Wednesday, May 28, 2014

The Realist Report - Marc from Canada


On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by Marc from Canada. Marc and I will be discussing Dimitri Khalezov and 9/11. Has Dimitri figured out what actually happened on 9/11 and who was resposnible? Calls are welcome!

You can download the mp3 for this program here, or visit the AFP Radio Network on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.

Below are relevant links for this program:

14 comments:

  1. Hey John Friend, would you ever consider doing a show exclusively on the topic of disinformation agents such as Alex Jones, and how exactly (in detail) they accomplish it, and what their purpose is? I've heard little things here and there in statements but nothing ever in a lot of detail.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yea that's a good idea actually. I'll see if I can arrange a show in the near future. I very rarely listen to Jones or even visit his website though... I'll have to check out what he's pushing these days.

      Delete
    2. I've been trying to listen to him a little bit lately. He seems to be pushing that the "Bilderberger Group" is trying to instigate a war against the veterans. And he is covering the whole Bilderberger meetings and one guy he had on said that the people behind the evils in this country are not Jews, but actually Nazis, LOL.

      Thanks for your consideration on the idea. I look forward to it if you can pull it off with a guest or someone.

      Delete
    3. Oh, and he seems to be pushing the drugs cause mass murder angle.

      Delete
    4. It's hard to listen to him because 2/3 of his show are commercials for his products.

      Delete
  2. If nukes had been used (which is difficult to imagine since nukes don't exist) why did the "bathtub" survive with nary a crack or chip? The waters should have promptly flooded the area.




    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is answered during the interview w/ multiple sources and citations regarding the extensive damage caused to the "Bathtub" as well as the PATH subway station.

      Delete
    2. I didn't feel this was answered satisfactorily at all to be honest. The simple fact is, if there had been a nuclear explosion like Marc from Canada is suggesting then the damage to the bath tub - even if only slight - would have caused the Hudson River to flood lower Manhattan which never happened. For my money, the directed energy explanation is the most plausible so far. Also I don't feel this guy's manner and presentation helped his cause. Nor did John's set-up for the interview help either.

      Just a friendly suggestion here John but how about you tell the audience who this Dimitri Khalezov guy is BEFORE you bring on the guest with all his mass of details.

      Main theme/ideas first, details second. Golden rule of radio.

      I had to wait nearly 30 minutes until I got a coherent thumbnail description of Khalezov. Until today I had never heard of the gentleman. Never assume the audience has as much knowledge of the subject as you and the giuest do. Second golden rule of radio :-)

      Delete
    3. Here you go http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center-damage-to-bathtub/

      Delete
    4. Thanks facebookprogrammer. I'll read it.

      Delete
    5. Okay, I've read it. Still not convinced. Khalezov's evidence of "damage to the bathtub" is quite, imho, underwhelming (eg, reference to subway damage in the mainstream media).

      What he has to say about the Judy Wood cult however rings true. I've had a few dealings with her and her sidekick Andrew Johnson and they are both rather strange (and very dogmatic) people, which is what often happens in the "research community". The cults around David Icke and Simon Shack, for instance, are the same. Notwithstanding, my own personal feelings about JW, some of her work is, I think, rather good, and to this point a reasonable hypothesis.

      Delete
    6. Dr Judy Woods is an Israeli with family living in Israel, I trust her as far as I can throw her.

      Delete
  3. Dimitri Khalezov was sentenced to one year prison by Thailand Supreme court on 1st May 2014.
    http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2545818/pg1

    http://www.mediafire.com/view/ajvhaie389ydzvf/Thailand_Consulate_-_English.pdf

    Demanding release of Dimitri Khalezov immediately and compensate for wrong verdict

    To : Royal Thai Consulate-General in Hong Kong
    8th Floor, Fairmont House
    8 Cotton Tree Drive
    Central, Hong Kong

    Dear Consul,

    On 1st May 2014, the Thailand Supreme Court sentenced a Russian with English name Dimitri Khalezov to 1 year prison. He now stays at the Bangkok Remand Prison. His Prison Number is 1709/57. According to my knowledge, he is innocent. This case has many problems and there are many political reasons behind. Therefore, I hope you would reflect the case to the relevant department, especially the Ministry of Justice. Demanding the Ministry of Justice to release Mr. Dimitri Khalezov immediately and compensate for the damage to him due to wrong verdict in 2014 and his imprisonment from 2003 to 2004.
    ......

    ReplyDelete
  4. Although Marc is very intelligent and articulate, I had a few issues with his report.
    - If the US was tricked into blowing up the buildings at the last minute with false intelligence, couldn't they have evacuated the buildings prior to the detonation? The reality makes me believe that 9/11 had the full foreknowledge and participation of both governments.
    - Marc suggests that there was an underground nuke, which, I too believe was needed to destroy all the supporting columns. Marc does not say this, but I believe that there were several conventional explosives used at various levels in the building. Video shows squibbs, melting aluminum flowing from many floors up and firefighters talking hearing and feeling several explosions. Remember, to be consistent with the official story, the impression had to be created that the collapse had to appear to be initiated from the hypothetical impact point some 90 floors up causing a progressive downward collapse. Video of the collapsing buildings shows them collapsing progressively from the top down. I do not believe a single subterranean nuclear charge would have created the effect that we saw in the videos. If it were simply a single underground charge then, the building would like have canted in one direction and toppled over a wide area not just on it's footprint. This is evident in pictures of one building where the top section leans over, then blows up and goes straight down. Other video shows massive beams impaled into adjacent buildings many floors above ground level. This lateral energy would not be derived from an underground charge but would have to be provided by conventional explosives at varying levels. Note too that bomb sniffing dogs were taken out of the towers several days before and there were powerdowns as well. Many office workers including the maintenance man Rodriguez claimed that there was jack hammering and renovation going on on various floors. Rodriguez himself, claimed that on some floors which were normally unoccupied, containing mechanical equipment presumably, this work was in progress and he was afraid to investigate. Crews could be setting explosive charges for remote detonation from bldg 7 where alphabet agencies had offices.
    I do not deny a massive subterranean explosion was necessary to knock the legs out from under the buildings, because this is the only way you could have a collapse at free fall speed.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.