Hypocritical Jewish identity politics, anti-Iranian hysteria, the futility of "peace talks" & Jewish ownership of the media revealed
One of the most noteworthy characteristics of the organized Jewish community is its outrageous double standards and hypocrisy, particularly as it relates to identity politics. The vast majority of Jews strongly identify as Jews, work in the interests of the organized Jewish community and the Jewish state of Israel, network with other Jews to advance economically, politically, and socially, and concern themselves with the well-being and future prosperity of their people. Jews are Jews, first and foremost - their Jewish identity takes precedence over all other identities. I cannot fault them for that - in fact, it's quite natural and healthy.
Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements.
This double standard in the Jewish community was on full display this week. The Jewish Daily Forward, a prominent, well-known Jewish publication, ran a number of articles demonstrating this hypocrisy which I would like to highlight. In an article entitled, Why Intermarriage Poses Threat to Jewish Life - But Gay Marriage Doesn't, the writer argues:
A Jewish same-sex family can provide a boon for the Jewish community, while an interfaith couple presents a threat, or at least a challenge.The Jewish Daily Forward also ran an article this week entitled, Jewish Day Schools? Our Future as a People Depends on Them. The second sentence in the article explains everything:
As technology has enabled same-sex couples to bring children into the world, and as adoption becomes so thoroughly accepted, any Jewish couple with children is a low-hanging fruit for synagogue staff concerned about Jewish vitality, community involvement and membership numbers. If the same-sex marriage debate represents the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community adopting at least some middle-class suburban domestic values, and if American synagogues depend on middle-class suburban families with children for their membership, gay and lesbian couples and American synagogues seem like a match made in heaven.
But that is not the case for an intermarried couple. [...]
... the majority of intermarried couples do not raise their children as Jews and, even among those who do, their levels of Jewish identity and practice are lower than in-married couples. If synagogues and Jewish communities want to attract intermarried families, they have an uphill climb that will depend on a huge investment in outreach work. Even with that effort, the odds of an intermarried family’s grandchildren having a strong Jewish identity remain low.
It’s pretty difficult for younger, liberal American Jews to find much moral opposition to either same-sex marriage or intermarriage, but there is every reason to think that American Jewry as a whole — at least non-Orthodox American Jewry — will face a more serious challenge from intermarriage than from same-sex marriage, and might even have much to gain from embracing the latter.
Nothing less than the future of the Jewish people rests on the existence of vibrant Jewish day schools. If we are to have a future as a people — we need day school!Imagine for a moment a White journalist writing an article entitled Why Intermarriage Poses a Threat to White People or White Day Schools? Our Future as a People Depends on Them. Could you imagine the outrage, the scorn, and the vitriolic attacks that would be leveled against any White person writing or saying this in the mainstream? They'd be called a "racist" and a "White supremacist" and would be told that this type of thinking is outdated, illegitimate, and wrong. "This line of thought is what led to the Holocaust," we'd be told.
The very same week The Jewish Daily Forward ran the two articles mentioned above, they also ran this article sourced from Reuters. The headline and photo caption says it all:
|Obama's America? A new study sheds a sobering light on the state of social relationship in the U.S.|
As if the anti-Iranian hysteria and ridiculous propaganda leveled against the Islamic Republic couldn't get any more absurd, we have the following "reports" issued earlier this week. The first comes from Israel National News:
Iran may be preparing to use a heavy water reactor for producing weapons-grade plutonium, according to U.S. and European officials cited in the Wall Street Journal. This is an alternative method for reaching a nuclear bomb, which joins its existing uranium enrichment project.The second comes from The Times of Israel:
A heavy-water reactor is an easier target to hit than the underground facilities that house Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities, the newspaper notes. [...]
Western intelligence analysts say a new missile launching facility in Iran will likely be used for testing ballistic missiles, not for launching satellites into space as claimed by the Iranians. [...]Does this childish propaganda sound familiar to you? It should - the Jewish media and high level propagandists controlling the United States government used virtually the same exact tactics against Iraq in order to propagandize the world into believing Saddam Hussein posed an "imminent threat" to the West and that he was pursuing "WMDs" that very easily could "fall into the hands of terrorists" and be used against the West.
If you believe this ridiculous propaganda, I've got some of Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons to sell you, as Mike Rivero likes to say.
Those of you following the mainstream mass media, which we know is totally controlled by Jewish financial and political interests (more on that below), you will have no doubt by now heard that Secretary of State John Kerry is in the process of organizing "peace talks" between the Israelis and Palestinians. Of course, anyone who has even a basic understanding of the history of "Israel" and the manner in which the Jewish state was founded knows full well that "Israel" is not interested in peace with anyone - "Israel" is a terrorist state, a "central organization" for Jewry's "international world swindle," and "a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks," as Adolf Hitler correctly pointed out in Mein Kampf. (See here for more)
The United States, the European Union, and other major international players, including Russia and the United Nations, facilitate "peace talks" between the Israelis and Palestinians from time to time, which essentially amounts to high level diplomats and insiders traveling the world posing for photo shoots and releasing statements to the press. Nothing is ever resolved, no major issues are discussed, no major concessions are made - the entire thing is a dog-and-pony show for the public.
The Israelis have never been and will never be interested in genuine peace talks (and sometimes I wonder whether the Palestinian leadership is either). Two recent news items demonstrate this fact. The first comes from Tablet Magazine and all you need to do is read the headline:
At the very same time the Israeli government is engaged in "peace talks," they are approving even more settlement development in territory that is supposed to be reserved for a future independent Palestinian state. This shouldn't really surprise anyone, I just wanted to point it out to underscore the futility of the "peace talks."
Then we have this headline from The Times of Israel:
Most Israeli Jews would oppose a peace agreement with the Palestinians if it included a full West Bank pullout with land swaps to let Israel retain major settlement population centers, according to a new poll that appears to contradict the conclusions of other recent surveys.
The poll, released Tuesday by the Israel Democracy Institute and Tel Aviv University, found that 63 percent of Jews in Israel oppose a withdrawal to the 1967 lines with land swaps as part of any peace arrangement with the Palestinian Authority, even if it meant Israel would hold onto the Etzion Bloc, directly south of Jerusalem; Ma’aleh Adumim, east of the capital; and Ariel in the central West Bank about 34 kilometers (21 miles) east of Tel Aviv. [...]
According to the survey, 50% of Jewish Israelis also oppose the transfer of Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem to Palestinian Authority control with a special arrangement for Jewish holy sites. [...]
Seventy-seven percent of Israeli Jews would oppose any agreement that recognized in principle a right of return for Palestinian refugees and their descendants, with a small number being allowed to come and live in Israel, and compensation for the rest.
Sixty-two percent of Israeli Jews and 72% of Israeli Arabs agree that a national referendum is needed to approve any peace settlement that involves evacuating settlements and withdrawal from the West Bank. Notably, 49% of Israeli Jews said that the national referendum should not include the country’s Arab citizens, as opposed to 46% who think all Israelis should have a say. In the Arab sector, the response to the question was 4% and 88%, respectively.
Some "peace talks", eh? What a joke this all is.
As I stated above, Jewish ownership of the mass media in America is really no secret anymore. It's quite apparent to anyone paying attention and who is truly interested in discovering this fact. Joel Stein, a Jewish writer formerly with the Los Angeles Times, once bragged about Jewish ownership of Hollywood (and the news media, Wall Street, and United States federal government) in a widely cited article entitled How Jewish is Hollywood? Last summer, The Times of Israel ran a piece written by a Jewish blogger entitled Jews DO control the media.
It doesn't get clearer than that, does it? If you're still unsure about the fact Jewish individuals largely own and control the mainstream mass media and entertainment industry in the United States, just click here and have a look for yourself.
The Jewish Daily Forward, in an editorial published a few days ago, again admitted and boasted about the fact Jews own the media, albeit in a round-about, Orwellian manner. The Forward's editorial revolved around Eugene I. Meyer, the Jewish man who purchased the Washington Post back in 1933. The Post was recently sold to Jeff Bezos, the Jewish founder and CEO of Amazon.com. Let's take a look at the editorial and see what we learn:
The inappropriate question tweeted late last year by media mogul Rupert Murdoch raised the touchy subject once again. “Why is Jewish owned press so consistently anti-Israel in every crisis?” were his exact words.Here we have yet another confirmation from a Jewish source that yes, Jews do indeed largely own and control the mass media in the United States. Considering the mass media is used as a weapon to systematically assault and exploit human psychology, the fact that organized Jewish political and financial interests actually own and control this weapon is an important fact to keep in mind indeed.
The context was the escalating Israeli bombardment of Gaza after a long series of rocket attacks by Hamas, and Murdoch’s scarcely-disguised critique of those in the media who were not, in his view, sufficiently supportive of Israel’s controversial actions. The response to Murdoch’s tweet was so swift and sharp that he apologized “unreservedly” within hours.
As well he should have. The canard that Jews own and control American media is, as Christopher Zara wrote, “a myth that is almost as old as the American media itself.” But, if we are honest, it is a myth with some basis in fact. Many of the great leaders of American journalism were born into Jewish families, and their ascendancy represented a time of unique power and prestige for newspapers and the civic values they championed. The Graham family’s decision to sell the Washington Post marks one more step away from that historical legacy — a legacy that the Jewish community ought to take pride in, rather than renounce or ignore.
Consider: Joseph Pulitzer — “Joey the Jew” was one of his nicknames — was a Hungarian-American Jew who turned the St. Louis Post-Dispatch into a renowned newspaper, published the New York World, endowed the Columbia School of Journalism and was memorialized in the Pulitzer Prizes, bestowed annually to the best in the business.
The Sulzberger family, which still runs and largely controls the New York Times, descends from prominent Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews dating back to America’s Revolutionary War period. Another Jewish family, the Annenbergs, published The Philadelphia Inquirer for decades.
And then there was Eugene Isaac Meyer, who came from a distinguished French Jewish family filled with rabbis and civic leaders that gradually became more assimilated in America, a recurring pattern. [...]
Jews, however they are defined, have developed and run some of the most influential journalism enterprises in America, leaving a legacy of creativity, professional commitment, intellectual pursuit and civic leadership. [...]