Monday, June 3, 2013

The Realist Report - Split with ANA & Rodney Martin

On this edition of The Realist Report, I will be announcing my split with Rodney Martin, who I originally co-founded the American Nationalist Association with. I will also be discussing some recent news items and explaining the concepts of false flag events, PYSOPS, and media fakery, and the importance of properly understand these terms. Past and current events, particularly the alleged Jewish "Holocaust" and 9/11, and how they can be classified as both false flags and PSYOPS involving extensive media fakery, will be analyzed as well. Finally, the fact that fake events using scripted "actors" are being presented to the public as real via the mainstream media will be discussed. Can we take at face value anything that is presented in the media? Calls will be taken during the second hour. Tune in for what will surely be a controversial, yet informative program!

You can download the entire program here, or subscribe to the American Nationalist Network via iTunes here. Thanks for listening everyone!


  1. Hi John

    People are such idiots. All they want is to quarrel. I dig you because of your positive, constructive attitude. Most of the rest are like a bunch of moody high school chicks.

  2. Jeez guys, I'm sorry I need to practice doing solo shows, LOL! I said, "Uhhhh" or "Ummm" way too much. I thought I was a better public speaker! I like interviewing someone much better than going solo.

    1. Your show's very informative. Nice to hear quotes from those various articles and essays.

      I have a hard time swallowing that there were no planes on 9/11, however. What about all those people on the ground? I also believe we landed on the Moon, although at the same time I think it's very possible that fake film was made - maybe "just in case" something went wrong.

      Anyway, it's not *that* important. Details. Main thing is we're ruled by corrupt lying crooks and we need to replace them with something better.

      Interesting with the reference to Forrest Gump and the possibilities of today's technology. Big point. We might indeed see *pure fiction* on our TVs and in our newspapers. But again: What about all those people near WTC on 9/11? What about the people in Woolwich? Some questions are hard to answer.

      Have a good holiday. :)

    2. Gasse-Geir,

      Re Woolwich: Take a look at the scene again. What is that bus doing there? What is that big white truck with no license plate doing there? Staging?

      "All those people" near WTC on 9/11? Who specifically?

      We all need to understand the methods used - or we won't be able to recognize them when they are used.

      Please read Field Manual (FM) 3-05.30 is the keystone publication for Psychological Operations (PSYOP) principles. Here:

      “Diminished rReality” software can delete an object from live, full-motion video.

      ....and they can insert an object into a live, full motion real time.

      ....but too many people would have to have been involved....right?

      Can you trust what you see?

      Keep in mind that military state-of-the-art image manipulation software is much more advanced than what you're seeing used in movies.

      What do you think the Israeli military has? What do you think the Mossad has?

      "By Deception Thou Shalt Do War".

    3. "Falsus in Uno - Falsus in Omnibus" is a Roman legal principle indicating that a witness who willfully falsifies one matter is not credible on any matter.

      We already KNOW and can PROVE that the jewish media "witness" has willfully falsified certain specific matters.

      This means that their reporting is not credible.

      There is already proof of their intentional deception.

      In Plato's Cave, information about the "world" comes to the cave-dwellers from a single source. What they "know" is fed to them by a single source.

      We reside in a version of Plato's Cave. Most of the information we get about the outside world comes to us from a single source. It comes through the jewish corporate media filter.

      They control the narrative. Since they control the narrative, why wouldn't they just "create" the narrative?

      There is plenty of evidence that they are creating the narrative.

      It does not make much sense of the inhabitants of Plato's Cave to debate the various finer points of lies fed to them from a single hostile source. The cave dwellers need to gain access to other sources of information about the outside world.

      That is what we need to do.

    4. Seriously guys, you can't understand you're being lied to? Really? Is it because you don't want to believe you're being lied to? Are you afraid of having your safety blankey (blanket) snatch away from you? Are you still sucking your thumb? Geezzzzzzzzzzzz..............

    5. Planes? Go back to the day of 9/11 and ask yourself how you know that planes hit the towers...or that there were planes at all. Where did you get that info? It came from the media. You saw some video. Where did that video come from? You also saw video of people saying they saw planes and many disagreeing about what type of planes they saw. Who were those people? Were they actors previously recorded? Could they have been actors? Does (did) the technology exist at the time to fake them? The technology did exist. If this issue went to a Court of Law, the "video" you saw would been judged as not admissible as evidence because its origin and chain of custody can't be verified. That means the jury would have to decide the case based on facts. Not faked video. A digital video is not a "fact". It is a video. Hope that helps.

    6. That big white truck with no front number, where's the best place to hide something?

      In plain sight.

      Most people are just plain stupid. Maybe they deserve being manipulated like this.

  3. This video will show you just how "honest" your news media is:

    CNN jew Charles Jaco was the CNN reporter doing PSYOP work against the US population while "covering" the 1990 US attack on Iraq.

    Watch it carefully. Note the slAnderson Pooper-like "serious" facial expression he uses.

    The first part of this video shows the stage set he was on, and he was clowning around with fellow CNN staff jews. Make sure you notice the size of the hook nose on the kid whose hair he pulls. The Saudi Arabian "hotel" in the background were fake palm trees and a blue wall in a studio.

    The second part of this video was a live CNN satellite feed recorded onto VHS showing the final cut. Charles Jaco was wearing a different jacket, but he had the same act. The acting was terrible as Charles Jaco wore a gas mask, and his fellow correspondent Carl Rochelle wore a helmet. The sirens and missile sound effects are part of the stage set. The camera never pans out or shows the sky.

    Yes, Charles Jaco is a "Dual Citizen". Google his name and read the results.

    Last we heard, Charles Jaco currently works as a reporter for FOX 2 NOW in Saint Louis, Missouri.

    Now, after having viewed that - turn off your TV.

    1. I see nobody refuted the above account of how charles jaco lied to us. andre? earth to andre? Hello?

    2. I'm not "that" Andre. I'm a different Andre. This Andre thinks that the damn jews have hijacked pretty much all of the world's broadcast infrastructure. And they are using it to transmit controlled narratives to target audiences. It makes no sense to think that avoiding the basic topic of fake, manipulated news will help us in this fight. We most definitely need to be discussing this problem. It's really a basic human rights issue and should be framed that way.

  4. Andre Anglin seems to have been defending the jewish media complex and tried to redirect discussion away from the source of fake news...and onto the content. That useless strategy is like hacking away at fast growing branches and ignoring the root problem. Why would he make such strong statements in defense of the London news broadcasts? He even seemed to support the official narrative of Sandy Hook. “(he) doth protest too much, methinks."

    1. I agree that, for some bizarre reason, Anglin seemed to be overly energized with attacking John's suspicions about the authenticity of the Woolwich attack or Sandy Hook being staged. I mean, why would something like that be worth getting so lathered up over? Why was it so important to Anglin to keep harping on over and over? History proves that these jews are false flag pulling maniacs, and all of their false flags don't necessary have to be gigantic ones, like 911 or the USS Liberty or Oklahoma City.

      This enemy is capable of ANYTHING and they are the most ruthless and evil tribe of monsters on this planet. To my way of thinking, this fact alone rules out anyone ever giving them a pass or even the benefit of the doubt on anything.

  5. They are using concocted "narratives", distortions and outright lies to control you. Failing that, they will have to use physical force.

    PSYOP doctrine is to influence perceptions and/or behavior. This is a fact.

    jews have hijacked our media. This is a fact.

    People better wake up to this real quick.

  6. In his great work, the Republic, Plato wrote the Allegory of the Cave to that "our nature in its education and want of education". In other words, we are a product of what we know…and what we don’t know. Where do you obtain your information about the outside world? Who controls that narrative? You get most of your information about the outside world passed to you through the filters of the corporate media. Who owns and controls the corporate media?

    Let’s say you and a few other were born in a cave - or a concrete basement with one door that always remains shut. Within that basement is a high wall not reaching the ceiling. You are told never to climb over that wall. Coming from behind that high wall - every morning at 6 AM a light would come on and every evening at 8 PM the light would go out. You’re told that light comes from the “sun”. You get all of your information about the world through sliding port in the door. We’ll call that information “news”. So each day you perform slave-labor tasks during “daylight hours” and receive “news and entertainment” through that sliding port in the door. One day, one curious and adventurous soul among you decides to investigate what’s behind that wall. So he climbs over it and discovers that the “sunlight” appears to be coming from a light bulb perched atop a metal stand that is plugged into the wall with what appears to be a length of wire. Further investigation reveals a passageway with stairs leading upward. So he investigates further and climbs the stairs of the passageway. Eventually he emerges above ground in a meadow in broad daylight. Overhead he sees a giant fireball in the sky lighting up everything. He sees green grass, birds, and animals. There appears to be a concentration of dwelling in the distance. Hours pass and it becomes dark. Still later, the light in the sky re-appears as night turns into day. Amazed at what he has discovered, he returns back down the passageway leading to the basement where his friends are and he tells them that what hey think is the sun is just a light bulb and that there is an entire world above. Sadly his friends don’t believe him because they have been told what to believe through information passed to them through that sliding port in the door.

  7. Watch this video:

    This video is entitled “Gadaffi Killed”. It shows what you’re supposed to believe is jumpy “cell phone video” that confirms that Gafaffi is dead.

    Who broadcast that video to you?

    What was the source?

    What conclusions would a viewer be led toward – if they believed that video to depict a real event?

    What if that video is NOT a depiction of a real event? What if it was created using state-of-the-art video modeling and editing software?

    Is Gadaffi still alive? What if he is? What has the Libyan population been led to believe?

    At the risk of being blunt here – I am going to say this: Simple logic indicates that you CANNOT take that video as being a depiction of a real event. It falls under the category of “Propaganda”. Propaganda is designed to “influence and persuade”.

    I think – as of the date that video was presented to you…that Gadaffi was still alive somewhere. But, the showing of that video probably convinced most Libyans that he was dead….and that further “resistance” against NATO aggression was pointless.

    See how that works?

    If not, face it…you’re stupid.


    There is a Roman legal principle indicating that a witness who willfully falsifies one matter is not credible on any matter. The underlying motive for attorneys to impeach opposing witnesses in court: the principle discredits the rest of their testimony if it is without corroboration.

    Falsus in Uno - Falsus in Omnibus is a legal maxim which means false in one thing, false in everything.

  8. But didn't andre tell us to believe what they say unless we have proof that it isn't true?

    Isn't that the opposite of the Roman Law principle "Falsus in Uno- Falsus in Ominbus"?

    Sure, we know the jewish media lies to us and has lied to us. But andre wants us to keep giving them the benefit of the doubt.


  9. I disagree with Andre, the truth is more important that promoting some propaganda point. The media fakery issue is hugely important. Interesting aside, I was asking a relative who lives in Maine about the Boston Baked Beans Bombing Hoax issue and they said the local media there keeps reporting about a girl who grew up in a town there who lost a leg at Boston. But they have never showed her, only second hand accounts of people talking about her. I do not remember seeing ONE photo of an actual victim, a real limb (not the fake ones) or real blood or bodies, do you? It very well could be that a real bomb went off and injured and killed people, but this would have to been on top of the drills and fake event. Keep up the good work John on your new network.

    1. yeah - and in CT they are passing laws so you can't search public records pertaining to the non-existent murders at the Sandy Hook Movie.

      The boston thing stinks as well. An independent investigative reporter needs to go interview the alleged "victims". I bet if you tried to do that you'd get arrested for "harassment" or something.

      In CT they just arrested a kid for calling up the State Medical Examiner and asking questions. No threats made. But they arrested him.

    2. @ AnonymousJune 5, 2013 at 7:30 AM,

      No so fast... listen to the call that activist made to the CT med examiner's office. His argument is factually incorrect.

      This alleged arrest doesn't seem right. It looks like something possibly cooked up to discredit people who are questioning the event.

  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

  11. The Conspiracy Shell Game

    Consider the street shill's shell game, an offshoot of 3-card monte. It's best not to participate, and more importantly, not to speculate -- you do not definitely know the facts! (Seriously ask yourself: "Are the facts strong enough to bet my life on them?*")

    Learn the kikejew and jewthinker methods of operation -- the ongoing 'shell game' they play with the facts. Whether an event is a real psyop (false flag or hoax, etc.) or 'random', note how they obfuscate as much as possible in either case -- leaving YOU to chose the wrong 'shell', or worse, to continue wasting time arguing about it!

    For decades now, no matter whether random or psyop, the controlled media and government etc. spins nearly everything involved.

    RESIST !!!

    *There is one conspiracy aspect I would bet my life on (in a fair rendering) -- That is the obvious controlled demolition of WTC-7, which is not just the smoking gun of 9/11, but also the weakest link in their long chain of takeover schemes.

    1. You're right. Their "information operations" are a shell game. The common denominator in any shell game ... is that one person controls the presentation of the various shells to you. That person is tricking you.

      Like you say...we need to simply reject the entire shell game.

      Don't get sucked into it.

    2. The 3-Card Monty analogy is a good one.

      In the above video, the dealer uses 2 black kings and one red ace. Initially, following the red ace is easy. But as soon as you enter the game, the cards are handled differently than they were before you entered the game - and you can't win.

      The moral of the story is: "don't play".

      Media PSYOP does employ that kind of deception. Maybe they broadcast 2 real stories and 1 fake story. Can you spot the fake story? To suck you in they might actually do a story on the media getting caught broadcasting a fake story.

      Again, good analogy.


    John, can you get this guy on your show?

  13. The audio of the phone call to the ct medical examiners office that got Jonathan Reich of Flushing, NY arrested is here:

    Let's see if John can get him on his show.

    1. Yeah that would be good. John can grill the guy and see if he's a jew. I'd like to know what he does for a living. I doubt the guys legit.

  14. Keep in mind that the story about the arrest of Jonathan Reich of Flushing, NY might have been planted to discredit real questions about the Sandy Hook Movie.

    Don't take Jonathan Reich at face value. He might be a jew plant. His has a jew name..."Jonathan".

    This could also be part of the overall PSYOP.

    You just can't trust what they tell you.

    1. I don't trust anything at all reported by the jewish media. That story about "Jon" Reich seems a bit odd. Hey wait a minute. "Jon" Reich...."Jon" Stewart...they both have the same first name. But "Jon" Stewart's real name is Jon Leibowitz and he's a "Dual Citizen" and his brother is is Larry Leibowitz..the president of the jew york stock exchange scam.

      I smell a rat here. Is this Jon Reich person a straw-man? What happens when we find out he's also a "Dual Citizen"? What happens when we find out he served in the IDF? What happens then? Should we kick him in the balls?

  15. The Plato's Cave analogy is powerful and it does account for what we've been seeing.

    Above, someone said we need to be seeking other sources of information about the outside world. This is true, and accounts for the growth of the alternative media.

    Much of the alternative media is obviously under the direct control of the primary, overt jewish media. Alex jone$tein, comes to mind - but he's just the tip of the iceberg.

    Let's use the Allegory of the Cave by Plato as our guide to understanding our predicament. The fact that Plato wrote about this means that this exact problem had been contemplated many centuries ago.

    How do we free ourselves from Plato's Cave? Rejecting the jewsnews media is the first step. How do we know what information we can trust? How do we know if information presented to us is true?

    Any ideas?

  16. What PYSOPS????
    Jews run your banks,media,education,government, promote massive non white immigration, race mixing, feminism, homo agenda, and boldly state they want to eliminated the white race.
    The over whelming majority of whites support and forward this jew world order.
    Is it "PYSOPS" or dumb whites ??????

    1. northpal,

      Imagine yourself in the following situation: You sign up for a psychology experiment, and on a specified date you and seven others whom you think are also participants arrive and are seated at a table in a small room.

      You don't know it at the time, but the others are actually associates of the experimenter, and their behavior has been carefully scripted. You're the only real participant.

      The experimenter arrives and tells you that the study in which you are about to participate concerns people's visual judgments. She places two cards before you. The card on the left contains one vertical line. The card on the right displays three lines of varying length.

      The experimenter asks all of you, one at a time, to choose which of the three lines on the right card matches the length of the line on the left card. The task is repeated several times with different cards.

      On some occasions the other "participants" unanimously choose the wrong line. It is clear to you that they are wrong, but they have all given the same answer.

      What would you do? Would you go along with the majority opinion, or would you "stick to your guns" and trust your own eyes?

      If you were involved in this experiment how do you think you would behave? Would you conform to the majority’s viewpoint?


      The above is a description of an Asch conformity experiment.

      Look that up.

      The broadcast media is a giant Asch Experiment. It's a PSYOP.

    2. Is it just "Dumb Whites" - or are they victims of Manufactured Consent?

      Watch Manufacturing Consent here:

  17. Good to see you cut the ties with many of these internet warriors who are more interested in personalities and factional drama then actually exposing historical truths. I think you are right about these false flags/ drill/media supported hoaxes. I think your talents are more suited to writing and commenting on these issues rather than trying to organize a grassroots movement especially when I see the caliber of the individuals you are wasting your time with. Exposing the shadow matrix is job one in my opinion, the race issue will resolve itself once the agitators are flushed from the culture which is no easy task. It is natural for races to gravitate to their own kind in the end. I would just publish my findings based on my intellect and my own interpretation of history etc. (I think you have mostly spot on) and stop seeking approval from these characters who think they have all the answers. Beware of the personalities who throw personal attacks around as they are surely paid to keep people divided and fighting. My conclusion is that you have involved yourself with "talkers" rather than academics and they have little regard for protocol and order and seem much more interested in position and hierarchy than truth.

    1. Excellent commentary.

    2. @ upontheedge1,

      The only thing that maintains the present "social order" is the collective "belief" of the population.

      Their collective "belief" is what keeps the people who are in power.

      So, let's say we are successful in exposing these PSYOPs for what they are and the collective belief system that the population holds is called into question. What happens then?

      The current power structure will fell threatened - and they will act with force in their own defense.


      That means guns, bombs, bullets and even more PSYOP.

      Is this just the nature of man?

      Or, once we quarantine the jew - will we be able to progress from where we are now?

    3. The current social order is nothing more than the less oppressive version of controlling the the herd ie bread and circus's. They have learned that jackbooted tryanny has a short life span so they prefer slaves that actually enjoy debt slavery. The revolt will come when they are not able to freely access Cokes and Doritos or if the soccer moms are denied passage to Walmart. The digital and physical mind control of the masses is extensive in America. I really believe that if we could corral these luciferian entities disguised as jews the rest of humanity would be much more likely to peacefully interact, That is why they have been run out of of every society. I believe they are generational psychopaths wired and armed with special knowledge sickly passed down. The rest of us are not capable of such widespread evil and service to self.

    4. @ upontheedge1June 6, 2013 at 7:19 PM

      ..."The revolt will come when they are not able to freely access Cokes and Doritos or if the soccer moms are denied passage to Walmart." ...

      Care to wargame that statement? I am in full agreement, but doubtful that the revolt will come because I think they will be able to keep those things in place.

      If that's true, then the only way out of this is probably to decapitate the beast through the apprehension of specific leaders and decision makers.

      This means target selection. And that means target identification.

      No doubt the reason why they prefer anonymity is because they don't want to be identified, selected, apprehended and brought to justice.

      "We" (the rest of us) are going to have to develop a powerful antibody to this nasty little virus.

  18. I don't know why EVERYBODY ignores the great work that Ace Baker has done; he never seems to get a mention.

    Surely we have to accept that the t.v footage of the destruction of WTC 1,2 and 7 is real. And that the dust clouds/columns is also real.

    Try to include this fine researcher in your discussions when you next discuss "media fakery and media psyops"

    "Psy-opera" make more sense to me than "September Clues"

    1. No - we do not have to accept that the TV footage of the destruction of WTC 1, 2, and 7 is real. The dust cloud footage could have been faked as well.

      We would have to accept that footage as being a true and accurate representation of a real event....only if the origin and chain of custody of that footage can be verified.

      Digital video is just a series of "1's" and "0's" residing in a computer. All of that can be created from scratch.

      That technology pre-existed 9/11.

      Sorry, you are not correct.

    2. I don't know why EVERYBODY thinks I'm a jew shill, shillin' fo' Ace Baker.

      Oy vey! Why do dey tink dat?

      I'm pretty sneaky and

    3. Hey Donald number 2 if you disagree with something that Ace Baker has done for 9/11 truth, spit it out, I would be very interested to know what it is.

      Hey Anonymous
      Why would you want to contradict what the MSM has offered as fact. Whether it is right or wrong we should use it. Doesn't it show the towers being demolished. There was not any other way the towers came down. If the MSM want to incriminate themselves I say let it be so.

    4. Re: "Ace Baker":

      Please see the above comment> WWSJune 4, 2013 at 9:26 PM

      As with 3-card Monte, it's best not to get sucked into the game. You cannot win.

      Please understand that once you are sucked into the game - You CANNOT win.

      A better strategy is to avoid getting sucked in and expose the underlying mechanics of the enemy.

      Arguing with the fake Wizard who appears as a giant head made from smoke and mirrors won't get us anywhere. We need to pull back the curtain and expose that short little hook-nosed cretin who's tricking you.

      As we all saw in The Wizard of OZ - the Scarecrow, Tinman, and the Cowardly Lion who sought a brain, a heart, and courage respectively, it's going to take a combination of Brains, Heart and Courage to defeat this enemy.

      We already KNOW the enemy employs media fakery. We even know the kinds of tactics and technology used. No need to waste time, energy and resources playing the enemy's game of 3-card Monte. That's what he wants you to do.

  19. Do you guys really think that the jews in power haven't pondered how they can be sure to stay in power?

    Do you really think they don't have a self-serving agenda?

    Anyone who doesn't see this is intelligence-challenged.

    I suppose people like that make good, obedient serfs.

  20. As people lose confidence in this artificial reality that's based on lies....things are going to get real interesting.

    I bet the jews opt to flip the chess board over and inflict WW3 on us.

    They will chose that option before ever voluntarily giving up their fake, unearned power.

  21. It's a bit shit what's happened to the ANA John but maybe things happen for a reason....? Who knows.
    Good luck finding a new broadcast platform and have a good holiday man!

    1. How can you have a viable American Nationalist Association when one of the founders isn't even smart enough to understand the strategy, tactics, and techniques of modern opinion shaping technology...and not only that, makes retarded statements in support of the enemy media apparatus?

      Rodney Martin's clueless close-mindedness regarding the London Beheading Movie plays directly into the hands of the enemy.

      The enemy not only controlled the narrative - but they also completely fooled one of their supposed opposition leaders.

      The ANA needs to die. And it needs to die now before it can siphon away and misdirect valuable resources from those who are seeking to be free from the jewish oppressor.

      John did the right thing.

  22. We have to keep our focus on the poisoners of our culture and society. It is true the Gentiles are imperfect in a big way, but that is our human nature. But read this great book:

    The Riddle Of The Jew's Success by F. Roderich-Stoltheim (pen name of Emil Theodor Fritsch) 1927 and you will learn WHO has for centuries been behind the perversion of culture, such as with economic transactions. Brilliant writing and so insightful. A real page turner even from 1927!

  23. I wanted to address the issue that came up about John having a mixed race daughter. John has been straightforward about this issue, and while I am opposed to race mixing, I have to say that I respect John for his honesty in this personal matter.

    I also want to say that I have a tremendous amount of respect for his desire to be a good father and to accept the responsibilities that go along with being a good father.

    Furthermore, when I hear the kind of cheap, petty, demeaning and derogatory garbage being spewed by the likes of John King during his phone call to the show, or whenever I've heard the Queen of Petty backstabbing, Carolyn Yeager spouting her nauseating venom and bile at John over his mixed race daughter, which John has admitted was the consequence of a youthful mistake on his part - but, today - John proves his value as a White man by accepting full responsibility for his own actions - I can't help but recognize that John Friend is a far more admirable White human than either King or the Queen of Gossip and Slime Shoveling, Carolyn Yeager.

    Contrast John Friend with J.B. Campbell, who I recently found out is married to an American Indian woman. Friend's message to his audiences is White pride, White survival. J.B. Campbell's message is White guilt over their victory over the American Indians.

    Which one of those two messages is pro-White and which one of those messages is pro-the-same-jewish white guilt agenda that we've all been subjected to for the last 60 years?

    The answer to that question will show you which of these two men deserve the highest credibility in our movement.

    1. JB Campbell most definitely does parrot the jewish narrative that tells us that White people should feel guilty about defending themselves from Indian tribes.

      Do you suppose that his viewpoint is influenced at all by the fact that he has an indian squaw yanking at his nutsack?

      Campbell supports the ENEMY narrative with respect to the Indian tribes.

      Sorry. I'm just not buying it.

      Who wrote those history books that Campbell reads from?

      Here's why I don't buy Campbell's "version" of "history":

      Have you noticed that the US invaded Iraq? Perhaps you noticed that the US Military was full of White guys who invaded Iraq. Does that mean that "White People" invaded Iraq?

      OR - does that mean that White guys in the military were following orders passed down from above? What if those orders came from jews who control the usury money system?

      Does that mean that jews invaded Iraq ------ or was it White guys who invaded Iraq?

      It was jews who invaded Iraq USING White guys to do it.

      And that's exactly what happened to the Indian tribes. I feel no guilt whatsoever regarding the Indian tribes who attacked my ancestors.


      I blame the jews for all of that.

    2. You should have put a name to this. Had I have written it I would have been proud to put a name to it and taken ownership of it.

      Obviously I agree with what you have written.

    3. Donald,

      The enemy has used the "fake guilt" meme repeatedly.

      Above, we saw how the jews used White people to do their dirty work against the Indian tribes. And later, blamed White people for it. Then, invoked a sense of "fake guilt" in the White population.

      Now, let's consider slavery. Who was it that operated the slave trade? Who was it that influenced and directed official British policy regarding slavery?

      I'll give you a hint: The center of the slave trade in the "new world" was Newport, RI. The slave auctions were closed on Saturday. Saturday is the jews sabbath.

      Negro slaves were used as cheap labor to support agriculture. Did "White people" set that policy? Who set that policy?

      Once the industrial revolution took place and mechanized agricultural equipment were invented, such as the Combine Harvester - slavery no longer made much sense from a financial point of view.

      Isn't it an interesting the combine was invented in the United States by Hiram Moore in 1834, and early versions were pulled by horse or mule teams. In 1835, Moore built a full-scale version and by 1839, over 50 acres of crops were harvested. By 1860, combine harvesters with a cutting width of several meters were used on American farms. Isn't it an interesting "coincidence" that slavery was on its way out just at the same time that the Combine Harvester made slavery obsolete?

      Now, what's the jewish narrative concerning slavery again? That it was "White people" who "enslaved the blacks". Right?


      White people were used as the fall guy...left holding the bag. White people were told they needed to "feel guilty" about what the jews did.

      Isn't that amusing?

      They used a similar strategy of "fake guilt" to prop up their fake holy hoax narrative as well.

      Laughing yet?

    4. Hey Anonymous
      Why would you want to contradict what the MSM has offered as fact. Whether it is right or wrong we should use it. Doesn't it show the towers being demolished. There was not any other way the towers came down. If the MSM want to incriminate themselves I say let it be so.

      First of all did you read this comment I posted yesterday?

      I believe the dust clouds were real and I believe the folks covered in dust were real. I mean real people caught up in a real controlled explosive demolition of WTC 1 and 2.

      Question: Was the footage that we see here!
      was it broadcast live on T.V?
      I suspect it probably was, which is why I believe it's real.

      Try to watch that vid, you have probably already seen most of it before and tell me if it was broadcast live?

    5. Donald,

      I watched the video you referenced.

      Video can be created several ways:

      1. It can be captured by a camera.
      2. It can be created entirely by software.
      3. It can be a combination of both of the above methods. This is called "video morphing". Morphing is a special effect in motion pictures and animations that changes (or morphs) one image into another through a seamless transition.

      I do not believe that the referenced video was a real event captured by a camera. I am saying this for a number of reasons that I can address later.

      You say that you "believe" that the dust clouds were real and that the folks covered in dust were real. How sure are you?

      I can tell you in certain terms that you cannot be sure.

      If you are "sure" - you are being misled.

      I think "someone" showed you what they wanted you to see. I also think that "someone" had/has the necessary computer technology to fake, morph and manipulate the necessary video and audio that you were exposed to.

      Please do some research on this subject. That will help.

      Again, at this time I am convinced - based on analytical facts finding - that video fakery and morphing were used to "sell" the 9/11 event to the public.

      You simply cannot put your faith in evidence if you can't establish its origin and chain of custody. Especially video evidence.

      Remember: Digital video is not the same as looking out the window at a real-life event.

      Most people simply have a very difficult time processing that.

    6. Donald,

      You simply cannot trust that any digital video presented to you was an unedited, unaltered, un-morphed camera capture of a real life event.

      Especially a highly politically charged high-stakes event.

      And especially if that digital video was fed to you by partied unknown.

      Please watch these videos:

      “Diminished rReality” software can delete an object from live, full-motion video.

      ....and they can insert an object into a live, full motion real time.

      ....but too many people would have to have been involved....right?

      Can you trust what you see?

      Those videos represent only a tiny fraction of what can be done with digital video. You mentioned dust clouds. Do you think that particle dynamics of dust clouds cannot be perfectly simulated and presented to you in digital video? I will tell you that they can be faked.

      Were they faked? Were portions of them faked? Did they morph portions of a real scene in with actors reciting scripted lines?

      I know that the broadcast news showed you what they wanted you to see. They wanted to tell you a story in a way that would be convincing to you.

      Since we already know that we cannot trust the content of that digital video and we can't base any conclusions on it - we have to look elsewhere for factual evidence.

      If you want to keep going back to believing that the dust clouds looked to real...that they must be real...and that you're convinced they were real...because they looked real......well....

      I am not fooled.

    7. I suppose the time of destruction of WTC 1and2 does accord with the same time it was reported by the MSM.

      Lots of people would have witnessed the towers falling and very likely looked at their watches to mentally record the time.

      It is also obvious that there would have been a tremendous amount of dust and debris in the air because very little of it could be seen where the towers once stood.

      So, whether the footage that we see on T.V is real or not it doesn't really make much of a difference.

      If it is fake (personally I don't think it is) the conditions on the ground at the time of demolition would be pretty much what we saw on our T.V.

      We should use what the MSM has provided because it suggests that the twin towers were demolished and incriminates the perpetrators.

    8. Donald,

      Do you think the method of demolition displayed to you in the MSM video was definitely factual - or could they have been hiding something?

      Here's what I know: They intentionally showed you some video that looked like buildings being demolished in a somewhat conventional fashion. Sequential floors being detonated, etc. Right?

      I don't think anyone really doubts a controlled demolition scenario. But is the type of controlled demolition that was shown to you the one that was used? And if it wasn't - what might they have been trying to hide?

      As you are no doubt aware, you could not get a building permit in NYC for a skyscraper without an approved demolition plan for that skyscraper that ensured minimal damage to surrounding infrastructure in the case that the building needed to be removed.

      Way back, this company patented a process employing an underground nuke to essentially create a hole in the ground into which a tall building would drop into ...and melt.

      Coincidentally, this is the same company that was on scene at "ground zero" on 9/11.

      There is plenty of evidence that there had been molten steel and concrete at ground zero. Steel melts at about 2600 degrees F and concrete melts at much, much higher temperatures. So what caused that heat that lasted for weeks and weeks?

      You seem like a pretty smart person and I'm not trying to belittle you. But you simply cannot base your opinion on enemy video.

      The four analytic errors that hinder detection of jewish deception are:

      • Poor anomaly detection: Analysts miss indicators of anomalies or discount their importance as being either irrelevant or inconsistent with other information. Evidence of extremely elevated temperatures in the sub-basement structures at ground zero on 9/11. Lack of blood at Boston, lack of blood in London, inconsistent stories from the jew-coot at Sandy Hook, etc.

      • Misattribution: Analysts attribute inconsistencies or anomalies to collection gaps or processing errors, rather than to deception.

      • Failure to link deception tactics to deception hypotheses: Analysts fail to recognise anomalies as possible indications of attempted deception. Does the jewish media lie to you “on purpose”. LOL

      • Inadequate support for deception hypotheses: Analysts fail to consider the likelihood of deception with respect to an adversary’s strategic goals. Could disarming you have been the reason for the Sandy Hook Movie Deception?


      Video analysis is a subject that I'm not going to delve into here. Suffice it to say that I am completely satisfied that the various video we were shown pertaining to 9/11 are unreliable and cannot be used as evidence or as a basis for any rational opinion.

    9. We both agree that the towers (all three of them) were demolished in a controlled explosive demolition. And neither planes slamming into them nor office fires was the reason why they came down.

      Ace Baker produced in my opinion a very good explanation and a very good video titled

      "The Great American "Psy-opera"

      You may have a different opinion on how the towers came down. I don't really know how they came down, but I do know that they did not come down due to a gravity fed collapse, and it is also my very strong belief that there no planes that crashed into WTC1 and WTC2.

      Ace Baker covers these two fundamental elements of 9/11 very well.

      If you are correct, and you say that there was a big explosion in the basement which created a hole for the tower to sink into, and then some how fuse into a super heated, super concentrated fusion of steel, iron and concrete. I would need to see some evidence of that or a real video of that for me to believe it.

      I am happy to accept the video provided because it proves to me that all three towers came down in a controlled demolition.


    Dust Clouds lots of them from lots of different locations. Fake? I don't think so. The folks reacting to them really are running away from them.

    These are 3 comments

    ezrapoundsghost 28 minutes ago

    If Americans every find out what the Zionist parasite has done to our nation, "Israel" will be mercilessly stamped out of existence under 10 million patriotic American bootheels. If we do not eliminate the Jewish state, the Western World is going down.

    jojo5056 17 hours ago

    and most Jews stayed away that day.

    Figure this one, GW Bush'it was only in office 8 months,He could have only allowed bombings.The main king pin is Bill Clinton--connect the Clean Break document 1996 and Jews needed another Pearl Harbour to put Jesus fear in all of us suckers :^(

    Americans must be whimps, if there is one brave person,scores of Israel firsters should be kidnapped and water boarded.Best easy scumbag--Larry Silverstink

    sonlover62 18 hours ago

    Truth can be suppressed, but in the end, it cannot be defeated. One day, it will be proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that this was not the result of 19 (many still alive) Arabs and two jets. Two jets, and three towers?? ... Simple math says, impossible.

    1. Donald,

      You're playing 3-card Monte.

      Stop playing.

      You can't win.

    2. Donald...

      ......."The folks reacting to them really are running away from them."...

      Donald, you are referring to digital video.

      Digital video is not the same as looking out the window.

      I know you know that.

      Digital video can be faked. The entire thing. People running around, people crying. People covered in dust.

      It can ALL BE FAKED in video.

      You are basing your argument on digital video that was fed to you by ........the enemy.

      You cannot do that. You're basing your argument on what it most likely a false premise. Are you willing to bet your life that the video you saw was not created in a computer?

      I wouldn't because I have a pretty good handle on what's possible. It's not a good idea to underestimate the capability of your enemy.

    3. Donald,

      Is this video "real"? Or was it created in whole or in computer software?

      Here is what I know: I know that the jewish media is presenting it as "evidence" that Gadaffi was "Killed".

      If you were a judge presiding over a trial - would you be prepared to accept that video into evidence?

      If so, why? Because it looked "real" to you?

      I would not accept that video into evidence....unless its authenticity could be confirmed. That involves establishing its origin and chain of custody.

      From a purely logical standpoint, that video cannot be relied upon in support of any fact or fact pattern.

      I hope you can understand why digital video cannot be relied upon. Especially when it is provided to you by a hostile source.

    4. Donald,

      Regarding using video as evidence, these questions need to be answered first:

      1. How was the image created? Did a camera create the image, or was it created in whole or in part by software?

      2. If captured by a camera, who captured the image and when?

      3. Who had access to the image between the time it was captured and the time it was introduced as evidence?

      4. Has the original image been altered in any way since it was captured?

      5. Who enhanced the image, when and why?

      6. What was done to enhance the image and is it repeatable?

      7. Has the enhanced image been altered in any way since it was first enhanced?

      How would you propose to authenticate that video?

      If you can't authenticate that video, why would you base your opinions on it?

      Video (and audio) creation and manipulation has been militarized and weaponized. The hostile media employs it routinely in their opinion shaping and deception efforts.

      As you research this issue, you'll come to understand what I'm saying.

  25. J.B. Campbell has obviously never read the outstanding book 'Scalp Dance' by Thomas Goodrich.

    Anyone who suffers from the jewish media induced white guilt disease over what our courageous White male ancestors did during the Indian Wars can read that book and I promise, it will forever cure your white guilt disease.

    1. Dr. William PierceJune 7, 2013 at 7:16 PM

      We need to have J.B. Campbell read that book.

      Here is Dr. Pierce describing that book:

      Scalp Dance: Indian Warfare on the High Plains, 1865-1879

  26. Control The NarrativeJune 7, 2013 at 12:13 PM

    We have to control the narrative.

    The theme is that the jews infest White nations and take them over through their usury money printing scam and hide behind a few non-jewish puppets and sell-outs.

    They hide among their host nation attempting to disguise themselves as citizens of that nation. This is the reason why they change their names, get nose-jobs, etc.

    They blame their crimes on the members of the society they infest and use inflict "false guilt" to swindle valuable property from those blamed for jewish crimes.

    We must end the jewish usury money printing scam and deprive them of their central source of power.

    jews are criminals...everyone else is a victim.

  27. William Cooper who had a significant radio program
    still extant and interesting though he is dead had an Asian wife and child.
    I wonder how they are doing.

  28. Hey john are you ok?

  29. Where can I hear the Carolyn Yaeger show where she is discussing john friend and rodney martin?

  30. Hey John. I am currently listening to this show on my laptop. I found out about you through Truth Militia. I found Truth Militia from Tom Metzger. I'm 19 and have been awake for about 3 years. I really love your work. God bless brother!



Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.