Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Sexual Warfare

In the following video, produced by the excellent LifePsyop YouTube channel, Dr. E. Michael Jones breaks down the history of sexual liberation and the systematic promotion of licentious behavior in the Western world via the mass media and pornography industry.

12 comments:

  1. Excellent explanation of how we got to where we are, alienated, alone and without love.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This same line of reasoning applies to drugs, good eating, and all the other fineries associated with Mystery Babylon.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicureanism

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simple, concise and absolutely true.

      Delete
  3. Here you will find three instances of Israelis using Pornography to subvert the culture of those around them. I am sure Dr. Jones mentioned the Ramallah incident in the recording here, which I have not listened to yet but may find I have already, but I doubt if he mentioned the other two incidents.

    Nevertheless, examples of this disgusting behavior need to be listed in text form. Of course, same kind of evil happened in USA "pre-code Hollywood talking movies of the early 1930s." and then went on to total degradation and disgustingness in 1960 movies and to now, with a brief 25-year limited hiatus of movie filth made possible by the Catholics' Legion of Decency and the enactment of the Motion Picture Production Code who boycotted movies and hit Jack Warner in the pocket book big time.

    "“The Israelis, it turns out, have been using pornography as a cultural weapon for some time now; Jews in general for much longer, as I have pointed out in “Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma.” In addition to the incident I have already cited (CW, April 2004) when the Israelis broadcast porn over Palestinian TV stations after their invasion of Ramallah, visitors who logged on to the Palestinian Hamas homepage in 2001, according to a story reported on by, among others, the BBC, “were treated to a lot more action than they might have bargained for when they were diverted to a hard-core porn site called Hot Motel Horny Sex Sluts.” Sheik Ahmed Yassin, the leader of Hamas who was murdered by an Israeli helicopter gunship while leaving his mosque, “pointed the finger at Israeli Intelligence accusing them of ‘trying to disfigure the image of Islam and Muslims.'”
    One year earlier, the Cairo weekly Al-Arabi accused the Israelis of using Egyptian look-alike body doubles to portray popular Egyptian movie stars in pornographic films. …”

    E. Michael Jones
    http://www.culturewars.com/2004/CruelMonth.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pornography is like any other addiction. It makes you weaker and when you are weaker, you are easier to dominate and control.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'll see the video later so maybe I'm repeating a point that Jones already made, but if so it bears repeating and really justifies dwelling upon.

    The ADL has globally promoted 'gentile' destruction by promoting pornography in America by, for example, bestowing its 'Torch of Freedom Award' to pornographer Hugh Hefner - allegedly in America's best interests - ; while also defending the Israeli Defense Forces even as they transmitted similar pornography into Palestinian homes with the express intent to destroy Palestinian family and social structures. :

    http://www.culturewars.com/2004/CruelMonth.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wait a second. Are you against titties and beer? lol

      Since when does a mother's primary and healthiest means of feeding her young become something to turn your face from because you might get sexually aroused and 'corrupted'?

      How is it 'gentile destruction' to not be prudish about sexuality? Would it be better to have four wives to a man, as long as you can take care of them and cover them all up in public, like in the Muslim lands because people cannot control their emotions and desires?

      Would you rather go back to the 1950's when even two married people could not be shown sleeping in the same bed or even having a double-bed on TV? Check out all those old movies where there's always a dresser between two separate beds. Was this the Jews priming a whole generation of repression for the floodgates of perversion to come in the 1960's and 1970s? Then putting out the fraudulent AIDS scare (as far as heterosexuals were concerned but also as a distinctly identifiable 'new' disease which it was not) in the mid 1980's

      [quote]

      The Morning Show with Patrick Timpone - 08 / 14 / 2012

      Guest: Christl Meyer - AIDS: Did it ever REALLY exist? Ms. Meyer has provided scientific evidence proving without doubt that the so called “HIV-virus”, which is claimed to be the cause of AIDS, does not exist, and that the definitions of “AID$” are sporadic and non specific, and the alleged syndrome is a cluster of OLD familiar diseases and not a disease of its own.

      Ms. Meyer talks about HIV testing and how it is unreliable and meaningless to boot and that pregnant women and children, in some cases, are forced to take medication. HIV is part of the human genome in Chromosome #6, we all have it. That’s the bottom line.

      http://www.oneradionetwork2.com/mp3/health/challenges/08.14.12_meyer_christl_aids.mp3

      [/quote]


      ~ Negentropic MK I

      Delete
    2. (. . . continued)

      Let's say the ADL was sent back to Israel on a permanent vacation. Who then decides, in your new racially heterogeneous country what's pornography and what's 'tasteful nudity'? The guy who gets in with two-thirds majority which the other third did not select? In the USA this would be 100 million people who did not choose their leader freely but have to abide by the laws passed. Will there be a constitution preventing any laws violating individual rights or does anything that the 'leader' says go until he screws up and you elect another one most likely not chosen by another 100 million people?

      "Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage." -- H. L. Mencken

      "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." -- H. L. Mencken

      Will you support a dictator who bans all nude media as such? And what will happen to dissenters? Jail time for showing breasts to non-infants and non-husbands? Prison time for showing fellatio to millions of newly repressed individuals who formerly had access to endless porn on the internet? Who decides which nude media is artistic and educational and which pornography? The head-honcho himself or his appointed lackeys? And how will you make sure that he makes sure that these are people who know the difference between porn and other types of nudity? Where will the line be drawn? At showing penetration which any country boy has seen farm animals engage in many times by the time he's a teenager? At direct shots of genitals? Or does there have to be a flirty or suggestive look in the model's eye for a ban to be applied?

      Hefner is a pornographer? Since when and compared to whom? Since he showed 'bush' in Playboy or since he started the Playboy channel which does show porno movies but of a more 'couple-oriented' variety (no 'money shots' or ejaculation, no anal sex, etc.)? Aren't there a thousand pornographers out there shooting stuff a thousand times more hardcore than anything Hefner ever did?

      Well, Hitler approved of full nudity (full frontal; no erections and little sexual suggestiveness but still with very attractive fully nude models) in official Third Reich Nudist Books, so was he a pornographer too or just a guy who appreciated the nude human figure or wasn't prudish about sexuality (although no one knows for sure if he even had sexual relations with his girlfriend Eva Braun)? Why is it that Uncle Adolf didn't see anything wrong with the nude human figure and tolerated and saw benefit in the nudist movement, buttnaked gymnastics, volleyball and other sports, naked sunbathing and such. These books are classy for sure but would that prevent people from masturbating to them? And isn't material that can be 'beat-off to' the definition of pornography? How about beyond that? Would you put a ban on mini-skirts or low necklines showing cleavage for women? See how silly it gets when you take the logic forward a bit?

      Only some of the Third Reich Nude Books sold on the net:

      http://www.od43.com/Schoenh_Leib_He.html

      http://www.od43.com/Nude_Aryans_1939.html

      http://www.od43.com/Reichert_Leibeszucht.html

      http://www.od43.com/Der_schoene_Mensch_1940.html

      http://www.od43.com/Nude_Sonnenzauber_1944.html


      ~ Negentropic MK II

      Delete
    3. (. . . continued)

      Nope. It's all pretty much relative to each individual and the only lines drawn are by nature itself. Nature, the dictator of all dictators decides what's healthy for humans but each individual, being unique in experience, can only decide for himself or herself what's healthy by taking counsel from mother nature based on their own position, perspective and experience.

      "It is not often possible to say of those acts that are called vices, that they really are vices, except in degree. That is, it is difficult to say of any actions, or courses of action, that are called vices, that they really would have been vices, if they had stopped short of a certain point. The question of virtue or vice, therefore, in all such cases, is a question of quantity and degree, and not of the intrinsic character of any single act, by itself. This fact adds to the difficulty, not to say the impossibility, of any one's — except each individual for himself — drawing any accurate line, or anything like any accurate line, between virtue and vice — that is, of telling where virtue ends, and vice begins. And this is another reason why this whole question of virtue and vice should be left for each person to settle for himself." -- Lysander Spooner, "Vices Are Not Crimes, A Vindication Of Moral Liberty"

      http://lysanderspooner.org/node/46

      People in times other than 1930's Germany would have considered people publishing the above nude books perverts and pornographers, they would have called Hitler himself a pornographer for allowing these kinds of books, no matter how tastefully done.


      ~ Negentropic MK III

      Delete
    4. (. . . continued)

      You cannot legislate the erotic out of human life (erotic and heroic are only two letters apart and how curious that the letter T or the cross is what transfers 'heroic' to 'her-oetic,' close to heretic and then 'erotic,' any ties to Christianity and Jesus-on-the-cross guilt-trips maybe?) and you certainly cannot legislate morality. It has never worked in the past and will never work in the future. You can only teach its benefits to voluntary practitioners when you get full control of propaganda back and prevent it from ever being monopolized by usury and fractional reserve counterfeiting again.

      The audios on this site

      http://www.therialtoreport.com/tag/podcasts/

      are well-worth checking out. They are not pornography but very insightful interviews with well-known pornographers from the so-called 'golden age' in the 1970s. They give you a perspective of how the whole industry developed from very humble shoe-string operations or 8mm loops shown in sleazy sections of town into the behemoth it is today and the very different zeitgeist of the period where many of the porn actors were political activists who did anti-Vietnam peace-marches and such at the same time. Kay Parker, for instance, was from Birmingham, England and had moved to the Haight-Ashbury and was the girlfriend of the later drummer of Jefferson Airplane, Joey Covington. Bob Chinn, the guy who discovered John Holmes, was a Chinese-American whose friend and classmate at UCLA film school was Jim Morrison of the Doors, etc.

      Jews at the steering wheel

      http://www.radioislam.org/thetruth/coopt.htm

      "If I were dropped out of a plane into the ocean and told the nearest land was a thousand miles away, I’d still swim. And I’d despise the one who gave up." – Abraham Maslow

      The Psychology of Sex by Havelock Ellis

      https://archive.org/stream/studiesinpsycho05elligoog#page/n6/mode/2up

      The Playboy Philosophy by Hugh M. Hefner (1962)

      http://brentdanley.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/theplayboyphilosophy.pdf


      ~ Negentropic MK IV

      Delete
  6. I disagree with his premise using the French King...The French King was a tyrant.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.