Tuesday, May 29, 2012

You're a Jerk if you bring up the USS Liberty!

Article 3, Section 3 of the United States Constitution:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
Call me crazy, but I'd say virtually the entire federal government is committing treason against the United States of America. Clearly, these guys are:



Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney pledged Monday in San Diego to maintain an American military unrivaled by any other in the world, contending it was essential to keep the nation safe and protect its interests abroad.

Joined by Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, Romney warned some 5,000 people gathered at the Veterans Museum and Memorial Center in Balboa Park about the consequences of scaling back the nation’s military might. [...]

The former governor of Massachusetts laid out two divergent courses he said the country could take: Follow the lead of Europe and shrink the military to pay for social needs, or commit to preserving America as the world’s strongest military.

He said the nation must choose the latter path “not so that we just win wars, but so we can prevent wars. Because a strong America is the best deterrent to war that ever has been invented.”

Many in the crowd rose to their feet when a speaker asked all those who served the country in a military uniform to stand up.

Audience members waved small American flags and the late morning event was replete with renditions of the “National Anthem,” “Amazing Grace,” and “Taps.” [...]

McCain received hearty approval from the crowd after being interrupted by a heckler. As the man was being escorted out, McCain returned to the microphone and deadpanned “jerk.”
Could it be any clearer how traitorous and despicable these scum bags are?  And yet virtually the entire crowd here in San Diego boos the man speaking about the USS Liberty, and cheers McCain and Romney.  Just another day in the good old United Colonies of Israel I suppose...

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Memorial Day, Orwell style

WAR IS PEACE.  FREEDOM IS SLAVERY.  IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.  



Memorial Day, a day to commemorate all the heroes that died fighting for America's freedom the bankers, Israel and international Jewry, the drug runners, and war profiteers. A day to remember all those brave souls who put their lives on the line to protect and defend this country murder millions of innocent people around the world, destroying their countries in the process, just so the rest of us Americans can live safely and enjoy the American way of life in tyranny and an increasingly chaotic and dystopian society. Thanks to all the veterans and current members of the armed forces for fighting to protect our freedom and our democracy advance Israel and international Jewry's agenda for world domination and subjugation.

Friday, May 25, 2012

Zan Overall, The Wise Old Man, attends a premiere


The Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth are currently on their Experts Speak Out tour, which began May 21st in San Diego, California.  Unfortunately, I was out of town and unable to attend the opening night.  The tour is promoting the group's recently completed Final Edition of the documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, and will be visiting 30 major American cities across the country.

My good friend Zan Overall, also known as The Wise Old Man, did attend the premier of the documentary in Los Angeles on May 22nd (pictures are here).  He wrote the following report of his experience at the event:

Richard Gage and his Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth organization (ae911truth.org) premiered the final version of their documentary called “Explosive Evidence” in Los Angeles on May 22nd, 2012.

I, the alleged Wise Old Man, attended, hoping to enlarge the scope of the event by focusing on “WHO” did 9/11 instead of just “HOW” the bastards did 9/11.

Richard Gage has made believing 9/11 Truthers out of many, many people. I admire him and we are friends. He does not get into the “WHO,” probably a wise strategic decision for him.

I DID get into the “WHO” that night, standing on the sidewalk with placards, one of which read:


People in general, as well as 9/11 Truthers, are waking up to the very politically incorrect idea that Israel was the prime mover in the atrocity of 9/11.  I got applause when, during the Q&A, I stated my belief that Israel did 9/11, with American help. A year ago I might have gotten boos.

During my sidewalk activity I said (loudly) things like:

“Israelis with American helpers did 9/11. The monsters who did 9/11 LOVE you Half Truthers if you don’t say Israel did 9/11!   That gives them more time to do other ‘9/11’s’ like Fukushima. That gives them more time to fool Americans into wiping out more of Israel’s enemies for her.”


I passed out material on Fukushima, principally the article “Fukushima-The Asian 9/11.”

I also said:

“You are spending and wasting years and years trying to get a ‘new investigation.’ You expect that the same powers that be that conducted a fraudulent investigation before would allow an honest one now?  The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Look at all the wasted effort trying to get an investigation in New York.”

Pointing to the traffic going by on Wilshire Blvd. I said, “The only way you are going to get those people to do anything about 9/11 is to get enough of them aware that Israel did 9/11!  Then they will turn the anger that 9/11 aroused against Muslims into anger against the real villains!”

“9/11 is not an intellectual exercise, a hobby. Because the true authors of 9/11, Israel’s leaders, are getting away with it, millions of innocent Muslims are suffering and dying and our country is going broke and piling up some very bad Karma.”

I passed out a lot of material and those attending were made aware that “WHO” did 9/11 is as important, if not more important, than “HOW” it was done.
______________________

I understand "mainstream" 9/11 Truth groups, like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, focus on the basics when trying to explain to the average person how the official government conspiracy theory (or, as I am starting to call it, the official government mythology) is literally absurd and ridiculous.  A&E for 9/11 Truth base their presentations and outreach efforts on their expertise, and that's all well and good. But where is it going to get us?  How is calling for a new investigation, sanctioned and conducted by the same criminal network that did 9/11 in the first place, going to get us anywhere?  

Instead of basing 9/11 Truth outreach efforts on pointing out all the obvious inconsistencies, absurdities, distortions, and outright lies in the official 9/11 narrative, why not point out that the only individuals arrested on 9/11 were Israeli Mossad agents that just so happened to specialize in explosives and electronic intercepts?  You know, the types of skills you would need if you were involved in carrying out an attack like 9/11!  

We could even print out the police report from the East Rutherford Police Department documenting this fact.  And why stop there?  Why don't we go ahead and print out all the FBI and DEA reports detailing the elaborate Israeli spy ring operating in the United States prior to and on 9/11, which was clearly involved in the attacks?  We may as well print out the Gerald Shea Memo documenting these facts as well, which was submitted to the official 9/11 Commission Report, but was (of course) ignored.  

Or how about pointing out that Larry Silverstein and the criminal network that privatized the World Trade Center complex shortly before 9/11, netting Silverstein $4.55 billion, are all Zionist Jews with ties directly to Israel?  Or how about explaining to people that Israel and criminal Jewish terrorist networks have a long, extensive history in carrying out false flag attacks, including attacking a United States ship, the USS Liberty, in 1967 in an effort to get the U.S. involved in a war on Israel's behalf?  Shouldn't we be calling for the immediate arrest and execution of the individuals we know are clearly involved in staging these attacks?  

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

9/11 Vancouver Hearings Updated

“It’s not what you don’t know that hurts you, it’s what you think you know that ain’t so.”
— Will Roger

This will be an interesting event, and should set the record straight on some important aspects of 9/11 that are often misunderstood and/or dismissed by many people, including the (misnamed) "planes/no planes" debate, how the World Trade Center Towers were destroyed, issues relating to the alleged passengers, and many other important angles of the 9/11 puzzle. If you are really serious about understanding what did and did not happen on 9/11, you will want to attend this conference. Unfortunately, I will not be able to make it, but am looking forward to seeing the videos of the event and will post them here on this blog when they become available.


The Denman Theatre
15-17 June 2012

OUR MISSION: TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF 9/11 TRUTH

THE VANCOUVER HEARINGS ARE DESIGNED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT:
  • The official account provided by the United States government is false
  • The search for truth requires that all possibilities be considered without prejudice
  • Theories must be compared on the basis of the relative probability of the evidence if they were true, where those with higher likelihoods thus defined are preferable to those with lower, where, when the evidence has “settled down”, the theory with the highest likelihood is “acceptable” in the tentative and fallible fashion of science
Theories in science consist of sets of laws combined with dictionary definitions, where the laws of the sciences can be used to explain and to predict the phenomena of experience. Establishing laws entails a process of sorting out the relevant properties from irrelevant via controlled experiments. Applying them entails deriving what happens when their initial conditions are realized, given the initial conditions that were present at the time. In this context, think of these theories as causes in relation to the evidence as their effects. The question thus becomes, “Which of these causes would have the greatest potential to explain the evidence as their effects?”, as an inference to the best explanation.

In case that sounds imposing, it is the same pattern of reasoning that police employ in the course of their investigation of crimes. Suppose that we have a male corpse with bruises around its neck, but no bullet holes or knife wounds. What is the probability that he was stabbed (shot or strangled) relative to that evidence? Because the probability of having no knife wounds if he was stabbed is zero, the likelihood that he was stabbed is also zero. Similarly the probability of having no bullet wounds if he had been shot is zero, so that he was shot likewise has a likelihood of zero.

Given the presence of bruises on the neck, however, there clearly would be a non-zero likelihood that he was strangled. With the accumulation of more evidence during an autopsy, it might turn out that the bruising was not the cause of death but that he was actually poisoned. The same pattern of reasoning applies to the events of 9/11. Ask, for example, if the Twin Towers collapsed, what is the probability that they would blow apart in every direction from the top down? Insofar as gravity works in only one direction, down, while explosives blow out in every direction, the likelihood that the towers collapsed is low, while the use of explosives is high.

Knowing that the Twin Towers did not collapse does not explain exactly how it was done, much less by whom and why. Consideration of the rate of destruction and of various residual effects, including upon other buildings and vehicles in the vicinity, offers clues as to how it was done which, in turn, can provide clues about the who and the why, where this conference will compare conventional explosives with exotic accelerants, including nano-thermite, with mini-nukes and with directed energy devices to determine which can best explain the totality of the evidence.

Similar questions will be asked about the hijackers, the planes, and the passengers. What is the probability, if the hijackers were real, that five or six would show up alive and well? If the flights were real, what is the probability two of them were not scheduled to fly that day and the other two not deregistered until four years later? If the passengers were real, what is the probability that all of their phone calls were faked? If these planes actually crashed, what is the probability of no evidence of plane crashes at Shanksville and elsewhere? We will address these questions and more.

Perhaps the most encompassing description of The Vancouver Hearings, therefore, is to expand the boundaries of 9/11 Truth by exploring the most complex and controversial of the issues confronting us, from what did or did not happen at the Pentagon, the possible use of exotic and unfamiliar technologies to destroy the Twin Towers, the exploitation of the mass media to convey false impressions about what happened that day, and up to a consideration of the motives and ideologies that brought 9/11 about to instill fear into the American public and manipulate them for political purposes.

The Denman Theatre, 15-17 June 2012
1737 Comox Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Organizers: James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., and Joshua Blakeney

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, Jim is the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, edited its first book, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized its first conference, “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ (Madison) and produced its first DVD.

Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, Josh was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study “The Origins of the Global War on Terror”.

PROGRAM: 5 PM—Doors Open. 6-10 PM—Speakers, Discussion, and Debate

“When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth” — Arthur Conan Doyle, Sr.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and to move beyond the “official account” of 9/11:

  • That 19 Islamic fundamentalists hijacked four commercial carriers–Flights AA #11, AA #77, United #93, and United #175–outfoxed the most sophisticated air defense system in the world, and perpetrated these atrocities under the control of a guy in a cave in Afghanistan.
  • That two of those planes, both Boeing 767s, were flown into the Twin Towers, where the combination of damage from their impacts, the jet-fuel based fires and those that endured, weakened the steel and caused both of them to collapse in about 10 seconds apiece.
  • That at 5:20 PM that afternoon, another enormous building in the World Trade Center complex, known as WTC-7, also collapsed due to fires inside the building, even though it had not been hit by any plane and had no jet-fuel based fires.
  • That the Pentagon was hit by a Boeing 757 that approached on a northeastern trajectory at around 500 mph and, just skimming the ground and taking out multiple lampposts, created a spectacular fireball and extensive damage, with 125 casualties at the building itself.
  • That another Boeing 757 crashed in Shanksville, after the passengers heroically attempted to regain control, which we know from phone calls they made–as others had made from other planes–where this plane virtually disappeared into the very soft earth.
  • That the government identified the 19 hijackers almost immediately, where 15 were from Saudi Arabia and the number from Iraq was none, where these events were used to justify wars of aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan, the passage of the PATRIOT ACT, and the on-going “War on Terror”.

The probity of these sworn presentations will be evaluated by a panel of judges, who will swear in our speakers, offer informal opinions at the conclusion of the conference and prepare their evaluation of the hearings in formal opinions for later publication, including:

* Constance (Connie) Fogal, LLB – Judge at the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings

Former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty.

* Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd – Judge at the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings

Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, Webre submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty endorsed by more than 270 NGOs worldwide.

Friday, 15 June 2012:

Masters of Ceremonies: Jack Etkin (odd sessions) and Greg Felton (even)

Television talk show host and media activist, Jack has been keenly involved with the 9/11 Truth movement and has interviewed many of its leaders from Wayne Prante to Dr. Neils Harrit on “Face to Face” and authored “Dick Cheney, Burning Korans, and the Media”.

An award-winning investigative journalist, Greg was a long-time political columnist for the Vancouver Courier and for the Canadian Arab News. He is the author of THE HOST AND THE PARASITE (2nd edition, 2010) and of EXPLODING MIDDLE EAST MYTHS (2011).

6:00-7:00 PM: Orientation and Keynote Address: Splitting the Sky

Activist and author who attempted a citizen’s arrest of George W. Bush in Calgary in 2009 and was near the Twin Towers the day before 9/11, STS participated in the Attica Prison rebellion and has become a staunch advocate for the marginalized and the dispossessed.

7:00-9:00 PM: Session 1: The Pentagon, the Witnesses, and the Passengers

* Enver Masud, “What didn’t happen at the Pentagon” (40 minutes)

Founder and CEO of The Wisdom Fund, recipient of the 2002 Gold Award from for THE WAR ON ISLAM. An engineer by profession, he was residing near the Pentagon and observed its condition immediately after the hit, which he wrote about in 9/11 UNVEILED.

* Mike Sparks, “What the Pentagon witnesses did and did not see” (40 minutes)

A 30-year U.S. infantry paratroop officer and military efficiency reformer, he is the author of magazine articles, web pages, videos & books on military technology. Mike has interviews on his book, James Bond is Real (2011), and the Pentagon witnesses on “The Real Deal”.

* Dean Hartwell, “Planes and passengers: What became of them?” (40 minutes)

With a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science, Masters in Public Administration, and law degree, J.D., Dean is also the author of PLANES WITHOUT PASSENGERS: THE FAKED HIJACKINGS OF 9/11 (2011) and DEAD MEN TALKING (2009) on JFK, RFK and 9/11.

9:00 PM-9:30 PM: Questions for the speakers from the panel of judges

9:30-10:00 PM: Discussion and Debate

Saturday, 16 June 2012:

9:00-11:00 AM: Session 2: How were the Twin Towers destroyed? Part 1

* Nicholas Kollerstrom, “The Nine Keys to 9/11” (40 minutes)

Ph.D., historian of science, including articles on Sir Isaac Newton, Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, founding member of the UK’s 9/11 Truth movement, member of the New York Academy of Sciences, author of 7/7: TERROR ON THE TUBE (3rd edition, 2012)

* Charles Boldwyn, “Why the Twin Towers could not have collapsed” (40 minutes)

M.S. in chemistry, 2-years in a Ph.D. program in polymer science at University of Akron; 82nd Airborne, 101st Airborne, Special Forces; more than 20 years as high-school math, physics, and chemistry teacher; and Chuck has fifteen (15) interviews on “The Real Deal”.

* Jeff Prager, “Proof of Ternary Fission in New York City on 9/11″ (40 minutes)

Founder of an award winning magazine for Senior Citizens, in 2002 he tried to prove 19 Muslims hijacked four planes and attacked us. By 2005, he realized this was false, sold his business, left the US and began to investigate 9/11 full-time. See 9/11 America Nuked.

11:00-11:30 AM: Questions for the speakers from the panel of judges

11:30-Noon: Discussion and Debate

Noon-1:30 PM: Lunch on the town

1:30-4:30 PM: Session 3: How were the Twin Towers destroyed?

Part 2

* Donald Fox, “Mini-nukes used at the WTC and the real ‘untold story’” (40 minutes)

Don has done extensive research on the role of mini-nukes by Dr. Ed Ward and on work by The Anonymous Physicist on the towers and has formulated an account of how it was done and why there is more to this story relative to very low-yield thermonuclear devices.

* Clare Kuehn, “Were DEWs used to decimate the Twin Towers?” (40 minutes)

A University of Toronto graduate in history and student of philosophy, mathematics and the arts, she will discuss Judy Wood, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, and will present evidence for the use of “DEWs” as “Directional Free or ‘Low-Input’ Energy Weapons”.

* Dwain Deets, “Assessing Alternative Theories about the Twin Towers” (40 minutes)

The former Chief of Research Engineering and Director for Aeronautical Projects at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Dwain has evaluated alternative explanations of the WTC-7 in “Approaching the Puzzling Destruction of WTC 7” and of the Twin Towers.

4:30-5:00 PM: Questions for the speakers from the panel of judges

5:00-5:30 PM: Discussion and Debate

5:30-7:00: Dinner on the town

7:00-10:00 PM: Session 4: The Fabrication of the Atrocities of 9/11

* Christopher Holmes, “Fabled Airplanes and Scripted Witnesses” (40 minutes)

Ph.D., a clinical and forensic psychologist, the director of the Zero Point Institute and author of THE MADNESS OF HUMANITY (2011), Christopher has a psychological and forensic examination of Simon Shack’s “September Clues” studies in “Fabled Airplanes”.

* Dennis Cimino, “The ‘official account’ of flights on 9/11 is a fantasy” (40 minutes)

A.A., EE; 35-years EMI/EMC testing, field engineering; FDR testing and certifications specialist; Navy Combat Systems Specialist; 2,000 hours, Pilot in Command, Commercial Instrument Single and Multi-Engine Land Pilot, Eastern Airlines 727-200, Second Officer

* Jim Fetzer, “Fakery and Fraud in the ‘Official Account’ of 9/11” (40 minutes)

A former Marine Corps officer, Jim has given hundreds of interviews and lectures on 9/11, including a 3.5 hour interview on television in Athens (2006), which was broadcast worldwide by satellite, in Buenos Aires (2008 and 2009), and in London (2010).

9:00-9:30 PM: Questions for the speakers from the panel of judges

9:30-10:00 PM: Discussion and Debate

Sunday 17 June 2012

9:00-11:00 AM: Session 5: Who was Responsible for 9/11 and Why?

* Kevin Barrett, “9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda” (40 minutes)

Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist and one of America’s best-known critics of 9/11, is co-editor of 9/11 AND AMERICAN EMPIRE: CHRISTIANS, JEWS AND MUSLIMS SPEAK OUT (2006), and author of TRUTH JIHAD (2007) and of QUESTIONING THE WAR ON TERROR (2009).

* Alan Sabrosky, “Genesis of Deception: Israel and Its Friends on 9/11″ (40 minutes)

Ph.D., Michigan; held MacArthur Chair of Research and was Director of Studies, US Army War College Strategic Studies Institute. 10-years USMC, has had adjunct appointments at Georgetown and The School of Advanced International Affairs at Johns Hopkins University.

* Joshua Blakeney, “The Likudnik Origins of 9/11” (40 minutes)

Graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, 9/11 activist, Staff Writer at Veterans Today, and now the Canadian correspondent for PressTV, Josh has made numerous appearances on radio and television discussing current events

11:00-11:30 AM: Questions for the speakers from the panel of judges

11:30 AM-Noon: Discussion and Debate

Noon-1:30 PM: Lunch on the town

1:30-5:00 PM: Session 6: The Media, the 9/11 Myth, and the Message

* John McCarthy, “US government involvement in 9/11 is no surprise” (40 minutes)

Combat veteran in Vietnam and Nuclear Weapons qualified, John coordinated war plans for Special Forces ops behind the Iron Curtain the CIA and will address the role of the DoD and the CIA in false flag terrorism and the double-edged sword of “plausible deniability”.

* James Tracy, “9/11 Truth and Publicity in an Era of Mass Deception” (40 minutes)

Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University, his scholarly work in the area of media history and political communication has appeared in numerous articles and book chapters. His recent research on 9/11, media and politics at www.memorygap.org.

* Anthony Hall, “How the Media have Failed us All” (40 minutes)

Ph.D., Founding Coordinator of Globalization Studies at University of Lethbridge, Tony is the author of THE AMERICAN EMPIRE AND THE FOURTH WORLD (2003) and of EARTH INTO PROPERTY (2010) and has been studying the impact of 9/11 upon globalization.

3:30-4:30 PM: The Judges, “Evaluations of The Vancouver Hearings” (one hour)

4:30-5:00 PM: Discussion and Debate: Where do we go from here?

* Speakers are confirmed.

RECOMMENDED READING (for background regarding issues under examination here):

Jim Fetzer, “20 reasons the ‘official account’ of 9/11 is wrong” [a summary of scientific findings that contradict the what the government has told us about the events of 9/11]

Morgan Reynolds, “Five Facts Falsify Five Theories” [a series of arguments advanced to help separate more and less viable theories about the destruction of the Twin Towers]

Judy Wood, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? [an encompassing compendium of evidence that an adequate theory of their destruction must explain with a defense of use of DEWs]

Dr. Ed Ward, “9/11 Nukes prove US Government involvement” [powerful arguments that the destruction of the World Trade Center is only explainable on the basis of mini-nukes]

Dennis Cimino, “9/11: The “official account” of the Pentagon attack is a fantasy” [a detailed and thorough analysis of the impossible and the improbable elements of what were told]

Jim Fetzer, “9/11: Planes/No Planes and ‘Video Fakery’” [a presentation of the evidence from multiple sources demonstrating that all four of the alleged plane crashes were faked]

Dean Hartwell, PLANES WITHOUT PASSENGERS [a study of the inconsistencies in what we have been told about those planes and their passengers by the American government]

Joshua Blakeney, “An Open Letter to Dr. Paul Viminitz: 9/11 Evidence vs. Straw Man Arguments” [a rebuttal of a Canadian philosopher who defends the official 9/11 account]

David Ray Griffin, THE NEW PEARL HARBOR REVISITED [the updated classic by one of the leading experts, if not the leading expert, on the inadequacies in the official account]

Anthony Hall, “Jonathan Kay Defends the Sacred Myth of 9/11″ [a revealing consideration of the abject failure of the Canadian press to publish responsible information about 9/11]

Barrie Zwicker, TOWERS OF DECEPTION [an expose of the failure of the media to cover 9/11 and of left-wing gate-keepers, including Noam Chomsky, to spread disinformation]

Jim Fetzer and James Preston, “Peeling the 9/11 Onion: Layers of Plots within Plots” [an explanation of multiple attempts to cast responsibility everywhere but where it belongs]

Joshua Blakeney, “Israel, 9/11, and Jonathan Kay” [an expose of the attempts by one of Canada's most prominent right-wing journalists to conceal Mossad's complicity in 9/11]

Edward Hendrie, 9/11 ENEMIES: FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC [a comprehensive analysis of the available evidence shedding light on virtually very aspect of the official account of 9/11]

NOTE: None of these studies should be taken as conclusory but are instead being offered as exemplifying the kinds of issues that will be addressed during The Vancouver Hearings.


Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Drones: another Israeli racket in the fraudulent "War on Terror"

Over at Salon today, we read about the Israeli drone industry, yet another racket in the fraudulent “War on Terror”, which is more aptly named the Jewish War of Terror. The article begins:
Stark Aerospace of Mississippi is perhaps the only foreign-owned company with FAA permission to fly a drone in U.S. airspace. Based in the town of Columbus, not far from Mississippi State University, Stark is a subsidiary of the state-owned Israel Aerospace Industries — not that you could tell from looking at the company’s website, executive leadership or affiliations. You have to go to the Mississippi secretary of state website to learn that two of Stark’s three directors are Israelis.

So too with the America’s drone industry. The Israeli influence is not visible but it is real, documented and extremely relevant to the future of drones in America. If you want to know how drones may change American airspace in coming years, just look to Israel, where the unmanned aerial vehicle market is thriving and drones are considered a reliable instrument of “homeland security.”

“There are three explanations for Israel’s success in becoming a world leader in development and production of UAVs,” a top Israeli official explained to the Jerusalem Post last year. “We have unbelievable people and innovation, combat experience that helps us understand what we need and immediate operational use since we are always in a conflict which allows us to perfect our systems.” […]
Since we are now “always in a conflict” with a faceless, manufactured enemy as a result of the Israeli false flag attack on 9/11, there will always be a market for these toys, especially here in the United States. And the Jews will be right there to sell them to their American puppets to use in their wars against Israel’s enemies:
Israel markets its expertise in defense to the rest of the world. Israeli academic Neve Gordon cites a glossy government brochure on drones titled “Israel Homeland Security: Opportunities for Industrial Cooperation,” which boasts, “no other advanced technology country has such a large proportion of citizens with real time experience in the army, security and police forces.” The chapter called “Learning from Israel’s Experience” notes that “many of these professionals continue to work as international consultants and experts after leaving the Israel Defense Forces, police or other defense and security organizations.”

The work has paid off when it comes to drones: The Jewish state is the single largest exporter of drones in the world, responsible for 41 percent of all UAVs exported between 2001 and 2011, according to a database compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Israeli companies export drone technology to at least 24 countries, including the United States.

In addition to exports, Israeli companies also create subsidiaries in consumer countries. “To increase sales outside Israel, Israel’s defense companies have to set up subsidiaries in target markets, rather than expand local manufacturing,” Haaretz reported in 2009. The Israelis “set up Stark in 2006 to drum up business in America,” according to Haaretz, because the U.S. prefers “to buy armaments and other defense gear from local companies.” In 2007, Stark “inaugurated its first production outfit, which makes Hunter unmanned vehicles that it sells through Northrop Grumman. In fact, the U.S. armed forces have been using [Israeli-made] Hunter drones since the early 1990s."
Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that Israel and the Jews are trying to turn have turned the entire world into Occupied Palestine since their successful false flag operation on 9/11?  Israel geared its economy towards the "Homeland Security/War on Terror" industry in 2000 and 2001, staged 9/11, used its criminal network of agents, sayanim, and assets in the West to launch illegal wars of aggression against its enemies in the Middle East as a result, and has benefitted more than any other entity both geopolitically and economically.  The entire "War on Terror" and its related industries are one big Jewish racket.

But shhhhhhh, don't say anything about this.  It's "anti-Semitic" after all, plus we all know the government is just trying to protect us from those Evil Muslims, right?

This is what our drones do to men, women, and children around the world:

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Ben Fulford on Fukushima, boycotts, staged North Korean rocket launch, and more

I don't know how much of this I buy, but it is certainly quite interesting.  What do you think?  

Is it possible that Fukushima (and the BP oil spill) could be a major PSYOPS?  

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Bomb Israel, not Iran!

"America is facing a dilemma just like we are in Israel.  America is fighting for it's soul.  It was founded on Biblical values, values of Liberty, and Freedom, and Kindness, and Truth.  And if America doesn't live up to those values -- and the gauge to whether America is living up to those values is their unwavering support of Israel -- and when a country loses the mission upon which it was founded, it's done."



Un-fucking believable!  Is it not clear how detached from reality these psychopathic Jews and their puppets in the media are?  They are on the verge of destroying what's left of the world and most of us are either too brainwashed by their propaganda to recognize it, or we're too cowardly to call them out because it's "anti-Semitic".  

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Super Serious "journalists" talking about Super Serious Stuff

In all seriousness: is there anyone anywhere on this planet that thinks this stuff is for real?  What a joke...



Are the alleged Muslim 9/11 conspirators even real?  These guys look like actors.  The entire narrative sounds scripted...



Another fake terrorist plot... this stuff is just laughable anymore.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Ron Paul in San Diego

I didn't attend this event, but from the looks of it, it was pretty successful.  I do not think electing Ron Paul will solve all our problems, especially because he is not addressing the fundamental issues that need to be addressed, such as 9/11 being an inside job done by Israel and her agents in this country.  I left the following comment on the video below:
Ron Paul needs to go all the way: 9/11 was an inside job done by Israel's Mossad and criminal elements in the US government/private sector. The entire Global War on Terror is a fraud. We need to start arresting and confiscating the assets of the criminals on Wall Street, end all these fraudulent wars, end all foreign aid, especially to Israel, and recognize the fundamental threat that Israel and her network of agents/supporters pose to our country and liberties.
Maybe it will get some people thinking at least?

Friday, May 4, 2012

Influential Norwegian professor publicly broaches taboo subjects

More and more people around the world seem to be waking up to the destructive role Jewish criminals have had and continue to have on our world.  If you're an honest person, you have acknowledge this fact. As the blogger xymphora correctly pointed out earlier today:
I've come to the conclusion that if your geopolitical analysis isn't profoundly 'anti-Semitic', it is wrong.
Maybe the times are a-changing?  From Haaretz:

Johan Galtung, Norwegian sociologist nicknamed the “father of peace studies,” made anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli remarks while lecturing at the University of Oslo, in an article published afterward in the Norwegian press and in an interview with Haaretz that followed.

Among other statements, Galtung claimed that a possible connection exists between the terrorist responsible for the massacre of children in Norway last summer, and the Mossad. “The Jews control U.S. media, and divert for the sake of Israel,” wrote Galtung in an article published in Norway.

He pointed out that one of the factors behind the anti-Semitic sentiment that led to Auschwitz was the fact that Jews held influential positions in German society.
Galtung also recommended reading “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” – one of the most popular anti-Semitic texts in the world.
This is an extremely positive development, considering the prestige and influence a man like Johan Galtung has.  We studied his writings quite extensively in a few of my courses when I was an undergraduate student.

Earlier this week, students at George Washington University in Washington, DC walked out in protest of a speech given by the Israeli Ambassador to the U.S., a major Zionist bullshit artist, Michael Oren:



This is good to see, but I wonder what these protesters would say if someone showed up pointing out the fact that Israel and Jewish criminals actually did 9/11, not Muslims?  Or how they would react if someone had a sign saying, "Israel is an illegitimate, rogue terrorist nation state!" or "The Holocau$t is the biggest hoax of the 20th century!"?  That is what we should be shouting while protesting criminals like Michael Oren.  

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Are preparations being made for full scale Bolshevik-style tyranny in the United States?

By now, I’m sure most of you are familiar with the FEMA camp reports, the various tyrannical provisions in the PATRIOT Act, the National Defense Authorization Act, and other War on Terror-related legislation, the manufactured “homegrown” or “lone wolf” terrorists "plotting to attack America", and the general preparation for martial law and full scale tyranny in the United States. I’ve always thought that this stuff was more about intimidating Americans rather than a serious effort to prepare for a Bolshevik-style tyranny.

Well, now I’m starting to re-think my position… maybe the traitorous, Zionist subverted U.S. federal government is set on implementing a full scale Bolshevik-style tyranny in this country after all? And we know who was behind the Bolshevik reign of terror, right?  The very same forces pushing for this type of tyranny right here in America...

The knowledgeable and always insightful commenter Mouser pointed out the following video today on a post at kenny's sideshow, which analyzes this military document outlining a general policy for internal internment and resettlement operations in the United States. Describing this document, Mouser commented:
The manual descibes in great detail the physical and psycholological measures permitted to 'facitate internees to develope positive attitudes to American policy. These include non-lethal weapons and silencing internees 'with a soft cloth around their mouth and tied behind the neck (sic)'.

Remember zionist Bolsheviks interred and murdered over 50 million Russian Christians less than 100 years ago.

Can't happen in America? Hmmm...
Hmmm indeed...


All of the detention techniques and policies outlined in the U.S. Army Internment and Resettlement Operations document discussed by Madison Ruppert of the excellent news website End The Lie in the video above have been fully institutionalized and utilized by the federal government and military of the United States as a result of the fraudulent Global War on Terror, which was initiated by the Mossad organized false flag attack on 9/11.

These techniques and policies have been directed primarily towards Muslims in the fraudulent Global War on Terror, but rest assured, the psychopaths running the government and military will have no problem doing this stuff to American citizens. In fact, they already have on numerous occasions over the past 60 years at least, only now, these sorts of atrocities will be an institutionalized endeavor resulting in blatant, open assaults on the American people. That is, unless you follow our Dear Leader Barak Obama’s lead and pledge a loyalty oath to this criminal government.

Is anyone else starting to feel more and more like Winston Smith? I know I am… 2 + 2 will never equal 5 no matter what they do to you!

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

To all my Democratic, Obama supporting friends...

Picture found at rense.com:



Obama has proven himself to be a bigger tyrant and war criminal that George W. Bush was… but since he has a "D" in front of his name, most liberals will simply ignore all the crimes he has covered up, committed, and institutionalized.

Face it folks: it’s not about the "Big Bad Republicans" or the "Evil Socialist Democrats". It's way deeper than the superficial political parties and their fake, baseless ideologies.

What we should be focusing on is Jewish tyranny, Jewish supremacy, and Jewish plutocracy.