Tuesday, December 31, 2013

The Realist Report - Reflecting on 2013

On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be reviewing events of the past year, and discuss what to expect in 2014. Tom in Connecticut and Dave Mansfield will be participating in this informal broadcast. Calls will be taken throughout the program.

You can download the mp3 for this program here, or visit The Realist Report on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.

Below are relevant links for this program:
And now for some final thoughts as we wrap up 2012 and head into another new year…

There are two fundamental truths that I’ve come to recognize over the course of this year. To begin with, anyone following my blog knows that I am a fan of Adolf Hitler. It is clear to me – and to anyone honestly assessing this man and the history of his movement – that Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany posed the greatest threat that has ever manifested against the forces of the “New World Order”. Adolf Hitler and many of the NSDAP leaders fully understood what the Jews were all about, explained it in detail, and made serious moves to end Jewish tyranny, exploitation, and subversion, at least in Germany. In my view, we should be looking to Adolf Hitler and National Socialism for inspiration and guidance in our struggle against organized Jewry going forward. Forget all the slanders, lies, and ridiculous conspiracy theories about Hitler and NS Germany, which merely distract you from the truth. Read what they wrote, listen to what they said, understand what they did.

Secondly, the role of the Jewish-controlled mainstream mass media and Hollywood in carrying out false flag operations, massive PSYOP attacks against the gullible public, and otherwise distorting our reality and history cannot be underestimated. Politicians, government officials, media personalities, and other opinion shapers use the mass media as a weapon in their psychological operations against the public. The recent Sandy Hook “shooting” hoax is a prime example, but there are many other historical examples, such as the alleged Jewish “Holocaust” of WWII, the Apollo Moon landing hoax, the edited Zapruder film depicting the JFK assassination, and many others, including 9/11.

These two fundamental truths – the use of video fakery and media manipulation in prosecuting false flag/PSYOP events and the true history of WWII and Adolf Hitler – are topics I have really tried to emphasize this past year, and will continue to do so in the coming year.

Other important conclusions I’ve come to this past year include:
  • every individual is a member of a unique race, ethnicity, and culture; race is not a social construct and there are differences between the various races - and that's a good thing, that is real diversity
  • the Jews want us to abandon or outright deny our unique racial and cultural identities in an effort to transform all of us into mindless consumers of Jewish information, technology, "entertainment", food, medicine and other goods and services
  • usury, the loaning of money at interest, is an illegitimate, criminal form of economic organization that must be eliminated from society
  • freedom of speech and association, in addition to the right to bear arms, are the foundations of any free society (of course these are the natural rights most under attack right now)
  • organized Jewish interests have always and will always be the destroyers of all decent, honorable indigenous cultures and societies, especially European and European-derived societies; Jewry must be viewed as a hostile elite at war with the non-Jewish world
  • the total distortion and fabrication of our history has increased with the advancement of technology and communication systems to a point where now virtually all information presented by the mainstream mass media and political establishment is false or distorted in a manner that advances international Jewry's agenda of global domination and subjugation

Sunday, December 29, 2013

"Holocaust survivors" and psychological terrorism

The fake Jewish "Holocaust" narrative is instilled and implanted in the minds of millions of people around the world - especially young, vulnerable children - largely through psychological terrorism and media manipulation, a subject I've written about before and will continue to emphasize.

Traumatic images and videos, which in virtually all cases turn out to be either completely fabricated or flagrantly distorted, manipulated, and/or taken out of context, along with extremely emotional (and entirely fabricated or embellished) "eye witness testimony" from "Holocaust survivors" have been and are continually being used to instill and perpetuate the lies associated with WWII, Adolf Hiter, and the fake story of "6 million Jews systematically murdered by the evil Nazis".

Of course, most of you reading this recognize that the official historiography pertaining to WWII is virtually the exact opposite of what really happened during and after WWII. Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany did not start WWII, they were not attempting to conquer the world, and there was no systematic plan to exterminate European Jewry.

International Jewry and the countries she (largely) controlled - namely, the US, UK, and Soviet Union - instigated and initiated WWII, while Adolf Hitler was determined to revitalize and rejuvenate the German nation - politically, economically, culturally, and spiritually - while attempting to diplomatically resolve the major political and geographical disputes brought about following the post WWI so-called "peace treaties", particularly the Treaty of Versailles which pertained to Germany specifically, after democratically coming to power in 1933.

Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany never advocated or planned to exterminate European Jewry - they simply recognized the parasitic, destructive nature of the Jewish people as an organized political, economic, and cultural force, and wanted to rid German society of Jewish influence and subversion. On the other hand, the organized international Jewish community openly advocated for the systematic destruction and genocide of the German people on a number of different occasions, and convinced their puppet governments and militaries to actually do so during and after WWII (see here also). 

An article appearing this weekend in The New York Times demonstrated once again the central role "Holocaust survivors" play in psychologically terrorizing young children in to accepting the fake "Holocaust" narrative of WWII specifically, and the historical "Jewish victimhood" narrative generally, which has essentially amassed the organized Jewish community a lucrative financial and sympathy racket used to exploit and ultimately destroy Western civilization.

LASZLO SCHWARTZ never had a proper adolescence. The Nazis made sure of that.

He was 14 when he and his family disembarked from a cold boxcar onto the selection ramp at Auschwitz, and he says he still remembers the feel of Josef Mengele’s wide leather gloves pinching his scrawny biceps.

As the sadistic concentration camp physician known as the “Angel of Death” sized up the teenage Laszlo, ordering him to line up with the other children, a sinister flame rose in the distance, he said.

“I knew what they were doing, but I didn’t want to believe it,” Mr. Schwartz recently told a class of 50 high school students in this small town in western Germany. “My turn came for Mengele, and he asked me to make a muscle. He asked how old I am. I said 17. It didn’t help.”

At 83, Mr. Schwartz splits his time between Germany and New York City, where he emigrated in 1946. Since July 2010, he has spoken at more than 80 schools around Germany about the kidnappings, starvation and torture he endured during the war and how the last time he ever saw his mother and sister was the day he met Mengele.

Talking about his travails has not always been easy for Mr. Schwartz, whose right cheek still droops slightly where, he says, a member of the Hitler Youth once shot him through the jaw. He says he used to choke up at the thought of losing his mother, but now he is stoic, his articulation slow but deliberate.

For Mr. Schwartz, speaking openly about secrets he kept for decades is cathartic, but for Germany he also plays an invaluable role in bolstering Holocaust education at a time when the number of living witnesses is shrinking by the year.

Germany is not alone in fretting over how to teach the Holocaust once the survivor generation is gone, but its role as perpetrator heightens a sense of urgency.

Survivors’ stories, like the ones Mr. Schwartz recently told at the Martinum Gymnasium in Emsdetten, are especially important for younger generations who feel increasingly detached from the crimes of their forebears, educators say. Firsthand accounts provide an emotional link to the atrocities that other forms of memorialization simply cannot duplicate.

“To hear it from someone who was there is different than reading dry books,” said Fransiska Hollekamp, 17, one of the 50 students here listening to Mr. Schwartz. “It’s so much more real.”
Let's be up front and honest about what these "Holocaust survivors", and the Holocaust industry in general, are doing to us and our children. They are psychologically and emotionally terrorizing us into accepting their fake narrative of history. That is what they are doing - and it's time we recognize it.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Childish, anti-White ADL Jews denounce John Friend as "anti-Semite"

Two days ago, Access ADL, the official blog of the White-hating, Jewish supremacist propaganda and intelligence gathering organization known as the Anti-Defamation League, posted a blog denouncing yours truly as an "anti-Semite" in an effort to not only defame me, but also David North, a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies. Mr. North appeared on The Realist Report last Wednesday, where we discussed the EB-5 visa program and the proposed "China City" scheduled to be built in New York state.

True to form, the pathetic, childish, classless Jews writing for Access ADL spewed their typical Marxist, anti-White buzzwords, including "anti-Semite", "conspiracy theory", and "white supremacist", in a rather laughable attempt to criticize and denounce the information I am presenting on this website and on my radio program. Of course, none of the information I've presented here and on The Realist Report was rationally, intelligently, or even coherently addressed - I was merely smeared as an "anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist", a "Holocaust denier", and a "white supremacist", while Mr. North was denounced for simply appearing as a guest on my radio program.

Let's have a quick look at the blog post:

David North, a fel­low with the anti-immigrant group Cen­ter for Immi­gra­tion Stud­ies (CIS) appeared on “The Real­ist Report,” a radio show hosted by the vir­u­lent anti-Semite and Holo­caust denier, John Friend. The show focused on immigration.

After the inter­view with North, Friend also pro­moted his white suprema­cist views regard­ing immi­gra­tion. He wrote in the com­ments sec­tion of his web­site that he wished he asked North the fol­low­ing ques­tion: “In your view, do tra­di­tion­ally White West­ern Euro­pean coun­tries have the right to main­tain and pro­tect their tra­di­tional racial, eth­nic, and cul­tural her­itage?” Also in the com­ments sec­tion, Friend pro­moted the anti-Semitic con­spir­acy the­ory that Jews are respon­si­ble for non-white immi­gra­tion to the United States. [...]
Really folks, how childish and ridiculous is this? Simply wondering whether or not traditionally White Western European countries - such as the United States of America, the country I reside in - have the right, as all sovereign nation states do, to maintain and protect their traditional racial, ethnic, and cultural heritage is considered a "white supremacist" point of view, according to the virulently anti-White Jews writing for Access ADL. Asian countries, African countries, South American countries, and, most ironically, the Jewish state of Israel are certainly allowed to maintain and protect their traditional racial, ethnic, and cultural heritage. In fact, to even become a citizen of the Jewish state of Israel, one must prove their Jewish racial heritage.

But heaven forbid a White man wonder aloud whether or not White countries have the right to maintain and protect their traditional racial and cultural heritage and make up - that's "supremacist" and "racist" after all, right? The hypocrisy is simply insulting and unacceptable.

Even more laughable, the White-hating Jews writing at the Access ADL blog describe the well documented fact that Jews have been and continue to be (largely) responsible for promoting and implementing policies designed to destroy the traditional White racial and cultural make up of the United States as an "anti-Semitic conspiracy theory". I wonder what the White-hating Jews writing for Access ADL have to say about the following report appearing earlier this summer in the popular Jewish newspaper, The Jewish Daily Forward. Is The Jewish Daily Forward a promoter of "anti-Semitic conspiracy theories" as well?

[...] After months of delay, the U.S. Senate is set to vote on the most comprehensive immigration reform legislation in 27 years. And Jewish groups across the country are acting together in a way characteristic of the community on few issues besides Israel.

“It’s about the right thing to do,” said Robert Gittelson, co-founder of Conservatives for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, and a Republican. In op-ed pieces and interviews, Gittelson, a retired Jewish businessman from California’s San Fernando Valley, has called certain GOP strategies on immigration reform “un-biblical” and “cruel.”

Those leading an active push for the bill, which will offer a path to citizenship for some of the nation’s 11 million undocumented aliens, include the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Bend the Arc and the National Council of Jewish Women.

The Senate vote — and the even harder struggle that will follow in the Republican-controlled House — represents the fulfillment of a sustained campaign by the Jewish community for immigration reform, which has built momentum over the past decade. [...]
Again, think about how ridiculously childish and laughable the anti-White Jews at Access ADL truly are. Those of us concerned about the massive influx of non-White, largely unskilled legal and illegal immigrants into the United States are "white supremacists", while those of us pointing out the well documented fact that the organized Jewish community is largely responsible for promoting and advancing policies that erode the traditional racial and cultural make up of America are "anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists".

This pathetic, childish blog post denouncing me as an "anti-Semite", a "white supremacist", and a "conspiracy theorist" only further clarifies what the primary purpose of the ADL truly is: to slander and attack any person exposing Jewish lies and the international Jewish agenda for world domination and subjugation, commonly referred to as the "New World Order". 

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Binge drinking: A reflection of our debauched culture

A recent article appearing in The New York Times reported on the culture of binge drinking - consuming massive amounts of alcohol in a short period of time - in Britain, and the problems confronting local municipal authorities and police departments as a result of it:

It was just after 4 a.m., the last clubs were closing and the police had three young men pinned against a brick wall and a fourth on the ground. The young men, gloriously incoherent, some of them bleeding, could barely stand, let alone answer the questions from the officers, who were responding to a fight. As the scene in downtown Northampton unfolded, another drunken young man slugged a passer-by, then fled.

A young woman, Becky, tried to attend to her boyfriend, whose arm was numb and collar bone possibly broken. It was freezing cold, but she had on a thin dress and no shoes. He begged her to stay; drunk herself, she walked away, then returned, crying, and began to kiss him as the police tried to restore order. [...]

It was just another Friday night in Northampton, where young Britons, often in packs, go out to get thoroughly, blindingly and often violently drunk, said Inspector Vaughan Clarke of the Northamptonshire Police. Given the price of alcohol in bars, pubs and clubs, they often “pre-load” with cheap vodka and gin from 24-hour discount stores or supermarkets. Some arrive in the city center drunk; by the time they leave, they make the city’s vagrants look sober.

From Falstaff to Churchill and beyond, Britons have been known for their love of drink. But whether as entertainment or mating ritual, the spectacle of dressed-up youth wandering the early morning streets barely able to walk or talk has become an issue of growing social importance, because of both the violence that alcohol often engenders and the vulnerability of young women, who are sometimes molested or raped when they are in no condition to defend themselves. [...]
Binge drinking is not limited to our British cousins. America has a very real problem with binge drinking as well, and this author can personally attest to it. More and more Americans are becoming strictly concerned with "having fun", partying, drinking excessive amounts of alcohol, and "enjoying life" free from any responsibility or concerns for the past, present, or future.

As a society, we seem to be incapable of dealing with any serious political or cultural issues confronting our nation or world. We're more concerned with our favorite football team, television show, beer or alcoholic beverage, or what we are going to do on the weekend.

The epidemic of binge drinking, along with the rise of broken families, promiscuous sex, and living a hedonistic lifestyle generally, are merely reflections of our debauched, corrupted, superficial culture. The sooner we recognize this, the sooner we'll be able to repair our damaged society. 

Sunday, December 22, 2013

"Holocaust" satire

satire: the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.
You may have read in some obscure part of the internet that the Holocaust of six million Jews during WWII is a hoax - it didn't happen - and that all of the heroic survivors and eye witnesses of Nazis atrocities are actually embellishing or outright fabricating their entire experience during WWII. Some even go so far as to claim that much, if not all, of the infamous photographic and video imagery depicting the Holocaust - piles of dead bodies, emaciated prisoners, death camps, and other iconic imagery associated with WWII and the systematic extermination of European Jewry - is either misrepresented, distorted, or even outright fabricated.

Many bloggers, researchers, and independent media personalities promote this far fetched, ridiculous conspiracy theory on the internet and elsewhere. Only a pathologically insane and illogical mind - a delusional individual - could actually entertain these ideas, and I'm here today to set the record straight.

Holocaust denying conspiracy theorists claim that the survivors of the Holocaust and other eye witnesses to Nazi atrocities are embellishing or outright fabricating their experience and suffering during WWII, "acting" so to speak in a made-for-television drama designed to denigrate and slander Adolf Hitler and National Socialism specifically, and the German people generally, in addition to capturing a lucrative financial and sympathy racket manufactured to advance international Jewry's global agenda. I'm sure you've seen Holocaust survivors and other eye witnesses to Nazi atrocities on television programs, in documentaries, at museums, or even in person. Many Holocaust survivors actually travel around the country, visiting elementary and middle schools across the United States, to tell students about their experience during WWII.

First of all, if the Holocaust denying conspiracy theorists are correct, how many people would have to be involved in this gigantic swindle? Are we to believe that all of the alleged "lying Holocaust survivors" and other eye witnesses to Nazi atrocities are "crisis actors" deceiving the public in order to advance a particular agenda and narrative of history, as Holocaust denying conspiracy theorists allege? Again, how many people would have to be involved in such a massive conspiracy? And to think that the mass media, entertainment establishment, and educational system would simply go along with and participate in such a deception - where does this pathologically insane conspiracy theorizing end?

Do you really believe that all of the Holocaust survivors and eye witnesses of Nazi atrocities presented on the television and at Holocaust museums are liars, playing a role in a scripted propaganda campaign designed to systematically target and exploit a mass audience's emotions and basic psychology, as some argue?

Are we to believe that "everyone is in on it," including modern Hollywood producers and educators, such as the legendary Hollywood film director Steven Spielberg, the renowned historian Deborah Lipstadt, and Holocaust icon and activist Elie Wiesel, along with millions of others? Is the United States federal government - the President and Congress, for example - part of the conspiracy to promote the "Holohoax" as well? Are they all "crisis actors" or somehow a part of the conspiracy?

Think about it: for the Holocaust to have been a hoax millions of people - Holocaust survivors, government officials, media executives, educators and historians, and countless others - would have to be involved in this conspiracy. And no one has said anything about it or exposed these "liars" yet? Come on folks!

Holocaust denying conspiracy theorists also claim that gas chambers do not exist - at least not for the purpose of systematically murdering people - and there never was an organized effort to exterminate European Jewry during WWII.

How such ridiculous claims could be taken seriously is simply beyond me.

We have seen countless videos and images of gas chambers, along with numerous photos of emaciated (presumably) Jewish prisoners and stacks of (presumably) dead Jewish men, women, and children, demonstrating that the Holocaust was indeed real and that there was indeed a systematic campaign to exterminate European Jewry. Plus, countless Holocaust survivors have provided first hand eye witness accounts of gassings and mass murders of fellow Jews - often their own family members and personal friends - at the hands of the Nazis and their sympathizers during WWII. Even Rudolf Höss, the German Commandant of the Auschwitz death camp, admitted that the Germans did have a systematic plan to exterminate European Jewry, and that roughly 3 million Jews were murdered at Auschwitz alone - 2.5 million of them by means of gassing.

How much proof do we need to demonstrate that the evil Nazis systematically murdered 6 million Jews during WWII?

Are we to believe, as the Holocaust denying conspiracy theorists allege, that the iconic Holocaust imagery, including the numerous videos and photos depicting the events of WWII and the Holocaust, is either distorted, taken out of context, or even outright fabricated? That the thousands - perhaps millions - of Holocaust survivors are "liars" deceiving the public in order to advance a particular narrative of history that benefits international Jewry's global agenda? That Rudolf Höss and other captured German military and political officials were coerced or tortured into providing their "false" testimony?

Again, how many people would have to be involved for such a deception to be successfully executed - without anyone saying anything?

Think for a moment what exactly these Holocaust denying conspiracy theorists would have you believe. 

They would have you believe that the mass media and entertainment complex, in addition to the educational establishment, is systematically deceiving the public by presenting distorted, fabricated or otherwise misleading images and videos, along with scripted testimony from "crisis actors" playing Holocaust survivors, in an effort to instill and perpetuate the official narrative of WWII and the deliberate murder of 6 million Jews at the hands of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis - all in order to advance a particular Jewish financial and political agenda. That somehow the Holocaust "didn't happen" and all the survivors are really just lying about or outright fabricating their experience and mistreatment at the hands of the evil Nazis during WWII. That somehow, without anyone actually saying anything, the media and entertainment industry have been and continue to present misleading or even fabricated photographic and video imagery to demonstrate the Holocaust did indeed take place.

What ludicrous, delusional, insane nonsense these Holocaust denying conspiracy theorists are spewing, infecting and corrupting the minds of millions of otherwise good natured people all across the world!

Many Holocaust denying conspiracy theorists point to David Cole's investigation and subsequent video documentaries allegedly "debunking" the fact that gas chambers were used to exterminate millions of Jews at the Auschwitz death camp and elsewhere (see here for more). Of course, those of us in the real truth movement recognize that David Cole is himself a Jew, and his entire presentation is based on "Jew tricks" and deceptions designed to dupe an unsuspecting investigator.

We simply cannot accept or even entertain ideas coming from Jews (or non-Whites generally).

Bottom line: you're either with us or against us. 

You either entertain and accept these ludicrous, delusional conspiracy theories, or you recognize how insane these ideas truly are and how damaging they are to our credibility as a movement. Even if the Holocaust denying conspiracy theorists are correct (which, of course, they are not), and the media and educational establishment have been and continue to systematically deceive and manipulate the public using misleading, distorted, or outright fabricated imagery, in addition to presenting ostensibly genuine victims and survivors of the Holocaust who in fact are telling entirely fabricated stories designed to target an audience's emotions and base psychology - even if all this is true - discussing or highlighting any of this information only makes us look crazy and alienates the masses from our main message.

Individuals promoting ridiculous conspiracy theories, such as the Holocaust was a "hoax" and never happened, must be called out, discredited, and shunned from our movement.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a game: delusional, mentally unstable individuals promoting ridiculous and outlandish conspiracy theories, including the notion that the Jewish controlled mass media is systematically deceiving and manipulating the global public by broadcasting fabricated, distorted, or misleading photographs and videos, and presenting false scripted testimony as a means of manufacturing and advancing a particular (false) narrative of history or contemporary events for geopolitical and sociocultural purposes, cannot be tolerated in this movement. These pathologically insane individuals must be denounced and shunned before they do our movement any more damage than they already have.

Hail victory.

Editor's Note: I have been criticized (in a rather ignorant, fallacious manner, I might add) by individuals in the alternative media for discussing the role that the Jewish mass media plays in systematically deceiving and manipulating the public by presenting misleading, distorted, or entirely fabricated images or videos and false scripted testimony in order to advance certain agendas and manufacture an artificial reality we are forced to operate in. 

However, these same individuals will be the first to proudly proclaim that the alleged Jewish "Holocaust" of 6 million Jews is a total fraud (which, of course, it is), and that the media has been and continues to systematically deceive and manipulate the global public into accepting this fake story. 

What you just read was a satirical piece I wrote using the faulty logic and arguments of my critics, and applying them to the fake "Holocaust" narrative of WWII in an effort to debunk "Holocaust deniers". My critics apparently fail to understand that if they were to utilize the faulty logic and arguments when critcizing me (for analyzing the media's role in events such as 9/11 or Sandy Hook or the Boston "bombing", for example) they would have a hard time debunking the fake "Holocaust" narrative of WWII. - JRF

Friday, December 20, 2013

Perverted Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein, dead at 77

“The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.” 

Al Goldstein, the perverted Jewish pornographer and publisher of Screw magazine, has died at the age of 77. This filthy, despicable man was the epitome of the "dirty old Jew" stereotype, and Goldstein seemed to relish in it, as The Jewish Daily Forward admitted. The New York Times reports:

Al Goldstein, the scabrous publisher whose Screw magazine pushed hard-core pornography into the cultural mainstream, died on Thursday at a nursing home in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn. He was 77.

The cause was believed to be renal failure, his lawyer, Charles C. DeStefano, said.

Mr. Goldstein did not invent the dirty magazine, but he was the first to present it to a wide audience without the slightest pretense of classiness or subtlety. Sex as depicted in Screw was seldom pretty, romantic or even particularly sexy. It was, primarily, a business, with consumers and suppliers like any other.

The manifesto in Screw’s debut issue in 1968 was succinct. “We promise never to ink out a pubic hair or chalk out an organ,” it read. “We will apologize for nothing. We will uncover the entire world of sex. We will be the Consumer Reports of sex.”

Mr. Goldstein, who lived to shock and offend and was arrested more than a dozen times on obscenity charges, stuck around long enough for social mores and technology to overtake him. By the time his company went bankrupt in 2003, he was no longer a force in the $10-billion-a-year industry he pioneered. But for better or worse, his influence was undeniable.

“He clearly coarsened American sensibilities,” Alan M. Dershowitz, the civil liberties advocate and Mr. Goldstein’s sometime lawyer, said in 2004.

“Hefner did it with taste,” Mr. Dershowitz added, referring to Hugh Hefner, the founder and publisher of Playboy, which predated Screw by 15 years. “Goldstein’s contribution is to be utterly tasteless.”
Pornography, prostitution, sex trafficking, and the systematic promotion of sexual deviance, promiscuity, and debauchery (not to mention homosexuality and transgenderism) are all Jewish in their inspiration. As Dr. David Duke has documented, pornography and the systematic promotion of sexual deviance are weapons used by the organized Jewish community in their on going cultural, spiritual, and psychological war against traditional White Western Christian civilization. In Dr. Duke's book Jewish Supremacism, he cites an article published in the winter 2004 edition of The Jewish Quarterly, "a leading literary, cultural and political journal" in the Jewish academic world, where Jewish professor Nathan Abrams openly documents the Jewish role in promoting pornography as a means to debase, corrupt, and ultimately destroy White Western Christian civilization.

Professor Abrams describes pornography as "a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged." Professor Abrams goes on to explain that:
Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.
What are Jews saying about Goldstein's death? An article appearing in the popular Jewish newspaper, The Jewish Daily Forward, argues that "our culture will be poorer without" the subversive perverted pornographer Goldstein:

Al Goldstein was a leading figure in the subversion, corruption, and destruction of traditional American morals, sexual practices, and culture, and major Jewish newspapers are lamenting his death, arguing that American "culture will be poorer without" radical, debauched deviants like Goldstein. Could it be any more obvious how hostile towards and contrary to traditional White Western Christian civilization Jews truly are? These people must be excluded from our society, once and for all. 

Thursday, December 19, 2013

The Sandy Hook Poem

The following poem was written by Kelley from Tulsa, an independent investigator of the alleged shooting said to have taken place at the Sandy Hook Elementary School roughly one year ago. Kelley was a special guest on my radio program this past Tuesday, so be sure to listen to that program if you have not already. -JRF

26 people they claim to have died,
YouTubers and bloggers call it the "Sandy Hook Lie".

The parents are too cheerful for this to be real,
for if your child had died, is this how you'd feel?

The motive is clear, they want our guns
and claim Adam used one to murder their daughters and sons.

The Sandy Hook Promise is all but a joke,
Donate! Donate! Donate! until you are broke.

Up at the firehouse round and round they all went
to participate in a FEMA CAPSTONE EVENT.

Victoria Soto to Ana Marquez-Green,
no autopsy report or death certificate has yet to be seen.

They demolished the school and left not a trace,
workers forced to sign letters to hide what they saw in that place.

I know it sounds crazy and mentally ill,
I said, "Hey, what's the deal?"

I can't believe it happened at all, do you?

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

The Realist Report - David North: Center for Immigration Studies

On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by David North, a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies. David and I will be talking about EB-5 visa programs and the "China City" project currently scheduled for development in Sullivan County, New York, along with other issues related to legal and illegal immigration policy in the United States.

You can download the mp3 for this program here, or visit The Realist Report on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.

Below are relevant links for this program:

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

The Realist Report - Kelley from Tulsa & Sofia Smallstorm

On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by Kelley from Tulsa and Sofia Smallstorm, two independent investigators of the alleged shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School last December. Kelley, Sofia, and I will be discussing their investigation and conclusions regarding the Sandy Hook "shooting," and the political and cultural agenda which has been and continues to be advanced in its aftermath.

You can download the mp3 for this program here, or visit The Realist Report on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.

Below are relevant links for this program:

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Horus the Avenger on The Realist Report

Subscribe to The Realist Report on YouTube

Check out WhiteRabbitRadio.net

Subscribe to WhiteRabbitRadioTV on YouTube

The Mantra


Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Former Israeli central banker offered top position at Fed

Yesterday, The Jewish Daily Forward (citing Reuters) reported that Stanley Fischer, the former head of the Israeli central bank, has been offered a top position at the Jewish-controlled Federal Reserve by the Obama administration:

Former Israeli central bank governor Stanley Fischer has been offered the position of vice chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Wednesday.

“He’s been offered the job” the source, who declined to be named, said. The source added that the process would still require approval by the U.S. Senate.

World-renowned economist Fischer ran the Bank of Israel for eight years until he stepped down in June and was widely credited with guiding Israel through the global economic crisis with minimal damage.
The Washington Post reported on this development as well:
The White House is leaning toward nominating the former leader of Israel’s central bank to become second-in-command at the Federal Reserve, according to people familiar with the appointment.

Stan Fischer helped Israel successfully navigate the global financial crisis, staving off the type of deep recession and muddled recovery that has plagued the United States and Europe. Fischer stepped down from that post this summer after eight years in the job. He has dual citizenship — U.S. and Israeli. [...]
Could it be any more obvious that the entire Federal Reserve System, which is essentially a private consortium of Jewish-run banks and financial institutions granted the authority to print and loan money at interest to the U.S. federal government and other private institutions, is a Jewish monopoly? The current chairwoman of the Federal Reserve, Janet Yellen, is Jewish, as were her immediate predecessors, Ben Bernanke and Alan Greenspan.

Could you imagine if The Washington Post reported that the Obama administration offered a top position at the Federal Reserve to an individual with dual citizenship with the U.S. and China, or Brazil, or Mexico, or Russia, or anywhere else other than the Jewish state of Israel? What would the public say if the former head of the Bank of China were offered a top position at the Federal Reserve? 

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

The Realist Report - Horus the Avenger

On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by Horus the Avenger of WhiteRabbitRadio.net. Horus and I will be discussing the anti-White narrative found in the mainstream media and educational establishment, and the very real dangers facing the White race globally.

You can download the mp3 for this program here, or visit The Realist Report on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.

Below are relevant links for this program:

Sunday, December 8, 2013

The Realist Report - Reflecting on 9/11 "debate" and its aftermath

On this edition of The Realist Report, I'll be discussing the 9/11 "debate" I participated in last weekend and its aftermath. Tom in Connecticut will be joining me, and calls will be taken during throughout the program.

You can download the mp3 for this program here, or visit The Realist Report on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.

Below are relevant links for this program:

Friday, December 6, 2013

Regarding Carolyn Yeager

This past Monday, Carolyn Yeager, one of the leading voices in the pro-White and WWII revisionist community, dedicated the entire second hour of her radio program The Heretics' Hour to criticize and attack me following the "debate" I participated in with Mike Delaney and Scott Roberts, and Andrew Anglin's subsequent commentary on it at the Daily Stormer. I'd like to respond to what she had to say, and what it reveals about her character.

Yeager begins by saying that she has always had a problem with me, viewing my "agreeableness" and behavior as extremely suspect. She also states that she believes that I am Jewish, or at least partly Jewish. She went on to say that she views me as a very serious problem in "this movement" and not at all an asset, as some people have expressed to her. She stated that I have always tried to be nice to her and have reached out to her in the past.

Folks, I am not Jewish. None of my ancestors were Jewish as far as I know. I would be utterly shocked if I discovered I had any Jewish blood flowing through my veins. At one point in the program, Yeager described me as "big" and "heavy," saying I have put on weight and that I look "older." She even stated that I look like I would fit right in over in Tel Aviv, Israel. She literally said that. And she was basing this judgement off of these pictures I posted a couple weeks ago when I was in Santa Barbara, California:

Please let me know if you agree with Yeager's assessment that I look like a fat Jew that would fit in just fine over in Tel Aviv in the comments section. I am just under 5'11, and I weigh roughly 190 pounds. I graduated high school almost 10 years ago, and when I did I weighed 180 pounds. So I have put on some weight in the past 10 years, and I could probably stand to lose a few pounds. But really? Do I look like a "fat Jew from Tel Aviv" to you?

I have emailed Yeager in the past. I remember sending her a link to an article I wrote entitled Rethinking Hitler & National Socialism in the summer of 2012. Carolyn is an excellent source when it comes to Adolf Hitler, WWII, "Holocaust" revisionism, and National Socialism, and I have been influenced tremendously by her research into these subjects.

What I find strange is that during her radio broadcast Monday evening, she did not mention that she actually emailed me on January 1st of this year, asking me to be a guest on her radio program to talk about the Sandy Hook "shooting", which she was very suspicious of. I was a guest on Dr. Rebecca Carley's radio program in late December of last year and we discussed the Sandy Hook "shooting" where I explained that I saw no reason to conclude a shooting even took place at that elementary school, let alone that anyone was actually murdered that day. Yeager wanted me to join her on her radio program to talk about it. This is her email to me (notice the subject - "The Sandy Hook Fraud"):
From: carolyn@carolynyeager.net
Date: Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:46 AM
Subject: The Sandy Hook Fraud
To: john.robert.friend@gmail.com

Hi John,

Happy New Year! I listened to your program with Dr. Carley about the Sandy Hook hoax and thought you sounded very good. I tend to generally agree with your position although I have not devoted a lot of time to studying this affair. I have, however, watched and read all the major exposes. What I find most convincing of a hoax is that no evidence has been presented to the public ... nothing. We are expected to believe whatever the media is telling us. And the vast majority of people are dutifully doing so. (Because they can't believe the Big Lie.)

I wonder if your views have evolved from what you said then. Where do you stand now? What is the story with the bodies of the dead children and their funerals? How is it possible that no one died, and this school and the whole town has been fooled??? It's true there was very little coverage of this aspect.

I'd be interested in having you as a guest on Saturday Afternoon with Carolyn this coming Saturday, Jan. 5 from 2-4PM Eastern time, if you can talk about this.

Best wishes,
I replied to her stating that I would not able to join her the day she asked me to, and we exchanged a few more emails back and forth over the next few days. I never made it on her program.

Why did Yeager not mention this? Clearly, she did not view me as suspect when she asked me to be on her radio program at the beginning of this year. What made her change her mind?

I believe what got Yeager suspicious of me was when I emailed her, William Finck, and Deanna Spingola later that month (mid-January 2013) and informed them that I was going to be having Jim Condit, Jr. on my radio program to have a gentlemanly discussion on Adolf Hitler. Condit promotes the truly absurd notion that Hitler was a "Zionist agent" and was possibly Jewish. I have done my best to debunk all these ridiculous theories and slanders against Adolf Hitler in an article entitled Was Hitler a Zionist stooge? for those interested.

I originally asked Yeager, William Finck, and Deanna Spingola if they were interested in calling in and participating in the discussion. But Yeager was not happy with me for having Condit on my program (mp3 here), and she said so in her email reply to me. The entire email thread is worth posting for everyone to read for themselves, starting with my original email to Yeager, Finck, and Spingola:
From: John Friend
Date: Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:10 PM
Subject: The Realist Report with John Friend 01/21 by Truth Militia | Blog Talk Radio
To: Deanna Spingola
, carolyn@carolynyeager.net, William Finck
I think it would be great if one or all of you could call in during the second hour at some point. Let me know if you have any questions.



From: carolyn@carolynyeager.net
Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: The Realist Report with John Friend 01/21 by Truth Militia | Blog Talk Radio
To: John Friend

Cc: Deanna Spingola
, William Finck

How would I be calling in to your program on Monday from 8 to 10 pm Central when I am doing my own program at that time?

I find it questionable that you have decided to do a program on the day and time that my well-known show, The Heretics' Hour, has been broadcasting for three years now. And then you pretend you don't even know it. The Heretics' Hour has been a live, call-in show for 17 months already in my Monday night time slot.

I think all you're doing by having Jim Condit, Jr. on, and promoting his websites, is to give credibility to his ideas. And you want other well-known people with good reputations to associate themselves with you in this?! You seem to be quite an operator, and you "hang out with" and even promote several frauds on your Blog. Truth Militia is also a suspicious undertaking. I do not wish for them and never gave my permission for them to use my name and reputation to try to stair-step a sleezy start-up operation up to a level of unearned respectability. I have no idea who these people are ... nor who you are, for that matter. Do you have a history? I have been a presence on the Internet with my own name and website since 2007.

The future of "truth" on the Internet looks bleak indeed.

Yours truly,

From: John Friend
Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: The Realist Report with John Friend 01/21 by Truth Militia | Blog Talk Radio
To: carolyn@carolynyeager.net
Cc: Deanna Spingola
, William Finck

Hi Carolyn, I know you have a program Monday evenings, I download it and listen almost every week. But I thought your show may be over by the time mine started. My shows are always on Mondays, because that is the only time I can do it.

I think Jim Condit Jr. is an honest guy who is just totally wrong about Adolf Hitler. I'm not trying to promote anything. When I have a guest on, I link to their website so people can check out the info they have for themselves.

If you or Deanna or Bill do not want to call in and address Condit, that's fine with me. I just thought you all may be interested, because I know you debated him on Deanna's show. And I know Bill debated him on a show with Mike Delaney.

As far as my history goes, I've had a blog for a few years and started getting more and more into radio the past 7 or 8 months or so. I'm not trying to con anyone Carolyn. The two main guys from Truth Militia Radio said they were interested in having other hosts produce radio programs during the week (they broadcast Sunday evenings), so I emailed them and they let me have my own show Monday evenings (normally). I don't agree with some of the things they say, but that's how it goes. Have you contacted them to let them know that you do not approve of them using your name and reputation to gain respectability? If you really feel that way, tell them. I'm sure they'd respond.

Take care, and keep up the good work.


From: carolyn@carolynyeager.net
Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:25 AM
Subject: Re: The Realist Report with John Friend 01/21 by Truth Militia | Blog Talk Radio
To: John Friend

Cc: Deanna Spingola
, William Finck

You listen to my program almost every week (downloaded - I understand) but you don't know what time it is.

"I'm not trying to promote anything."
"I'm not trying to con anyone."
There is a lack of honesty here.

Those Condit "debates" were two years ago and nothing has changed since. So why the need for another one by YOU. And you're such great friends with Charlie Guiliani who is a friend/ally with Condit's ideas ... except for the Christianity part. It's all such a tangled web, but you have no interest in untangling it, but tangling it up more, it seems.

You are not the only one doing this. Most are such damn opportunists just playing around on the world-wide web ... for no other reason than because they can. I'm only asking people to THINK. You join up with Truth Militia without even knowing them, without agreeing with some of what they say, but ... what the heck, it's an opportunity. That's either not true or it doesn't speak well for you.

From: John Friend
Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: The Realist Report with John Friend 01/21 by Truth Militia | Blog Talk Radio
To: carolyn@carolynyeager.net
Cc: Deanna Spingola
, William Finck

Carolyn, I simply informed you, and Deanna and Bill, about this upcoming debate. If you can't participate, or don't want to, or think I'm dishonest, or some opportunist, fine. Don't tune in and don't call in. I am interested in this subject, and thought it would be a good debate.

I have been on Charlie's show a few times, and he came on mine a few weeks ago. I don't like the way he bashes Christianity, especially because he doesn't offer a solution or replacement for it. But I enjoy listening to his radio programs, just as I enjoy listening to yours. If you can't tell I'm being honest about what I'm all about then you simply haven't been following what I'm doing on my blog and radio program.

Either way, I'm done with this email thread. I find your accusations a bit childish to be quite honest. If Deanna or Bill want to call in, they are more than welcome to.

You can see for yourself what type of person Carolyn Yeager is just by reading this email thread.

I asked Yeager to be a guest on my radio program back in June of this year, months after the dispute posted above. I wanted to discuss "Holocaust" revisionism and her views of Adolf Hitler. She declined. Since then, I haven't communicated with her at all.

Yeager also characterized me as a "serious copy cat" and that all I do is "mimic others." As I stated earlier, and I have been very clear about this when I write on my website or broadcast on my radio program, I have been influenced by Carolyn Yeager's research, writings, and radio programs. I have learned a great deal by listening to her radio programs and reading her articles dealing with WWII revisionism and Adolf Hitler. I have also learned a great deal from many other individuals, including Deanna Spingola and William Finck. William Finck's Mein Kampf Project at Christogenea.org is perhaps the best source available on the internet for the truth about Adolf Hitler, National Socialist Germany, and related matters. I do my best to give credit where credit is due, and cite sources properly.

Yeager claimed that I mimic not only her, but also Andrew Anglin. To make her case, she claimed that I started writing my News from the Jews column and posting it on Fridays in an effort to "copy" or "mimic" Anglin's weekly Fascist Friday Wrap Up article that he (usually) posts on Fridays.

If you look on the right hand side of this website, you will find a link for the Archives of all my News from the Jews columns. I have posted many of these articles on Friday, but certainly not all of them. I have been hosting two, and sometimes three or four, radio broadcasts per week, normally on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays, so of course I'm going to post a more lengthy written article on the weekend (Friday or Saturday normally). The first time I ever wrote a News from the Jews column was back in August of 2012 - well before I even knew Andrew Anglin. I'd write them somewhat sporadically, and really began making it a weekly column in May or June of this year. Sometimes I would post them on Fridays, sometimes I wouldn't. So if Yeager is going to claim all I do is "mimic" and "copy" others, and that I want to "be like Andrew Anglin," she's going to have to do better than that.

Again, I have been influenced by and have learned a great deal from many individuals since I began this blog, including Yeager, Spingola, Finck, Rodney Martin, John Kaminski, Bruce Campbell, Dr. Jim Fetzer, Dr. Kevin MacDonald, Dr. David Duke, and many others, including Andrew Anglin. But to say that all I do is "mimic" and "copy" others is a bit disingenuous to say the least, especially considering I always try my best to cite sources and explain where I found my information or gained my perspective on a particular issue. Anyone who has followed my website and radio program knows this. Just go through and read some of my past News from the Jews columns and you will clearly see that what I am saying is true.

Yeager also questioned my "suspect" connections to "Jews" and other "shills" or "disinfo" agents in the alternative media. She pointed specifically to Dr. Jim Fetzer, Henry Makow, Michael Rivero, and Veronica Clark as prime examples.

Many of you know that Henry Makow and Mike Rivero are both Jewish. I posted a link to an article that appeared on Henry Makow's site a couple weeks ago when I interviewed Tom in Connecticut. I posted it because I mentioned that specific article during the conversation with Tom. I also posted a link to Mike Rivero's site in a blog post a while back (I can't find it now, but I know the one Yeager was talking about). The reason why I did was because I was quoting Rivero. You can see that I try to cite and link to the sources I am using, talking about, or quoting.

Now, Yeager is right about one thing: there really is no reason for me to ever link to or cite Henry Makow or Mike Rivero for anything. Both of them absolutely fail the Hitler Test (and other tests as well), so I will not be linking to them or even mentioning them in the future.

I have received all sorts of criticism from all sorts of people for my association with, respect, and admiration of Dr. Jim Fetzer. I do not agree with Dr. Fetzer on everything, but I do think he is a brilliant man that has done a lot of excellent research into a wide variety of topics, including the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and 9/11. I enjoy listening to his radio programs (for the most part), and I have read many of his articles. Dr. Fetzer is not (outwardly) pro-White, and he is most assuredly confused about Adolf Hitler, National Socialism, and WWII generally, from what I gather. But I think he is a great source of information, and he has proven himself to be intellectually honest on numerous occasions just since I've followed his work. Dr. Fetzer is not perfect, and he is not a good source of information when it comes to WWII-related subjects, but I do consider him to be a top notch intellect and an honest man.

Yeager pointed to my review of Veronica Clark's book Hitler and Himmler Uncensored, which I wrote back in May of 2012, as somehow "suspect," proving that I am somehow associated with Veronica Clark. I have never met or spoken to Veronica Clark. I have listened to many of her radio programs with Deanna Spingola in the past, and I have three of her books. She emailed me months ago asking me to take down any links to her work because she was not and is not a "White Nationalist" or a "National Socialist" or a "Fascist" and she wanted no connections with anyone who was. So I really don't know what Yeager is getting at regarding Veronica Clark. I have some of her books, which I found very interesting. So what?

At the beginning of the program, Yeager stated that what's happened as a result of the "debate" and the resulting fallout has "really brought things into focus." And she's absolutely right: what has transpired in the past week really has brought things into focus. The collective behavior of Carolyn Yeager and the trio of Delaney, Roberts, and Anglin demonstrate their utter dishonesty, both on a personal level and, even more importantly, on an intellectual level. Cheap attacks on my character and physical appearance, coupled with a total distortion and misrepresentation of my views, reveal all we need to know about these despicable, undignified, and mean-spirited characters.

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Thoughts on the 9/11 "debate" and its aftermath

The day after the 9/11 "debate" with Mike Delaney and Scott Roberts this past weekend, I had to take my computer to the Apple store for a minor repair. The repair took longer than I expected. A lot has happened since the "debate", and I'd like to take this opportunity to address the "debate" itself and Andrew Anglin's commentary on it. Carolyn Yeager's radio program this past Monday will be addressed in a future blog post.

I would like to thank both Delaney and Roberts, and subsequently both Andrew Anglin and Carolyn Yeager, for providing much needed clarity on their moral standards concerning what they think is intellectually honest discourse.

Agreeing to the "debate" was a total mistake on my part. If we were going to do this properly, we needed to have clear ground rules and an unbiased moderator. In a real debate, each side defends one single specific topic with the other side offering a rebuttal to each argument presented. My intent was to present information on the role of the Jewish media in deceiving the American and world public on 9/11 by broadcasting fabricated or otherwise distorted imagery and testimony. My citation of September Clues was for reference only.

As you heard, Delaney and Roberts had pre-planned to avoid discussing the role of the media on 9/11. This is proven by their preparation of audio clips of Simon Shack making peripheral comments taken out of context in an effort to discredit him and misrepresent his views of 9/11.

The entire "debate" was simply an attack on Simon Shack, coupled with a total distortion of the facts he has brought to light regarding the authenticity of the video and photographic imagery of 9/11, in addition to the serious problems discovered with the alleged "3000 victims" said to have perished on 9/11. I was prepared and willing to discuss all of these details; however, Delaney and Roberts merely wanted to attack Simon's character, claiming he is a Jew, he looks like a Jew, all of the "no planes" researchers are Jews, anyone who considers media fakery on 9/11 as a possibility is a Jew, any who investigates the photographic and video imagery of 9/11 is a Jew or is a fool, anyone who seriously considers the research presented by September Clues is gullible, etc. Delaney and Roberts had prepared clips of Simon Shack on my radio program ready to roll in order to attack him and take his words and research out of context. 

I entered the "debate" with Mike Delaney and Scott Roberts with good intentions and in good faith, thinking we'd actually address Simon's research and my views of 9/11 in an honest, objective way. That's not what happened at all. Instead, Delaney and Roberts just bashed Simon, totally distorting what he has discovered about 9/11. In fact, I don't even think Delaney and Roberts really know what September Clues is all about. Delaney claims to have seen the documentary four times, and if that's true, he simply doesn't understand the information being presented or he is being deliberately dishonest about it. Roberts based all of his arguments off of the interview I conducted with Simon a few weeks ago, and even admitted during the "debate" he had not bothered investigating what Simon and his research team have uncovered about the alleged "victims" on 9/11. I doubt Roberts has watched the September Clues documentary, or read any of the articles on the website and forum. So I was up against two guys that simply didn't know anything about September Clues' research and were hell bent on discrediting Simon Shack as an individual (rather than addressing the facts he has uncovered regarding the 9/11 imagery and alleged "victims").  

Let me start off by explaining where I agree with Delaney and Roberts. There is no doubt that 9/11 was a Jewish operation from start to finish that advanced a particular Jewish agenda both internationally and within the United States (and Western world generally). 9/11 was used to officially initiate the fraudulent international "Global War on Terror", which Jewish intellectuals, propagandists, and strategists have long planned for, and to justify the tyrannical and Orwellian "Homeland Security" agenda within the United States. I began this blog to expose these facts, and do so on a regular basis, both in written form and on my radio broadcasts. 

9/11 was planned, orchestrated, and covered up by Jewish criminals controlling the United States government and media who have direct ties to the state of Israel. That is just a fact, and I agree with Delaney and Roberts that Simon Shack's failure to explicitly state this fact is indeed a problem. September Clues' research focuses primarily on media fakery, deception, and manipulation, and yet, as far as I know, they fail to actually identify who owns and controls the media (Jewish plutocrats and propagandists with direct ties to Israel).

What most bothers me about the failure of Simon Shack and September Clues to properly identify the owners and controllers of the media is that Jews themselves literally admit and brag about the fact that they control the media and Hollywood (and government and Wall Street). Perhaps, due to legal ramifications, Simon Shack does not say these things publicly because of the tyrannical "hate speech" laws in Europe? I simply do not know why Simon and September Clues do not specifically identify the Jewish media as the primary conspirators behind the events of 9/11. But either way, the main points established by his research are sound (by and large), and I have used it to further underscore the central role Jewish criminals played in carrying out and benefitting from the events of 9/11 utilizing their main weapon: the mass media.

Making over-reaching inferential statements like “nobody died” and there’s “nothing to worry about” only serve to discredit their previous work on the media’s role in transmitting manipulated or fabricated imagery and scripted testimony on 9/11, which is another criticism I have of Simon and his work.

At the beginning of the "debate", Delaney criticized many individuals associated with the "9/11 truth movement", and he made a lot of good points. I too have many problems and criticisms of the "9/11 truth movement" and have written about them on this blog. I think many of the individuals associated with the "9/11 truth movement" are promoting disinformation (knowingly or unknowingly), and the vast majority of them are afraid to clearly identify the primary role Israel and international Jewry played in planning, orchestrating, covering up, and benefitting from the events of 9/11.

Delaney and Roberts both repeatedly made the point that the overall Jewish agenda is the destruction of the White race, and that the battle we are engaged in is not merely about money or politics - it is about the Jewish-led assault on the White race. - and I completely agree. The ultimate agenda of the Jews and their puppets pushing for a "New World Order", as I've said repeatedly here and on my radio program, is not merely global governance, a destruction of national sovereignty, and Jewish monopolization of international finance and politics. There is a very real racial agenda as well, and the Jews are aiming to destroy the White race. History can be viewed as the struggle between the Aryan and the Jew. This seems very clear to me, as I'm sure it does to both Delaney and Roberts. 

So there were points made by Delaney and Roberts that I fully agreed with. However, I thought the debate would center around my views of 9/11 and the research September Clues has presented. And it simply did not. Delaney and Roberts were only interested in attacking and discrediting Simon Shack (distorting his views and research in the process), and tying me to him as if Simon is somehow "my leader". Roberts has been going around Facebook and other websites (including my own) claiming that September Clues is "my bible". The basic premise presented in September Clues is correct in that the media transmitted a multi-faceted deception on 9/11. 

That is why I reference their work on that specific issue.

Let me clarify what exactly I am saying about 9/11 and the research September Clues has presented. I am not saying that "there were no planes" or that "no one died on 9/11" or that "nothing hit the towers" or that "nothing happened and 9/11 was a hoax" or that "everything is fake". I am specifically saying that:
  1. There were no hijackings by "Muslim extremists" connected to Osama bin Laden on 9/11;
  2. No large Boeing commercials airliners crashed anywhere on 9/11, including into the WTC towers;
  3. The video imagery broadcast by the Jewish-controlled mass media depicting the events of 9/11 (both the live media footage and subsequent "amateur" videos) is fabricated and is not authentic footage of the day's events, a fact which has been conclusively proven by Simon Shack and September Clues (and other researchers, for that matter);
  4. The Jewish-controlled mass media regularly presents fake images and videos, sometimes utilizing scripted actors, in their on-going psychological and information assault on the global population, which is designed to achieve certain geopolitical and sociocultural goals;
  5. Media fakery and media deception is nothing new; in fact, it is often used in psychological and information warfare, so it should not surprise us that this strategy was employed on 9/11;
  6. Many of the alleged victims said to have died on 9/11 appear to be fabricated identities, and there are very real problems with most, if not all, of the individuals said to have perished that day (from the available evidence, at this time, we cannot be sure exactly how many died or exactly who died as a direct result of the events of 9/11);
  7. The methods used to psychologically and emotionally exploit the American (and world) population on 9/11 follow the same exact template used by Jewish propagandists to instill and perpetuate the fake "Holocaust" narrative of WWII.
The official government and media promoted conspiracy theory explaining the events of 9/11 posits that 19 radical Muslim fanatics hijacked four commercial airliners on the morning of September 11, 2001: American Airlines flights 11 and 77, and United Airlines flights 175 and 93. Flights 11 and 175 were said to have struck the World Trade Center towers, while flight 77 was said to have struck the Pentagon and flight 93 was said to have crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania after the alleged passengers "heroically overtook the hijacked airliner." There is no legitimate evidence to support the official story, and much to disprove it.

Col. George Nelson, a retired U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and former pilot, has remarked: "The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft."

According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, American Airlines flights 11 and 77 were never even scheduled to fly on 9/11, and United Airlines flights 175 and 93 were de-registered as active commercial flights four years after 9/11. The official story regarding the alleged "hijacked airlines" is not only ridiculous, but demonstrably false.

There is literally no evidence that "Muslim radicals" hijacked commercial airliners on 9/11, much less orchestrated and executed the day's events. Many of the alleged "Muslim radicals" said to have participated and died in the 9/11 attacks were actually alive and well after 9/11. All of the phone calls alleged to have been made by "the passengers" on board the "hijacked airliners" have been proven to be fabricated - entirely fake! Dean Hartwell, author of Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk: The 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and Its Indictment of Our Leaders, explains that "the story of the hijackings was given by the media to the public via fake cell phone conversations and the false use of names and images of Arabs as perpetrators." The official narrative of 9/11 was entirely scripted and designed to exploit our basic psychology and emotions using fabricated images, videos and scripted testimony from actors playing a specific role in this event.

Again, I am not saying that "nothing hit the World Trade Center towers" because something may have. I am saying that the videos depicting "an airplane" (or a poor image of one) hitting the World Trade Center towers are not genuine. I am also saying that the official narrative explaining the events of 9/11, particularly in New York City, is demonstrably false. Perhaps a missile or unmanned aerial drone hit the World Trade Center towers, the type of military technology Rabbi Dov Zakheim's company specialized in producing? Maybe nothing hit the World Trade Center towers, and explosions were placed in the floors where the "hijacked airliner" was said to have crashed? I just don't know, and am open to any of these possibilities. I think they are all interesting theories worth exploring. But the bottom line is that the video broadcast (both the live footage and subsequent "amateur" videos) to the global population by the Jewish-controlled mass media depicting "an airplane" crashing into the World Trade Center towers has been conclusively demonstrated to be unauthentic.

There is no doubt about this anymore folks, all you have to do is sit down and see for yourself. There are so many problems with all of the 9/11 video imagery it is truly mind-boggling. In fact, in the September Clues documentary, Simon specifically points out that the video trickery involved with 9/11 was designed to bewilder and confuse any rational, objective study of it. And he's right.

If you are truly interested in this aspect of 9/11, and I firmly believe it is an important aspect to understanding 9/11 and how we are so easily exploited by the Jewish-controlled mass media, you have to watch September Clues and check out their research into these matters. I am not saying they are perfect or that I agree with everything Simon has said about 9/11; but I think their analysis of the 9/11 imagery is spot on, and I think they raise a number of very real problems with the alleged "3000 victims" said to have died on 9/11.

None of this was addressed in a rational, intelligent, or even coherent manner by either Delaney or Roberts during the "debate". Delaney's main arguments consisted of claiming that:
  1. Everyone who has ever researched and discussed the "no planes" or video fakery aspect of 9/11 research is a Jew (not at all true);
  2. Simon Shack looks Jewish;
  3. Simon Shack is a Jew;
  4. Thousands, perhaps millions, of people would have seen a plane strike the WTC towers (an assumption Mike has made without any evidence or proof - in fact, if you analyze the "eye witnesses" on 9/11 in New York City, you will find that a small group of individuals connected to the media implanted the idea a commercial airliner crashed into the WTC during the live broadcast of the day's events, while many others said they thought they heard or saw a missile, a smaller plane or drone, or nothing at all hit the WTC);
  5. Simon Shack looks Jewish, and all of Denaley's friends think so, too - therefore, Simon is Jewish and all his research is suspect and ridiculous.
The main arguments made by Roberts included:
  1. 9/11 was done by Jews to advance a Jewish agenda (agreed!);
  2. The Jews have no problem murdering non-Jews, therefore they would have no problem murdering real people on 9/11 - so Simon's research into the alleged "victims" is not even worth considering or investigating (Roberts actually admitted during the "debate" he had never studied Simon's research into the alleged "victims");
  3. Simon Shack constantly contradicted himself and made crazy, wild assertions when he appeared on The Realist Report (Roberts, and Delaney for that matter, simply do not know what they are talking about when it comes to the information Simon Shack and September Clues have presented regarding the video imagery of 9/11 and the "3000 victims" said to have perished on that day).
The entire "debate" consisted of ad hominem attacks against Simon, and a total misunderstanding and distortion of his research and the facts he has brought to light regarding the video imagery of 9/11 and the many problems discovered relating to the alleged "3000 victims" of the 9/11 attacks. At about the 25 minute mark of the "debate" (mp3 is here), I read the first main conclusion that September Clues has come to regarding their research into the 9/11 imagery, which is that:
The 9/11 imagery was nothing but a Hollywood-style film production, complete with actors in the role of 'eye-witnesses' or 'firefighters', staged 'running crowds', 3D-compositing and special cinematic effects. The '9/11 movie' was split into a number of short clips and sold to the TV audience as 'newscasts'. The few clips featuring 'airplanes' (or dull silhouettes thereof) were computer-generated images - all of which in stark conflict with each other, as now comprehensively demonstrated in every imaginable manner, angle and method.
From what I have researched, I think this is a sound conclusion if you actually analyze the 9/11 video broadcasts. Right after I state this conclusion September Clues has made, Delaney attempts to refute it. Please, go listen to what he has to say. He starts off by asking me (I'm paraphrasing here), "John, do you believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny?" He then proceeds to incoherently ramble about "thousands of people living in New York City" and again launches into an ad hominem attack stating that "Simon Shack is a Jew who blames White people for everything" and goes on to say that "the 9/11 imagery being fake is only a claim" and that "Simon Shack does magic tricks to deceive his audience."

And to think that there are people saying that Mike Delaney "expertly refuted the silly 'no-planer' arguments" and that I "arrogantly dismissed" his refutation is truly amazing to me.

Delaney did not "expertly refute" anything throughout the entire "debate". And neither did Roberts. Delaney even claimed that all of the 9/11 videos are authentic, and that it is Simon who is actually the one distorting them. I simply do not know what to say to such ridiculously ignorant statements. Once Delaney started playing clips of my interview with Simon, I knew this entire "debate" was simply about attacking Simon Shack and distorting what he is saying about 9/11. I should have hung up the moment they started playing the clips.

I'd like to provide a brief excerpt of Simon Shack's article THE RATIONALE FOR THE 9/11 HOAX, which no doubt Delaney and Roberts have not read. I generally agree with much of what is stated here (I cannot say for certain that "no one died on 9/11" but I do think there are very real problems with many of the alleged "victims"); however, during the "debate" we really didn't discuss any of this information. Simon writes:
If you have come to terms with the fact that 9/11 was a massive money-making scheme and - of course - a pretext to wage hugely profitable wars, the basic rationale behind this Grand Deception should, hopefully, become clearer. It is essential to consider all the variables which such an audacious false-flag operation would entail and what precautions its plotters must have observed: The Grand Deception plan was undoubtedly meant to be foolproof and, ideally, free of unnecessary elements of risk and opposition. There was simply no rationale for the 9/11 plotters to commit a mass murder of some 3,000, mostly white-collar professionals (brokers, bankers, financial analysts, etc.) whose families would likely have access to first-rate, ‘uptown’ legal assistance. Surely, killing that many people would have been an utterly senseless, self-inflicted aggravation on the part of the perpetrators. Since they could reliably rely on the fully compliant ‘top-brass’ of the mainstream media, they would have used this unique, exclusive asset to its full potential.

Ever since day one, the major hurdle for many people to even start considering 9/11 being an ‘inside job’ has been: “I can’t believe my own government would murder 3000 of their own people". Once that psychological obstacle is removed, it should become apparent that the whole operation consisted essentially of a covert demolition of a redundant, asbestos-filled building complex. To kill thousands of people in the process never was an envisaged proposition as it would have encountered severe resistance among the insiders involved. The second objective was to blame this destruction on a foreign enemy; an inanely fanciful, outlandish tale involving hijacked airliners used as missiles was concocted, to be supported by digital imagery and special movie effects. How this was done is thoroughly illustrated in my September Clues video analyses.

WHAT DIDN’T HAPPEN ON 9/11 ( the deceptive imagery )
No unauthorized, private imagery was captured on September 11, 2001. Most - if not all - of the imagery we have of that morning’s events is prefabricated and/or manipulated. The September Clues video research – and many similar independent studies - have amply demonstrated the unfettered complicity of the mainstream media – a disturbingly 'reliable' partner in crime. The 9/11 morning broadcasts were, by and large, digital computer-animations and all successive, so-called “amateur” video snippets (featuring crashing planes or collapsing towers) have likewise been methodically exposed as a series of poorly crafted forgeries. The defining time-windows of the day (tower strikes and tower collapses) were certainly not meant to be captured on film - much less aired on television: As it is, no real footage of the real-life morning events is to be found. To be sure, the existence of specific, military-grade technology able to achieve this precise aim is well documented. In all likelihood, electromagnetic weaponry (EMP/HERF) routinely employed in war zones was employed, causing the temporary jamming of all unshielded camera equipment *. With no real footage being captured, the TV networks could ‘safely’ broadcast their substitute, artificial imagery of the morning’s events.

*see: Visual Control

WHAT DID HAPPEN ON 9/11 ( the tower collapses )
The ‘ground operations’ in Lower Manhattan called for a coordinated demolition of the entire WTC complex (9 buildings in all). Just what type of explosive forces caused this destruction is hotly debated among scientists galore – yet it is but a secondary and ultimately doomed endeavor - since there is no certifiably authentic rubble nor any authentic imagery to examine. We may however assume (as of the events’ timeline) that the demolition process started a full hour after the alleged “plane strikes”, leaving plenty of time to evacuate the area. The briskly displaced bystanders – as well as more distant eyewitnesses - would have had very slim chances to make out the precise dynamics of the collapses as, most plausibly, smokescreens (military obscurants) started blocking the WTC from view. The time-window of the Lower Manhattan evacuation was filled in with two convenient, yet blatantly phony Distraction Dramas: The Pentagon and Shanksville mock-events. These two diversions also helped sway the attention away from the absurd absence of helicopter rescues at the WTC. As it is, the improbable tale of 3,000 souls trapped for up to 100 minutes in the WTC top floors (with no rooftop rescues - “due to locked access doors") may have a simple explanation: The WTC towers were empty. To be sure, all photographs and video snippets depicting people (or silhouettes thereof) falling down the side of the WTC’s have also been comprehensively exposed as digital forgeries. Only time will tell whether anyone really was killed on 9/11 - and under what circumstances - but, as things stand, the bulk of available evidence suggests otherwise.

Perhaps – and probably - none. A ‘fanciful’ contention? No. Not if measured against the thoroughly fanciful, grotesquely contrived and conflicting 9/11 ‘victim memorials’. A close scrutiny of the numerous available listings of alleged 9/11 victims provides countless indications that they are, by and large, outright fabrications. Most of them are still easily accessible on the Internet by the general public – yet some have been (‘mysteriously’) shut down. Of course, if it’s true that the WTC was fully evacuated, thus follows that the many memorials listing the 9/11 victims must, in turn, be fabricated too. As elaborated below, that is precisely what they appear to be. The 9/11 victim memorials simply do not stand up to scrutiny and comparison. The sheer bulk of inconsistencies and absurdities pervasive in those unseemly listings unveils their true nature : Just another piece of the Grand Deception. [...]
Please read the entire article for more on the problems with the alleged "victims" and the "victim memorials". I hope to have Simon back on The Realist Report in the near future to further explain his research regarding the 9/11 imagery and alleged "3000 victims."

The day after the "debate", Andrew Anglin published Final Showdown: Mike and Scott vs. John Friend on his website DailyStormer.com, which has received close to 200 comments as I publish this. The article he wrote is incredibly dishonest for a variety of reasons, which I will explain here. He begins by writing:
Though I fell asleep and didn’t get a chance to call in, I listened to the Mike Delaney and Scott Roberts versus John Friend debate about whether or not planes hit the towers on 911. 
I have some comments. 
It was an intense show. It is up to all of you to draw conclusions about what took place, but I will agree with what is the majority view: John Friend got his ass handed to him
Both Scott and Mike were as lucid as I have ever heard either of them be, and John really didn’t seem to have any response to any of the points being brought up, other than to keep citing Simon Shack as some type of unquestionable authority and act as though the only reason anyone would question him is out of ignorance, or an incapacity to understand simple concepts. 
Mike demanded the debate after John’s recent interview with Simon Shack, creator of the September Clues documentary, which puts forward the idea that not only did no planes hit the towers, no one actually died on 911, and the whole thing was staged like a Hollywood movie. He says they shut down all of Manhattan, and everyone present was an actor.
Just to clarify: this debate originated because of a comment I made on Facebook stating that Delaney was not being honest about the research September Clues has presented (and he's still not). Also, Simon does not claim that "they shut down all of Manhattan" - he is specifically saying that lower Manhattan and the immediate area around the World Trade Center complex was shut down shortly after the event began. I'll let the reader judge whether or not "I got my ass handed to me" or if "Scott and Mike were as lucid as they have ever been." In my view, all of Denaley and Roberts' arguments were ad hominem and fallacious, and they failed to actually address any of the research September Clues has presented. Anglin continues:
I have never gone into any of this stuff, as I find it boring and pointless. I think the documentary is obviously retarded, anyone with any basic sense should be able to watch it and observe this, but even if it were true, the bottom line is that it doesn’t matter. Trying to tell people about something like this - even if it were true – makes a person look insane.
Here Anglin admits, like Roberts did during the "debate", that he is totally ignorant of the research and information Simon Shack has presented. And yet, in the very next sentence, says that "the documentary is obviously retarded" and that "anyone with any basic sense should be able" to see this. If he has "never gone into any of this stuff," how can he say the documentary is "obviously retarded"? None of these guys even know what they are talking about when it comes to this information.

Anglin then claims that talking about the research September Clues has presented, even if it were true, "makes a person look insane." Well, we could say the same thing about talking about Adolf Hitler and exposing the fake "Holocaust" narrative of WWII - surely discussing these topics "makes a person look insane," right? There are a lot of topics we have been lied to about, and I'm interested in exposing all of them, no matter how "insane" I appear to some people. The truth is the truth, plain and simple. Anglin continues:
We understand that the Jews were responsible for 911. As Mike says repeatedly, there is no need to obsess over details. It was 12 years ago, and we have much more pressing issues to deal with, such as figuring out a way to get control of the state.

Simon Shack also claims that nuclear weapons do not exist. He even goes so far as to say that there are no satellites in the sky – this too is a part of an elaborate system of hoaxes which is much more complicated than reality ever could be.

Perhaps the best part of the show is when Tom in Connecticut, who was supposed to be John’s partner, comes on halfway through and decides to agree with Scott and Mike that there just isn’t any reason to talk about this stuff, and that Simon Shack is either insane or a shill, as evidenced by his list of insane assertions which is longer than my arm.

I will say here that I do not agree with Scott’s idea that we should talk about everything and let the people decide. If we want to have complicated discussions, we can do so in private, as a hobby. The message we present to the masses must be simple and easily digestible. Scott mentioned that he is now reading Mein Kampf, and I would hope that he will pay particular attention to the chapter on Propaganda. We have spent enough time trying to figure out what is going on in the world, and now is the time to streamline and reduce the message, to say things in a clear and simple manner, so that as many people as possible can understand it and come to our side.

After leaving the show in anger, John went on to write this piece about the debate, and according to Scott, posted it before the debate was even over.
I have to say that I was totally perplexed by Tom in Connecticut's performance during the debate. He did basically agree with everything Delaney and Roberts said, and in no way backed up anything I was saying about the video imagery relating to 9/11 and the many problems associated with the alleged "3000 victims."

And this is where Anglin and I have a fundamental disagreement: a main message I am trying to communicate to the world is that the Jewish-controlled mass media presents distorted or entirely fabricated images and videos to the world in order to systematically deceive us and create a false reality we are forced to operate in. Perhaps Anglin, Roberts, and Delaney do not believe that the Jewish media engages in psychological operations and information warfare involving manipulated imagery and actors? Or, if they agree that the Jewish media does these things, maybe they think it's not that big of a deal and isn't worth pointing out and discussing (it will "make us look crazy")? Well, to me it is a big deal. It is the primary weapon they are using against us at this time, and I want to talk about it and expose it. If they don't, that's fine by me.

And for the record, I did not "leave the show in anger" and post the "debate" article before it was even over. I have a two year old daughter that needed my attention, and the "debate" was just about over with anyways (or so I thought - they actually carried on for another hour or so once I hung up). Anglin continues:
John Friend is a Friend of Mine 
I have said, repeatedly, that anything we as a movement spend time on needs to fit a clear agenda – the agenda being working toward gaining political power and repairing our broken society. Talking about fakery is hobbyism, and does nothing to work toward any agenda at all. 
I consider John a good friend. But this simply has to stop. It is just all so weird and sick, and we have very real issues to be dealing with. 
Again, this is where I completely disagree with Anglin. Exposing the role of the Jewish media in deceiving and manipulating us is a central message I am trying to communicate. This to me is a "very real issue" that must be dealt with. Anglin continues:
This all ties into the YouTube presentations of the gross Jew 108morris108, who comes from the same position that everything is somehow fake, and nothing actually happens. 
John has supported the Jew 108morris, who says that the Woolwich beheading was faked to make it look like Muslim immigrants are violent, and cause people in White nations to turn against the immigrants. He also claims that no one died at Sandy Hook. 
These guys repeatedly claim that I "support the Jew 108Morris108" on YouTube. I believe I posted one video he made about the alleged Woolwich "beheading" and that's it. I do not support 108Morris on YouTube. I don't even watch his videos or really know anything about the guy. But he was right about the Woolwich "beheading" event being a total hoax, so I posted the video he made back in May. And let me clearly state my position on Sandy Hook: there is simply no reason to conclude anyone was murdered at the Sandy Hook Elementary School. Apparently, Anglin accepts the Jewish-controlled mass media's version of both Sandy Hook and the Woolwich "beheading" - I do not. Anglin continues:
In all honesty, it sickens me that I am even typing this right now. We are being genocided. Our birthrate is almost nonexistent, and the third-world invasion just keeps intensifying, we will soon be a minority in our own countries. Morality has eroded to the point where it is now referred to as immoral to oppose homosexuality. Religion has collapsed. The Jews are dancing around calling for an end to free speech, everyone is poor, the youth are using drugs on an unimaginable scale, and there is an overwhelming feeling across the board that there simply is no future. 
And the most important thing John can think to do is engage in delusional fantasies about how everything is fake? 
It just makes me sad.
What a totally dishonest thing for Anglin to write. Claiming that all I do is "engage in delusional fantasies about how everything is fake" has to be the most absurd, dishonest thing he could have written. Anglin was recently a guest on my radio program to discuss all of the things he wrote about in the preceding paragraph. I write about and discuss a variety of topics on my radio program, including media fakery and psychological warfare. Here is a list of all of the guests and topics I have covered on The Realist Report since I began broadcasting again on BlogTalkRadio:
  • Dr. Kevin MacDonald - Culture of Critique, White identity, and the future of White America
  • Brother Ryan - Christian Anarchism
  • Andrew Anglin - debunking libertarian shill who attacked him on YouTube
  • Tom in CT - Cass Sunstein and "Conspiracy Theories"
  • Caius Marcus Ideus - The Imperian Manifesto
  • "One Born Free" - 9/11 fakery
  • Clement Pulaski - Christian virtue and political order
  • Tom in CT - Cass Sunstein and "Conspiracy Theories" Part II
  • Andrew Carrington Hitchcock - Synagogue of Satan
  • Simon Shack - September Clues
  • Pat Shannan - JFK and "Two Oswalds"
  • Ace Baker - 9/11: The Great American Psy-Opera
  • Dr. Jim Fetzer - JFK Assassination
  • John Kaminski - The Hitler Test
  • Michael Collins Piper - Final Judgement 
  • Dr. Eric Karlstrom - "Global Warming" hoax and 9/11
  • Tom in CT - Worldviews and Information Warfare
  • JB Campbell - American Defense Party
And yet Anglin claims that all I do is "engage in delusional fantasies about how everything is fake." If anyone is delusional, it is Anglin.

Here is my problem: I have been operating in good faith with everyone I have ever dealt with in this internet-based "movement". I have always tried to be a team player, conduct myself with honor, respect, and dignity, and the sad truth is that almost everyone I have ever dealt with does not act this way. I am not doing what I'm doing for popularity, or to "lead a movement", or for fun and entertainment. I am doing this because I have discovered that I have been lied to about everything I have ever been taught, and there are some very real problems and criminals in our world that need to be exposed and analyzed. I have no agenda, other than the truth. I am not driven by ego or spite or envy or anything else. And I really do mean that. I'm not here to bullshit anyone. Never have been, never will be. I am who I am, and will always remain that way.

Real leadership is predicated on moral decency and integrity, and not deception or juvenile tactics involving character assassination and guilt by association smears. The fact that Delaney and Roberts went out of their way to collect audio clips of Simon Shack in order to play them during the "debate" and attack and misrepresent his positions on 9/11 demonstrate their intent. Those kinds of ambush tactics were designed to avoid discussion of the real issues, namely that the video imagery broadcast to the global public depicting the events of 9/11 is demonstrably fabricated.

The kinds of personal attacks we heard coming from Carolyn Yeager are simply beneath the dignity of any decent person and say more about Carolyn Yeager than about anything else. I will be addressing the statements she made about me in a future blog post.

Perhaps most importantly, the collective position of Delaney, Roberts and Anglin dismissing the role of the media in transmitting intentionally false information to the public as “news” calls their agenda into question. Folks, all three of those guys are actually making statements that essentially provide cover for the Jewish media. Delaney says the video we saw on 9/11 reflected reality and was not manipulated or fabricated. This means that Delaney supports that part of the official narrative of 9/11. Delaney, Roberts and Anglin all appear to support the official narratives of Sandy Hook, the Boston “bombing” and the Woolwich “beheading” event. They are also saying that we should not be looking into the role that the Jewish media plays in systematically deceiving and manipulating the public in order to achieve certain geopolitical and sociocultural goals.

So I'm going to do Mike Delaney, Scott Roberts, Andrew Anglin, Carolyn Yeager, Rodney Martin (go read his comments on Anglin's article at DailyStormer) and their entire "movement" a favor - I am publicly disassociating myself from all of these individuals, and ending whatever relationship I may have had with all of them. I have nothing to do with and want nothing to do with whatever "movement" they are a part of.