Wednesday, March 11, 2015

On Red Ice Radio w/ Henrik Palmgren

I was recently a guest on Red Ice Radio, hosted by the very talented and erudite Henrik Palmgren. I'd encourage everyone to support Red Ice Radio by becoming a member today!

What follows is the description of the program. Be sure to visit the show page at Red Ice Radio for download links.
John Friend is an independent blogger and journalist based in Southern California who maintains John focuses primarily on the events of 9/11, WWII revisionism, media deception and psychological warfare, power and influence of the Zionist Lobby in America, and the systematic assault upon and subversion of traditional Western European civilization. He is currently working on a book which will be examining and demystifying the "New World Order" conspiracy often discussed in the alternative media in an attempt to clarify the main goals and ultimate agenda of the Global Power Elite. We begin our discussion with reflections on what it's like to awaken to the big lies, to tread into the darkness and dig into the murky areas where the truth lies, a process that is immensely difficult and depressing at best. John explains how the disillusioning events of 9/11 triggered him to take a closer look at the frightening narrative our government concocted to promote the institutionalization of the idea of the global "War on Terror." John outlines some of the key foreign policies hatched from the fiasco, who was in control of the World Trade Center complex at the time, and Israeli players who had direct ties to the crime ring involved. Then, we consider the roles of the mainstream media/entertainment industrial complex and the educational system in perpetuating our fabricated history, the demonization of truth seekers who dare to criticize the diabolical, tyrannical agendas these events continue to promote, and the ongoing assault on Western traditionalism. In the members' hour, we weigh up what it takes to objectively analyze the verifiable facts of the multitude of controversial and taboo issues eroding away our cultural and moral framework. We deliberate the urgency for informed, talented individuals to get motivated, take a stand, and spread the truth widely in the spirit of love and concern. We end with strategies for breaking through to our overwhelmingly politically correct, programmed, monoculture so they can effectively hear the alarm being sounded and join in the fight for the best interests of Western civilization.

If you enjoyed this radio program and appreciate the work I'm doing here on this website, please consider supporting my Indiegogo Fundraiser entitled Support John Friend's Free Speech!, which I announced last week. Many thanks to everyone who has and continues to support my efforts here. It is very much appreciated!


  1. That was a fluent and coherent representation of your thinking in the first hour, delivered very calmly.

    It can't be easy to be asked to organize so many complex issues into a manageable narrative of recent Western politics and history on demand but you did a great job.

  2. see also the Emet Group....

    a "War Room" in Washington D.C. - 23 days before 9/11...what are the odds ?

    Reported by Joel C. Rosenberg –
    18 Aug 2001 = The Emet Group.

    A group of American {Talmudic Terrorists}
    business and political leaders are building a pro-Israel media “war room” in Washington, D.C.
    The group will be called “Emet”—which in Hebrew means “truth.”
    Emet will try to address biased media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
    and also make the case that the conflict, while serious and important,
    pales in comparison to the larger geo-strategic threat posed to the United States
    and the West by Iran and Iraq, both of whom are trying to build and/or acquire weapons of mass destruction.
    Funding Emet is Leonard Abramson; he sold U.S. Healthcare to Aetna in the mid-1990s for $8.9 billion.
    Abramson has recruited a powerful board of directors, including Bernie Marcus, founder of Home Depot; Les Wexner, founder of The Limited;
    Edgar Bronfman Sr., who once owned Seagram’s;
    and Lou Ranieri, a major Wall Street player who now co-owns one of
    Israel’s largest banks.

    Also joining the board are Jeane Kirkpatrick,
    former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, and Jack Kemp.

    JEWTOPIA is HELL....where "JEW" worshippers go to collect their
    REWARD for "JEW" worshipping...!!!



  3. Dear Mr. Friend,

    I listened to your recent interview on the Red Ice Radio show and I applaud your passion and research into the issue regarding immigration into developed nations. I am a resident of Toronto and we do have a diverse set of races and cultures in our city but I don’t see the problems that you described on the Red Ice Radio show. I don’t remember the last time we had a big issue regarding race in Toronto.
    As an elementary, high school, and university student in Toronto, I had White, Black, Indian, and Chinese friends and I don’t remember race ever being a big issue. We all went to the same parties, participated in the same sports, and played the same video games. All of the classes that I attended in school were composed of students of different races. This is in stark contrast to a student I once met who was from China and he told me that the first time he ever saw a Black student was when he came to Canada as a high school student. Naturally, he studied in classes composed entirely of Chinese students in China but I find the thought of an entire class full of students of a single race to be odd. Don’t you believe that people are less likely to be prejudice if they live, work, and study among people of different races and cultures?
    Calgary’s mayor, Naheed Nenshi, is South Asian and Muslim. I don’t believe his race or religion has negatively affected Calgary which is a city comprised of people who are predominately Christians of European descent.
    In my experience, Chinese immigrants to Toronto are hardworking and rarely involved in criminal activity; especially violent criminal activity. Their children are usually among the students that graduate with the highest grades from Toronto high schools. A high school teacher personally told me in confidence that he and his colleagues enjoy teaching Chinese students because they are hard working and don’t cause trouble in the classroom. He cannot publicly say this because it is not considered to be a politically correct view. As a former college student, you must have personally witnessed the hard working nature of foreign students as they try to succeed in an unfamiliar country.
    Thank you for reading my message and I look forward to any information that you can provide to me regarding the negative impact of immigration into developed nations; especially Canada.

    1. Good comment.

      I appreciate your curiosity in the subject and your life experience observation. I have had the same experience for the most part. It is the same argument that Thom Hartman made to Kyle Hunt last year...

      In essence it is this..."Kyle...Have you personally been affected by multi-racialism in a negative way?" Keep in mind that this 'culture' that you grew up had/has the pre-requisite firmly established out of the gate, that white people and ONLY white people have done 'bad' things to the non-whites of the planet. For the most part, by and large this is a non negotiable stance that is taken/taught/endlessly promoted in all media.

      To the unthinking observer it may seem that Thom has a point. It may seem you have no right to complain if in fact, you have not been personally mistreated or abused by the policies enforced by the regime in power.

      However, if memory serves me correctly, Mr. Thom Hartman opposed the Iraq War. Now, is Hartman able to voice this opinion and position although he has not been personally affected by the war? Of course he can, and he backs up such a position by arguments and evidence. Such evidence may include that the war was/is based on lies and ulterior motives. The costs to the USA in resources and lives and the costs and resources and lives to the people of Iraq. Right?

      Let us break this down further...Do you think that people should have the right to not have policies and ideology that the majority does not have a say in, imposed upon them?

      Take yourself...Imagine that you are a person of one race and you mix and have children with another race. Okay. Now lets say that the 'society' says that is a good thing. Okay. Do you know or have seen any homeless people around where you live? Do you think they may want/desire a better life?

      Okay. How about YOU take them in. Come on. Take them in. Do you have a spare bedroom? What is keeping you from doing this? Are you evil and greedy? Do you hate them?

      So lets say that you had children, mixed or whatever. Are they gay? If not, then have you considered maybe telling they may want to explore if they are or not? Why not? What is the harm? You may have a diverse family now...but are they diverse enough?

      You see where this "political correct" bullshit is going? I hope I made my point. You do not have to be personally affected by black on white murder - which is much more prevelant in the USA to have an opinion based on common sense and pattern recognition to take the opinion that....

      The 'Persecuted Survivors of Holocaust Victims" who just so happen to own and control the message delivery system called the media, in all its forms...Brainwash the minority populations into hating the majority population for false reasons that they in fact, are the cause of in the past and presently.

      This leads to rape, violence, and murder. You may say...that that has always taken place...maybe...but any truly healthy society would strive to eliminate that completely...and would have a media outrage if any such thing happened even ONCE on ANY DAY of ANY YEAR.

    2. You do NOT see this. Why? Because you are living in a thought prison and a backwards world of illusion. What is worse? The loss of life? Or somebodies feelings being hurt by an ACCURATE observation about a group.

      Groups are told to act as a group. EXCEPT one group. A group that is said to be the cause of all of the other groups suffering and injustices. The actual group that is guilty of those sufferings and injustices is the group called 'Persecuted Descendants of Holocaust Survivors' and they blame EVERYTHING on the group THEY SAY did such a thing. Based on no evidence and only story telling.

      This group in their news media and movies and television shoahs...Continuously talk about white people as a collective group that thinks as a group. They also say that we are not groups and are all the same. They say that non-white groups can act on their own self interest. Not us. You see the scam yet?

      Even IF what they said was true would not change the fact that past alleged transgressions should not and do not have any moral backing in penalizing the descendants in the present time. But who SPECIFICALLY is in control of the present situation...and the past situation? White people? Specifically which 'white people'? Do they hold the same 'religion' as the majority of whites?

      Sorry if this is a bit jumbled...

      I argue that John Friend and myself and others...Do not 'HATE' people for no reason or HATE people of other groups at all....What we HATE is the SCAM that is being perpetrated against our group and in extension OURSELVES...based on a multitude of OVERWHELMING reasons and circumstances that smart people such as ourselves....

      Who did EVERYTHING in our power to avoid such a position...were FORCED to take based on analyzing the evidence and obvious realities that one comes to when you DO NOT depend on the 'mainstream' media for information.

      - Dave Mansfield

    3. Chinese immigrants in Canada are currently exploiting white guilt and victim status on the West Coast. Chinese will stay quiet until they have sufficient numbers to press their group interests, you can read about the situation here:

      In one instance you claim your school is diverse, and without realizing it, you completely contradict your claim a paragraph later: "We all went to the same parties, participated in the same sports, and played the same video games."

      You have inadvertently stumbled upon the truth, and the goal of multiculturalism, to destroy all culture, and to leave a deracinated, race mixed, rootless new man in its stead. A new, standardized man with no foundation, no history and one who will happily accept any identity handed to him by the media.

      All conquerors all through history have done this, erase the history, destroy the identity, and rebuild the population. This is the Japanese forbade the Koreans to speak their language under occupation, and the English forbade the Irish to speak their language. This is why the Christians burned down the great pagan temple, and changed the names of the Gods and holidays. This is why Isis is destroying Assyrians rubies in the middle east presently, and why the Taliban destroyed the Buddhas of Bamiyan.

      The question is in the West, just who are the occupiers?

    4. Bravo. One of the most insightful comments I've ever read on John's site. If you keep going like this you run the risk of becoming a true poet. And then they will really fear you because your ideology (what you know) and your creativity (how you impart this know-ledge to others, in ways that makes them feel better and energizes them to activity in the direction of that good feeling SUBCONSCIOUSLY) will be perfectly merged and tempered without compromise.

      "Energy depends on one's ability to make a vortex-genius meme at the cross-conflicts of art and ideology." -- Ezra Pound

      Voluntary group interests are based on individual rights (might-makes-right-because-rights-make-the-most-might, INDIVIDUAL rights, and the American republic was designed to be, as far as possible, the OPPOSITE of a democracy or dictatorship of the majority) and are either valid for all or valid for none.

      Imposed group interests always seek to deny the individual and most of all the choice of groups of individuals to voluntarily synergize into groups based on ANY criterion, rational or irrational, for better or worse, as long as there is no NATURAL LAW crime committed, i.e., no physical harm done to others in the form of INITIATED force or fraud (indirect force). Psychic harm always has physical symptoms or you would not be able to detect it. Free-speech stops when demonstrable LIE-bel, which can destroy the reputation of a person and therefore PHYSICALLY harm him and his livelihood through future opportunities destroyed, begins).

      The goal of free individuals is NOT to play the civilization-destroying pressure-group game and win while others lose, but to simply follow the win-win dialectic of all civilization without impediment. Western European civilization is where the win-win has been practiced the most and hence why so far it has produced more creativity than all other civilizations put together. This is because its philosophers have been smart enough to promote and protect free speech, free choice and free association. The goal of free individuals should be to maximize the win-win, minimize the win-lose and always balance individual creativity with group synergy. Ever heard of the Beatles? 4 relatively free individuals of British Anglo-Saxon descent and genetic predisposition voluntarily formed a band to express themselves creatively through the art form called American rock'n'roll based on black-blues synergized with country music, at the time called rockabilly and most famously represented by Elvis Presley, Chuck Berry and others. They had what is colloquially called chemistry and scientifically called synergy, the whole became much more than the sum of the individual parts. This was proven later when the band broke up and the individual creativity of the separate band-members synergized with others of lesser compatibility was shown to be far less potent and consistent in effect than it had been during the reign of the most popular musical group of all time. That's only one well-known example but EVERY successful civilized enterprise is like this, even a happy marriage. Sexual attraction plus individual qualities of character and creativity join with compatible ones possessed by another and voila, you have the synergy of a "serious" relationship that lasts much longer than you thought possible and sometimes even a lifetime, without being a pain-in-the-ass, and which you yearn for "heart-broken" when the fragile balance of compatibilities is lost.

      ~ Negentropic

    5. Aristotle on how to maintain a tyranny:

      ~ Negentropic

    6. "The poet and the historian differ not by writing in verse or in prose. The work of Herodotus might be put into verse, and it would still be a species of history, with metre no less than without it. The true difference is that one relates what has happened, the other what may happen. Poetry, therefore, is a more philosophical and a higher thing than history: for poetry tends to express the universal, history the particular." ~ Aristotle

      ~ Negentropic

  4. Hello John,

    Really enjoyed your interview with Red Ice Radio, you did an excellent job, and that is an understatement (I like to understate rather than overstate).

    Also isn't it great Henrik has recently had so many guests dealing with the "jewish problem" aspect? For years Red Ice was interesting but only recently has it taken the buill by the horns. Congrats to the both of you.

    Richard Wilcox

    1. Thanks Richard, I completely agree! Red Ice is doing great work!

  5. Henrik should stop beating-around-the-bush and interview Simon Shack already. Simon is actually more fluent in Norwegian (his father's tongue), Swedish (mother's tongue), Italian and French than he is in spoken English (he is absolutely and brilliantly fluent in written English). How can you run a "truther" website that researches all sorts of conspiracies, is open to all angles of potential discovery of hidden truths, and never interview the single most important alternative media researcher of our age?

    People have no idea how PSYCHOLOGICALLY sophisticated 9-11 was because it was DELIBERATELY done in a rather sloppy fashion on pre-manufactured video to, among other things, throw researchers off the scent of this very psychological sophistication designed to gatekeep them where they need to be, segregated and harmless and hallucinating themselves on the path of truth for decades when in actuality they are just as lost as before, in a voiceless and marginalized faction of previously set-up, divided-&-conquered controlled-opposition.

    Silverstein went on PBS to supposedly "slip-up" and admit that they "pulled" building 7 in order to prevent more "unnecessary lost lives." Is PBS an uncontrolled and independent source of news? I mean how naive are people to actually assume that PBS, PUBLIC television, is an uncontrolled and independent source of honest journalism that not only caught Silverstein in a "mistake" but would actually have the balls to air any footage not 100% approved by the government in the aftermath of 9-11? Silverstein's "slip-up" was designed to protect the media's FULL complicty in the false-flag Psy-Op by making the dissenting peons think the media is still out there looking out for them.

    Another question the "jew-wise" crowd never asks is why was Silverstein made the owner of the complex in the first place? Well, as usual, the reasons go far beyond what most of them are wiling to imagine since they themselves would never go to such lengths. Jews know very well that having a tribe-member in place assures far superior loyalty to the bankster higher-ups in the tribe but they know even better that making one of their own fully visible in the very center of the biggest PsyOp ever inflicted on the planet will tend to keep most criticism reigned in predictable areas by charges of racism and anti-semitism.

    ~ Negentropic

  6. (. . . continued)

    The so-called arrested "dancing" Israelis is the internet-bait given to the anti-Judaic crowd (fully anticipated in advance; the ADL by itself has 70 million dollars a year in stolen and legally counterfeited budget to anticipate any and all threats to the usurocracy in more detail than anyone can possibly imagine) in order to hook them on the gatekeeping of full-media complicty and the real media-faked-from-scratch modus operandi of 9-11 carried out by characters like Christopher Bollyn and Alan Sabrosky, both plane-huggers and victims-huggers to this day. Are these so-called experts that dumb that they don't realize that an aluminum plane cannot hit a 500,000 ton steel and concrete building and have no parts fall off out of millions and not only that but have the NOSE of the plane come out the other end of the building intact? I don't think so. Has Bollyn come out in favor of a media-fakery modus-operandi on Sandy Hoax and most post-Sandy-Hook PsyOps WITHOUT changing in the slightest his analysis of how 9-11 was done? Yes. Does his former partner Daryl Bradford Smith do exactly the same thing? Yes. So, why should I trust or promote either of these two guys or Sabrosky (who seems to have disappeared from the scene) even across the street when they continue to push such outright DISINFO? Haven't we had enough DISINFO in the past 14 years? Isn't it time all this endless gatekeeping was buried once-&-for-all?

    And how about the complete BS that those who contend and have proven that 9-11 was done through media fakery are out to "let the Israelis off the hook"? Well, I don't know about you but last time I checked, Stephen Rosenbaum of Camera Planet, Howard Lutnick of Cantor Fitzgerald, Charles Hirsch (the medical examiner), Kenneth Feinberg (Victims Compensation Fund), Judge Alvin Hallerstein (who actually claimed that "most of the 9/11 victims were "VAPORIZED," lol Matt Lauer, Rick Leventhal, Rick Siegel, James Rossen, Aaron Brown, Hyman Brown, Ben Venzke (Intelcenter, the source for most of the videos released by "Al-Qaeda," is owned by Ben Venzke), etc., just to name a few, were all chosenites.

    At around the 2 hour 18 minute mark of the following audio hoi polloi aka Max Konrardy of September Clues Forum tells Abirato (check out his hilarious attempt at redirection since you can bet he wasn't expecting this) that it can easily be proven that it’s Jews behind most institutions running PsyOps including not just the mass-media but “army intelligence” & not only that but it’s also Jews behind most of the violence on the planet & it’s just a fact that people should face & deal with even if it’s also certainly not the only issue:

    September Clues (2008) - Simon Shack

    September Clues Addendum - Simon Shack

    THE KING KONG MAN – Simon Shack

    KING KONG MAN Part II – the 21 foot jumper! – Simon Shack

    ~ Negentropic

    1. Well said Negentropic, as usual. I agree with you man. Although I do think that the "dancing Israelis" and other Israelis arrested on and after 9/11 are significant facts that need to be highlighted and emphasized. But your basic point that 9/11 was a media PSYOP is spot on - I totally agree. As I've said in the past, the fact that 9/11 was indeed a media PSYOP provides even more proof, as if we needed any more at this point, that 9/11 was a false flag/PSYOP organized and executed by Jewish criminals with direct ties to Israel controlling the mass media and key positions in the federal government.

    2. Right on. The way I see the deliberate "sloppiness" of these PsyOps, including the super-sloppy Moon Landing Hoax and if you want to go back that far, the completely ridiculous claims of the official holohoax narrative, is that they know they'll make SOME mistakes and glitches that give the game away in the process of fakery, regardless of how many times they watch "the movie" themselves in the editing room on their computers, so they try to neutralize that by putting in deliberate mistakes of their own. That way, they figure, plenty of dissenting researchers will end up scratching their heads for years wasting time trying to figure out which ones are deliberate and which ones are real mistakes, etc. Media fakery research is very important for the general public because it lets them know HOW these things are done so that they are not bamboozled over-&-over again by the same lame-ass tricks, BUT all this would not be necessary in a real court of law as soon as even ONE instance of outright fraud and fakery is proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Even one fully proven lie discredits the witness that claimed it as true (the mainstream media and all its collaborators in government since they ALL more-or-less claim the same thing on most of these PsyOps and especially 9-11).

      falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

      False in one particular, false in everything.

      This principle of Roman law is still respected and has been appropriated by other disciplines. The concept is that if a witness has been shown to lie in one particular respect in a case, he is not to be trusted in anything else he says. This is why it is important for attorneys to impeach opposing witnesses in court: it discredits the rest of their testimony. The object behind the principle is [b]to reject questionable testimony (even if it might be true) before accepting falsehood into evidence.

      The legal principles of interrogating witnesses have been drawn into the task of evaluating historical sources. Just as a witness in court can be impeached by being shown to have lied, an historical source likewise loses much of its authority if its author can be shown to have deliberately falsified something--how can we trust an author concerning fact X when we know him to have lied about fact Y? Such an author may corroborate something a better witness says, but has forfeited our trust where he speaks without corroboration.

      And by the way, aside from creating completely fake identities morphed on a computer which we know, for a fact, they have done extensively, and which, for the perps, leaves all their options open as to who they will make a "victim" and gain sympathy for, what his background will be, there are also many real people who will act the part of a victim under a fake name and identity and then return to their real identities for a big payoff. They can easily disguise them with a bit of facial morphing if they want, of course but even if they did it using their real faces, who's going to find them and bust them? If some nosy journalist or detective manages to find them by their looks alone, they just deny that they're the "victim" and that's that. There are also some people who actually want to disappear out of their old circle into a completely new life and will take a payoff to disappear into a new identity set-up for them, just like a "witness protection" program, while their old identity "dies" in the PsyOp and their real friends and family can then claim that he really did die, BUT without ever having seen his body. This is also a possibility although, admittedly, much rarer than the far more workable first two scenarios.

      ~ Negentropic

  7. Correction: It was Charles Hirsch (the medical examiner of the 9-11 "victims") who claimed that most of the 9-11 victims were "vaporized" LOL, not Alvin Hallerstein.

    ~ Negentropic

    1. Another reason for deliberate sloppiness is, of course, arrogance. The higher the level of arrogance, the safer they feel in their power, the more likely it is that they will not bother about too many details in these PsyOps, since the majority buy it anyway PSYCHOLOGICALLY, the alternative being too horrible to contemplate, and the mistakes, some real mistakes, some deliberate, provide fodder for the conspiracy theorists to argue with each other over. Here's a very interesting discussion between Hoi Polloi and Observer about this very topic of "real or deliberate mistakes, how much of each and possible reasons why," until Hoi gets pissed off at the end and cuts it off (I hope he didn't go out and ban Observer but it looks like Observer decided to no longer post and go back to reading the forum; too bad)

      I agree more with Hoi's position although Observer also has some very good points.

      Having gotten away for so much for so long, they get a thrill out of seeing what utter absurdity they can get away with next, such as having Noah Pozner's picture from Sandy Hoax as a "victim" at the Peshavar, Pakistan PsyOp or using the same actor in multiple PsyOps, etc. I don't listen to her show much anymore but I heard from others that Spingola was making bizarre excuses for Pozner's photo being in Pakistan because god forbid she should actually have to admit she was wrong about Sandy Hook being a real event.

      Didn't you interview this Pat Colo guy once? If not, he'd be a good person to interview. See if you can contact him on his forum.

      ~ Negentropic

    2. I think they definitely put blatant nonsense and absurdities into media PSYOPS - they can't be THAT sloppy ALL the time. It's part of the operation, in my opinion.

      Simon's point about the 9/11 footage - that it was made in a way that would befuddle and confuse anyone rationally, logically, critically examining it for accuracy and legitimacy - is spot on, and that's how all the media PSYOPS work. They throw so much BS at us with all of these media PSYOPS, that it just confuses everyone, although it is very easy for independent researchers to debunk the official story. We can debunk the official story, but we have problems PROVING our case with legitimate evidence and facts.

      For example, the official Sandy Hook story is ludicrous and full of holes, but can any of us actually PROVE that it was a fake event with actors playing various roles in a scripted PSYOP? That is the logical conclusion any rational, critical investigator would come to after evaluating all of the evidence and information about the alleged event, but can it actually be PROVEN? I don't know...

      I have never interviewed Pat Colo, but he would make a very good guest (as would you!). If my memory serves me, Pat Colo was very critical of me in the past for discussing the "no planes" theory - so I don't think he's on board with that aspect of 9/11, for whatever reason. Maybe he can clarify his position on that topic here for all of us.

      Negentropic, you should be a guest on my show in the future. I think it'd be a great conversation. I've always really enjoyed all of your commentary here and on other sites. Hit me up via email if you're interested.

    3. Oh yeah, I forgot that! On second thought, looks like Colo IS gatekeeping 9-11 no-planes like DBS and the rest of these guys, so don't even waste your time. Direct agent or useful ego/idiot, the result is the same: disinfo. We don't need anymore disinfo and unproven speculations.

      Delcroix's been bugging me to do audios for the past year. Originally I wanted to set up something with Kenny from Kenny's Sideshow, bounce ideas off him, but he's no longer with us. Believe it or not, despite being on the internet for 16 years, I only just got a pair of headphones and will hook up with Delcroix and probably foon1e (if he's game) to do some LONG shows on his network as soon as I have time (probably by next week). I like the relaxed open-topic format that Chris Kendall uses. Thinking of calling it a con-spin-dustry jam session or something like that. After the first 3 or 4 shows we'll add 2 more people a show to add variety and fresh angles on things, hopefully media-fakery-wise people who don't gatekeep the Judaic angle, people like Jason Erb, El Buggo and such, kind of like a roundtable and you're welcome on there anytime you want and if all goes well and the show isn't a total bore you can post a link here. As for your own show or other people's shows, I'd like to get going on my own stuff first with a voice apart from the posts, which should probably take about 2 or 3 months, then once I get in a bit of an audio groove and things are flowing nicely, sure I'll do your show anytime you want.

      ~ Negentropic

    4. Hi all; I know one or two readers can feel my pain, in just having lost a shiteload of work, pecked out on a smart-alek-phone. I was 99% done with my 1st attempt at this reply; a bona fide work of art; I checked another browser tab for a moment; and upon returning to this Realist... tab, the phone/chrome/whatever decided to "convenience me" by refreshing the page!! WTF?! So here's a much shorter & more dull version:

      Great job with Henrik, John.

      My "Critical of JFetzer & JFriend's No Planes @ WTC campaign" thread is linked in my 'PatColo' handle above.

      Negent, your screeching "agent/gatekeeper/disinfo/idiot/yada/yada" above, absent all reasoning, reeks of the signature-joowey "Flip The Script & Project" deception gambit.

      In my "Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports's Official Sandy Hook Story" thread, discussion of her dodging addressing Noah Pozner's dying again in Pakistan, plus selective censorship in Mami's comments, begins here:

    5. Looks like my attempt to "tinyurl" my link to the Spingola/Shark Pozner discussion, also got botched. :(

      Here's the whole thing, also linked in my "PatColo" handle above:

  8. A reader/listener comments via email:

    Hey John. I sent this out to a bunch of people last September. I was listening to your interview where you said that the dancing Israelis were arrested in NY City. That is not true. They were arrested in New Jersey. That may not seem like that big of a deal, but I think it's important for people like us in the "truth" movement to get facts like that correct.


    Thirteen years ago today, 5 men were arrested in a van near the Meadowlands Sports Complex by NJ State police officer Scott DeCarlo.

    The names of the men are Sivan Kurzberg, Yaron Shimuel, Baul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, and Omer Gavriel, Marmari.

    There were explosives in the van and they were believed to be on their way to blow up the George Washington Bridge.

    Here is the police report of their arrest:

    Here is an interview with Officer Decarlo

    Here are related documents about their arrests:

    Here is the police transmission recording of the van that blew up on King Street that day:

    Here is the newspaper article from The Bergen Record

    These men were NOT Muslims. They were Israelis.

  9. @ Anon 9:53 AM

    I also grew up in a very multicultural environment, and still live in one. For the most part, I can get along with people of other races, ethnicities, and religions just fine. I think being exposed to different peoples and cultures can be a good thing - it can be educational, eye-opening, etc. But in my view, and I think this is backed up by massive amounts of scholarly research and analysis, multiculturalism, diversity, and massive non-White immigration into traditionally White European and European-derived nations (Canada, US, Australia) are in reality Jewish, Marxist inspired strategies to displace, reshape, and ultimately destroy White nations.

    I agree with one of the commenters above who stated that the goal of multiculturalism and diversity is to create a deracinated, rootless, mongrolized mass of consumers and workers who are strictly concerned with satisfying their base emotional and physical needs. That is exactly what has happened in the West, and that is why I have a problem with the Jewish enforced and promoted multicultural paradigm prevailing in America and other White nations. You notice there isn't any "diversity" or "multiculturalism" - and certainly no massive non-Jewish immigration - in Israel, right? Don't you see the hypocrisy and agenda being promoted by the Jews and their Marxist stooges?


Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.