Wednesday, September 11, 2013

The Realist Report - Tom in CT: 9/11


On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by Tom in CT. Tom and I will be breaking down all aspects of 9/11, including the obvious Israeli and Jewish connections and the various PSYOP aspects of the event.

Please visit The Realist Report on TalkeShoe to download this and past episodes.

Below are relevant links for this program:





18 comments:

  1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04LCvk2KYfY 9 11 NO PLANES Theory - Undeniable Proof!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sorry about that. I do have Skype. We didn't use it because my settings were not correct and the audio coming from my computer were not feeding through my headphones. So, instead of messing around with setting at the last moment, we opted to use the cell. That sucks. Sorry.

      Tom

      Delete
    2. The mp3 file turned out OK. I just went to the gym and listened to the first hour or so, and the audio quality was fine.

      Tom Johnson, we will chat on Skype soon.

      Delete
  3. In Germany, dates are written the other way around, making 9/11 November 9th! Nov 9 1918, the tyrannical Weimar Republic is illegally proclaimed without referendum. Nov 9, 1938 a false flag Reichskristallnacht to gain attention to attack Germany. (Judea declares war on Germany 1933), Nov 9, 1989, Berlin Wall fell to unite the Soviet and US/UK/FR occupation zones and sell it as peace treaty.

    In Jewish belief the both temples' the first and the second were destroyed, on the 9 of Aav,(it is a day of mourn) it is the 11 month ( 9/11) in the Hebrew calendar , but actually it is a Babylonian months the international calendar of those days .

    The Swastika surrounded by the Jew Star in your picture is really a good depiction to show how int. Jewry encircled Aryanism from all sides.

    I was in the shower on 9/11 in Germany, and packed my stuff right away to flee to Switzerland. I thought all hell broke loose and Switzerland would be safer. I became critical of all this Illuminati thing etc in 2005, when a descendent of a Scottish King from Canada told me about it in a Yahoo chatroom.
    Markus

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good discussion in many ways, and so I hate to be a buzzkill, but the 'centerpiece', namely "No Planes @ WTC" (NP@WTC) theory, was again disappointing.

    Updating my thread, "Critical of JFetzer & JFriend's No Planes @ WTC campaign" (jump to the end for my reflections on today's podcast):

    http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?71312-Critical-of-JFetzer-amp-JFriend-s-No-Planes-WTC-campaign

    Beginning about 1:25:00 into this latest Vyzgoth podcast, he goes into a good rant about effective vs ineffective approaches to 911 Truth:

    http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/09/a-vyzygoth-moment-20130823.html

    Show description:
    While 9-11 truther groups busy themselves with internecine squabbles over exactly how the towers were brought down, while partisan political pukemeisters bang on the “other party” for the ills of the nation, while the Great American Herd blissfully surveil themselves, our government–The Mommy State–is extending its reach farther and faster into our lives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the feedback Pat, but I have no time for drama and gossiping, especially regarding ZCF and my views on Christianity. I have explained my position on the ZCF drama (the guy was an arrogant asshole, to put it bluntly), and I have done numerous shows about Christianity and do not hide my views on this subject. The Christian Identity interpretation of ancient history, the origins of the Aryan man, and of the Bible makes a lot of sense to me. What else can I say? I'm not expecting everyone to agree with me, and if you don't then so be it.

      9/11 was a major PSYOP, whether you want to accept that or not. There were no hijackings, no planes flew into the WTC towers, the Pentagon, or Shanksville, there probably were no real victims, actors with scripted testimony were used to sell the official narrative, and all of the videos/photos we've seen depicting what took place in NYC are likely fabricated in one way or another. That's just the truth man, I hate to break it to you. If you can't handle the truth, that's your problem. If you find my views so objectionable, then find someone else to listen to. There are plenty of other options.

      Delete
    2. Pat, I do have a question for you: have you ever sat down and watched September Clues?

      Delete
    3. "No Plane" a "Buzz-Kill"? Without writing a book here, we've been explaining in ugly detail how we "know" that a fake digital reality was sold as a real event. This is not "speculation". We arrived at that conclusion after a laborious analytical analysis. Unfortunately, not very many people have a technical background in complex analysis. This is a science. We have covered several of the methods that Intelligence Agencies use to separate facts from bullshit smoke-screens. It's interesting how some people simply reject or choose to overlook key evidence. This is due to "Cognitive Bias". Cognitive Bias is a problem that has to be guarded against in any analysis. This is also an issue that the developers of PSYOP are well aware of. They construct their deceptions to exploit the Cognitive Biases of the Target Audiences in such a way that the Target Audience will overlook or reject evidence that leads to places where they deceiver does not want you to go. Again, this is a well-established and mature methodology. It's called Information Warfare. Digital media literally has the ability to create a fake reality for people that buy into it. As you should know, this is what "Advertising" is all about. Well, guess what Sherlock....this tool has been Weaponized. We "KNOW" and can "PROVE" it. In fact, we already have. If you are so unable to look objectively at evidence and fact patters - perhaps you should stop listening to John Friend and go elsewhere. How about Alex Jones? Sound good? Over and out.

      Tom

      Delete
    4. I'm busy in the real world at the moment and plan to return & properly address John & Tom's posts above. FYI here's a direct link to my critique of this podcast:
      http://tinyurl.com/lprombm

      Meanwhile, there's been a conspicuous silence from the NP@WTC advocates to my question asked in response to John's July 24 podcast with Fetzer, namely:

      "Surely the NP@WTC advocates would graciously 'allow for the possibility', that the very "video evidence" you cite as "proof positive of video fakery", could itself be video fakery? Produced and interjected into 'our movement' by the same Hollywood/CIA-Dept-Of-Fake-Osama-Videos™ cabal which has a bottomlessly-funded vested interest in sowing dissent/infighting into our movement rendering us ineffective in "moving anywhere", and in dissuading J6P-911-True-Believers OUT of further investigating our main message?"

      Delete
    5. Pat have you sat down and watched September Clues? It is clear to me that all of the footage we have seen depicting what took place in NYC is fraudulent video - the live shots, the amateur videos, all of it.

      Our purpose here is not to alienate or dissuade others from investigating 9/11, and the fact that Israel and Jewish criminals were behind it from start to finish. If anything, exposing the video fakery and PSYOP aspects of 9/11 only further underscore the fact the Jews did 9/11.

      Delete
  5. Perhaps John could do a show specifically on the fact pattern analysis that led to the conclusion that video manipulation had to have been used in the perpetration of the 911 hoax. Evidently, there are people out there who could benefit from this. While explaining the detailed method - I would hope that calls would be accepted so that the audience could participate in any necessary debate about how and why a particular piece of evidence was treated. Most of us aren't trained investigators and as laypeople we rely on our intuition when trying to figure things out. I notice that the Sandy Hook hoax was a bit different. They didn't bother to create any fake video of an alleged attack. They simply created a narrative and pushed it on us. That's the power of media for you. It looks like there are a lot of people who look to media broadcasts as coming from "God" or maybe from "Big Daddy". They've beed conditioned to allow a damn media talking head to tell them what to think about issues - what the "acceptable" limits to any debate is....even what's "cool". You know, come to think of it - they probably deserve this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I [Yeshua] know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich) and the blasphemy by those [imposters] who say they are Jews [Judahites] and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

    Really enjoyed the show, it was very interesting.I have a question for Tom.How do you think they disappeared the towers? I think it was nuclear,could be wrong though. Thanks and God bless!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Revelation 2:9

      I can tell you how I think they did it. But, it would be more constructive to show you "how" to approach that question. Our analysis first identified "why" the 911 event happened. They we identified "how" it was done. As a result of understanding how it was done - we were led to "who" did it. It would be most beneficial to explain to you how we performed the analysis - so that you could critique it yourself.

      To answer your question a bit more directly, we believe we know how they did it. And we have a very high "confidence level" of belief in the validity of our conclusions.

      The analogy here is a Jury Verdict in a Criminal Trial. The Jury must be convinced "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt" as to the guilt of the accused. We have met that criteria.

      Tom

      Delete
    2. Tom,thanks for your reply.I hope you and John can discuss how they did it in your next show you do with him.I sure would like to hear what you have to say on this subject.I have been looking into 9-11 since 2003 and this is the one question I am not sure of.
      Thanks.

      Delete
  8. It’s clear that there is a lot of confusion surrounding the 911 event. Part of the confusion is due to intentional disinformation spread by agents of the perps. Part is due to the lack of reasoning and logic skills among the Target Audience.

    In the above show, we mentioned that we’ve used several advanced investigation techniques that were developed to extend the brains ability to process complex reasoning tasks.

    Among those are the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses. Others include Argument Mapping. Argument mapping is, literally, making a picture of reasoning. More precisely, it is the graphical display of the structure of reasoning and argumentation. Typically, argument maps are box-and-arrow diagrams, a bit like flowcharts. Argument Maps are constructed using the rules of logic. If there is “speculation” – it is explicitly identified as such.

    This approach provides an Audit Trail. It breaks down prose arguments and visualizes arguments so that everyone can see exactly how conclusions were arrived upon. It shows strengths and weaknesses of argument and it drastically reduces cognitive bias.

    I warmly invite any of the “doubters” out there to a public debate on the “Planes” issue….which is really the “Media” issue as it pertains to 911. To avoid audience confusion – this audience must be viewing a real-time Argument Map online as we construct it. There are resources available that will enable this. I would show the audience exactly how we know that the media was central to what amounts to a hoax.

    If John would allow this – I would gladly go up against anyone.

    Tom

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.