Saturday, March 1, 2014

Will France abolish the "Holocaust-denial-law"?

God bless Robert Faurisson and all brave revisionists who have risked life and limb to expose the fraudulent Jewish "Holocaust" narrative of WWII. May truth and justice prevail.

9 comments:

  1. When are we going to say to the Jews in a united strong voice that we are no longer tolerating lies about Hitler and WW 11?

    Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhGfCTA_6wA#t=181

    ReplyDelete
  2. John, please email your mailing address to me to mail you a check because I don't use credit cards. If there is a delay know it will come. You deserve support.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there, I don't have your email. You can contact me at john.robert.friend@gmail.com though.

      Delete
  3. Earlier today, I announced the Spring 2014 fundraiser for The Realist Report and this website. I'd encourage everyone to check it out.

    "If you truly appreciate and support what I am doing here, please consider making a financial contribution of any amount this month to show that appreciation and support. Anyone who contributes $100 or more will receive a free gift from me. I mentioned this during the recent program with Tom, however, I do not want to give specific details publicly. The gift I have for contributors donating $100 or more are products that I myself use. However, I am certainly no sales representative or marketing agent for any of the products I would give to you. Please email me directly for details.

    Of course, you can make a simple, easy donation using a credit card, debit card or other electronic payment using Paypal. There is a "Donate" button on the upper right hand side of this website that will take you directly to my Paypal account, or you can click here. If you are uncomfortable using Paypal, which I totally understand, please feel free to email me directly and we can work something out. I understand $100 is a lot of money for most people. However, $5, $10, $20, $50 or any other amount goes a long way. If you'd like to set up a monthly contribution plan via Paypal, that is also an option. Committing to donate even $5 per month would be tremendously helpful (most regular contributors prefer this method).

    I want to thank all of you who have supported me in the past from the bottom of my heart. It really feels good knowing that there are kind, compassionate generous souls out there who truly appreciate and support what I'm doing here. Those of you who do appreciate and support what I do here please consider showing your appreciation and support by making a financial contribution. Let's make the Spring 2014 fundraiser a success!"

    http://www.john-friend.net/2014/03/the-realist-report-spring-2014.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. I rather doubt anything will change. Don't forget, judiciary is notoriously the most corruptible of the branches of gov. And as long as the money & banking system holds, the judges will always be easily paid-off. And if judges rule diff. fm expected, it'll only mean some other plan is afoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're absolutely correct. The US Supreme Court is a perfect example. Chief Justice John Roberts was blackmailed by the Jews into joining his Jewish colleagues in declaring the Obamacare mandate constitutional; and, why was he blackmailed? He had concealed his financial scandals from public scrutiny; thus, he was able to sail through the Senate ratification process without much trouble.

      Just as Satan had returned to Faust to collect on their contract, the Jews did likewise to Chief Justice Roberts; and, what was the Jews' demand? That Roberts cave in and declare Obamacare and its mandates constitutional.

      Delete
  5. I am not sure, Jew Zionist controlled France is busy banning ''QUENELLE'' because it offends Jews. Do you think Jews who took over France since 1790 will relinquish holo-hoax story and stop milking the goys? me think not.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is great, John--thanks for publishing it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Faurisson was in court here because he participated in a conference in Iran in 2006.

    How can the State of France object to something that happened somewhere else (Iran) and was perfectly fine with them there? Because the State of France claims it OWNS this person - he is its property we must infer. What other logical explanation do we have for that the State of France can interfere on actions that have taken place in other rulers territory? If these action are fine with the rulers of some other territory where the rulers of France have no say? It is because Faurisson is the property of the State of France, and it can do what it want with its own property. The State of France is not just the ruler of the territory, but the owner of its people too, they are the States property. It owns the people. And we accept this principle too?

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.