Thursday, September 25, 2014

Jewish newspaper surprisingly publishes views of "anti-Semitic" Senatorial candidate

In a rather surprising move, one of the most established and respected Jewish newspapers in America, The Jewish Daily Forward, has published an interview with Robert Ransdell, the heroic Kentucky Senatorial candidate whose campaign slogan unabashedly states: "With Jews We Lose."

“With Jews We Lose”? No, this isn’t a poster from Nazi Germany. It’s a campaign placard currently on view in Kentucky, where write-in candidate Robert Ransdell is running for U.S. Senate. His party, The White Guard, “seeks to show White people the facts regarding the Jewish role in America’s decline as well as highlight the destructive effects that multiculturalism, diversity, and political correctness have had on this country.” (He details his whole platform in this incredibly rambly video.)

We here at the “Jew Media,” as Ransdell calls it, had a few questions about his views. And so we emailed him. To our surprise, he answered back. Highlights of the interview, which has been edited for style and length, include: his belief that Christian Zionists should relocate to Israel, that no Jews are white, and that there’s only one group out there more arrogant than members of the tribe. 
Ladies and gentlemen, Robert Ransdell in his own words:

1) Nowadays, many American Jews consider themselves white. Why don’t you share that view?

I don’t share that view because Jews themselves don’t share that view, it is absurd and a fantasy that Jews in America do not make a distinction between Jews and Whites, I won’t even bother quoting the numerous statements made by Jews, past and present, that affirm this fact. Most Whites falsely see Jews as White because they are never given an in depth and accurate portrayal of Jewish solidarity, unity, and identity which would go to show, again through the actions and statements of Jews, through the prolific number of Jewish interests organizations, that Jews regard themselves as what they are, a separate group.

2) You propose to end all aid to Israel. What would you say to white Christian Zionists who lobby in favor of continued support?

Anyone, whether they be Jews or non-Jews, who support a foreign nation over America should be encouraged to leave this nation and take up residence there, whether it be Israel or any other nation. Most Jews put the interests of Israel over America due to racial and religious loyalty to their fellow Jews. Religious conviction leads Christian Zionists to support Israel, except that is for the leaders of this group of people, people like John Hagee, who do it for personal gain. I am not anti-Christian, but those Christians who put Israel over America due to their religious beliefs also are not people that should stay in America, they should relocate to Israel, if the Jews there will have them.

3) The FAQ page on your website shows concern with “increased black-on-white violence” in America. What, then, do you make of the events in Ferguson over the summer?

The riots in Missouri are just another example of the failed experiment of “racial diversity” and failed notion of racial “equality”. The riots themselves were largely incited by the media, controlled by Jewish interests. The riots were the product of decades of appeasement and compromise with regard to Blacks in America. Blacks in America have achieved a level of arrogance that I once thought was only reserved for Jews, many now believe that they can do whatever they want, commit crimes of violence as the Black man shot dead in this case did and that Whites are to simply accommodate them, the concept of owning up to taking responsibility for their actions is almost non-existent to them.

4) Have you personally had any negative interactions with Jews?

I had no negative interactions with Jews before becoming aware of the role organized Jewry has had in the decline of America and the Western world, also their role historically in so many destructive events and programs through history, specifically the last 120 years, although it goes back much further than that. These days my interactions with Jews are pretty negative seeing as I am one of the few who speak out publicly against Jewish supremacy in America and the world today. My disgust for Jews does not stem from any bad experiences with them personally rather I am concerned about my people, White people, and the negative effects Jewish power and control over their world has had on them.
In my view, Robert excellently addressed these questions. What he is doing with his campaign, and the firm, bold stances and perspectives he is openly championing, is exactly what America needs today.

People need to be confronted with the truth for once. They need to be exposed to these ideas. And Robert is doing just that: he is telling the truth about some of the most important issues facing America and the world. Finally, someone is addressing the Jewish Problem head on, and is getting tons of media coverage. This is a major step in the right direction, in my opinion. Until we address the subversive, destructive, parasitic nature of international Jewry, and their death grip on America - organized Jewry and Jewish criminals have a lock on our banking system, our politics, our government, our media, many of our major corporations, and other important sectors of American society (Hollywood and academia, for example) - we will never get anywhere. We will never adequately address, let alone solve, any of the problems facing our world today unless and until we confront the Jewish influence upon and control over our country, a fact Robert appears to fully understand.

For those of you who tune in to The Realist Report (and I hope you all do!), Robert will be my special guest this coming Tuesday morning. The program will begin at 8am Pacific time on Outside Radio. As always, I will post a brief description of the program along with relevant links and, of course, the MP3 file shortly after the program ends. Stay tuned!

20 comments:

  1. Unfortunately this is not a surprise. This technique is used to bring the man and his ideas to the jewish community as a way of trying to encourage them to start a campaign against him. Right now little cabals are sat behind close doors planning their approaches.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. let them. organized jewry can no longer hide behind schemes and tricks. the truth of Yashua will seperate their bodies from their souls.

      Delete
    2. Come on! I have it from respected sources in the White community that jews never conspire or plan. They don't have to. It's solely their genetics which jews rely upon to guide them to do what needs to be done to defeat the goyim.

      Delete
  2. US Jews who do not have commitment to the welfare of America, but who put their loyalty to Israel first are actually subversives. We see this in dual US/Israeli citizens and in Christian Zionists as well. I believe the term is "fifth columnists," those whose intent is to act as internal destroyers of the country while claiming to be loyal Americans. This is what Hitler encountered in Germany and is probably why so many persons were arrested and imprisoned in labor camps. What is ironic is that that is exactly what FDR did to the Japanese Americans, as well as to some Italians and Germans. Done to prevent possible subversion within. Now in America, the government is in partnership with the subversives -- the ones that Ransdell identifies. He is a very vulnerable person for taking his stand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obviously, the jews commitment is the deliberate destruction of America and all White countries. International jewry declared war on Germany in 1933, so therefore jews in Germany were the enemy, not to mention the successful traitorous efforts by jews to bring the US into the First World War which spelled out ignomineous defeat for Germany. Jews earned their incarceration by their treachery and they got it.

      Delete
  3. Thanks John I for one look forward very much to listening to Robert.

    I live in London, UK and I have heard many people in the UK and abroad singing praises for UKIP. I did some searching and found the following, which is not in my opinion very encouraging, in fact to me it seems like another controlled opposition Party:

    The Conservatives, Labour and Lib Dems all have a 'Friends of Israel' organisation and for the most part support Israel's and Zionism's actions in Gaza etc. I found this to be true of UKIP also.

    I found the UKIP Friends of Israel web page:

    http://www.ukipfoi.moonfruit.com/#

    And I quote:

    UKIP Friends of Israel exists to promote solidarity and understanding between the membership of the UK Independence Party and the people of Israel. UKIP has long advocated the need for all freedom-loving people to show their support for Israel. As a libertarian, capitalist, democratic party, UKIP is a natural friend of the world's only Jewish State.

    The decision to create UKIP FOI was taken by the UKIP NEC in 2005. In 2010 it launched at the Party's Annual Conference with strong enthusiasm. For more information please look at this site's history page. '

    I also came across the following article by Julian Conway, Director of UKIP Friends of Israel:

    http://www.thecommentator.com/article/3122/zionism_in_ukip_the_real_story

    And I quote:

    UKIP's official policy statements, such as one entitled "Out of the EU, into the World" (currently under review), make reasonable claims of support for Israel, in particular: the nation's right to exist, to defend itself proportionately, and a rejection of attempts to sanction Israel by supranational organisations for defending itself.

    It is the goal of my organisation, Friends of Israel in UKIP (FOIIU), to take these policies further and make UKIP a party that British Zionists and members of the Jewish community in Britain can be proud to be affiliated with.

    ............. 'Meanwhile, support for Zionism from within UKIP will likely continue to grow on the understanding that Britain and Israel are both seeing their right to self-determination and their national sovereignty threatened by external powers.'

    I also came across this response to a question on a blog, the reply from Julian Conway:

    http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/bnp-friends-of-israel.html

    ' UKIP is a party of course devoted to civic nationalism (clearly stated in our manifesto) and not ethnic nationalism. THis means not being devoted to a country of one homogenous race, which would be almost impossible given the ethnic diversity which exists in Britain. But rather, a devotion to Britishness as a culture which people may subscribe to and be involved with no matter what their cultural heritage.

    I for one, am a Jewish person with ethnic routes going back to Eastern Europe. Clearly it would be illogical if I were to advocate a pure white Britain.'


    So, is UKIP actually an alternative or just another Zionist controlled entity?

    UKIP is NOT concerned, it seems, with the plight of White people and the genocide of our people which is happening all over Europe.

    On the basis of its UKIP Friends of Israel and its stance on the white race, I for one feel I couldn't vote for them.

    If I am missing the point I would appreciate other's views on this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you're dead right. That they support ethnonationalism for Jews should be less of a concern than that they oppose ethnonationalism for us. But where the double standard obtains it would obviously be crazy to sincerely support a party like UKIP (or the BNP and its numerous off-shoots for that matter).

      ***

      UKIP cannot be other than a Jewish controlled entity when we observe its passionate devotion to privileging Jews over its English members and supporters. Who or what else makes 'em do such things - morality? Greeks? Sun-spot activity? Nope - Jews! Obviously.

      ***

      "I for one, am a Jewish person with ethnic routes going back to Eastern Europe. Clearly it would be illogical if I were to advocate a pure white Britain."

      So, 1) Jews are not White and know they're not; and 2) it would be logical for Whites to advocate a 'pure White Britain;' and 3) a Jews feels secure and on the moral high ground saying both these things while asking Whites to help defend Israel's Jewish character but abjure equivalent advantages for their own peoples?

      Look over to the sidebar - Uncle Ezra was right ... "It is this filth that elects, selects, your politicians."



      Delete
  4. John- so excited to hear you interview this brave man who speaks a truth that many aren't willing to speak.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Charles Giulian is also having him next week

    Good to get his voice aired

    BTW John

    could please post a guest schedule so listenes know who is on your show in advance

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gosh! I hope Robert doesn't offend Charlie's racial sensitivities.

      Delete
  6. Wow, brave guy! To criticise Israel is usually the kiss of death politically but maybe we are moving into more enlightened times.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The new definition of an "anti-Semite" is someone Jews hate and wish to tarnish by calling names and censor.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Looking forward to this upcoming interview.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I liked this article and while I commend both the media outlet for airing these views and also the would be senator for expressing them I have no faith in any change mattering. The Jews have destroyed America!. It is a bankrupt and immoral nation full of addicts hooked on everything except honesty. The Jews cannot get anything more from America or its people so they are most likely planning the next host they will invade. Funny how a man some 90 years ago said exactly the same things about this parasitic tribe of quasi Israelites but was vilified and his country pillaged and raped by that same tribe using their proxy the US. Well enjoy it America. You reaped what you sowed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You were right when you said the Jews have destroyed America, so you must be wrong when you blame Americans. Americans have overwhelmingly opposed every destructive Jewish agenda from race-replacement invasion to liberalisation of pornography and morality to wars for Jews. But Jews had already taken power before imposing these policies on powerless Americans.

      Delete
  10. Martin Niemoller is often cited as a critic of Hitler's agenda of arrest and labor camp incarceration of specific groups within Germany, such as "communists, socialists, trade unionists, and, finally, the Jews. " I used to just accept this concept based on the "Hitler was very bad," as I had always been indoctrinated. Now that I have been reading truthful history like at "Justice for Germans," I can see that what Niemoller preached was propaganda and not the reality in Germany at the time. Hitler was quite intent on rebuilding a strong, moral, united Germany. As such, the groups of persons whom Hitler had removed and isolated from the population were deemed subversives, or very threatening, potential ones. With vile, murdering Bolshevik Russia eager to overpower Germany, Hitler did what was necessary to protect the thriving German people. Other noted groups that had morally and ethically undermining influence in Germany were independent, non-law submitting, Gypsies and homosexuals which were anathema to moral, family units which Hitler wanted German society based on. Thus, Hitler did support churches because the doctrines at that time taught morality and ethics. Church leaders that did not understand the Jewish subversion threat, became involved in political dissent against Hitler's policies, so were also removed from causing societal upheaval. The Germany Hitler began to lead was "a bankrupt and immoral nation full of addicts hooked on everything except honesty." The Germans were also starving due to food blockades demanded by the Jews who also had made Germany a sewer of degeneracy, which is what they have now done to America. But who notices, except the few not seduced by the Jewage.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ransdell advocates returning non-white immigrants to their countries of origin. This has Muslim alt-news bloggers angry. The Jewish run Congress has enforced bringing non-white immigrants into the US because there have been too many white immigrants. The non-whites are mainly Black Muslims from Africa who are settled in predominantly white, Christian areas. They are subsidized by the US and local governments. These Blacks do not assimilate, are not civil in actions, and are economic burdens to the communities they are in. The Muslim bloggers are of the same mindset as the Blacks -- race centric-- with no willingness to be rational about the aggressive intrusiveness of their own ethnic faults that do harm to others. Just as Israel-only subversives should be sent permanently to Israel, so should disruptive Black Muslims be sent back to their own origins to live where they do assimilate. Yes, the Jewsters are salivating for internal ethnicity warfare in America.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hopefully not one of you believes that through election some day a good government will be achieved (it never was, never will be; election was invented by the same power that you claim to oppose, for the purpose of making sure that the people may never have a government for the people, by the people)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Seems to be a very straight-shooting and candidly upfront type of man. Agree with him regarding his take on the Jews: With Jews, (most definitely) We Lose (ALWAYS!). However, while many Blacks indeed are of a low-class, low-life bent, Ransdell pontificates a return to the past where Blacks enjoyed very few basic rights. I don't agree with him about his totally hard-line approach to Blacks. While I can understand the concern regarding African-American jerk and criminal proclivities, to package nearly all Blacks as practically sub-human assholes is going a bit too far!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Maybe he will start a trend .

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.