Saturday, May 25, 2013

London "beheading" - Responding to critics

I have received some criticism after publishing a brief blog post the other day contending that the London "beheading" may have been yet another hoax or fake event, similar to Sandy Hook and the recent Boston "bombing." Let me say for the record that at this point, I am 100% convinced the London "beheading" was indeed another hoax, a fake event portrayed in the mass media as real which is being used to perpetuate the fraudulent "Global War on Terror" meme and the idea of "lone-wolf Islamic terrorists," in addition to justifying the crackdown on the internet and expanding governmental authority to spy on the private communications of citizens in the United Kingdom.

The official narrative of this event is literally absurd and quite ridiculous for all sorts of reasons. I have posted numerous articles highlighting this on my Facebook page, as many alternative writers on the internet have thoroughly exposed this event as being a total hoax.  I highly recommend reading the Clues Forum thread entitled Woolwich 'Terror Attack' - SE London. See also Eyre International's post London's false flag even more pathetic than the Boston Bombing and the London Beheading Hoax Confirmed? post over at The Truthseeker.  The always interesting blog aangirfan recently posted an article entitled Woolwich: False Flag: Inside Job: Fake which is worth reading as well.  This entire story reeks of fakery and PSYOPS.

Andre from Total Fascism wrote a rather lengthy piece entitled Regarding the "UK Beheading was a Crisis Actor PSYOP" Insanity taking to task those of us contending this "beheading" in London was a hoax, and Scott Roberts from The Forbidden Truth has also doubted my claims about this event on my Facebook page and in an article he wrote on his forum.  I have no problem with either of these fine gentlemen, and consider them good friends and allies.  But I think they are very mistaken in their outlook on this event, and I'll explain why.

First of all, anyone that believes the murder and "beheading" of a British soldier by "Islamic extremists" in London was a real event is agreeing with the official story, outlined here by British newspaper the Daily Mail:

Click to enlarge

Folks, this is simply absurd, as I said above.  How could anyone swallow this silliness? Apparently Andre and Scott have.  Since they believe the official narrative of this event, it follows they believe this, too.  Again, from the Daily Mail [notes from me in brackets and bold font]:


A mother and daughter dubbed the 'Angels of Woolwich' because they bravely risked their own lives by comforting a soldier left dying in the street stepped forward 'because no man should die alone'.

Gemini Donnelly-Martin, 20, and her mother Amanda Donnelly, confronted the suspected killers and asked the attackers if they could be by Drummer Lee Rigby's side.

Their refusal to be cowed by the terrorists won praise from all quarters, including Downing Street.

Although other bystanders watched in horror and police waited helplessly for armed officers to arrive, Gemini modestly insisted her and her mother were not heroes and had done what anyone else would do.

Amanda's son Simeon, 22, said the two women acted out of love.

He said: 'My mother was just driving past and she saw something and wanted to try and help. 'She just showed a bit of motherly love. She just did what any mother would have done. [Ed note: PSYOPS always have these very emotional sob stories.  Major red flag.]

'She felt that could have been me lying down there in the street. She just felt for the poor guy.

'No man should have to die like that in the street with no-one around him.

'She came home afterwards and she just sat down and had a cup of coffee. But she doesn't want to talk about it. She did what she did and wants to get on with her life again.

'Of course she is upset, it was a gory thing for anyone to see. But she just wants to get on with things.'

Gemini said that they had simply done what they thought was right.

She told the Daily Mirror: 'We did what anyone would do. We just wanted to take care of the man. It wasn't brave. Anyone would have done it. It had to be done. They (the killers) said women could pass.'

'The only thing people need to worry about is that poor man's mum. We are grateful, though, for what people are saying about us.'

When it became apparent Drummer Lee Rigby was beyond their help, they shielded his body from further desecration by his savage attackers.

Amanda, 44, insisted she be allowed to pray for the dead man even when confronted by one of the killer. Kneeling at his side, she cradled him gently, seemingly unfazed by his horrific wounds.

Yesterday Gemini was back searching for work at a local job fair while her mother did not want to talk about what happened.

At the same time, Ingrid Loyau-Kennett remonstrated with the fanatics, despite her fears they would attack again.

The Cub Scout leader and mother of two asked them to hand over their bloodstained weapons and listened to their hate-filled tirade about wanting to ignite ‘war in London’.

She selflessly tried to draw the men’s attention, later saying: ‘Better me than a child.’

Yesterday Mrs Loyau-Kennett, 48, denied suggestions she was a hero, saying: ‘That’s too much. I don’t think I have done anything really extraordinary. I just talked to a guy.’

But there were calls for her as well as Amanda and Gemini to receive honours for their courage.

David Cameron said Miss Loyau-Kennett’s bravery showed how ordinary people could unite to defy extremists.

The Prime Minister said: ‘When told by the attacker he wanted to start a war in London, she replied “You’re going to lose. It’s only you versus many”. She spoke for us all.’

The women’s intervention was made all the more remarkable by the scene of horror they faced.

A pool of blood lay where Drummer Rigby was attacked, and his assailants were covered with gore and still clutching their cleavers and knives. [Ed note: Where is all the blood?  Where are the photos of "gore" on the alleged assailants?]

But witnesses said the first woman, thought to be a highly religious mother in her 50s, did not flinch.

An eyewitness told the Guardian that one of the 'Angels of Woolwich' courageously persuaded the suspected killers to allow her to tend to the wounded.

'This lady whom I met talking with them went on trying to persuade them, and they finally allowed her to attend to the victim,' the eyewitness identified only as Abecham told the newspaper.

'She walked to him (the soldier), touched him, and said: "You have killed him," then sat beside him and was rubbing her hand on the victim's back while still saying: "You have killed him".'

Joe Tallant, 20, said: ‘She was so brave, she didn’t care what happened to her – she knelt down by his side and comforted him.

‘She held his hand and put her other hand on his chest. I think she might have been praying.’ [...]

‘I trained as a first aider when I was a Brownie leader, so I asked someone to watch my bag and then got off to see if I could help.

‘I went over to the body where there was a lady sitting there and she said he was dead.

‘She had comforted him by putting something under his back and a jacket over his head. I took his pulse and there was none.’

The language teacher, a former ‘snowy owl’ leader with the Brownie Guides, said she became aware of a man standing over them, armed with a gun and a knife.

She said she acted on instinct and began to talk to him, trying to save others from violence. [Ed note: How could anyone believe this nonsense? The "radical Islamic terrorists" who committed this crime allegedly said they were going to target average British citizens - why didn't they proceed to butcher this woman?]

In interviews with newspapers and broadcasters, she pieced together the vital few moments when she was face to face with the suspect.

She said: ‘My instincts were just to talk to him, he looked like a normal guy, he wasn’t drunk, he wasn’t high on drugs. ‘He said, “Don’t touch, I killed him”. I said, “Why?” He said, “He’s a British soldier. He killed people. He killed Muslim people in Muslim countries”.

‘I tried to make him talk about how he felt. He said [about] all the bombs dropping and blindly killing women, children.

‘I wanted him to concentrate on me and make sure he doesn’t have a funny idea. There were more and more mothers with children stopping around, so it was even more important I was talking to him and asking him what he wanted.’

Asked if she was scared, she replied simply: ‘No – better me than a child.’

Miss Loyau-Kennett, who is half French, said the man had towered over her, so close he was almost touching her.

She said: ‘I was shocked, I asked him, “Why? What’s the point?” He said, “War in London, there’s war in my country”. He said it was war and if the police were coming, he was going to kill them.’

The Cub Scout leader said the attacker seemed to be ‘in full control of his decisions and ready to do everything he wanted to do’.

Her courage was shown by broadcasters and newspapers around the world, winning her international praise.

Miss Loyau-Kennett was in London for the 23rd birthday of her librarian son Basil Baradaran.

He said: ‘My first thought was for her safety but I could see she was completely intact. I couldn’t believe what she was telling me.

‘I don’t know what was going through her mind or how she found the strength to do what she did but I’m totally awestruck. I’m about as proud as a son could be.’

He said his mother raised him and his sister Pawony, 24, as a single parent after their father returned to France when they were young. He added: ‘She’s caring, loyal and very, very protective.

‘Her incredible maternal instinct must have kicked in when she saw that defenceless man lying there. She could have walked away or stayed on that bus but she was determined to help. She has a real passion for helping people.

‘As amazed as I am by what she did, it’s actually what I’ve come to expect from her.’

Mrs Loyau-Kennett’s actions were praised by the Scout Association.

Wayne Bulpitt, UK Chief Commissioner, said last night: ‘We are very proud of Scout volunteer Ingrid Loyau-Kennett for her calm and measured actions in very difficult circumstances.

‘We are looking to make an award of bravery to her in the fullness of time to recognise her actions.

‘At this time our thoughts and prayers are with the family and friends of the victim of this terrible crime.’
I apologize for the extended excerpt of from the Daily Mail article cited above, but I want readers to understand exactly what guys like Andre and Scott Roberts believe happened.  This is the official narrative of the event, and they apparently buy it.  And I'm the one being called "pathologically insane" for rejecting this ridiculous nonsense?

To be clear here, Muslims and Blacks in Europe do in fact commit all sorts of outrageous and violent crimes, including rape, murder, and robbery, especially against Whites.  But what they don't do is commit terrorist acts and behead British soldiers in public, and then get "counseled" by nice British ladies afterwards while waiting for over 20 minutes for police to arrive.  In fact, all the "Islamic terrorism" we're told is perpetrated by Muslim radicals, including 9/11, 7/7, and the wide array of other "foiled terrorist plots," is actually staged or manufactured by criminal elements of the intelligence services and the media.  There is no "radical Islamic terrorism" folks, at least not the kind endlessly discussed and hyped in the Jewish mainstream media.

The Jewish mainstream media downplays and covers up all the hideous crimes committed by Muslims and Blacks in Europe - the rapes, the murders, the drug dealing, you name it.  Very rarely is anything presented in the mainstream media that does not advance the international Jewish agenda - so we have to ask ourselves why this particular event is being discussed and highlighted in the mass media, especially in the United Kingdom.  What agenda is being promoted here?  Why is the media covering this alleged violent crime, but failing to cover the litany of horrendous rapes, murders, and other violent crimes committed by Muslims and Blacks in Europe (and America)?

The reason is that this event does advance Jewish interests and the overall tyrannical agenda of international Jewry and their puppets.  As I mentioned at the beginning of this post, it perpetuates the idea that there are indeed "radical Islamic terrorists" willing and capable of attacking innocent Westerners.  Events like this advance and perpetuate the "Global War on Terror" meme, which is largely based around the fraudulent idea that there is a genuine threat from "radical Islamic terrorists."  Mainstream British news sources are even claiming that the London "beheading" is "straight out of al-Qaeda's terror manual,"if you can believe it.

Again, there are very real problems resulting from Muslim and Black immigration into Europe and America - but terrorism is not one of them.  There really is no "Islamic terrorism" or "al-Qaeda" - at least the way it's portrayed in the Jewish media. It's all either fake or manufactured by criminal elements in the intelligence services and media.

Also, this event has advanced the notion that "Islamic extremists" are "radicalized" on the internet, therefore the government needs to crack down on free speech and monitor the internet and private communications. British politicians and elite media personalities are arguing that this event proves the country needs to pass the "communications data bill" which would essentially allow the government to spy on the online communications of individuals in an effort to "thwart terrorism."

Scott and Andre have argued that it is much easier for the intelligence agencies to actually carry out attacks like this, rather than stage them. And I totally disagree.  It is in fact much easier and more efficient for them to fake events like this, and present them as real via the mass media to the gullible and often traumatized public.  There is all sorts of evidence for this, and I've explained it in detail here and here.  Please read those posts.

Of course, events like this "beheading" hoax and other PSYOPS are very difficult to figure out specifically how they are carried out.  And I'm not claiming to have all the answers - I just know that the official narrative of this event stinks to high heaven and is totally absurd.  We also know that the official story is advancing a particular agenda that just so happens to serve the interests of the Jews and their puppets controlling the United Kingdom specifically, and international Jewry generally.

Media fakery and PSYOPS are the primary tactics used by the Jews and their puppets to advance their tyrannical "New World Order" agenda. They target our emotions and psychology, and it seems to work every time. But now, the events they are staging and faking in the media are so obvious, more and more people are seeing through it and recognizing that things just don't add up.  That is why it's important to expose these fake events. The artificial reality manufactured and perpetuated by the Jewish media and political establishment is breaking down, and I am doing everything in my power to expose this fact and destroy the artificial reality that psychologically enslaves millions of people in America and the Western world.  

23 comments:

  1. I think we have to be VERY suspicious of any of these types of events from now on, Jewish Propaganda broadcast through the Talmud Vision (TV). Media fakery up the wazoo folks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Come on brother. Just because I am not willing to accept your interpretation on this (and other events), does not mean I am blindly accepting/pushing the official narrative.

    Like I was clear in pointing out before, the Jews certainly orchestrated and carried out the other events (Sandy Hook, Boston, etc), but I don't believe they hired actors to do what they would have no problem doing themselves in real life.

    THAT is my point of contention with your position. You think the events were faked, I think they were carried out by either MOSSAD agents or patsies (depending on which false flag we are talking about)... But I am pretty far from accepting/pushing the official narrative. Not sure how anyone could even suggest such a thing.

    Once more:
    Why fake it and hire hundreds of witnesses when they can just send in a MOSSAD team or a patsy to make those witnesses and the blood shed real? It's easier, cleaner, and they would have NO reason whatsoever to refrain from killing the "Goyim". Yet your answer to that question is to simply say "it is easier", when it clearly is not (hundreds of unnecessary loose ends, for no good reason).



    And like I said/asked before, why on Earth would you make this (relatively) irrelevant point your main focus? Why not instead point out how the Jews benefit from these events, whether they are staged or not?

    Well, I can't control what you make your focus, but I think there are countless other angles to take (and efforts to make) that trump this "issue" you seem to be fixated on.

    I mean, my options are still open on this "issue", but so far I have not seen any real evidence to support your position (just because it's not the "official narrative" doesn't make it right)... And more to the point, I don't think it is as important as you make it out to be.

    So, like I said bro, I am moving on, unless/until you come up with more than conjecture as the basis for your argument here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL, Scott I have explained in detail how the Jews have benefited from this event. It was a major portion of this blog post, did you read it?

      Here are the relevant excerpts where I address the agenda being pushed as a result of this fake event:

      Let me say for the record that at this point, I am 100% convinced the London "beheading" was indeed another hoax, a fake event portrayed in the mass media as real which is being used to perpetuate the fraudulent "Global War on Terror" meme and the idea of "lone-wolf Islamic terrorists," in addition to justifying the crackdown on the internet and expanding governmental authority to spy on the private communications of citizens in the United Kingdom. [...]

      The reason is that this event does advance Jewish interests and the overall tyrannical agenda of international Jewry and their puppets. As I mentioned at the beginning of this post, it perpetuates the idea that there are indeed "radical Islamic terrorists" willing and capable of attacking innocent Westerners. Events like this advance and perpetuate the "Global War on Terror" meme, which is largely based around the fraudulent idea that there is a genuine threat from "radical Islamic terrorists." Mainstream British news sources are even claiming that the London "beheading" is "straight out of al-Qaeda's terror manual,"if you can believe it. [...]

      Also, this event has advanced the notion that "Islamic extremists" are "radicalized" on the internet, therefore the government needs to crack down on free speech and monitor the internet and private communications. British politicians and elite media personalities are arguing that this event proves the country needs to pass the "communications data bill" which would essentially allow the government to spy on the online communications of individuals in an effort to "thwart terrorism."

      Delete
  3. I agree totally with everything you just wrote, JF.

    I was expecting you to go into all the little details, but really it's not that necessary. It's also quite difficult, as we have so very little real information available.

    Morris presented a fact that's always a very valid point: Hey, if you're a terrorist, is killing some regular soldier *the best* that you can do? Are these Muslims *that dumb* that they can't manage to do something more efficient? By efficient I mean killing some VIP or blowing up some stuff that would really *hurt* the people they're so pissed off at.

    We're also in collective amnesia today. Back in the 1970s we had real terrorism. Terrorists identified themselves as belonging to such and such a group with a definite goal, and then they made threats, demands, negotiated, blackmailed, etc., to get what they wanted. They didn't just show up somewhere, kill somebody, and say: "We're so angry because the world is unfair. Look, you made us kill some guy." That's just so idiotic.

    Baader Meinhof (RAF) in Germany - that was real terrorism. PLO, IRA and so on. And ETA in Spain. Al Queida is a silly ghost. The eternal bogeyman. Not real.

    This story also stinks because it's so terribly irrational and absurd. You see two big guys who've just butchered somebody in the street, and you *don't* run the hell away from them? You *sit down* and fondle a (bloody) corpse? You *make* two big bloodthirsty killers not take photos of the corpse by sitting down with this corpse (and....)? "Oh, terrible woman who sat down with the corpse. Now we won't be able to take our photos of it, Akhim."

    Where did this "beheading" (and "machete") story come from, anyway? We haven't seen the slightest sign of any beheading. Not any machete either. Anyway: such knives that we saw in the photos can easily do a lot of damage. But where's all the blood? Why wasn't the victim's shirt/sweater/body soaked in blood? What about the clothes of the two black men? The street? The woman fondling the corpse?

    Obviously there were two guys shooting video of the black guy talking. We can tell by the camera angles. Why did they stop filming? When did they start filming? Why does the media say only 1 guy filmed? of all the people present nearby - didn't anyone capture *more* with their cellphones? (Everybody has a video-phone today, and everyone love using these phones.)

    Why run down a guy with a car, and then stab him to death? Why not just shoot him? How about chopping his head off in front of a camera?

    And there's many more questions. Questions we'll most probably never get answered.

    PSYOP....... *Everything*'s a PSYOP. Even *if* someone really dies. The PSYOP is how you present something. The Holohoax being the prime example: You *have* dead bodies, but the story you present is something quite different than what really happened. And you do this for a (psychological) reason.

    Sure, the soldier probably *did* die, but it's still a PSYOP. People died on 9/11 too, and that was also a PSYOP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Sure, the soldier probably *did* die"

      why? surely a hoax death can be a helpful part of any psy-op?? these things can be achieved easily.

      Delete
  4. I am quite disappointed to hear that two of your associates now defending a story put out by the jewish media.

    There is a principle of Roman Law that is still respected and has been appropriated by other disciplines. It is called: "Falsus in Uno - Falsus in Ominbus". The concept is that if a witness has been shown to lie in one particular respect in a case, he is not to be trusted in anything else he says. This is why it is important for attorneys to impeach opposing witnesses in court: it discredits the rest of their testimony. The object behind the principle is to reject questionable testimony (even if it might be true) before accepting falsehood into evidence.

    Here, we have yet another politically charged "story" being pushed by a demonstrably non-credible source. Yet - two seemingly intelligent bloggers are quick to accept, "believe" and go along.

    Thank goodness neither of them are Military Officers operating in wartime. They would likely be taken in by every single PSYOP and misdirection ploy generated by the enemy.

    Make no mistake folks, the jewish owned, jewish run broadcast media is "Enemy Propaganda" designed to "Influence and Persuade". It is not there to "Inform".

    ReplyDelete
  5. EVERYTHING coming from the jewish media is "Enemy Propaganda". In 1940, the Germans published a pamphlet on how to deal with "Enemy Propaganda". Don't you think it's time we stop paying attention to "Enemy Propaganda"?
    ========
    Warning! Enemy Propaganda!

    From:
    Der Reichsführer SS und Chef der Deutschen Polizei, Was tue ich im Ernstfall? Eine Aufklärungsschrift für das Deutsche Volk (Berlin: Verlag Hermann Hilliger, 1940), pp. 21-23.


    In modern warfare, weapons, the economy, physical resources, and organization play a role. So, too, do spirit and soul.

    A new and sinister weapon is used against a nation’s spiritual strength: Propaganda!

    Germany lost the World War of 1914-1918 because it did not recognize the danger of enemy propaganda. It collapsed spiritually.

    That may not and will not happen again!

    Enemy propaganda wants to break the German people’s will to resist by slanders, rumors, suspicions, and with political, military, or simply general lies.

    The methods of enemy propaganda include: leaflets, appeals, false pictures, atrocity stories, rumors, radio incitement, and systematic complaining.

    All those who are reached by enemy propaganda and have their will to victory reduced by it, whether consciously or unconsciously, are tools of enemy propaganda.

    Complainers and grumblers, doubters and agitators are the enemy’s spiritual Foreign Legionnaires amidst the German people.

    It is often only a short step from doubting the justice of one’s cause to the complete collapse of the will to resist. The World War proved this!

    How do I respond to enemy propaganda?

    If I encounter enemy propaganda in word, print, picture, radio, in conversation about the news or through rumors, it depends on my intelligence and good sense whether or not I render it ineffective.

    I immediately collect the enemy propaganda material and explain what it is to citizens who have come in contact with it.

    I know that the greatest danger of enemy propaganda is in the phrase: “There must be some truth in it.”

    I am careful in all my conversations and correspondence. Letters and conversations could reach the enemy and provide him with material.

    I strengthen the will to victory of citizens who may be wavering.

    If I encounter citizens who are being overcome by enemy propaganda, I confront them directly and make clear to them the enormous danger they face, appealing to their sense of honor.

    Anyone who becomes a tool of enemy propaganda and contributes to weakening our spiritual strength places himself outside the people’s community. He should not be surprised if he is treated as an enemy of the people and of the state. If all my warnings are in vain, I do my duty and turn him over to the authorities.

    I actively oppose enemy propaganda whenever I encounter it. I also do this with foreigners and friends abroad whom I talk with or write to. If I have German propaganda material at hand, I include it in my letters.

    If I find or am given enemy propaganda material, I quickly write in large, clear letters “Enemy propaganda” on it and turn it over immediately to the nearest police station.

    I do not show such enemy propaganda material to strangers.

    I obey all regulations against listening to foreign radio stations, not only because there are severe penalties but also because I view it as an obvious patriotic duty.

    I know that enemy propaganda material is an enemy method of warfare.

    Enemy Propaganda is poison!

    He who falls for it is lost.

    I also know the severe penalties for harming our fighting ability.

    ReplyDelete
  6. During WW2, there were regulations against listening to foreign radio stations. This was done for several reasons. One reason was to stop enemy propaganda from reaching the population. Enemy propaganda in the form of fake news stories, etc.

    Today, we are discussing the content of "Enemy Propaganda" that has been transmitted directly from an Enemy Propaganda Ministry known as the BBC.

    How intelligent is it to be listening/watching ANYTHING coming from that source?

    Enemy propaganda material is an enemy method of warfare.

    Who do you think the intended recipient of that propaganda is?

    Why would you willingly expose yourself to it?

    Do you enjoy being manipulated?

    ======

    Rather that discussing the content of Enemy Propaganda - we should be discussing how to protect ourselves from Enemy Propaganda.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I live in London and watched the whole circus on BBC, ITV and SKY. All saying the same thing, showing the same images. I'm glad I looked into Sandy Hook and Boston because I saw through this dross in a matter of minutes. You are correct, John, their web of lies is slowly unravelling. Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  8. People have to understand that everything's propaganda. Even if it's true. I mean, even if a true event is reported, it's reported *in a certain way* to achieve the desired effect in the public.

    Terrorism is anyway a non-problem. One guy losing his head/life is just one guy. That same day maybe 10 died in the traffic in the same city. It's really not that much to be upset about. Sure, if it were the prime minister or the queen, or some other person of special significance such as a 9/11 whistleblower or maybe some Holohoax denier or environmental activist that got killed, the story takes on a different significance. But it was just a regular soldier in an army of a million (?) regular soldiers / or you can say it's just another victim of street violence among hordes of victims of street violence.

    Terrorism? You may say there IS a kind of Muslim "terrorism" going on in Europe, but that's the state sanctioned terrorism of mass immigration, rapes of white women and so on. Many people have been killed by these immigrants as well, and like JF says, that's hardly ever reported. I read recently on some blogs that more than 7000 ethnic Germans have been killed by immigrants in Germany since the wall came down in 1989. THIS is a big story. But ONE guy losing his head? No. Not really. It's just ONE guy, after all. We need right relativity.

    ReplyDelete
  9. John:
    I am very suspicious when a Jew (Morris) immediately makes a video, which you have posted, telling people to ignore a Negroid-Muslim-Immigrant attack on a White.

    Tell me again why we should listen to a Jew? Seems to me that the Psyop is Jews telling us that the attack by Negroid-Muslim-Immigrant attack on a White didn't really happen and is all just a hoax. For years the Jew agenda has really been to marginalize, downplay, ignore nd hide from the public these types of crimes.
    Frankly I am shocked at the contridiction here, we see you on one hand attacking the Jew Agenda, etc, then posting a video of a Jew (Morris) telling people "don't belive it, don't belive it", as reinforcement of your position.
    Every basis for saying the attack on Lee Rigby is a "psyop" fall flat and does not hold water. It was not in impose "internet censorship" in the UK, that has been law in the UK for years, ask Simon Sheapard, it has nothing to do with the "War on Terror", per se, other than the Brits are realizing that immigrants are not what liberals portray, There has been no logical explanaion provided to say thi was a "Psyop" that advances he Jew agenda, this actualy should advance our Agenda, we should be united and uing this as a basis to show people that immigration is bad, that Muslims are as bad as Jews, and that yes, Race does matter. To say that it is a "Psyop" and really did not happen, and thus divide Nationalists is the real Jew Agenda, so we cannot capalize on it and broaden our appeal to Whites who have thus far not engaged in Nationalist and Ethno-Nationalist politics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Morris does some good videos in my opinion. Yes he is a Jew, but some Jews make good points and have good observations and insights into certain subjects I'm interested in. Morris falls into this category.

      You write:

      "For years the Jew agenda has really been to marginalize, downplay, ignore nd hide from the public these types of crimes."

      Yes, exactly, I made this point in my post above. So the question then is: why are the Jews in fact promoting this particular event, when they ignore, downplay, and hide real violent crime committed against Whites by Muslims and Blacks in Europe? Hmmm.... could it be because this was a staged event designed to advance their agenda? I think so.

      I disagree with pretty much everything else you wrote. This fake event most certainly does advance the Jewish agenda (Islamophobia, the idea that there is a genuine "terrorist threat from radical Muslims", the fake "Global War on Terror" meme, etc.), which I wrote about in this post.

      We should be exposing real violent crime committed by Muslims and Blacks against Whites in Europe and America, and the myriad problems associated with non-White immigration into our homelands, no doubt. I have posted articles on Facebook about this numerous times. But using this fake event to do that is dishonest and counterproductive in my view. I think we need to expose these fake events for reasons I discussed in the post above. This is what I specifically wrote in case you missed it:

      "Media fakery and PSYOPS are the primary tactics used by the Jews and their puppets to advance their tyrannical "New World Order" agenda. They target our emotions and psychology, and it seems to work every time. But now, the events they are staging and faking in the media are so obvious, more and more people are seeing through it and recognizing that things just don't add up. That is why it's important to expose these fake events. The artificial reality manufactured and perpetuated by the Jewish media and political establishment is breaking down, and I am doing everything in my power to expose this fact and destroy the artificial reality that psychologically enslaves millions of people in America and the Western world."

      Delete
  10. Trouble understanding that you're the victim of enemy Psychological Operations transmitted to you through the enemy controlled media?

    How about educating yourself on their methods?

    Here....read this:


    ==========
    NATO Allied Joint Doctrine for Psychological Operations
    http://info.publicintelligence.net/NATO-PSYOPS.pdf
    ===========

    Make sure you read Annex D.
    Annex D contains an overview of techniques and procedures in HOW TO DEAL WITH ENEMY PSYOP. This is called Counter-PSYOP.

    Here you go:


    ANNEX D COUNTER PSYOPS TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES

    Section I – Analysis

    D101. Aim of counter PSYOPS. The aim of counter PSYOPS is to counter or exploit the effects of adversary propaganda or psychological activities. Counter PSYOPS are directed at approved target audiences that are affected by the adversary propaganda, less our own forces and citizents, who are the responsibility of troop information and PI.

    D102. Definition. Actions designed to detect and counteract adversary psychological activities.

    D103. Analysis of adversary’s psychological activities. Analysis of an adversary’s psychological activity involves the detailed examination of the source, content, audience, media and effects (SCAME) of his messages to obtain intelligence that supplements the conventional forms of intelligence. The audience and the effects can be unintended as well as intended. The primary purpose of the analysis of an adversary’s psychological activity is to collect PSYOPS-related intelligence information. This is in order to evaluate its effect on own troops as well as on friendly and uncommitted civilian audiences within the AOR, in order to be able to eliminate or diminish the negative consequences, and to exploit any contradiction in that adversary psychological activity. The analysis also involves a systematic study of foreign mass communications intended for domestic and/or international audiences.

    D104. Source analysis. Identifies the individual, organisation or government that sponsors and disseminates a particular item of an adversary psychological activity. The three components of source analysis are: actor, authority and author. Sources are further subdivided into:

    a. White. An acknowledged source.

    b. Grey. An unacknowledged source.

    c. Black. Originates from a source other than the one that is claimed.

    ReplyDelete
  11. All one has to do is view the original video. No need to explain yourself John. If people can't see that it was a fake, I don't know what to say....like WTC 7 falling....nothing here to see...move along please. The elderly woman carrying her cart of groceries home as if it was normal that a man was beheaded just 50 feet away was priceless.

    ReplyDelete
  12. John, I think the main concern here is whether or not this kind of propaganda is good for our race, or not. The best propaganda is simple and to the point, with a clear and concise message that's not an open target for ridicule. All of your peer's are unanimously standing against you on this for god's sake, how can you expect to draw in and convince the broad masses with it? Hey I deleted my article about Jewess Jackie killing Kennedy after being taken to task on it and I'm still completely convinced that is what happened. My suggestion is not that you concede your point, or change your view if that's what you believe but maybe just mentioning it in passing like "I believe this was another false flag, evidence suggests that it might even be a complete hoax" and then move on to more pressing issues. This has made a HUGE distraction out of a situation that's actually quite simple.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well Ben G. many people are seeing through these fake events and the artificial reality manufactured by the Jews and the political establishment is breaking down, that's why I expose fake events and media PSYOPS. I explained this in my post.

      And who is making this into a huge distraction? Andre and others are going out of their way to criticize me for highlighting this fake event - I am not the one making a big deal about it. Andre even said that the idea this event was fake is "pathologically insane." I talk about all sorts of issues, media fakery and PSYOPS being one of them. And it's an important one to understand and discuss, in my view. Maybe you and others disagree. Fine by me.

      Delete
  13. All of John's peers are not "unanimously standing against" him. There may be a few who simply don't understand how Weaponized information is used to "Influence and Persuade" Target Audiences to behave in certain ways. The issue at hand is how we are going to deal with enemy propaganda as transmitted through their propaganda outlets. If anyone is "Pathologically Insane" - it is the person who insists that what they saw on TV was a true representation of a real event...even though they were not there. The burden of proof on the veracity of a story presented by a source...lies with the source. They jewish media fed you that story. Have they ever lied to you in the past? Yes, they have. They lie all the time. What kind of crackpot would default towards believing a proven liar? Would that person be "Pathologically Insane"? Maybe. Those of you who are consistently taken in by jewish media fakery need are what are known as "Useful Idiots". Useful to the jewish agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I follow aangirfan, but consider it an obvious disinfo source as aangirfan regularly puts out Nazi slander and anti-Hitler propaganda.

    http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2013/05/many-americans-supported-hitler.html
    http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2011/10/hitler-escaped.html
    http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2010/08/hitler-gay-jew.html
    http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-real-hitler.html

    What aangirfan has written out about Woolwich may be accurate, but should not be taken as "gospel".

    ReplyDelete
  15. Fake blood on hands, added digitally after the fact. Fakery has been used by the mainstream media, end of story. Let's not fool ourselves, their video editors would have spotted these enhancements immediately. They are trained to spot them. Therefore, the only question is how much MORE is fakery?

    What we are facing here is the phenomena of repeated blood libel, however not against the jews, but rather perpetrated by the zionist cabal through their jewish owned/controlled media against the Muslims.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Great work on the blog ... regardless of semantics...the closing point should be that you can't hang around wielding knives outside an army barracks for 25 seconds let alone 25 minutes...you would be dealt with right away...these people do not fck around.

    I think they pulled the scam there precisely because it's a highly surveillanced area and highly secure in case anyone intervened.

    second point is that 'believed to have been a soldier' theme the media ran with tells me they did not have their patsy in place yet. Sadly it looks like they sacrificed one of their own.

    - steve

    ReplyDelete
  17. If you watch the full video on YT of this "terrifying terrorist's" that the SUN newspaper put out /watch?v=grn3HZgv_lU it is clear this chap is a second rate actor who can't get his lines right.

    Listen to what he is saying and not just the allah bits that are there to programme a reaction. He says that this is what happens in 'our countries' (meaning muslim, I would imagine) then he says 'bring our troops home' (meaning British).

    ReplyDelete
  18. I knew this was a Jew psyops straight from the off. How? The date. It was the 22nd. The zionists love to carry out their operations guided by numbers sacred to them. In the main the 11th and secondly 22nd. As in 9/11, Madrid Bombing 11th March 2004, Fukushima 11th March 2011, Mumbai train bombings 11 July 2006, Kennedy assassination 22nd November 1963, Norway 22nd July 2011, King David Hotel bombing July 22, 1946, to name just a few.
    If an ‘event’ happens on this day you can bet your bottom dollar the Jew is behind it.
    Why 11 and 22? A theory has been put forward because there're 22 letters in the Hebrew alphabet. The 22 letters can also be distilled from the lines and intersections that make up the Star of David http://www.awesomelamb.com/Store/magen/magen.html

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.