Thursday, May 30, 2013


Video found at Daryl Bradford Smith's excellent website


On Monday, June 3rd, I'll be discussing the concepts of false flag events, PYSOPS, and media fakery on The Realist Report. Why is it important to properly understand these terms and concepts? I will also analyze past and current events, particularly the alleged Jewish "Holocaust" and 9/11, and how they can be classified as both false flag events and PSYOPS involving extensive media fakery. Finally, the fact that fake events using scripted "actors" are being presented to the public as real via the mainstream media will be discussed. Can we take at face value anything that is presented in the media? Calls will be taken during the second hour. The program will begin at 4pm PST, two hours earlier than normal.  Tune in for what will surely be a controversial, yet informative program!  


  1. So, after viewing the above video - Are Rodney Martin, Andre, Scott Roberts, Mike Delaney all going to side with the jewish media and claim that nothing is wrong with the "official story"?

    So, are they going to claim that the jewish media is not engaging in Psychological Manipulation?

    Are they going to claim that the "Dual Citizen" controlled news media does not routinely uses underhanded, deceptive, and abusive tactics to exploit and manipulate us?

    Go ahead Rodney, Andre, Scott and Mikey...go ahead and keep defending the jewish media as a source.

    Those stooges have lost what ever credibility they had.

    Isn't if funny how they always "out" themselves? LOL

  2. ...But wait, I'm kinda confused now. They wouldn't lie to me, would they? I mean, they're on TV. Isn't that illegal or something? I mean, I don't believe it. They wouldn't lie to me. They couldn't. Andre said too many people would have to be in on it. That's kinda like 9/11. Maybe those A-rabs did it after all. I many people would have to be in on it - right? Isn't that right? Oh...I'm feeling kinda sick. I think I'm gonna puke. I know. I know what I'll do. I'll go watch Scott Roberts tell me that it was real and that I can believe what's on TV. Yeah, that's the ticket. I'm feeling better already.

    1. Comments by NO NAMES have NO CREDIBILITY...
      I am sure most of the inter-nut experts who have relied on Jews like Morris, have never been in a violent setting or even seen a dead body in a crime scene setting in real life. You idiots that declare everything fake, based on You Tube expert testimony not only do the work of the Jew, but also make yourselves look like fools but also make Nationalists look bad. Lee Rigby was the victim of violent negroid violence on whites, that is it. To say otherwise plays into the Jew agenda of covering up black on white violent crime and I have to question your motives, if not your sanity. None of your arguments will hold up to rational and logical review, discussion, and debate. All you are doing is screaming like Jews, "fake, fake, fake", and "that negroid didn't kill that white man", "that negroid didn't kill that white man". You cannot answer why the Jew would want to fake a black on white act on violence, when that works against their agenda. Jews actually jinn up white on black crime to enact their anti-white Hate Crime Laws. The UK did not need a hoax for internet censorship, the UK already has those laws on the books.

      So.....explain, what is the Jewish Agenda benefit "staging" a hoax black on white crime?
      The real Psyop is Jews (Morris) telling people a black on white crime didn't happen, and useful idiots believing it. When you all get mugged, stabbed, or your woman sexually assaulted by a negroid(s) to simply say shut up, it was all a hoax.

    2. Rodney I'll be covering this on my show Monday, feel free to call in.

    3. @ WV Foundations,

      Media propaganda is a weapon used by those who want to retain power. By definition, propaganda is the deliberate attempt to shape perception, attitudes and behavior of a Target Audience. You yourself have spoken often about the necessity of rejecting the "jewish buffet". It is ironic that you have failed to take your own advice. Here, you cherry-pick an obviously politically charged "media event" directly from the "jewish buffet" and not only do you "believe" it, you defend the source. The enemy is laughing at you. The "London Beheading Movie" appears to be Black Propaganda. BP purports to emanate from a source other than the true one. This type of propaganda is associated with covert psychological operations. You need to get some education on propaganda methods, PSYOP, Target Audience Analysis, and who operates the broadcast media. You do know who operates the media, don't you? WV, are you going to "deny" that media is used a a primary tool of deception and perception shaping? BTW, the jewish media correctly reported the outside air temperature today...does that mean they don't lie? LOL Yes, you're being laughed at. Both by us...and the enemy.

  3. OK guys, obvious Andre, Scott, and Rodney have a disagreement with me regarding this London "beheading" event, but we don't need to go around mocking them or anything like that.

  4. Is this a hoax too?

    Maybe your movement is a hoax too.

    Im out of here.

    1. This is the same argument Andre, Scott, and Rodney have been making. Pointing to an actual, verifiable crime committed by a Muslim or Black and then saying, "Jeez John, is this a hoax, too?!" This is a fallacious argument.

      I have said repeatedly that there is indeed a very real threat from Muslim and Black immigration into Europe (and America). Muslims and Blacks commit all sorts of outrageous violent crime against Whites - I post article about this on my Facebook page quite often in fact. But that doesn't mean the Woolwich event is real. The real crimes committed by Muslims and Blacks against Whites are covered up, downplayed, or largely ignored by the mainstream media. The alleged "beheading" in London was not - it was promoted all over the mainstream British and American news outlets. Shouldn't that be a red flag for you? Plus, the entire official story is ludicrous.

    2. The logical fallacy you and others have been using to criticize my take on the Woolwich "beheading" is called a hasty generalization.

  5. Thanks John, for standing firm on this bogus staged event...

    It is still your choice for wanting to stay in association with those 4 individuals.... They have their opinions, and you rightfully have yours....And they should respect and welcome your right to stand behind your convictions....

    Keep up the fine work...

  6. Instead of using the event as a cry to stave of euro immigration crisis you join conspiracy theory lefty loosey anti zionist dingos

    your still a newb John so lots of learning left

  7. I highly recommend everyone blindly accepting the official account of the Woolwich event to read Dr. Paul Craig Roberts recent piece "Why Disinformation Works":

    Have you ever wondered how the government’s misinformation gains traction?

    What I have noticed is that whenever a stunning episode occurs, such as 9/11 or the Boston Marathon bombing, most everyone whether on the right or left goes along with the government’s explanation, because they can hook their agenda to the government’s account.

    The leftwing likes the official stories of Muslims creating terrorist mayhem in America, because it proves their blowback theory and satisfies them that the dispossessed and oppressed can fight back against imperialism.

    The patriotic rightwing likes the official story, because it proves America is attacked for its goodness or because terrorists were allowed in by immigration authorities and nurtured by welfare, or because the government, which can’t do anything right, ignored plentiful warnings.

    Whatever the government says, no matter how problematical, the official story gets its traction from its compatibility with existing predispositions and agendas.

    In such a country, truth has no relevance. Only agendas are important. [...]

    We have reached the point where evidence is no longer required. The government’s statements suffice. Only conspiracy kooks produce real evidence.

    1. So true, we even see this tactic used recently in the alternative media space ... certain groups/personalities only choosing to go along with the offical version when it can be used to their agenda's advantage

      - steve

  8. This to Rodney:

    Psychological operations are planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. The purpose is to induce or reinforce behavior favorable to enemy objectives. In order for PSYOP to be successful they must be based in reality. All messages must be consistent and must not contradict each other. Any gap between the propaganda and reality will be quickly noticed. A credible "truth" must be presented which is consistent to all audiences. Rodney, you asked "why" they would fake the above mentioned event. The "why" is found within the objectives of the enemy. There is credible evidence that the enemy wants to bolster public support for yet another war in the M.E. and also wants to bolster legislative support for more internet repression. Objectively, would you agree that this event furthers those agendas? Are you capable of being objective - or have you been neutralized by enemy propaganda?

  9. Maybe Rodney is having trouble understanding how PSYOP generated propaganda can be detected. To be able to identify different forms of propaganda, it helps to define it. “Propaganda is expression of opinion or action by individuals or groups deliberately designed to influence opinions or actions of other individuals or groups with reference to predetermined ends."

    The key here is "Predetermined Ends".

    PSYOP Propaganda intentionally targets the emotions of the Target Audience because someone who is emotionally engaged in a situations is much less likely to be able to think objectively about it. The "Beheading" scene was the emotional trigger here.

    Rodney, "someone" who controls the media wants public support for another war in the Middle East and they also want more domestic repression against "Extremists". Do you know who that "someone" is?

  10. I noticed that WV Foundations had nothing to say about the above video. He failed to comment on the content that shows that the version broadcast to the public was heavily edited. No comment from WV Foundations on what was edited out or why that may have been. All we got from WV Foundations was essentially an incoherent rant. Who is that guy anyway? How far did he go in school? What was his occupation? Evidently, that's a guy who didn't use his head a lot. People like that should probably just keep their emotion laden rants to themselves. The bottom line here is that we cannot trust any media product. It's gotten so bad that unless or until any particular media content is independently investigated and verified - it should be regarded as suspect. This means that you cannot allow yourself to be influenced and/or persuaded by it. Got that WVF?

  11. Our criticizers never address the actual anomolies in videos presented. (i.e. the Woolrich video John Friend has presented above as well as the Boston bombing video which shows "victim" Jeff Bauman with straight hair before the bombing incident as well as NO BLOOD trail and with CURLY hair after the bombing). They just resort to ad hominems. NOW my question...why aren't these "actors" coming forward? Surely some of them are decent people willing to set the record straight.

    1. The "actors" appear to be getting paid monetarily. The Sandy Hook Movie actors are most definitely getting paid through the donations of good hearted people who were taken in by the fraud. Ex-Senator Joe "The Israeli" Lieberman has taken over a major donation funds disbursements. In the case of Sandy Hook, you will note that most of the actors presented to you were jews. No doubt they are actually Israeli citizens performing a PSYOP mission here on US territory. No way they would "come forward". Jeff Bauman? Is he a "Dual Citizen" as well? Maybe he's just in it for the money. After all, he'd already lost his legs in Afghanistan...

    2. Most probably they are getting paid handsomely and at the same time threatened : if you talk we'll kill you (and your family). That will keep them mum for the rest of their lives. At most expect from one or two a "deathbed confession" at the end of their lives. If they are Jews, they don't need to be threatened, they'll "do it for Israel".

  12. John said this:
    "Video found at Daryl Bradford Smith's excellent website"
    NOTE, John described Smith's web sites as "excellent", Smith has the following posted on that same "excellent" web site.
    I assume you all endorse the premise Jews funded the NSDAP, I seem to recall John saying he did not believe this, NOW he accepts sources that say this. Make up your minds people, you all look more and more like Jews and disinfo agents.

    From the front page of Daryl Bradford Smith's excellent website
    In the early 1920’s and early 1930’s, large amounts of money were given to the Nazi party from Jewish banks.

    1. LOL, Rodney, you're saying that I, the guy who you founded the ANA with, a "Jew and disinfo agent"? Daryl's site is excellent, he's been on the front lines exposing the Jews and their agenda for quite some time now - in fact, it could be argued he popularized it and made it mainstream, at least in certain corners of the alternative media and blogosphere.

      I have learned a lot from his website and radio broadcasts, and so have hundreds of thousands, if not millions of others. I wouldn't be where I'm at today if it was not for his website and me discovering it back in '09.

      No, I absolutely do not endorse the premise Jews funded the NSDAP, and I have told Daryl that myself. We disagree on this, obviously. That doesn't mean I am going to throw him under the bus. I have written and spoken extensively about Hitler and tried my best to debunk all these ridiculous claims about him being a "Zionist" or a "Rothschild" or being "funded by Jews and international bankers." You of all people should know that.

    2. John,

      This Rodney guy is grasping at straws. Kinda reminds me of a pathetic drunk in a stained wife-beater lashing out incoherently with senseless guilt-by-association rhetoric.

      I suppose I should thank the guy though. There's absolutely NO WAY I would give that guy any money.

      In fact, due to his intentional side-stepping of obvious facts presented that reveal the PSYOP nature of the London event, I will be going out of my way to discourage anyone else from wasting their money on his organization.

      As you know, the media is one of the primary weapons of the enemy. Yet, here we have Rodney Martin defending the veracity of obviously manipulated enemy media broadcasts.

      What does that tell you?

      In the best case, it tells me nothing good about Rodney's intellect.

      Worst case, it tells me we can't trust him.

      Than you for the awesome work you're doing in exposing these bastards.

    3. What the fuck is wrong with you? Just because someone disagrees with you means automatically they are a jewish disinfo agent,If you actually listen to daryl's radio shows you will come to the understanding that he is genuine in what he says whether he is correct or not,example the "hitler rothschild agent thing".He has stated early as 2007 that jews are bringing muslim immigrants all over European countries and America to prop up the clash of the civilization agenda.Also if you listen to one of his top guests Mohammad Rafiq and have a basic understanding of economics,you will realize that Rafiq is spot on.Also I recall one time Daryl saying to rafiq that they disagrees with him on the ww2 scenario,Mohammad R doesn't buy the Hitler being a rothchild agent story,why would daryl have him on,if he has a jewish agenda regarding the NSDAP.BTW, I guarantee most people have benefited off of Daryl's site when it comes to research material and rare books available for download.Please give credit where it is due.

  13. I think some of reasons for this psy op are to counter the growing sentiment among whites that the media covers up black on white crime, but control the narrative by showing blacks attacking as a political statement against oppression by whites, not just hatred and jealousy of whites. And to show that white women have nothing to fear from violent black men, by having the women standing there calmly talking to the blacks that just chopped the white man’s head off.

    1. I agree with you on the component reasoning behind the PSYOP. When they plan these things, they analyze the Target Audience carefully and plan how they want the Target Audience to perceive and behave. In the case of the Sandy Hook Movie - note that they chose NOT to include a crazed "moosilim" or negro. That would have instantly bolstered self-defense instincts among Whites. So, they chose to use a character who was arguably "White" (even though the Lanza family is jewish...but most Whites don't know that). And they placed the blame on "evil guns". I agree with your viewpoint on the London Beheading Movie.

      The script writers of these PSYOPs are interested in steering the sheeple in a specific direction.

      Apparently, people like Rodney Martin and Andre see it differently - to the extent that they are actively supporting the jewish narrative.

      The only real question is "why".

      They have actively taken a firm position in support of the jewish narrative and are downplaying the possibility of "Faked News".



  14. Woolwich-London Killing - Compelling Evidence - False Flag?
    Hi, look forward to hearing your show on the 3rd. Here is another blog, which extensively covers and seems to prove this was indeed a False Flag Op among others, both "good" or bad.


  15. Teacher: Close your eyes. What do you hear?
    Student: I hear the water, I hear the birds.
    Teacher: Do you hear your own heartbeat?
    Student: No.
    Teacher: Do you hear the grasshopper which is at your feet?
    Student: Old man, how is it that you hear these things?
    Teacher: Young man, how is it that you do not?
    Open your mind grasshopper. See what is real - and see what is not real. What is it that you would still believe - even if shown undeniable, verifiable proof that the thing was not true?
    Is it possible that even the Trayvon Martin thing was faked? Could the Trayvon Martin fiasco be a PSYOP featuring a fake victim and fake perpetrator designed to incite the black population against the white population, while at the same time undermining White racial solidarity?

    Official Narrative:

    Story: Innocent kid shot by evil racist. Aim: hate the white man!
    Vicsim 17 year old black guy, picture of a 13 year old black kid.
    Perpetrator half-Jewish, half-hispanic, actor's picture photosopped to appear more White. We know that crime statistics in the US are manipulated as hispanics counted as White.

    Story: black attacker, self-defence without racial question involved, the shooter being a pachuco. Negro vicsim is an original gangsta homeboy straight outta da hood in a hoodie up to no good, attacking brave man defending your loved ones and living area. You have to deny your real thoughts and denounce racism instead. Aim: Encourage White double-think and marxist self-criticism.

    Do you really think "they" couldn't pull that off?


  16. When I first heard the soldier had been beheaded I thought that was just exaggerated hype. I have read the odd thing about this event at and front covers of a few British tabloids, they are really saying that Lee Rigby really did lose his head.

    Women checking for the poor lad's pulse and a lack of blood suggests to me this was more than likely a hoax.

  17. From London: Woolwich London Killing False Flag


    Oh, you mean "false narratives" like 9/11, Sandy Hook, Boston, and London?

    For any of you who simply "refuse to believe" ... go here, read this:

    Overview: DARPA is soliciting innovative research proposals in the areas of

    (1) quantitative analysis of narratives,

    (2) understanding the effects narratives have on
    human psychology and its affiliated neurobiology, and

    (3) modeling, simulating, and sensing—especially in stand-off modalities—these narrative influences.

    Proposers to this effort will be expected to revolutionize the study of narratives and narrative influence by advancing narrative analysis and neuroscience so as to create new narrative influence sensors, doubling status quo capacity to forecast narrative influence.

    Proposed research should investigate innovative approaches that enable revolutionary advances in narrative science, devices, and/or systems. Specifically excluded is research that primarily results in evolutionary improvements to the existing state of practice.

    Motivation: Narratives exert a powerful influence on human thoughts and behavior. They consolidate memory, shape emotions, cue heuristics and biases in judgment, influence in-group/out-group distinctions, and may affect the fundamental contents of personal identity.

    It comes as no surprise that because of these influences stories are important in security contexts: for example, they change the course of insurgencies, frame negotiations, play a role in political radicalization, influence the methods and goals
    of violent social movements, and likely play a role in clinical conditions important to the military such as post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Therefore, understanding the role stories play in a security context, and the spatial and temporal dimensions of that role is
    especially important.


    Yes, "They" are using your own tax dollars towards research into manipulating narratives brought to you via "stand-off modalities...which means "MEDIA".

    Media PSYOP is far, far more widespread than commonly understood.

  19. keep the good work Friend! I hope the rest of the world will have the time to watch the video and read your blog! You're now on the list of my heroes. Much love from Northern Nigeria! Seekers of the Plain Truth. @EmlanisYNWA


Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.