Thursday, February 28, 2013

Introducing TruTube.TV

Buh Bye Youtube, hello TruTube! Visit TruTube.TV to sign up!


_____________________________

Tomorrow afternoon, I will be hosting a Special Broadcast of the Realist Report on the Truth Militia Radio network. I'll be joined by Truthwillout1003 from the United Kingdom. Truthwillout1003 is the producer of the must-watch documentary series Adolf Hitler - The greatest story NEVER told! Calls will be taken throughout the conversation.  The Special Broadcast will begin at 1pm PST.  Be sure to tun in if you can!

Monday, February 25, 2013

The Realist Report with John Friend


On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by Rodney Martin of World View Foundations to discuss his organization and its purpose, mission, and activities. We will also address aspects of WWII history, National Socialist philosophy, White Nationalism, and related matters. Be sure to read Rodney's excellent essay WHAT WHITE NATIONALISM MUST TO DO "BREAK OUT". Calls will be taken throughout the conversation.

You can download the entire show here, or subscribe to Truth Militia Radio here. Thanks for tuning in!

Friday, February 22, 2013

John Friend on The Real Deal w/ Dr. Jim Fetzer


Last Wednesday, February 13th, I was a guest on Dr. Jim Fetzer's radio program The Real Deal. We discussed the Sandy Hook "shooting" hoax, the use of fake victims and scripted actors to perpetuate PSYOPS on the public, and the PSYOP aspects of the alleged Jewish "Holocaust" during WWII. You can download the entire two hour program here.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

The Wise Old Man Disses four 2013 Movies

The Wise Old Man Disses four 2013 Movies:
Lincoln / Django Unchained / Zero Dark 30 / Argo

Zan Overall, The Wise Old Man, will be on the street again this year, as close as he can get
to the Kodak Theatre, protesting those four films. He will pass out flyers (see below) and display a placard reading:

JEWISH HOLLYWOOD 2013
PROPAGANDA DISGUISED AS ENTERTAINMENT

After doing these one man demonstrations for some ten years, he has still not brought Hollywood to its knees, blubbering for his forgiveness - but there's always next year!

Look for him at Hollywood and Orange, just west of the theatre.

Zan Overall
zn365@aol.com
The Wise Old Man
__________________

THE 2013 ACADEMY AWARDS FLYER

Lincoln

Abraham Lincoln was not the hero “Lincoln” portrays. Read The Real Lincoln by Thomas DiLorenzo and learn he was:
  1. A dictator
  2. A war criminal
  3. A racist
(1) He shut down newspapers and imprisoned their editors if they opposed his “War of Northern Aggression.” The war was not fought over slavery. The South seceded over destructive tariffs and States' rights. They had every constitutional right to do so. Lincoln’s big concern was not slavery, only keeping the Union together (for the interests of his masters,  the Northern industrialists and capitalists). Lincoln wrote: “If I could save the union without freeing any slave I would do it…” He also said he would free all or only some to save the Union. Most other nations had freed their slaves by compensated emancipation but Lincoln did not work for that. His needless war killed 600,000 Americans! 5 million in today’s terms! His war on the South was like a brutal husband who pursues his runaway wife and drags her back into the house by her hair.  The revered Emancipation Proclamation was a war time strategem. Hoping to cause slave rebellions in the South, it only freed slaves in territory held by the South and specifically DID NOT free slaves in territory held by the North. That was mentioned in the film but not the riots that ensued in the North. Northerners were not fighting a crusade to free slaves.

(2) Europe was shocked at Lincoln’s attacks on civilians. Sherman’s March to the Sea left behind it towns dubbed “Chimneyvilles,” with only chimneys standing, women and children left without shelter. "Nice Guy Lincoln" delighted in hearing tales of the “bummers,” Army looters ransacking Southern homes.

(3) By today’s standards, Lincoln was an anti-black racist.  As an Illinois legislator, he voted to ban freed blacks from entering Illinois. In his private law practice, he never had a black client. He represented a slave owner trying to recover fugitive slaves and succeeded in returning them to their “owners.” Lincoln long advocated sending freed blacks to Africa or the Caribbean! Abolitionists hated Lincoln. That wasn’t in Spielberg’s propagandistic “Lincoln.”

Consider the following quote from Abraham Lincoln in a debate with Stephen Douglas:
I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.
You won't find this important quote in Spielberg's propaganda film, "Lincoln"!

Django Unchained

“Django” incites race war. See here. We have enough black mobs as it is. See here. Or see the video below.



Both “Lincoln” and “Django,” produced by Jews, incite race war and do not mention the prominent role played by Jews in the slave trade. Jews owned most of the slave ships. America’s first synagogue was in Newport, Rhode Island, a center of the slave trade. Slave auctions were postponed on Jewish holidays. See here, and read what Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael had to say about Jewish involvement in the slave trade.  Also, see the video below which discusses the prominent role of Jews in bringing slaves to the Americas.




In Jewish movies about slavery, “Whitey” is always the bad guy. That’s why my placard reads: 

Propaganda Disguised as Entertainment

Zero Dark 30

“Zero Dark 30” glorifies torture and is the most ludicrous of the four movies. Osama bin Laden died in December 2001. In July of 2001 bin Laden was treated at the American Hospital in Dubai for kidney disease. He was on dialysis. Our “governedment" - totally controlled by Israel and her agents - pretended all those years they could not find him, needing a bogey-man to scare the stupid American public (YOU!) into supporting the “War on Terror.” The “War on Terror” is an excuse to take away our freedom and justify our genocidal attacks on innocent Muslim nations. By the way, bin Laden denied doing 9/11. See his interview here.

(See also Zero Dark Thirty: blatant "Global War on Terror" propaganda)

Argo

Since 2001 the U.S. has knocked over one Muslim nation after another for our master Israel. Syria is under attack now and then the final target is Iran. “Argo" is a good ramp up for a war with Iran. We’re the “good guys” when we were the bad guys who overthrew an elected Iranian leader, Mossadegh, and installed a dictator, Shah Pahlavi. A revolution overthrew him and when we continued to support and aid the Shah, Iranians took over our embassy. Big deal. All our wars in the Mideast have been to aid Israel. Americans would stop those wars but they are not in control. Israel is! On to Teheran! Ben, you are selling your soul for an Oscar! Like all the actors in the other 3 films!

Screw Hollywood propaganda! Visit www.Rediscover911.com to learn Israel did 9/11! Visit www.youtube.com/1wom for my Wise Old Man videos. Don’t be a Sheep! Be a Ram!

“Utter the Unutterable! Think the Unthinkable! Dispute the Indisputable!” - Zan Overall

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Hitler's Shadow - In the Service of the Fuehrer

Video found at the excellent website Justice for Germans.  Another phenomenal video by Wayne from Canada.



It is the personal story of Karl Wilhelm Krause, who was the valet. of the Fuehrer from 1934 to 1939, and was also responsible for his personal safety and security. Through his daily contact with Adolf Hitler, and those of his most intimate circle, both in his public life, as well as, inside the Fuehrer’s private quarters, no one had access like Herr Krause. Nor was anyone ever in a better position to observe Hitler; his personal habits, character, and demeanor, and to assess his social interactions with average citizens, employees, friends and colleagues, public figures, academics, leaders of industry, as well as, with foreign leaders and dignitaries. In this one and only interview, recorded on camera in the early 90s, Herr Krause testifies of his duties, his daily routine, and what he saw, heard and experienced, while in the constant presence of, and service to, the leader of the the Third Reich. Hitler called him “mein Schatten” (my shadow).

The testimony which you are about to hear is of invaluable historical importance, and forms a comprehensive and highly relevant, contemporary documentation, revealing surprising facts about the most talked about and enigmatic man in history, painting a far different picture of Adolf Hitler, than the court historians, Hollywood, and the Mass Media have typically portrayed.

This German language interview took place around 1990 and has been kept under wraps. We have translated it into English, paying close attention to accuracy. We do not have access to the original tapes. What is contained here is exactly what was published in Germany in its original form. We have also translated the text captions into images, inserted some extra pictures, added a musical score, and created both an intro and outtro. A 90 minute version is planned with some extra related footage.

Monday, February 18, 2013

The Realist Report with John Friend


On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by Andre from TotalFascism.com to discuss Fascism and National Socialism, and how these ideologies differ fundamentally from Jewish communism and Jewish capitalism.  We also discussed his essay On the Issues: American Third Position vs. Total Fascism, and solutions to the problems facing our communities, society, and race.  This turned out to be an excellent program folks, be sure to download and listen to the full three hours.  

You can download the entire episode here, or subscribe to Truth Militia Radio via iTunes here.  

Saturday, February 16, 2013

What is Fascism?

"The nation does not live for the sake of the economic system, and the economic system does not exist for the sake of capital. On the contrary, capital is the servant of the economic system and the economic system is the servant of the people."
- Adolf Hitler



THE DOCTRINE OF FASCISM by Benito Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile, 1932

Like all sound political conceptions, Fascism is action and it is thought; action in which doctrine is immanent, and doctrine arising from a given system of historical forces in which it is inserted, and working on them from within (1). It has therefore a form correlated to contingencies of time and space; but it has also an ideal content which makes it an expression of truth in the higher region of the history of thought (2). There is no way of exercising a spiritual influence in the world as a human will dominating the will of others, unless one has a conception both of the transient and the specific reality on which that action is to be exercised, and of the permanent and universal reality in which the transient dwells and has its being. To know men one must know man; and to know man one must be acquainted with reality and its laws. There can be no conception of the State which is not fundamentally a conception of life: philosophy or intuition, system of ideas evolving within the framework of logic or concentrated in a vision or a faith, but always, at least potentially, an organic conception of the world.

Thus many of the practical expressions of Fascism such as party organization, system of education, and discipline can only be understood when considered in relation to its general attitude toward life. A spiritual attitude (3). Fascism sees in the world not only those superficial, material aspects in which man appears as an individual, standing by himself, self-centered, subject to natural law, which instinctively urges him toward a life of selfish momentary pleasure; it sees not only the individual but the nation and the country; individuals and generations bound together by a moral law, with common traditions and a mission which suppressing the instinct for life closed in a brief circle of pleasure, builds up a higher life, founded on duty, a life free from the limitations of time and space, in which the individual, by self-sacrifice, the renunciation of self-interest, by death itself, can achieve that purely spiritual existence in which his value as a man consists.

The conception is therefore a spiritual one, arising from the general reaction of the century against the materialistic positivism of the XIXth century. Anti-positivistic but positive; neither skeptical nor agnostic; neither pessimistic nor supinely optimistic as are, generally speaking, the doctrines (all negative) which place the center of life outside man; whereas, by the exercise of his free will, man can and must create his own world.

Fascism wants man to be active and to engage in action with all his energies; it wants him to be manfully aware of the difficulties besetting him and ready to face them. It conceives of life as a struggle in which it behooves a man to win for himself a really worthy place, first of all by fitting himself (physically, morally, intellectually) to become the implement required for winning it. As for the individual, so for the nation, and so for mankind (4). Hence the high value of culture in all its forms (artistic, religious, scientific) (5) and the outstanding importance of education. Hence also the essential value of work, by which man subjugates nature and creates the human world (economic, political, ethical, and intellectual).

This positive conception of life is obviously an ethical one. It invests the whole field of reality as well as the human activities which master it. No action is exempt from moral judgment; no activity can be despoiled of the value which a moral purpose confers on all things. Therefore life, as conceived of by the Fascist, is serious, austere, and religious; all its manifestations are poised in a world sustained by moral forces and subject to spiritual responsibilities. The Fascist disdains an “easy" life (6).

The Fascist conception of life is a religious one (7), in which man is viewed in his immanent relation to a higher law, endowed with an objective will transcending the in­dividual and raising him to conscious membership of a spiritual society. "Those who perceive nothing beyond opportunistic considerations in the religious policy of the Fascist regime fail to realize that Fascism is not only a system of government but also and above all a system of thought.

In the Fascist conception of history, man is man only by virtue of the spiritual process to which he contributes as a member of the family, the social group, the nation, and in function of history to which all nations bring their contribution. Hence the great value of tradition in records, in language, in customs, in the rules of social life (8). Outside history man is a nonentity. Fascism is therefore opposed to all individualistic abstractions based on eighteenth century materialism; and it is opposed to all Jacobinistic utopias and innovations. It does not believe in the possibility of "happiness" on earth as conceived by the economistic literature of the XVIIIth century, and it therefore rejects the theological notion that at some future time the human family will secure a final settlement of all its difficulties. This notion runs counter to experience which teaches that life is in continual flux and in process of evolution. In politics Fascism aims at realism; in practice it desires to deal only with those problems which are the spontaneous product of historic conditions and which find or suggest their own solutions (9). Only by entering in to the process of reality and taking possession of the forces at work within it, can man act on man and on nature (10).

Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal, will of man as a historic entity (11). It is opposed to classical liberalism which arose as a reaction to absolutism and exhausted its historical function when the State became the expression of the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts

The rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual (12). And if liberty is to he the attribute of living men and not of abstract dummies invented by individualistic liberalism, then Fascism stands for liberty, and for the only liberty worth having, the liberty of the State and of the individual within the State (13). The Fascist conception of the State is all embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism, is totalitarian, and the Fascist State - a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values - interprets, develops, and potentates the whole life of a people (14).

No individuals or groups (political parties, cultural associations, economic unions, social classes) outside the State (15). Fascism is therefore opposed to Socialism to which unity within the State (which amalgamates classes into a single economic and ethical reality) is unknown, and which sees in history nothing but the class struggle. Fascism is likewise opposed to trade unionism as a class weapon. But when brought within the orbit of the State, Fascism recognizes the real needs which gave rise to socialism and trade unionism, giving them due weight in the guild or corporative system in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the State (16).

Grouped according to their several interests, individuals form classes; they form trade-unions when organized according to their several economic activities; but first and foremost they form the State, which is no mere matter of numbers, the suns of the individuals forming the majority. Fascism is therefore opposed to that form of democracy which equates a nation to the majority, lowering it to the level of the largest number (17); but it is the purest form of democracy if the nation be considered as it should be from the point of view of quality rather than quantity, as an idea, the mightiest because the most ethical, the most coherent, the truest, expressing itself in a people as the conscience and will of the few, if not, indeed, of one, and ending to express itself in the conscience and the will of the mass, of the whole group ethnically molded by natural and historical conditions into a nation, advancing, as one conscience and one will, along the self same line of development and spiritual formation (18). Not a race, nor a geographically defined region, but a people, historically perpetuating itself; a multitude unified by an idea and imbued with the will to live, the will to power, self-consciousness, personality (19).

In so far as it is embodied in a State, this higher personality becomes a nation. It is not the nation which generates the State; that is an antiquated naturalistic concept which afforded a basis for XIXth century publicity in favor of national governments. Rather is it the State which creates the nation, conferring volition and therefore real life on a people made aware of their moral unity.

The right to national independence does not arise from any merely literary and idealistic form of self-consciousness; still less from a more or less passive and unconscious de facto situation, but from an active, self-conscious, political will expressing itself in action and ready to prove its rights. It arises, in short, from the existence, at least in fieri, of a State. Indeed, it is the State which, as the expression of a universal ethical will, creates the right to national independence (20).

A nation, as expressed in the State, is a living, ethical entity only in so far as it is progressive. Inactivity is death. Therefore the State is not only Authority which governs and confers legal form and spiritual value on individual wills, but it is also Power which makes its will felt and respected beyond its own frontiers, thus affording practical proof of the universal character of the decisions necessary to ensure its development. This implies organization and expansion, potential if not actual. Thus the State equates itself to the will of man, whose development cannot he checked by obstacles and which, by achieving self-expression, demonstrates its infinity (21).

The Fascist State , as a higher and more powerful expression of personality, is a force, but a spiritual one. It sums up all the manifestations of the moral and intellectual life of man. Its functions cannot therefore be limited to those of enforcing order and keeping the peace, as the liberal doctrine had it. It is no mere mechanical device for defining the sphere within which the individual may duly exercise his supposed rights. The Fascist State is an inwardly accepted standard and rule of conduct, a discipline of the whole person; it permeates the will no less than the intellect. It stands for a principle which becomes the central motive of man as a member of civilized society, sinking deep down into his personality; it dwells in the heart of the man of action and of the thinker, of the artist and of the man of science: soul of the soul (22).

Fascism, in short, is not only a law-giver and a founder of institutions, but an educator and a promoter of spiritual life. It aims at refashioning not only the forms of life but their content - man, his character, and his faith. To achieve this propose it enforces discipline and uses authority, entering into the soul and ruling with undisputed sway. Therefore it has chosen as its emblem the Lictor’s rods, the symbol of unity, strength, and justice. [...]
________________________

On Monday, February 18th on the Realist Report I'll be joined by Sword Brethren of The Mein Kampf Project to discuss the nature of Fascism and National Socialism and how they differ from Jewish international capitalism and Communism.  We will also discuss political theory and political history in the Western world generally.  Tune in for what will surely be an informative and interesting program!

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Evil Jew-puppet Sir Arthur Harris: 'I would have destroyed Dresden again'

"The aim of Bomber Command should be... publicly stated: the destruction of German cities and the killing of German workers."
- Sir Arthur Harris, head of Bomber Command of the Royal Air Force, October 1943

In Willis Carto's must read article A Straight Look at the Second World War published in the January/February 2012 edition of The Barnes Review, he clearly explains that WWII was not the "Good War" we've been lead to believe.  WWII was not about checking "Nazi" aggression and designs on world conquest, or "liberating" Europe from fascism and tyranny, or even a war of self defense against a war-mongering, imperial German and Japanese alliance - it was a fratricidal, Jewish instigated genocidal campaign whose only beneficiaries were the Jewish plutocrats and Communists largely controlling the United States, United Kingdom and Soviet Union. It was, as Carto correctly points out, the suicide of the West:
[WWI and WWII] must be seen as a civil war in the West; 8.5 million American, British and continental European troops were killed in WWI and 43 million in WWII. The civilian count in WWI is about 13 million and 38 million in WWII [...]

Regardless of persons like Tom Brokaw (who refers to WWII as “the good war,”) it was unnecessary, and all belligerents — Great Britain, America and Russia included — lost. American Francis Yockey pointed out that to win a war, a power must gain resources, strength and prosperity. Since 1939, all three major powers who started and fought it have declined into a pit of escalating inflation, unpayable debt, national bankruptcy, loss of national character, the immigration of millions of aliens and a highly questionable future.
With this in mind, let's turn to the mainstream British news outlet the Daily Mail, which recently published a rather revealing article relating to Sir Arthur Harris, head of Bomber Command of the Royal Air Force, and his central role in the cowardly and barbaric British-led fire bombing campaign of German industrial centers and cities during WWII.  Take a look at the headline and this brief excerpt:

The RAF commander who ordered the controversial fire-bombing of Dresden which killed an estimated 25,000 civilians during World War II said he would do it again in a long lost interview filmed 30 years after the end of the conflict.

Former marshal of the Royal Air Force, Sir Arthur 'Bomber' Harris, gave the green light for the 1945 bombing which reduced the city in Saxony, Germany, to rubble.

The attack was widely criticised because of 'blanket bombing' which hit civilian areas as well as military targets - killing thousands of innocents.

But the newly-discovered interview with Sir Arthur, which was filmed in 1977 and will be aired for the first time on the BBC tonight, shows the RAF chief defending his decision. [...]

During the interview, Mason discusses how many felt the Dresden attack was 'a city too far'. 

However Harris stood his ground saying: 'The bombers kept over a million fit Germans out of the German army… Manning the anti-aircraft defences; making the ammunition, and doing urgent repairs, especially tradesmen.'
Let's be clear about what happened to Germany during WWII: the entire Western world - the UK, France, and USA primarily - teamed up with Stalin's Soviet Union to destroy Adolf Hitler's National Socialist Germany, the one nation exposing and standing up to the international Jewish plot to destroy Western civilization.  Rather than defeating the German army on the battlefield, the Western Allies, namely the UK and USA, embarked upon a deliberate policy to murder and destroy German civilians and industrial centers through a fire bombing campaign, a policy the sadistic and despicable Sir Arthur Harris would be happy to carry out all over again.  Millions of German people suffered unspeakable horrors, death, and destruction.

As the war was ending, and the Red Army advanced into Eastern Europe and Germany, millions of German and other European peoples were tortured, brutalized, raped, and murdered by the Communist butchers.  Following the surrender of the German Army, millions of German soldiers were rounded up by the Allies and placed in what amounted to an open air prison, resulting in the death of countless German soldiers and other POWs from exhaustion, dehydration, and even deliberate murder.

Today marks the 68th anniversary of the fire bombing and incineration of the German city of Dresden, the beautiful cultural and artistic capital of Saxony on the Elbe river.  As we commemorate this horrific and evil attack on our German brethren, let us all recognize what WWII was really about: the destruction of Western European civilization at the behest of the international Jew.
______________________________

On Monday, February 18th, I'll be joined by Sword Brethren of The Mein Kampf Project on The Realist Report to discuss the nature and characteristics of Fascism and National Socialism, and how these ideologies are fundamentally opposed to Jewish international capitalism and Communism.   Be sure to tune in!  

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Inside the Eye - Live! w/ John Friend


Earlier today I guest hosted Inside the Eye - Live! on Oracle Broadcasting.  Dennis Fetcho, AKA "The Fetch", was away on business and asked me to fill in for him.  I interviewed Andre from Total Fascism and we discussed the concepts of National Socialism and Fascism as reactions to Jewish international communism and international capitalism, Christianity and spirituality, feminism, cultural Marxism and the organized Jewish assault on traditional European culture and society, and related matters.  

You can download the entire show here.  

Monday, February 11, 2013

The Realist Report with John Friend


On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by John de Nugent to discuss his political views, experience in the pro-White movement, and related matters. Calls will be taken throughout the conversation. You can download the entire program here, or subscribe to Truth Militia via iTunes here.

Below are two videos I recently watched produced by John de Nugent.  Check out all of John's videos here.




Friday, February 8, 2013

Die Flut Kommt

Video found at HARDON'S BLOG:

"It is a characteristic feature of all great reforms that, in the beginning, there is only one single protagonist to come forward on behalf of several million people." 
- Adolf Hitler



"He who would live must fight. He who does not wish to fight in this world, where permanent struggle is the law of life, has not the right to exist." 
- Adolf Hitler

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Book Review - Why Hitler Came Into Power

Theodore Abel’s 1938 book, Why Hitler Came Into Power is perhaps the most important, and yet unknown, book exploring the rise of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party and Adolf Hitler. In early 1934, Abel travelled to Germany after convincing the National Socialist government that had recently come to power that Americans, and the world generally, knew far too little about the National Socialist movement, its ideology, its history and rise to power, and its followers. Abel, working under the auspices of Columbia University, proposed an autobiographical essay contest, in which any member or sympathizer of the NSDAP who had joined prior to the party solidifying its political power over the German state in 1933 could submit an essay explaining his or her background, education, experience, and political affiliations for review.

Abel placed an announcement in June 1934 in party publications which read in part:

400 MARKS IN PRIZES
For the Best Personal Life History of an Adherent of the Hitler Movement
Any person, regardless of sex or age, who was a member of the National Socialist party before January 1, 1933, or who was in sympathy with the movement, may participate in this contest.

Contestants are to give accurate and detailed descriptions of their personal lives, particularly after the World War. Special attention should be given to accounts of family life, education, economic conditions, members in associations, participation in the Hitler movement, and important experiences, thoughts, and feelings about events and ideas of the post-war period. 
The prizes will be awarded to authors who have submitted the most detailed and trustworthy accounts. Style, spelling, or dramatic story value will not be considered. Completeness and frankness are the sole criteria, so that even the simplest and most undramatic story will receive full consideration. […]
Abel eventually received 683 manuscripts from a wide variety of National Socialist party members and sympathizers, which he breaks down into age distribution, occupation, class affiliation, and date of joining the NSDAP. Statistical charts and other identifying data are broken down for further analysis as an Appendix. Abel notes that 83 manuscripts were eliminated from consideration, either because they were too short in length and lacking in any detail, or because they were submitted by women, whose entries were used for a separate study published independently of Why Hitler Came Into Power. These manuscripts form the basis for Abel’s work, and numerous excerpts are provided throughout the first two parts of the book from members of the NSDAP themselves, offering readers a unique insight into what motivated and inspired these individuals to join the party and embark on what turned out to be a life long struggle.

In 1986, Why Hitler Came Into Power was re-published with a Foreword written by Thomas Childers, who made some profound observations about Abel’s original and unique research into the NSDAP and the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany. Childers wrote in part:
Abel’s material simply did not fit neatly into the dominate interpretation of National Socialism as a “revolt of the lower middle class.” […] 
Abel was struck by the wide variety of motivational factors at work among the respondents, many of which could not be easily subsumed under the interpretive rubric of “lower-middle-class revolt.” […] 
These studies have allowed us to identify the social bases of the Nazi following with far greater precision than was ever before possible. Although thematic emphasis and methods differ, these works are in fundamental agreement that support for the NSDAP extended far beyond the lower middle class to elements of the socially established Grossb├╝rgertum (upper middle class) as well as to sizable segments of the blue-collar working class. […] 
What attracted members of the upper middle class to the party? Why did many workers turn to the NSDAP? What had drawn them? What role did the NSDAP’s ideological positions play in its popular appeal? How important were Nazi propaganda tactics and organization? These are obviously important questions for any study seeking to explain the sociopolitical dynamics of Nazi success, and it is precisely this set of central issues that Theodore Abel’s work addresses. […] 
Abel’s book is comprised of three distinct parts. Part One deals with the history of the NSDAP, with chapters titled The Background of the Hitler Movement, The First Period: 1919 – 1923, The Second Period: 1924 – 1929, and The Third Period: 1930 – 1933. Part Two is analytical in nature, and explains how and why the NSDAP movement gained support. What attracted people to National Socialism? What factors lead to the rise and eventual triumph of the NSDAP in German politics? These and other related questions are addressed in these pages. Abel breaks Part Two into three chapters: Discontent As a Factor, Ideology As a Factor, and The Why of the Hitler Movement.

Finally, Part Three of the book is comprised of six selected autobiographies of the NSDAP members, published in full. Abel publishes the life stories of a worker, an anti-Semite, a soldier, a middle-class youth, a bank clerk, and a farmer – all chosen “to show, in unified, more realistic form, patterns of National Socialist experience separately analyzed in previous chapters.” Abel clarifies that the published accounts in Part Three are “a sample of the material on which the analytical section of the book is based.” These selected manuscripts demonstrate the widespread appeal of National Socialism, which united German nationalists and patriots from all backgrounds, social classes, and education levels. Farmers, merchants, soldiers, veterans, teachers, industrial workers, bureaucrats, managers, fathers, mothers, children – National Socialism appealed to and sought to unify all segments of the German populace, and was largely successful in doing so, especially once firmly in control of the German state.

By relying on primary source material – authentic autobiographies of NSDAP members and sympathizers – Abel offers historians and other interested parties a unique analysis of the rise of Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP not found elsewhere. Abel’s Why Hitler Came Into Power is as important today as it was when it was first published in 1938, not only as a chronicle of the Hitler movement, but also as an analysis explaining how and why the NSDAP came to power. Modern political activists, especially those in the nationalist camp that recognize the insidious and parasitic nature of organized Jewry, have much to learn from the National Socialists and their struggle to gain control of the German state.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Thoughts on Christianity and religion

"The Jew is not content to dechristianize, he Judaizes; he destroys Christian beliefs; he provokes religious indifference, but he also imposes on those whose faith he destroys, his own concept of the world, of morality, and of human life; he labors at the age-old task - the destruction of the religion of Christ."
- Jewish author Bernard Lazare

Andre from Total Fascism basically said everything that I've been thinking about lately concerning Christianity and religion in general, but just couldn't express verbally or in writing.  I'd like to add just a few of my own comments here for people to consider.

For starters, there can be no doubt that Christianity has played a major role, for better or worse, in Western civilization for centuries now. I would argue that the imperial, universalist interpretation of Christianity has been more destructive than anything else. In fact, this globalist perspective of Christianity, which seeks to proselytize and convert the entire world, regardless of their race, unique cultural background, and genetic characteristics, is not only destructive and unjust, it is a perversion of what real Christianity was and is all about. Also, the idea that the solution to the age old Jewish Problem is simply their conversion to Christianity is absolutely asinine, which has been a position organized Christianity, both Catholic and Protestant, has taken for years now. Real Christians, and all righteous men and women, recognize that the Jews are the genetic enemies of all humanity, and the destroyers of Western civilization primarily. They must be viewed as a hostile, alien race, totally contrary to our spirit, nature, and worldview, at least those of us not poisoned by the Jew and his propaganda.

I view the Aryan man, and all decent, honorable men of any race, to be innately endowed with the virtues Jesus Christ – whether you believe he was real or imagined – spoke of and practiced: a love for your brother, a respect for your family, a willingness to sacrifice for your community, a desire to advance the interests and well-being of your race, a conviction of transcendentalism and belief in an afterlife, and a rejection of materialism.

Organized Christianity, from the outset, has been problematic for not only the White race, but the entire world. Wars have been waged, entire continents subjugated, whole populations slaughtered, tortured, and otherwise mistreated in the name of "Christianity".  But this is not the true nature of Christianity and the man who founded this creed.  It is, in fact, the exact opposite of what real Christianity is.

Organized Christianity is universalist, evangelical, and imperial. But organized Christianity is NOT real Christianity. Mainstream organized Christian churches, congregations, and assemblies are corporate, superficial, and corrupt. Real Christians are honest, hard-working, selfless, and righteous, at least in my opinion. All of the criticisms guys like Charlie Giuliani and other Christian-bashers make about Christianity can and should be applied to mainstream, organized Judeo-Christianity.

One last thought - I've been reading some Pagan literature lately, and I found the core values of Paganism, at least described at that last link, are perfectly in line with real Christianity and my core philosophy, especially concerning the concept of transcendentalism, belief in an afterlife, learning from our past mistakes and experiences, striving to live an honorable life, and sacrificing for one’s community.

Anyways, I hope you take the time to go read Andre's essay at Total Fascism, and I really hope we can all drop this childish, immature, and anti-intellectual religious bashing.  Even if we disagree on religion, Christianity, Paganism or whatever, let's at least be respectful, professional, and productive moving forward.  

Monday, February 4, 2013

The Realist Report with John Friend


On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by William Finck of Christogenea.org to discuss the origins, migrations, and history of the European peoples and Western civilization generally. Where do modern Europeans have their origins? What is our true history? These and related questions will be discussed. You can download the entire program here, or subscribe to Truth Militia via iTunes here.

Sorry for the abrupt ending tonight folks. Skype dropped the call, and once that happened the show apparently ended automatically.

Friday, February 1, 2013

A proposal

I took a drive up to Los Angeles the other day to visit a good friend, Zan Overall, and had some time to think and reflect on all the developments in the "truth movement" lately. Zan and I discussed the future of this "movement", the issues that seem to be dividing those of us in it, and what we can do to effectively and pragmatically make some sort of progress in our struggle against the forces of the Jew World Order.

First of all, just in the past two months or so, we've seen countless disputes and outright hostility between the different factions making up this "movement". And I'm sick and tired of it. It's immature. It's childish. It's ridiculous. I don't know about anyone else, but I would really like to do something about the situation we find ourselves in, and the criminals responsible for it. And to do that we need to get serious.  We need to stop whining, moaning, gossiping, bashing and complaining about internet trolls, other radio hosts or alternative media types (unless it's justified and specific issues are discussed), Christians and other religiously inclined individuals, and instead concentrate on our common enemy and focus on key points we agree on. 

I would like to propose the following key points of agreement for our "movement". This is not set in stone; it is merely a blueprint. But these are key points that we should all be in agreement on, more or less.  Of course, our political platform will be much more comprehensive, but I think these key points can and should form the basis for it.  If you agree, generally, with these points, you should not be bashing others that do, too - regardless of your differences on other issues.  
  1. Race is real, it is not a mere social construct.  The only solution to the Jewish Problem is a racial solution - an understanding that the natural ordering of the universe is "racist", which has been subverted and turned up-side-down by the Jew for his benefit.
  2. The Jews are a hostile, subversive race of people who have always and will always undermine and eventually destroy their host nations. They are at war, if not militarily, then certainly politically, economically, culturally, demographically and spiritually with the non-Jewish world. The Jews must be viewed as the usurpers and destroyers of Western Christian civilization and white society specifically, and all decent, honorable civilizations generally. The Jew seeks to destroy the natural ordering of the world for his tribe's advantage, preying on confusion, loss of identity, and disunity.  
  3. Usury and private central banking are totally illegitimate, criminal forms of economic organization, which must be eliminated permanently from society.  
  4. The lies concerning Adolf Hitler, National Socialist Germany, the fake Jewish "Holocaust" and WWII generally are the Big Lies of the 20th century, just as the lies concerning 9/11 and the fraudulent "Global War on Terror" are the Big Lies of the 21st century.  These monstrous lies form the basis of our peoples' understanding of the world - their entire political and historical paradigm are shaped by these events more so than anything else. We must reject and effectively combat these Jewish lies and distortions of our history.
  5. The use of the mass media, "entertainment" industry, and educational establishment to perpetuate false history and psychological violence (PSYOPS) against our people must be recognized,  destroyed, and eventually reversed.  
I'd also like to mention that, in my view, National Socialism or Fascism are the only political ideologies that protect and advance the interests of the nation - politically, culturally, economically, and spiritually. We must reject Jewish international capitalism and Jewish international Marxism - they are merely two sides of the same Talmudic coin. These evil ideologies produce the same results, no matter where they are practiced - the Jew has all the money, power, and influence, while the host nation lays in ruins, totally devoid of it's identity, purpose, and soul.

Three broad demands I believe we should make:
  1. Immediate end to all foreign wars, occupations, and military outposts or bases, with American military policy being redirected towards controlling and policing the borders and coastlines, along with identifying and arresting all traitors, collaborators, and agents of the international Jewish criminal syndicate.  
  2. International declaration that Israel and a global network of Jewish criminals carried out 9/11 and blamed it on the Muslims to kick start the fraudulent "Global War on Terror". The state of Israel will be declared an illegitimate, rogue terrorist nation.  
  3. Immediate arrest of all top Wall Street CEOs, along with all top level officials in the U.S. Treasury Department, Federal Reserve, and IRS.  The practice of usury and private central banking will be abolished permanently.
There seems to be one issue that is particularly divisive, and that is Christianity and organized religion generally. We have Christian Identity, traditional Catholics, pagans or naturalists, anti-Christians, secularists, atheists, and people in between in this "movement". I say we all agree to disagree on this one issue. In my view, religion and spirituality are a private matter any ways, meaning I would never push my personal beliefs or views on you, and I wouldn't accept you pushing your views on me.

If you think Christian Identity is nonsense, good for you. If you're an atheist, great. If you are a traditional Catholic or cultural Christian, wonderful. I believe that the white Aryan or white European peoples are innately good-hearted, honest, hard-working, and creative people - exactly the message that Jesus Christ delivered, whether he was real or not. So even if you think Christianity is nonsense, let's at least be civil and respectful, make our points, engage in a dialogue, keep an open mind, and pursue the truth. There is simply no need to bash anyone of any particular religious or spiritual background that is on board with the key points above, or who may be open to them.

I'm going out on a limb here, but I think all the guys at Truth Militia, the Prothink network, and Renegade Broadcasting would be on board with these points. Also, websites such as Total Fascism, The End of Zion, and a variety of other sites and blogs may be as well.

I'd also venture to say that guys like Bill Finck, Charlie Giuliani, Dennis Fetcho, John Kaminski, and Jonathan Azaziah, and ladies such as Deanna Spingola and Dr. Carley, would be in agreement or at least sympathetic to these points and demands. At some point, hopefully in the near future, we will need to produce some sort of political manifesto that we can present on our radio shows and websites that explains what we all agree on and what we need to do to go forward - sorta like those guys in Germany did back in 1920 before coming to power - and stop all the infighting.

I'll be discussing the history and the origins of the European peoples and Western civilization generally with Bill Finck this coming Monday at 6pm PST.  I'd like to have a round table discussion following my interview with Bill Finck, and encourage Rich and Keith, Siegfried, Mike Delaney, Andre from Total Fascism and anyone else associated with Truth Militia to call in during the second hour so we can talk about how we are going to go forward and end all this childish bickering and infighting.