semitism" or giving Jewish organizations millions of dollars for "security" in order to prevent "terrorist attacks"). And it works every time

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Famous Jewish porn stars

To celebrate the "Queen of Porn" Jenna Jameson's recent conversion to Judaism, the Jewish Telegraph Agency published a list of the 7 most famous Jews in the pornography industry, which as many readers are well aware of is largely run by Jewish perverts and sexual deviants intent on corrupting and debasing traditional Western sexual and gender norms.

This week the news surfaced that “Queen of Porn” Jenna Jameson is converting to Judaism. Jameson, who has been married twice before, is engaged to Israeli Lior Bitton (who works in L.A.’s diamond business and has been charged with stealing merchandise from his stores). Jameson’s Instagram page is filled with photos of challah and other kosher dishes she’s been cooking up; she’s even dropping Hebrew words on Twitter.

As it it turns out, Jameson will be in great company — several other members of the tribe are (or have been) major stars in the adult film industry. In honor of Jameson’s high-profile conversion, we give you seven of the most famous Jews in porn.

You might not want to Google them in an office or other public place. [...]
The article goes on to list Ron Jeremy (real name Ron Jeremy Hyatt), arguably the "most famous porn star of all time," as well as James Deen (real name Bryan Matthew Sevilla), Nina Hartley (real name Mary Louise Hartman), and Joanna Angel (real name Joanna Mostov), all of whom are major players in the porn industry.

Other top Jewish porn stars that made the list include Michael Lucas (real name Andrei Treivas), a Russian-born Jew who owns Lucas Entertainment, "the biggest gay adult film company in New York," according to the JTA. Lucas "has made some of the most expensive gay pornos of all time" and "is fiercely pro-Israel and pro-gay rights." Porn stars Naomi Russell and "Seymour Butts" (real name Adam Glasser) concluded the list.

As the perverted Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein frankly admitted, the only reason Jews are involved in pornography is because they "think Christ sucks." Jewish professor Nathan Abrams argues that "Jewish involvement in porn... is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion." And they have been quite successful.

However, it is rarely pointed out to non-Jews that Jews are the main players behind the systematic promotion of sexual deviance and pornography. Jewish news outlets like the Jewish Telegraph Agency may openly admit and even boast about Jewish involvement in pornography, but the masses are kept in the dark, especially as to how pornography is used as a weapon to debase and corrupt Western society.

Thursday, June 11, 2015

Gilad Atzmon on Jewish ethnocentrism, hypocrisy, & "anti-Semitism"

Editor's note: What follows is part two of an ongoing Q&A discussion I am having with Gilad Atzmon, an Israeli-born internationally renowned musician, philosopher, and writer. I hope to continue this dialogue in the future.

JF: I think a strong argument can be made that the vast majority of Jews, and certainly the organized Jewish community, conduct their lives, business, and other affairs by the maxim: Is it good for the Jews? What's good for the Jews is often also framed as: is it good for Israel? Admittedly, there are at times heated debates and diverging points of view within the international Jewish community about what exactly is good for the Jews (and by extension the Jewish state of Israel).

GA: This is a true observation, however I would refine it a bit, if you allow me. The Judeocentrism you describe above is symptomatic of those who identify politically, socially, spiritually and culturally as Jews. This identification is vague and is kept vague for a reason. It allows the tribally oriented mind to slip in and out and to morph in accordance to the transforming reality around it. However, it is true to argue that those who identify as Jews, whether hard core Zionists or so-called "progressives", such as Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), are primarily concerned with one thing, namely Jewish interests. They just fail to agree amongst themselves what these interests are.

JF: It is quite obvious that Jewry has a very strong sense of ethnocentrism, identity, purpose, and direction. Jews get involved in various political causes, engage in "culture creating" activities (i.e., producing movies, plays, literature, etc.), advocate and lobby for public policy, and engage in other activities primarily to advance the interests of their own community, which often translates into enormous wealth and prestige for themselves as well. We discussed the Jewish infiltration and subversion of the Palestinian Solidarity movement in order to advance Jewish ethnic interests in our last Q&A, and I recently wrote an article for American Free Press dealing with the organized Jewish community's use of the Anti-Terrorism Act in the United States to pursue and advance Jewish ethnic interests. There are many more examples of Jews engaging in a variety of activities with the specific goal of advancing the overall Jewish community's interests and agenda.

Would you agree with my analysis? In your view, what explains this high level of Jewish ethnocentrism?

GA: Totally, your observation is well-founded. In my recent work, which I have now compiled into a book, I offer a few methods that help to explain this unique tribal mode.

In The Wandering Who I offered a study of Jewish identity politics which examines the origin of this thought from cultural and political perspectives.

There is no doubt that Judaism as an exilic spiritual precept had supported the development of some unique survival tactics that maintained Jewish segregation and sustained Jewish existence. In The Wandering Who I refer for instance to the Book of Esther that teaches Jews how to form political lobbies and to intervene with a host nation's politics.

However, while the rabbinical Jewish society kept Jews separated (culturally, religiously and physically) from their host nations, the emancipation of European Jewry and the call for emancipation led to the development of a new type of Jewish identity. Unlike their rabbinical ancestors, the emancipated Jews were seeking integration and assimilation.

Some Jews have taken the most radical measure and demoted themselves into ordinary human beings - they became goyim and drifted away from Judaism and Jewishness. However, many other Jews adopted the Jewish Haskala paradigm, where they were goyim in the street but sustained Jewishness at home. This mode of behavior is obviously duplicitous. The Haskala Jew deceived the ‘Goy’ while in public, yet lied to his or her creator while at home.

Zionism was born to solve this ethical dilemma. It admitted that Jewish secular diaspora existence was incompatible with Western civilization. It vowed to take the Jews away and to make them into a "people like all other people." As we know, in spite of Zionism being a spectacularly successful and powerful project, the Jewish state is on its last leg. The Jews have managed to make themselves hated in the Middle East. And this is far from being surprising, in spite of the Zionist promise to "civilize" the Jew. From its day of inception Zionism was based on the plunder of other peoples' land and assets.

As bizarre as it may sound, it is actually secularism, emancipation and the collapse of the ghetto that transformed Jewish culture into a tribal bond driven by an imaginary concept of racial brotherhood.

JF: When I interviewed Fredrick Toben on my radio program last year, we discussed how the Jews essentially operate as a race, pursuing their own specific racial interests (often at the expense of other peoples), while denying that very same right to other racial or ethnic groups, especially White people (whether in Europe, America, Canada, Australia, or elsewhere). Toben published an article quoting the renowned German philosopher Martin Heidegger as stating: "The Jews, with their marked gift for calculating, live, already for the longest time, according to the principal of race, which is why they are resisting its consistent application with utmost violence." Quite an insightful and powerful statement, don't you think?

GA: I was also fascinated by this insightful quote by Heidegger that appeared in the recently published Black Notebooks. I also found it fascinating that The Guardian saw anti-Semitism in it. Heidegger was basically pointing at Jewish cultural projection that is performed collectively by those who identify with the tribe.

However, please allow me to comment on the idea that the Jews are an unique racial group. The Jews are not a race and are actually far from forming any racial continuum. However, it is true that Jewish politics and culture are racist to the core and this applies to Zionists and anti-Zionists, liberal Jews and progressive Jews.

JF: Jewish activists and intellectuals have literally pathologized White racial identity, especially in the post-WWII era. If a White person openly identifies with their racial kinsmen, concerns himself with their future well-being and prospects, and seeks to formulate and advance his race's unique political, cultural, and economic interests, he is immediately denounced and slandered as a "racist" or a "White supremacist" or even "a Nazi". Whites are certainly not permitted to organize along political lines, at least not openly. There are no explicitly White political or cultural groups, at least not in the mainstream.

GA: To start with, as you surely know, I am a jazz artist. I basically dedicated my artistic life to Black music and culture. As such, the dichotomy between Black and White is foreign to me. I would also mention that though my Black musician friends are clearly subjected to daily discrimination of all sorts, I have hardly encountered any of them exploring the shockingly vile anti-White language that is unfortunately so common within Jewish "liberal" circuits. I have never heard any of my Black colleagues calling to wipe out the White race or destroy Whiteness. What they want instead is to live in equal terms, which is something I obviously fully support!

There is no doubt that some Jewish political merchants see the White subject and White working class as an enemy. It is also true that some dominant segments within the Jewish progressive circles aim to break the working people into sectors of identity politics. The method is simple. Rather than following the old leftist mantra that was there to unite us all against "the capitalists," regardless of our ethnicity, race, or gender, the New Left is there to teach us to view ourselves in sectarian terms (i.e., as a Jew, as a Black, as a lesbian, as a woman, as a gay, as a Muslim etc.).

The New Left is a doctrine that cosmopolitanizes the symptom. The gay, the woman, the Muslim etc. are becoming transnational identities just like the "cosmopolitan Jew". Rather than being devoted to the nation, to the soil and to the local interests of the working class and other compatriots, the new identity enthusiasts are bonded with a segment of the world population who share the same symptoms or belief system. Devastatingly enough, the New Left and identity politics is the other side of the globalization coin.

JF: On the other hand, the organized Jewish community controls a billion dollar charity industry (which receives many millions of dollars from various governments around the world), AIPAC and other Jewish political lobby groups openly advocate for Jewish interests and pro-Israel public policy, and we see countless specifically Jewish cultural and educational organizations operating all across the United States, a nation founded and built by White people.

GA: Correct, you are spot on. The first to grasp that identity politics are a disaster were the Zionists and Israelis. And why? Because after being submerged by identity political thinking for 3000 years, Jews have developed enough intellectual anti-bodies to that ideology.

Israel was the first to grasp that identity politics is dangerous for the cohesiveness of diaspora Jewry. Israeli hasbara and Zionist merchants correctly pointed out to their fellow diaspora Jews that speaking "as a Jew" didn’t really mean much out of Jewish orthodoxy. They told the American, British and French Jews, rather than speaking "as a Jew," come to Israel and "be" Jews. We will teach you how to fly F-16 or drive a Merkava tank. Israel offered a very successful alternative to the bogus "identifier" offered by the Jewish Left.

It would be important to mention that ISIS offers a very similar product. Rather than speaking "as a Muslim," which really means little in institutionally Islamophic France, ISIS would tell young European Muslims, "Join us and be a real Muslim!"

In general, the rise of nationalism which we see in Europe is a clear reaction to years of the duplicitous New Left agenda that is set to split people into sectarian discourses.

JF: What explains this hypocrisy? How can the Jews be so openly ethnocentric and concerned about their own unique political, cultural, and economic interests, while demonizing and pathologizing other racial or ethnic groups - especially White people - for even attempting to do the same thing?

GA: In the light of the above, what we see now is an internal debate within the Jewish world. A conflict between radical Zionist nationalism and identity politics advocates, both of whom are fully dedicated to Jewish tribal interests. The question is how is it possible that an internal Jewish debate has such a seriously devastating impact on Western society? I think that the answer is Jewish power – the ability to suppress any attempt to discuss, let alone criticize, Jewish power.

JF: Finally, I've have written quite a bit about "anti-Semitism" on my blog. If you read the Jewish press, and by the Jewish press I mean newspapers, websites, blogs, and other sources of information published by and written specifically for the Jewish community, "anti-Semitism" is a constant theme. Almost every single day, one could find an article in the Jewish press hyping the threat of "anti-Semitism", discussing the alleged "rise of anti-Semitic sentiment" around the world, purported attacks on Jews just because they are Jews, etc. In my view, "anti-Semitism" is a weaponized term that is used by the organized Jewish community to marginalize, demonize, and delegitimize anyone who is opposing some aspect of Jewish power and influence.

GA: If being a (secular) Jew is defined as the unique capacity to evoke hatred amongst others then the existence of anti-Semitism is there to suggest that Jewish politics has fulfilled its mission.

JF: But "anti-Semitism" is rarely specifically defined. The ADL conducted a global survey last year on "anti-Semitic" attitudes around the world. It found that roughly 25% of individuals polled harbored "anti-Semitic" attitudes. But if you look at the criteria for determining whether or not someone is an "anti-Semite", you will discover that the ADL considers an individual an "anti-Semite" if they simply recognize the power and influence of the organized Jewish community, or state basic facts about Jews.

GA: Correct, and I think that this is why some of our friends decided to coin the phrase "Too much knowledge is anti-Semitism" and even to make it into a popular badge. As I mentioned above, I define Jewish power as the power to suppress discussion and/or criticism of Jewish power. What you describe above is the mechanism the ADL and the Jewish left (i.e., Chomsky, Democracy Now!, and the entire Jewish political continuum) are using to suppress some clear and necessary observations regarding Jews and their relative power in politics, culture, academia, banking, entertainment and so on.

JF: I basically understand "anti-Semitism" to mean someone who:
  • states basic facts about Jews, Jewish power and influence in the West, and/or agendas promoted by the Jewish community;
  • openly discusses Jewish criminality and treachery;
  • opposes or denounces Israeli barbarity, terrorism, and criminality; or
  • questions or refutes Jewish interpretations of events, both in a historical and contemporary context.
How do you define "anti-Semitism"? What exactly is "anti-Semitism"?

GA: What you describe above is indeed fully consistent with the Jewish suppressive mechanism that is symptomatic to lobby groups all across the Jewish political spectrum, from the ADL to JVP and beyond.

The Jewish political attitude is pretty simple to grasp. It is a concentrated institutional collective attempt to shift the blame from the Jews onto the goyim. Within the context of contemporary Jewish politics, Jews are always innocent and the goyim, whoever or whatever they are, are always guilty of blind racially motivated hatred.

But is it really possible to imagine an historical narrative in which Jews are always innocent and goyim are constantly guilty? In other words, how is it possible that Jews have managed to make themselves unpopular in so many places and in so many cultures that have nothing to do with each other?!

Bernard Lazare, an early Zionist and a contemporary of Herzl, hated anti-Semitism, but he was courageous enough to accept that "it was not born without cause." In the late 19th century, Lazare produced one of the most daring studies of anti-Semitism. He attempted to find out what is it in the Jews that makes their history into a chain of countless holocausts. Bernard Lazare did the impossible - he blamed the victims. He came to the conclusion that some Jewish religious and cultural traits are indeed problematic and beg for correction.

I myself tend to believe that anti-Semitism is the core of Jewish shame. Jews hate to be hated; they desperately try to make themselves loved. Zionism is a radical attempt to make the Jew likable. JVP is a similar desperate attempt to make the Jew loveable for being anti-Zionist. Jewish history and politics is an inconsistent zigzag operation set to avoid the shame or attempt at mirroring. It therefore systematically places the blame on the goyim while vindicating the Jews.

My close friend Paul Eisen defines anti-Semitism as "Goyim reaction to bad Jewish behavior." Like Bernard Lazare, Eisen also blames the victims. Like Eisen and Lazare, I also believe that Jews must self-reflect and identify what is it in their politics and exceptionalist cultural attitude which some people reject.

I would also use this opportunity to mention that along my intellectual career, I have met many opponents of Jewish politics, Israel and even Jewry. But I have hardly met anyone who opposes the Jews as a race, as a biological entity or even as an ethnicity. As peculiar as it may sound, it may be possible that the only people who still think in ethnocentric and racist terms are those who engage in Jewish politics. It is almost amusing to find out that in racist Israel the third biggest party in the Knesset is an Arab party, yet the JVP board is a collective of ethnic Jews, not one goyim invited, let alone a Muslim. And why no Yusuf or Hammed on the boards of  JVP, J-BIG or IJAN? Probably because they are not racially qualified.

As bizarre as it may sound, it is the Jewish left and New Left in general that are sustaining the racially oriented discourse and the reason is simple. "Race" sustains the relevance of the left. Otherwise, it has very littler to offer.

Monday, June 8, 2015

Obama: Jewish traditions & values make "America a better place"

Following Jewish American Heritage Month, the White House has released a letter exchange between a young Jewish boy, whose parents were invited to celebrate Hanukkah in the nation's capital last year, and President Obama. The White House holds a special Hanukkah celebration each year.

In Obama's letter, the president writes that "Jewish traditions and values have made America a better place." The Times of Israel reports:

In honor of Jewish American Heritage month, the White House published correspondence between US President Barack Obama and a 10-year-old Jewish boy whose parents attended a Hanukkah celebration with the first family last year.

Yadid Frydman Orlow from White Plains, New York, wrote to Obama thanking him for inviting his parents to the reception before asking the president a number of thoughtful questions.

Along with asking Obama about his hopes for the future and race issues in the US, Orlow queried why the White House bothered holding a Hanukkah reception considering the small percentage of Jews in the US.

In the exchange, published Friday, Obama responded to Orlow by explaining that Jewish traditions and values have inspired American leaders and helped move the country forward.

“The story of the Exodus inspired Civil Rights Leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Jewish Americans have helped lead fights for civil rights, workers’ rights, and gay rights,” the president wrote.

Obama said that the shared values helped form the “unbreakable” friendship with Israel. [...]
President Obama, like Vice President Joe Biden before him, basically acknowledges the central role Jews have played in the transformation of America.

Few realize that the "civil rights" crusade beginning in the 1960s was in reality a Communist-inspired destabilization strategy organized, financed, and led primarily by radical Jewish activists. Its main goals were forced racial integration coupled with the elevation of minorities over the traditional White establishment in America. The "civil rights" movement was designed to disenfranchise, alienate, and disempower Whites in America, while giving special privileges to minorities.

Like the "civil rights" movement, the "gay rights" movement has been directed and led by radical Jewish activists as well.

Jewish traditions and values have only made America a better place if you are a cultural Marxist and an Israel-firster. If you are a traditional American, it's clear to see that Jewish traditions and values have entirely transformed and perverted this once great nation into a Marxist hellhole dominated and ruled by Jewish tyrants and their puppets.

Saturday, June 6, 2015

"Caitlyn Jenner" to be guest of honor for Tel Aviv Gay Pride week?

Municipal officials in Tel Aviv, declared the "world's best gay city" in 2012, have asked "Caitlyn Jenner" to be the guest of honor for Gay Pride week in that debauched city. The Jewish Daily Forward reports:

The City of Tel Aviv invited Caitlyn Jenner to be a guest of honor at its Gay Pride Week celebration.

Jenner, 65, the former reality show star and Olympic gold medal-winning decathlete, has not responded to the invitation announced Thursday. She has garnered the media spotlight with her recent transition to become a woman.

Tel Aviv’s Gay Pride week, which begins on Sunday, draws thousands of participants each year. This year, the celebration will emphasize the transgender community.

“The fact that you provided us an opportunity to smile and revealed the personal and complex process you went through, the difficulties that stood in your way, made you a source of inspiration for us in Tel Aviv,” Yaniv Weizman, a member of the Tel Aviv-Jaffa Municipal Council, wrote Jenner in the invitation, according to Yediot Acharonot. [...]
Judging by the Jewish-owned and controlled mass media, the "Caitlyn Jenner" story may be the most important thing that has ever happened in human history. A former male Olympic gold medalist mutilates his sexual organs, ingests female hormones, and boldly declares himself a "female", and the Jewish media turns it into the most significant event in recent memory. Stories about "Caitlyn Jenner", and the ridiculous, superficial "praise" she it has received, are everywhere you look.

As Brother Nathanael recently pointed out, "Caitlyn Jenner" has been entirely enabled and promoted by Jews as a means of further degrading and perverting traditional American culture (as if it wasn't already degraded and perverted enough).

The big story is the July edition of Vanity Fair, which features a "22-page cover story" including "stunning Annie Leibovitz photos of Caitlyn Jenner, formerly known as Bruce, along with revealing new details," according to the culture distorting magazine's website. Unsurprisingly, Annie Leibovitz is a Jewish lesbian who is currently in a relationship with yet another disgusting virulently anti-White activist and "intellectual" named Susan Sontag who once proudly declared, "The white race is the cancer of human history."

The author of the Vanity Fair article, Buzz Bissinger, is also Jewish. And of course, Vanity Fair is owned and published by Samuel Irving Newhouse, Jr. Yes, Newhouse is a Jew, too.

The entire "Caitlyn Jenner" situation is Jewish through and through. Indeed, the assault on and destruction of traditional Western civilization emanates from the organized Jewish community. It's so obvious and it's certainly no secret. When will Americans recognize it?

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Jewish historian argues fake "Holocaust" narrative central to Jewish power in post-WWII America

Dr. Jeffrey S. Gurock, a Jewish history professor at Yeshiva University, argues in a new book that Jews would never have gained the immense power and influence they possess in America today had the fake "Holocaust" narrative of WWII not been so successfully promoted and institutionalized. Without the "Holocaust", Dr. Gurock contends that Jews in America would have never achieved "the level of empowerment and agency that we associate with American Jews today," The Times of Israel recently reported.

"Things could have been much worse had the cataclysm of the Holocaust not happened," said Dr. Jeffrey S. Gurock recently over lunch at a Jerusalem café.

A statement like this is hard to swallow if you don’t realize that his new book, “The Holocaust Averted: An Alternate History of American Jewry, 1938-1967,” deals with counterfactual history, a speculative exploration of what-ifs, and the author is in no way dismissive of the murder of six million Jews at the hands of the Nazis.

What Gurock demonstrates in his book is that World War II was a major turning point in American Jewish history, and that many positive things came out of it for American Jews as well as for US-Israel relations. Had key moments in the run-up to and during the course of the war played out differently, the Holocaust may not have happened. Gurock posits that instead, Jews in America would have had to “run for cover.” They would have had to assume—and maintain—a low profile, never achieving the level of empowerment and agency that we associate with American Jews today. [...]

While historians look back in history to understand what happened (or in the case of counterfactual history, what did not, or could have, happened) Gurock said the ultimate purpose of “The Holocaust Averted” is to get y Jews to think about their present and future.

“The book teaches important lessons about the post-war and contemporary Jewish condition. It emphasizes what WWII meant for Jewish empowerment and Jewish activism,” he said.
Mark Weber and Greg Johnson, two important scholars that I have learned a great deal from, correctly argue that Jewish power and influence in America and the wider Western world was already substantial prior to WWII. Thus, they aver, the political and cultural power stemming from the "Holocaust" is "not so much a source of Jewish-Zionist power as it is an expression of it," as Weber wrote in a 2009 article entitled How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism?

Both Weber and Johnson recognize that although the "Holocaust" narrative is an important element of Jewish power and influence in the West today, and a weaponized narrative of history that demonizes and pathologizes European identity and ethnocentrism while strengthening Jewish identity and ethnocentrism, it is not the foundational source of this power and influence.

In Johnson's controversial and thought provoking essay entitled Dealing with the Holocaust, he argues:
Before the Second World War, Jews already had an enormous amount of power in the United States: enough power to deliver the United States into two World Wars, for instance. Jewish power was based on over-representation in banking, business, law, politics, academia, and the news and entertainment media.

If the holocaust suddenly lost its potency as a tool of moral intimidation, Jews surely have the talent, money, power, and ill-will to foist a new one on us. Whites will never be free until we identify and defeat the real sources of Jewish power. [...]
Weber and Johnson's arguments are entirely valid in my opinion: the "Holocaust" narrative is not the foundational source of Jewish power, so simply debunking this narrative (which is rather easy to do) will not end the Jewish tyranny suffocating America and the West. Exposing and refuting the fake "Holocaust" narrative in and of itself will not end the immense power and influence Jews have in America and the West. It will certainly be a step in the right direction though, and I believe it is an important endeavor to undertake because the truth matters to me.

However, as the article highlighted above notes, the false "Holocaust" narrative has facilitated the Jewish takeover of America and the wider Western world. The fake "Holocaust" story is indeed central to maintaining, perpetuating, and reinforcing Jewish power, and is the backbone of the entire "New World Order" agenda. The "lessons of the Holocaust" that Western governments and societies have adopted and institutionalized - "anti-racism", "diversity", "multiculturalism", "tolerance", and fighting "anti-Semitism" (i.e., stating facts about Jews and questioning their version of events, both in a historical and contemporary context) - are the blueprint for White genocide in America and the Western world.

Regardless as to whether or not the fake "Holocaust" narrative is the ultimate source of Jewish power and influence - it clearly isn't - the fact remains that this weaponized narrative of history is central to maintaining and perpetuating their current power and influence in the West, as well as justifying the anti-White, genocidal policies we see being promoted and implemented all around us. 

Monday, June 1, 2015

Gilad Atzmon explains the subversion of the pro-Palestine cause by the Jewish left

Editor's note: Gilad Atzmon, an internationally renowned musician, philosopher, and writer born in Israel, is currently on a speaking tour to promote his latest book entitled A to Zion: The Definitive Israeli Lexicon, as well as address the Jewish subversion of the pro-Palestinian movement. On Monday, May 11th, Atzmon spoke at a public library in San Diego County, an event I was able to attend. We had a nice conversation and I was able to ask him a question following his presentation.

What follows is a Q&A I conducted with Atzmon via email shortly after his speech in San Diego. I hope to continue this dialogue in the near future. There are many more questions I'd like to ask him.

JF: In your talk, you described Jewish leftists infiltrating and ultimately undermining the Palestinian Solidarity movement - why? What is their ultimate goal?

GA: In an interview a few years back, Philip Weiss, the chief editor of the Jewish pro-Palestinian website Mondoweiss, admitted to me in plain terms that, in his eyes, pro-Palestinian activism serves "Jewish self interests."

Such a Jewish activity conveys a (misleading) image of Jewish political pluralism. It suggests that not all Jews are "bad," Jewish politics can even be ethical and universal.

Evidently, Jewish liberals are angry with me for unveiling the deceit that is embedded in such an attitude. They have invested a great effort attempting to silence me, and for a good reason - I have produced some persuasive arguments suggesting that Jewish solidarity is not the solution, it is actually the core of the problem.

In fact, the Jewish Left is far more problematic and dangerous than hardcore right-wing Zionism. Zionism is a celebration of the Jewish "symptom," so to speak. The so-called "anti" are set to deny the rest of us an access to the symptom.

If Jewish power is defined as the power to suppress the discussion on Jewish power, Mondoweiss, Jewish Voices for Peace, Democracy Now!, Noam Chomsky and others are there to pursue with that task day and night.

They crudely restrict the boundaries of the discourse by means of political correctness. Mondoweiss went as far as banning any criticism of Israel within the context of Jewishness. This duplicitous attempt to subvert the discourse worked for a while. However, not anymore, and I take some credit for it.

Together with other thinkers and commentators, I have been pointing at a controlled opposition apparatus that is committed solely to "Jewish self interests," as Philip Weiss was either brave or foolish enough to admit back in 2011.

JF: How is the Palestinian Solidarity movement or pro-Palestine cause now framed in Jewish terms and related to overall Jewish interests?

GA: As I showed in my San Diego talk, while in the past it was the Palestinian right of return that defined the Palestinian cause in ethical, political and legal terms, the growing domination of liberal Jews within the movement diluted this elementary right. It was replaced by a tsunami of misleading and faulty terminology that was set to appease some diaspora Jews and whatever is left of the Israeli Left. All of that was done at the expense of the Palestinians.

While the right of return located the Palestinian plight within historical, political, legal and moral context, the newly imposed terminology i.e., "End of Occupation", "Colonialism", "Apartheid", and even the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (post-2010), is legitimizing the Jewish state within pre-1967 borders. It dismisses the refugees, Gaza, and the Palestinian diaspora’s plight entirely.

It instead engages only with issues that are relevant to the West Bank, and why? Because the West Bank is subject of an internal Jewish debate. While the vast majority of world Jewry sees the West Bank as an integral part of greater Eretz Yisrael, a few liberal Jews in Manhattan insist that Tel Aviv is the true fulfillment of the Zionist project. The meaning of it is tragic. Thanks to the growing domination of Jews within the Palestinian Solidarity movement, the entire movement has been reduced into a Jewish internal debate. This may explain why the solidarity movement has achieved nothing as far as Palestine is concerned. It was born to fail and it achieved its goal.

In short, the Palestinian Solidarity movement is now a Jewish movement devoted to solidarity with the Jews. This could have been an amusing development unless there was a tragedy of another people involved.

JF: Can you comment on how the Palestinian Solidarity movement has become part of the larger overall social justice movement (LGBT rights, immigrant rights, feminism, etc.) in recent years?

GA: The Palestinian Solidarity movement becoming a part of a large social justice movement could have been a great and welcome development. Yet, one may wonder, is the breaking of society into identity politics sectors or factions such a great development? Obviously not.

In the last six decades the working people have been plundered repeatedly. The people who used to be called the working class are now the workless class, and many of them are underclass by now. But why?

Unlike the (imaginary) "old good labor-oriented Left" that promised to unite us all against capital and the Empire, the neo-Marxists and the Frankfurt Yeshiva enthusiasts invested a huge effort breaking the cohesiveness of the working people and Western society in general.

Instead of bringing people together, which was the old Left ideal, we are now split into tribal sectors. We are transformed into a matrix of a manifold of Jew-like tribal groupings defined largely by biology (color, gender, sexual preferences, race, etc). However, it is hardly surprising that Jewish identity merchants are way better than anyone else in being Jews. Jews have been practicing Jewish tribal survival strategies (identity politics and ethnocentrism) for 3000 years. This form of tribal politics is pretty new to gentiles and this may explain why identity politics has failed those who were lame enough to follow it in the first place.

We are dealing here with a multiplicity of impotent, marginal identity campaigns that are paralyzed by a strong sense of victimhood. The feminists are oppressed by masculinity, the Black is intimidated by the White, the gay is chased by the homophobe, the Muslims and their Islamophobes, and now the Palestinians also have the Zionists. We are dealing with a binary dichotomy between an imaginary and evasive "oppressor" and a concrete and lucid "victim".

But here is the problem: those who indulge in a victimhood narrative end up in a state of paralysis - they learn to blame others yet vindicate themselves. Those who succumb to victimhood never look in the mirror; they never take responsibility for their fate.

For more than a while we have been witnessing a few Western Palestinians and Jewish liberals spreading hollow and misleading terminology that has removed the conflict from Palestine and their resistance; colonialism, apartheid, BDS -  everything but building Palestinian rockets or military defiance. This development obviously served the Jewish state. Instead of fighting Palestinian freedom fighters, the conflict was reduced into a meaningless exchange between two Jewish positions.

Though some Western Palestinians and NGOs joined this well-funded corrosive liberal Jewish project, Hamas didn’t fall into this trap. IDF infantry units were minced in Gaza last summer. They were met with fierce Palestinian resistance. While Chomsky debated Dershowitz on some questions to do with "the future of Palestine," young Palestinians were preparing for battle. While the liberal Zionist George Soros’s Open Society funded a BDS LGBT tour in America, young Hamas engineers were digging tunnels and building rockets in Gaza. I am convinced that Palestinian Muslim leaders in Gaza grasped at a certain stage that the struggle for Palestinian queer politics may not be the definitive path toward Palestinian liberation.