Wednesday, March 5, 2014

The Realist Report - Dr. Kevin MacDonald

On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined once again by Dr. Kevin MacDonald. Dr. MacDonald and I will be discussing the history of the Jewish assault and subverision of traditional Western civilization.

You can download the mp3 for this program here, or visit The Realist Report on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.

Below are relevant links for this program:
I'd like to thank everyone who has participated in and supported the Spring 2014 fundraiser for The Realist Report and this website! If you appreciate and support what we're doing here, please consider showing that appreciation and support by participating in the fundraiser and making a financial contribution. You can make a simple, easy donation using a debit or credit card through Paypal by clicking on the "Donate" button on the upper right hand side of this page. If you are uncomfortable using Paypal, please email me directly and we can make proper arrangements. Let's make the Spring 2014 fundraiser a success!


  1. A new book on 9/11 is out. The author knew the Mossad agent who organised the events of that day.

    Dimitri Khalezov has spent 10 years researching and writing this book. Download links:

    Or read at:

    In a 2010 interview, Khalezov explained that you can't build a skyscraper in NYC without an approved demolition plan. On 9/11, the World Trade Center's demolition plan was put into action to demolish the complex.

    Khalezov learned of this demolition plan from his job in the Soviet Union. He had worked in the nuclear intelligence unit and under an agreement between the Soviet Union and the USA, each country was obliged to inform the other of peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. The WTC was built with 3 thermo-nuclear charges in its foundations.

    Note: underground nuclear explosions do not produce mushroom clouds. This is only ever seen when the explosion takes place above ground. On 9/11, the explosions were deep underground.

    More info:

    You can watch the 2010 interview at:
    Video # 4 - WTC's demolition plan
    Video # 14 - WTC 7 (which fell ½ hour AFTER the BBC announced its collapse).
    Videos # 24/25 - chronic radiation sickness of WTC responders (their cancers are not due to asbestos poisoning)

    Khalezov was interviewed on 4 Sept 2013:

    Here is a recent article mentioning Khalezov:

    I know it is preposterous to claim that the WTC was brought down by nukes. But note that the place where the WTC once stood is called 'Ground Zero'. If you look up the meaning of 'ground zero' in the old dictionaries you have at home, you'll find that there would only be one definition. It is what you call a place that has been nuked.

    After 9/11, the US government sent people out to switch all the dictionaries in the public domain. The replacements differed only in the meaning of 'ground zero'. They show extra definitions for that term, to obfuscate the original single meaning.

    For example, if you have a genuine old Merriam-Webster dictionary, you would see this:
    ground zero n (1946) : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs.

    The replacement books (even of old editions) show two extra definitions and this is what you'll see:
    ground zero n (1946) 1 : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs. 2: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change 3: the very beginning : SQUARE ONE

    Have a look at this video:
    At 6:05 mins, he shows the old and new definitions of 'ground zero'.


    1. There's serious problem w. this nuke theory: (a) it doesn't seem to be really reflected or verified by the seismic evidence, aside fm other reasons. (b) There actually is visible evidence for the literal dis-integration ("dustification") of the materials even as it all fell down--see Judy Wood's

    2. apsterian, Jew-dy WoodStein is not credible. I'm sure you know very well that digital imagery can be fakes and/or manipulated.

      Unless or until you can establish the genuineness of any specific 911 related imagery - it simply cannot be relied upon as "evidence".

      If you are pointing to a specific picture put forth by Jew-dy WoodStein, please cite the specific image and tell us all exactly what type of camera took that image. What exact type of lens was used? Who operated that camera? Where exactly were they standing?

      Once you've run all that down for us - then you can go ahead and explain how you know that image was not manipulated. You can't just "say so", you have to prove it to us.

      We have looked at the imagery, and have determined that the issues of imagery creation and chain-of-custody are a monumental problem that benefits the perpetrators of 911.

      The facts indicate that the 911 imagery was created/manipulated.

      A rational examination of 911 would set aside the imagery and take a look at the bulk of the evidence, using structured methods of analysis.

      Once you do that, you will dump Jew-dy WoodStein in the trash where she and other operatives belong.

      I am quite surprised that John Friend even allowed you to publish a comment endorsing Jew-dy WoodStein. But, I suppose it must have slipped by.

  2. I was just about to listen to this show but read the comments first and they seem to relate to 9-11 and how the WTC buildings were destroyed. I am surprised to see those comments from the write-up as it appears that the topic discussed had nothing to do with 9-11 methods of WTC destruction.

    I just want to make three observations related to 9-11 and videos and still photos and so-called simulated victims (VicSims). (Until we get these matters straight first, we should save a lot of useless postings/comments and arguments.)

    1. The proponents of "ALL the videos are fake" school of thought said there was some kind of device used that made all cameras and camcorders of all types inoperable within a certain period of time and a certain radius from the WTC.
    We do not have FACTS about this alleged device. We need FACTS about what is and what is not possible from said device from objective third party source.

    2. If we gave a particular video to a super specialist in analyzing videos, we may be able to tell if say, for example in examining the building wall part of the video, was CGI or was an actual photo of a Tower exterior wall used in the make-up of the video that was mostly CGI but did involve some actual photos. But there is no way on God's green earth that any video analyst could say for sure or even at all that the entire video or any part of the video was from real-time "footage" on 9-11-01. To me, this means that it would not be possible to verify the authenticity of any video no matter how professionally the fakery were accomplished and no matter how expert the analyst.

    3. Regarding determining if someone actually died by using a list of victims provided by a TV network or some other source, and I am here referring to WTC Towers alleged victims, you have to first determine that the name belonged to a real living person. You need to assemble all the facts about that real person from as many sources as possible. Just determining that a name does not appear on the SSDI or that the person on the SSDI had "no last known address" is not near enough to prove anything. If you cannot gather enough solid information to show a real person existed by that name and that person could have been working in one of the Towers or could have had business in one of the Towers on that day, that name being On the SSDI list with a good last known address would not be enough to prove that you have a real victim.
    No person or group has conducted a quality investigation of each and every alleged victim in the Towers, and until that is done, just as say a good private investigator would do on a person, it is useless to go on and on about VicSims because we have not facts at all about this.

    I do think anyone can see where the perpetrators may well have been strongly motivated to have a number of victims that would impress and sell their Big Lie. For example, it might be good for them to say that that there were 3,000 people killed as that number is approximately the same number killed at Pearl Harbor. But the truth is we have no solid truth about 9-11 victims at all. (We know there were no planes so we know the list of names of passengers on those alleged four commercial flights were not victims as portrayed in the official story. So we do have those "VicSims." We do know the names of the people killed at the Pentagon and we know they were real victims. We know there were some firemen and other first responders killed so they were real victims. We know there were no victims in Building 7. So just keep in mind that when there is talk of so called "VicSims", what is really being referred to is people in the offices of the Twin Towers.

    1. Thanks Jeannon, great comment re: 9/11.

      I know you didn't bring it up, but I'm just letting everyone here know that I will not be publishing any 9/11 comments on this post going forward. This show had nothing to do with 9/11. There will be a 9/11 debate on The Realist Report between Don Fox and OneBornFree this coming Sunday at 2pm PST. Check BlogTalkRadio for more details.

      It'd be nice if you could call in Jeannon.

  3. "Jewish power is the unique capacity to stop us from discussing or even contemplating Jewish power. It is the capacity to determine the boundaries of the political discourse and criticism in particular. " --Gilad Atzmon

    1. That's exactly right - Atzmon has a good take on many issues.

  4. Christopher Bollyn is the expert on 911 in my view.

  5. Dr. Kevin MacDonald is not only right, but also quite brave. I would hope that he continues his work and lectures well into the future.

    We have a very, very serious problem here. And I fear that those who are exerting power over us will not relinquish that power voluntarily.

    This means that they will have to be removed.

    Our job is to continue to push towards a "Social Cascade" that convinces the majority that we have a jewish problem. That the jewish problem is really a dual-citizen-traitor problem.

    That concept is spreading like wildfire now.

    Please continue talking about this problem while you still have a First Amendment. We all owe it to the next generation. They will have it much worse than we don now - if we don't succeed in stopping these dual-citizen-traitors.

  6. Dr. MacDonald in the early part of this interview says that the time of the Enlightenment was the time when Jews, who had for centuries been segregated and kept out of mainstream intellectual society, but “all that all changed with the Enlightenment and Jews started to enter the mainstream of Western Society.”

    The “in-group / out-group” psychology took over [I would tend to call this much like the Hegelian dialectic or the Left-Right paradigm]. The Jews became the “hostile elite” of the this psychological paradigm.

    However, Dr. MacDonald does not give an adequate description of what this Jewish elite group were hostile against. They were hostile against Jesus Christ and all ORDER as conveyed by the Greek word Logos. That is genesis of the Jews’ revolutionary spirit, their hostility.

    The Age of Enlightenment --beginning in late 1600s- and just all of the 1700s centuries Europe emphasizing reason and individualism rather than tradition.[1] Its purpose was to reform society using reason, to challenge ideas grounded in tradition and faith, and to advance knowledge through the scientific method. It promoted scientific thought, skepticism, and intellectual interchange.[2

    Note that the 1600s and 1700s was when the French Revolution happened and when the USA was founded. There were also giant upheavals in England and Europe in all aspects of societal order. This is the period called the late Middle Ages.

    And 'hey, what bad ole people could be against such a good sounding thing like intellectual Enlightenment for the poor downtrodden masses? !!!'

    Dr.E. MichaelJones, ( as well as several other Catholic scholars do not think kindly of the period known as “The Great Enlightenment”, called the Age of Englightenment.* The Age of Englightenment is when Christ the King, His Kingship on this earth, His visible Church on earth, and the moral order (Logos) were ditched.Dr. Jones wrote the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Monsters from the Id and several other books, booklets, and articles ...
    Benedict's Rule: The Rise of Ethnicity and the Fall of Rome an e-book by E. Michael Jones. Europe has lost contact with its roots. The Enlightenment separates Europe's contemporary inhabitants from the man who made their culture possible. Benedict of Nursia could not save the Roman Empire, but he did something more remarkable: he created Europe to take its place. Benedict's Rule brought order and classical coherence to the chaos. Read More/Buy

    “"Another excellent work from one of America's leading Revisionist historians. Jones ... has convincingly traced the Enlightenment ideology in Western Europe from promises of freedom to the agony of unrestrained passions.”

    Yesterday, Alex Jones had Stephan Molineaux, a well known popular Canadian Libertarian philosopher, in his Austin, TX, studio as a guest on his radio show on for the full last two hours of the 3-hour show. This guy is very intelligent and entertaining. He is in town to push Bit Coins for the Libertarian local patriot gang. Pushing "freedom" and "free markets."

    Molineaux conveyed much truth but he said he thought the Englightenment was a good thing and he hit on, mischaracterized certain things, the Catholic church a couple of times.

    Just remember that Libertarian money philosophy, that is, the Austrian School of economics, is a 99 percent Jewish ideology founded by and nursed along over the decades mainly by atheist Jews.

    Alex Jones, who is a Protestant Christian, is always saying how great The Enlightenment was. You see, the Protestants love the Englightenment. It went right along with the early developmental years of the Protestant Revolution/heresy.

    I am just trying to say be careful in all this and be sure to see that this is really all about the One Who is Truth and the people and forces in this world system who hate Him.

    1. Alex Jones reportedly is a Zionist agent, and named his youngest son with the first name of Einstein.

    2. K. MacDonald's Information/Exposition Isn't Bad, But Seriously Limited

      As former Hist. major allow me to note the generally agreed "eras" or periods of hist.--and I admit these are mere "consensus" (agreed-upon) -type acclamations for the course of hist., quite subject to criticism and reservations. Still, note there are useful general ideas which can be followed for distinction of the historical "progress," such as it is.

      Thus after "ancient" (say, the fall of W. Roman emp.) came "medieval" whence came the "Renaissance" at about 1300 whence there was a distinct and rising middle class--which had existed previously, of course, but was still small, but after 1300, esp. in N. Italy, was growing in numbers and esp. in power and influence, reaching then to all the other European countries previously dominated by nobles, there being insignificant middle btwn top nobles and workers/peasantry at the bottom.

      1517 marks Martin Luther and the Reformation era whence the other European countries become more independent, esp. culturally, fm the Italian states, rise of distinct nation-states and empires attached thereto.

      1648, end of German 30 Yrs War whence doctrinaire and strict religious gives way to a more general appreciation of REASON, thus "enlightenment" culture, leading then to American achievement and revolution, the Constitutional republic founded upon individual freedom, soon followed by--

      1789 French Rev. which now marks present "modern" age/era featuring reactionary "anti-enlightenment," "romantic" rejection of previous age of REASON and individual freedom, this rendering moralism/Pharisaism of Kant, statism of Hegel, outright "scientific socialism" of Marx, welfare state of Bismarck, communist rev. of Bolsheviks, and world-gov. of League of Nations which world gov. has continued to consolidate to present genocide and "population-reduction" of AGENDA-21, outright satanic irrationalism, including an anti-Christ establishment "Christianity" which supports terror-state of Israel.

      One extremely important notation is the RISE OF THE JEWS and the criminal money & banking institution they've fostered and exploited throughout hist. Even today, note the amazing confusion there is for what is proper, honest money & banking, esp. regarding just the simple definition of "usury" (it isn't just charging of interest).

      Note Jews didn't just all-of-a-sudden appear as powerful cultural force--as MacDonald indicates--in enlightenment. Jew banking and financial manipulations in the form of "court Jews" existed fm well within the Reformation era whence they first began to acquire noble titles fm the corrupt monarchs willing to sell-out for their money and financing. True enough though, Jews really came into their own during enlightenment era w. the rise of free-masonry (corruption of the middle class), and began to totally dominate after French Rev. whence they achieved "emancipation."

      * * * * * * [truncated due to entry limitation--continued below, part 2] * * * * *

    3. * * * * * * * [Here's Part 2 to above entry] * * * * * * * *

      And "Austrian economics" (see for fullest expo) simply features, basically, the understanding of economic "value" to being, first of all, SUBJECTIVE--until it is rendered objective by the free market. Thus note this value subjectivism is in marked contrast to Adam Smith and then Karl Marx, who took it up fm Smith and also David Ricardo who immediately followed Smith.

      Austrian economics then is notable and extremely virtuous for its information upon and exposition of the fraudulent Jew banking built upon fiat-money issued fm the fractional-reserve criminal enterprise, also known nowadays as "central-banking"--like the present US Federal Reserve Bank COUNTERFEIT scam. Indeed, note "fiat-money" and "central-banking" are mere euphemisms for what is really just legalized COUNTERFEITING of pretended money-substitutes in form of paper money ("fiat"), nowadays also digitalized by means of computer entries on spreadsheets and book-keeping programs.

      The great deficiency of K. MacDonald is, despite his noting and exposition of SOME of the details of the rise and effects of Jew power in Western culture, he totally overlooks the money & banking issue and subject-matter, being utterly at sea when it comes actual knowledge for the details and facts.

      Further, MacDonald is very weak and deficient when it comes to the strict philosophic back-ground for the course of Western history and culture--utterly clueless, for example, regarding the practical revolution for the effect and influence of Immanuel Kant upon middle-class mentality.

      Naturally, MacDonald has very little to say about the state of Christianity and its practical influence for the present culture and how it's developed historically--and this is all despite MacDonald's otherwise excellent details he provides for the limited commentary he does make for certain things, esp. politically. MacDonald chiefly lacks for overall context and perspective, though his limited details are quite accurate, even telling, revealing, and poignant. MacDonald deserves credit, but he also need fuller perspective.

    4. I do not know much about economics but I would reply to your...

      "And "Austrian economics" (see for fullest expo) simply features, basically, the understanding of economic "value" to being, first of all, SUBJECTIVE--until it is rendered objective by the free market."

      that a simple way for us to understand libertarian economics is "whatever you can wring out of person", "whatever the market will bear" or read Ron Paul's flawed "In Praise of Price Gouging."

      Ron Paul has written six books on Austrian economics and is very favorable to it. This philosophy included usury and “free markets” and has never proven itself ever in history to work. When you are talking economic philosophy, it is not a hard science. It is an area of human choice and morality. As a Christian, we should realize that economies and finance should care for and be structured to care for the moral as well as physical welfare (the common good) of each individual.
      Here are the names of the people who founded and promoted and supported the Austrian School of economics throughout its history. I do not know for sure, but I would say about 99 percent of these people are atheist Jews.
      Carl Menger,
      Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, and
      Friedrich Freiherr von Wieser.
      Later Austrian School devotees include…
      Ludwig von Mises,
      Friedrich Hayek,
      Joseph Schumpeter.
      Murray Rothbard,
      Israel Krizner,
      Ludwig Lachmann,
      Peter J. Boettke, and
      Peter Schiff.
      The bible verses that condemn usury are
      Psalm 15, Exodus 22:24, Leviticus 25:36-27, Deuteronomy 23:20

      The bible says "the poor you will always have with you" but I add my own verse here too -- "the rich you will always have with you." There will always be evil moneyed elites and oligarchs who want to extract every last dime out of the average man. They do not want to provide a living wage, a fair wage. They do not want to charge a fair price. A Christian is supposed to care about a person's livelihood and wellbeing on this earth for the reason that we feel a job and a just wage provide for an intact Christian family and the best circumstances to aid all the family members to get to Heaven. A Christian believes this because that is what Jesus taught us. The primary concern always is for a man's soul, that he be saved and obtain salvation.

      There is the true story of hotels and motels on the way out of New York City increasing their room rates exponentially when many were fleeing New York City on the day of and a few days after 9-11. If a room was $100 a night, the rate went up to $300 or $400 a night. Libertarians think that is a perfectly fine thing to do. Christians should think that is a morally wrong thing to do. That is not what Christ would do or have us do. That is taking advantage of a person. That is taking advantage of the dire situation, what they would call "the market."

      Austrian economics is anti-Christ economics.

    5. Freedom, Reason, And Free Markets: Most Appropriate For Christians, Whites, All Humanity

      Note Christ is TRUTH, only way to Godly happiness (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), who thus assures us of objective reality, necessary basis of such truth, against Jew lies (JOHN 8:44).

      Thus free market Austrian economics is most appropriate to the human, creature of reason, most appropriate to that Christian objective reality. Dictatorship is always excused and rationalized by hereticalist and non-existent "good" and the hubristic perfectly "free," hence God-like, human will--these just Jew-styled lies, don't forget, in same style of the serpent who tempted Eve by the promise of being "like God."

      Scarcity of a product justifies the higher price within a free market which is the right of the people--who are not allowed to successfully charge arbitrary prices, but only those determined by market conditions. Jeannon wants satanic dictatorship, always excused by hereticalist "good." Jeannon needs to leave off w. the Pharisaism which always leads to dictatorship, mass-murder, and total perdition.

      Freedom, including free markets, is only economic system appropriate to Christians and white people, never doubt--and history affirms this observation. The accident that Austrian economics is associated w. some Jews is obvious ad-hominem fallacy meant to divert fm the Godly and Christian TRUTH regarding freedom, free markets, and the rational human creature. Ron Paul is excellent Christian, obviously.


    6. "Usury" Is NOT Mere Charging Of Interest

      There's one other pt. to be made, which I forgot: it's true "usury" is condemned in Bible, BUT nowhere is it defined, and indeed, there is no clear definition given anywhere in any ancient source I know of.

      But one thing is clear: usury is NOT mere charging of interest, as to ban such charging of interest would obviously be contrary to human right to enter into contract(s) with others.

      But "usury" is undoubtedly the same issuing, as happens today, of fiat-money, interest then charged upon this issuance, interest then mere incidental "icing on cake."

      For fiat-money, which is basically fraudulent replications of receipt money (for the real, commodity, money stored in a legitimate bank) is issued and then curtailed, often due to price inflation, and the resulting deflation then causes the re-payment of loans to become difficult and impossible.

      So the mere charging of interest upon this fiat-money is NOT the basic problem, but rather the fraudulent fiat-money in the first place, which has interest attached as an incidental, not essential feature. For loans, under such conditions, could not be repaid in any case, regardless whether interest was charged or not.

  7. The performer, Bill O'Reilly, is reportedly a CIA operative. He will retire to great wealth, although not necessarily in great health, but, as DC Dave said, those who have used their journalistic endeavors to tell the truth, are not so 'fortunate'. I pray our truther, Dr. MacDonald, is living comfortably in retirement.


Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.