Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Iran is NOT pursuing nuclear weapons

A news brief for all Zionist warmongers working overtime to convince the gullible American public Iran is a dangerous threat set on developing nuclear weapons:



Tuesday, February 28, 2012

O'Keefe: "Israel involved in 9/11"

Kenneth O'Keefe, a heroic anti-war and pro-Palestine activist, was trying to make a few simple points in the video below, but kept getting interrupted and shouted down by cowards in the audience.



Discussing the criminal Apartheid State of Israel and her leading role in the FALSE FLAG event on 9/11 is bound to stir some controversy. Shills and Zionist stooges will continue to make asses of themselves by trying to prevent this information from reaching large audiences. Hmmm... I wonder why? Do they have something to hide?

Monday, February 27, 2012

A Wise Old Man visits the Academy Awards Ceremony

Zan Overall, a Wise Old Man and good friend, visited the Academy Awards Ceremony yesterday in Hollywood.  He wrote the following review of the 9/11 Propaganda Movie of the Year, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close.
"Extremely Loud" is beautifully written, acted and produced. I like that! When I am being propagandized I like to see them do a good job of it. It shows a modicum of respect for their target.

The film perpetuates the lies about 9/11 we have been told by the government and the media. Unfortunately for them, millions of Americans now see through the official fairy tale. Millions know the buildings came down as controlled demolitions, a feat beyond the powers of some "Ayrabs" operating out of Afghanistan.

"Extremely" uses a personal sob story to reinforce the failing official lie.

Let's have a sequel!. The boy Oskar is very intelligent. In the sequel let's have him use that intelligence to learn the truth about who did 9/11 and killed his father. It wasn't "Ayrabs," folks!
Below are some photos taken yesterday in Hollywood. You can see the entire gallery here.  Zan Overall is a man with courage, conviction, and honesty, traits sorely lacking in the United States these days.  God bless him.








Saturday, February 25, 2012

9/11: the Mossad connection, a presentation at Cafe Libertalia

I'll be hosting a presentation and discussion next Saturday, March 3rd, at Cafe Libertalia, located in the Hillcrest neighborhood of San Diego, California. The event description is below.

9/11: the Mossad connection

Description: The official government conspiracy theory explaining the events of 9/11 have been thoroughly debunked by engineers, architects, scientists, pilots, veterans, professors, and other researchers. If the official conspiracy theory is false, who was really behind the events of 9/11? This presentation will analyze who was arrested on 9/11, the key individuals in the Bush administration and their connections, and other factors which suggest an Israeli connection to the events of 9/11. Join us for a discussion following the presentation!

Hosted by John Friend 
Date: Saturday, March 3, 2012 
Time: 5:00pm-7:00pm
What do the Jewish supremacists ruling the world fear most?  An excerpt from Protocol #5: Despotism and Modern Progress:
There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative: if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more harm than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord.
It's time we all take personal initiative to expose and put an end to the Jew World Order.  Hope to see you there!

Learning about the Holocaust




Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Who is worse?

Jewish supremacists that control the world?

Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in his weekly Saturday night sermon said that non-Jews exist to serve Jews.

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat.

"Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat," he said to some laughter.

Yosef, the spiritual leader of the Shas Party and the former chief Sephardi rabbi of Israel, also said that the lives of non-Jews are protected in order to prevent financial loss to Jews.

"With gentiles, it will be like any person: They need to die, but God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant. That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,” said the rabbi, who recently turned 90.  (read the full article here)
Or Christian Zionists who worship the Jews and Israel? (h/t Wake Up From Your Slumber for video)





Sunday, February 19, 2012

PSYOP aspects of 9/11

The are many ways to analyze the events of 9/11. On this blog, I've mainly focused on the crime network that benefitted from the events that day. Today, I'd like to focus on some of the PSYOP aspects of 9/11, which is an extremely important angle to consider and understand.

Major Ed Rouse explains the concept of a PSYOP quite well:

Psychological Operations or PSYOP are planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of organizations, groups, and individuals. Used in all aspects of war, it is a weapon whose effectiveness is limited only by the ingenuity of the commander using it.

A proven winner in combat and peacetime, PSYOP is one of the oldest weapons in the arsenal of man. It is an important force protector/combat multiplier and a non-lethal weapons system.

Psychological Operations (PSYOP) or Psychological Warfare (PSYWAR) is simply learning everything about your target enemy, their beliefs, likes, dislikes, strengths, weaknesses, and vulnerabilities. Once you know what motivates your target, you are ready to begin psychological operations.

Psychological operations may be defined broadly as the planned use of communications to influence human attitudes and behavior ... to create in target groups behavior, emotions, and attitudes that support the attainment of national objectives. The form of communication can be as simple as spreading information covertly by word of mouth or through any means of multimedia.

A psychological warfare campaign is a war of the mind. Your primary weapons are sight and sound. PSYOP can be disseminated by face-to-face communication, audio visual means (television), audio media (radio or loudspeaker), visual media (leaflets, newspapers, books, magazines and/or posters). The weapon is not how its sent, but the message it carries and how that message affects the recipient.
9/11 was a classic PSYOP, used to deceive the American public into believing that Muslim fundamentalists attacked their country, playing on their emotions, ignorance, and naivety.

I'd like to lay out some examples of the fakery and fabrications involved on 9/11, many of which are not properly understood, even by those in the 9/11 "truth" movement.

The Airliners and Flights Purportedly Involved on 9/11

Let's first take a look at the official government conspiracy theory we were told about the hijacked airliners:
The official theory holds that American 11 and United 175 struck the World Trade Center, north and south towers, respectively, and that American 77 hit the Pentagon. United 93 is said to have crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Flights 11 and 175 left from Boston with Los Angeles destinations. Flight 77 left from Dulles Airport in Virginia, also headed for Los Angeles. Flight 93 left from Newark for San Francisco.
This scripted story is false on virtually every account.  Col. George Nelson, retired U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and former pilot, has remarked:
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft.
Even more striking, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics did not even list American Airlines flights 11 or 77 as having taken off on 9/11:

Thus for September 11, 2001, and for Flights UA 93 and UA 175, the destination, tail number and departure time are the same as that given above. But for Flights AA 11 and AA 77 the situation is totally different — these flights are not scheduled at all. The implication is that Flights AA 11 and AA 77 did not exist on September 11, 2001.
After this fact was made public, the BTS altered the official records in 2004 to "correct" this major blunder on the part of those responsible for covering up 9/11.  As for flights 93 and 175, they were taken off the FAA list of active flights many years after 9/11:

Two of the 9/11 airliners were never 'deregistered' and remained on the 'active' flight list until Sept. 28. 2005, the classification officially changing only a month after two inquisitive flight researchers made repeated calls to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), inquiring about the strange irregularity.

The two planes in question were Flight 93 and Flight 175, both owned and operated by United Airlines and, according to the official story, both destroyed on 9/11, one in Shanksville, Penn., and the other crashing into the South Tower of the WTC.

Usually a normal procedure after an airliner is destroyed, why it took United more than four years to 'deregister' the airplanes and fill out the official FAA paperwork remains a mystery and never has been fully explained by the FAA, United or the government.
Andrew Johnson has analyzed the eye witness accounts on 9/11 in New York, and has shown that many of the witnesses did not see a large Boeing 767. The eye witness accounts are all over the place, with some reporting to have seen a small military aircraft or a missile. Bottom line: very few reported seeing a Boeing 767 crash into the WTC, and those that did appear to be planted witnesses reading from a script.


At this point, I think it is pretty well established that the airplanes and flights involved in the official government conspiracy are completely fraudulent. Besides, the maneuvers attributed to the airliners are not even physically possible by an experienced pilot, especially in regards to the alleged flights that hit the Pentagon and WTC.

Also, consider the following videos of mainstream media reports on 9/11:






The Alleged Hijackers and Phone Calls Involved on 9/11

If the airplanes and flights are fraudulent, what about the hijackers and the phone calls allegedly made on 9/11?

Mohammed Atta, one of the key hijackers on 9/11 according to the U.S. government, was still alive after 9/11, according to his father. From The Guardian, September 1, 2002:

The father of Mohammed Atta, the alleged ringleader of the September 11 attacks, said in an interview published yesterday that his son was still alive.

"He is hiding in a secret place so as not to be murdered by the US secret services," Mohammed el-Amir Atta, 66, told the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag. He also vehemently denied that his son - believed to have flown the first plane into the World Trade Centre - had taken part in the atrocities, blaming them instead on "American Christians".
Daniel Hopsicker has investigated Mohammed Atta and the other "hijackers" in Florida, and wrote a book titled, Welcome to Terrorland: Mohammed Atta & the 9/11 Cover-Up in Florida.


Hopsicker interviewed Atta's former girlfriend, Amanda Keller, who describes Atta as a jealous and violent drug addict, who may have been involved in drug running.





An Israeli spy ring was actually monitoring and surveilling Atta and his friends in Florida and New Jersey prior to 9/11, and Wayne Madsen has reported that, according to British intelligence, the Israeli spy ring was "running" or controlling the Muslim hijacker patsies.

Were there two Mohammed Attas?  Did the 9/11 perps set up Atta and the other alleged Muslim "hijackers" to take the blame?

Elias Davidsson has written a lengthy article showing that the U.S. government has not produced any credible evidence to back up its assertion that Muslim fanatics pulled off 9/11:

The United States government has alleged that 19 individuals with Arab names, deemed fanatic Muslims, hijacked four passenger planes on 11 September 2001 and crashed them in a suicide-operation that killed approximately 3,000 people. In this Report, the author shows that there is 8. For this reason, it is impossible to support the official account on 9/11. As the US government has failed to prove its accusations against the 19 alleged hijackers, the official account on 9/11 must be regarded as a lie.
Dean Hartwell has written, Facts Talk But the Guilty Walk: The 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and Its Indictment of Our Leaders.


His book contends:
[The book]... falls in the category of "no planes" in regards to 9/11 because it contends that none of the four purported flights, 11, 175, 77 and 93 crashed.

It also makes the case that no hijackings took place at all. Instead, the story of the hijackings was given by the media to the public via fake cell phone conversations and the false use of names and images of Arabs as perpetrators. [pg. 72]
In an article titled "Total Number of Hijackings on 9/11: ZERO," Hartwell explains:
There is also no credible evidence that any planes were overtaken by anyone. The "evidence" given to the public of hijackings came through the phone calls, which have been proven to have been made under false pretenses. Furthermore, no credible videotape of any of the so-called "hijackers" at any of the airports in question has ever surfaced (a 2004 tape purportedly of hijackers at Dulles has been challenged widely for its lack of date and time of recording), nor has any independent authority ever established the finding of the remains of any of them at the crime scenes. And there is no record of any pilot taking a few seconds to punch in the emergency code that pilots are taught to use in hijackings.
Dr. David Ray Griffin has written extensively on the fake phone calls coming from the allegedly "hijacked" airliners and concludes:
... the main evidence provided to the general public has consisted of the hijack-describing phone calls reportedly received from passengers and flight attendants aboard the airliners. But when subjected to a detailed analysis, these alleged phone calls, far from supporting the war-justifying story, lead to a very different conclusion: that these alleged calls were faked. This analysis thereby suggests that the entire 9/11 story used to justify the US-led wars is a lie.
Professor A.K. Dewdney confirms Dr. David Ray Griffin's conclusions:


Below, Alice Hogland is being interviewed about her son, Mark Bingham, who supposedly died on Flight 93. Is this a scripted PSYOP meant to reinforce the 9/11 narrative of Muslim "hijackers" attacking America?



Video Fakery 

It's important to note that there is a historical precedent of video fakery in monumental events, including the assassination of President Kennedy. Dr. Jim Fetzer, amongst others, has concluded that the Zapruder film, supposedly capturing President Kennedy's assassination in real time, was altered:
The editor of Assassination Research, James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., has announced the discovery of new proof that the home movies of the assassination of JFK known as the Zapruder film and a second known as the Nix film are fakes. (The Nix film was taken from the opposite side looking toward “the grassy knoll.”) Both were subject to extensive alteration to fabricate evidence of the crime and keep the truth about the sequence of events in Dealey Plaza from the American people. Fetzer, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota, observed that the films are authentic only if the visible events they record correspond to the actual sequence of events at the time. “This proof is based upon the convergent testimony of motorcycle patrolmen, members of the Secret Service, and the Dallas Chief of Police. That it contradicts the official account of the assassination recorded in the films qualifies as a major breakthrough.”
Below, John Costella offers a brief explanation of the Zapruder film fakery:



In a brilliant article, Killtown points out that the technology to alter live video feeds was developed long before 9/11, and is an important aspect of PSYOPs.  

From "Information Warfare," by Professor George J. Stein:
Let us take just one example of how current technologies could be used for strategic-level information warfare. If, say, the capabilities of already well-known Hollywood technologies to simulate reality were added to our arsenal, a genuinely revolutionary new form of warfare would become possible. Today, the techniques of combining live actors with computer-generated video graphics can easily create a "virtual" news conference, summit meeting, or perhaps even a battle that would exist in "effect" though not in physical fact. Stored video images can be recombined or "morphed" endlessly to produce any effect chosen. This moves well beyond traditional military deception, and now, perhaps, "pictures" will be worth a thousand tanks.
From "When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing," Washington Post, February 1, 1999:
Digital morphing — voice, video, and photo — has come of age, available for use in psychological operations. PSYOPS, as the military calls it, seek to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations to pursue national and battlefield objectives.

To some, PSYOPS is a backwater military discipline of leaflet dropping and radio propaganda. To a growing group of information war technologists, it is the nexus of fantasy and reality. Being able to manufacture convincing audio or video, they say, might be the difference in a successful military operation or coup.
Is it really that far fetched to conclude that what we "saw" on 9/11 was TV fakery?



Carl Bernstein has written about how the CIA basically controls the media, so is it really that difficult to conclude the media played a major role in facilitating the events of 9/11, especially in New York City.  

What About the Victims on 9/11?

We're constantly told that 3,000 people were murdered on 9/11.  But why are almost all victims not on the Social Security Administration's official list of deceased Americans?

A New York congresswoman who represents Manhattan wants answers to why nearly 3,000 victims of the 9/11 terrorists attacks weren’t reported in the Social Security Administration’s official list of deceased Americans.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., said her staff started making inquiries after the errors in the federal Death Master File (DMF) were detected by Scripps Howard News Service. The file is a public record intended to protect families of the deceased from identity theft and other types of fraud.

“While nearly 3,000 individuals were killed on Sept. 11th, the list does not show an increase in numbers from the typical DMF daily average,” Maloney said. “A sampling of those names did not yield any matches in the DMF and confirms their apparent absence.”

She said her staff has contacted the Social Security Administration, the New York State Department of Health and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, only to receive “conflicting answers as to why there is a lack of reporting on this matter.”
Take a look at these videos that suggest many of the victims on 9/11 may be fraudulent:







Was 9/11 Scripted?

Take a look at this video:


Was 9/11 a scripted PSYOP on the American people?  It appears that in virtually every single aspect, the official government conspiracy theory explaining the events of 9/11 is fraudulent, including the flights, passengers, hijackings, phone calls, videos, and victims.  

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Robert Faurisson, Against Hollywoodism, Revisionism

“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”

I'd like to post an article by Robert Faurisson in it's entirety here on this blog.  I rarely post entire articles here, but I'll make an exception with this wonderful essay by one of the most courageous historians of our time.  The Holohoax is the central lie dominating Western political discourse, and it must be exposed for the fraud that it is.

*     *     *     *


The term Hollywoodism refers to the transformation, often mendacious, of reality by the spirit and practices of a whole sphere of American cinema. At first, I shall discuss the evil in general done by Hollywoodism. Secondly, I shall describe the wrongs of Hollywoodism in the shaping of the imposture of “the Holocaust”, that is in building the myth of genocide, gas chambers and six million Jews killed by the Germans during the Second World War. Finally, in a third and last part I shall speak of Revisionism as the antidote par excellence to Hollywoodism and its incessant, aggressive publicity for the religion of “the Holocaust”.
 


1. Hollywoodism and the evil that it does



According to the American Heritage Dictionary, “Hollywood” may signify “the US film industry” but also “a flashy, vulgar atmosphere or tone, held to be associated with the US film industry”. Used as an adjective the word stands for “the US film industry”, as in “a Hollywood movie, a Hollywood producer,” or means “flashy and vulgar”, as in the dictionary’s illustrative sentence “Flashy and vulgar, their clothes were pure Hollywood.”



A well-known facet of the ideology propagated by this film industry is the basic division of the world between the Good and the Bad. The Good are the United States and the Bad are those whom the United States decrees as such. The Good are fundamentally Good and the Bad are fundamentally Bad. The United States is always in the right and always wins, whilst the “Bad Guys” are always in the wrong and always lose. Thus there cannot, there must not be any pity for the vanquished: their defeat proves that they were indeed criminals. The winners will independently assume the right to try the vanquished in court or to have them put on trial by others.



Everyone can bring to mind what are known as “the Nazi atrocities”, especially the images of walking corpses or corpses proper. For the past 67 years Hollywood has presented them as evidence that the Germans had death factories wherein the SS spent their time killing, especially Jews. In reality, those corpses were proof that because of the systematic destruction of German cities by the Allies, Germany in 1945 was in its death throes: the inhabitants who had survived the deluge of steel and fire were living in rubble or in holes in the ground, exposed to cold and hunger; often there was hardly any food or medicine; the hospitals and schools were destroyed; practically no trains and convoys were running any longer; the refugees from the East terrified by the invading Red Army’s murder and rape numbered in the millions. In 1948 the Italian director Roberto Rossellini faithfully described this situation in Germania, Anno Zero. Therefore one must not be surprised at the fact that in 1945, in the labour camps or concentration camps, famine and disease (typhus, typhoid fever, dysentery) reigned, whilst medicines and disinfectants such as Zyklon B were sorely lacking.



Hollywood, along with British cinema and Soviet propaganda, had a terrible and direct responsibility both in the lies attending what was called the discovery of the German concentration camps (1945) and in the ignoble “lynching party” (the phrase is that of Harlan Fiske Stone, Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court at the time) that was the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946), where the winners of the war, in coalition, made themselves judges and jury to try the defeated. It is altogether true that in 1945 even a privileged concentration camp like that of Bergen-Belsen offered a nightmarish vision. But the horrors discovered there were not created by the Germans. They were due to the war and, in particular, an air war conducted mercilessly, to the end, by the Allies against… civilians. It took a fine cynicism to show those horrors and point an accusing finger at the defeated when the ones mainly responsible were the US Air Force and the Royal Air Force. In April 1945, no longer able to manage, the commandant of Bergen-Belsen, SS captain Josef Kramer, sent some men to meet the advancing troops of British Marshal Montgomery and warn them that they were approaching a terrible den of infection, and that they should not immediately release the prisoners lest they contaminate the civilian population and the British soldiers. The British agreed to work with the Wehrmacht. Once on the site, they kept the detainees there and tried to treat them but mortality remained appalling high for a long time. The British wanted to know how many inmates were buried in the mass graves. They extracted the corpses and counted them; then, using a bulldozer, a British officer pushed the bodies towards six large ditches where the soldiers forced female SS guards to cast them in with their bare hands. But this reality was very soon transformed by the film propaganda services, which had people believe that the bodies were those of people killed in an alleged extermination programme. A photograph taken from a plane and showing the bulldozer from afar made it possible to convey the impression that the vehicle was driven by a German soldier performing his daily work as an employee of a death factory. In one case, a photo taken from up close showed the bottom of the machine pushing corpses but “beheaded” the driver so that, with him not appearing as a Briton, it was reckoned he was a German. The Americans went on to make more and more falsifications of this kind. The American general Eisenhower, supreme Allied commander, was the impresario of this intensified Hollywoodism. The famous Hollywood film director George C. Stevens was brought to Germany in the uniform of lieutenant-colonel. His team shot 80,000 feet of film from which 6,000 feet (or 7.5% of the total) were selected for General William Donovan, special assistant to the US chief of counsel at Nuremberg. It was those parts carefully selected by the American prosecution which, on November 29, 1945, practically at the lifting of the curtain of the loathsome “Nuremberg Trial”, were projected to a stupefied world; some of the German defendants, most disturbed at what they saw, deduced that Hitler had carried out a gigantic crime behind their backs. In this sense it can be said that the “Nuremberg Trial” marked the triumph of Hollywoodism.



2. Hollywoodism’s part in creating the myth of “the Holocaust”



“The Holocaust” of the Jews then became a sort of religion whose three main components are the extermination, the gas chambers and the six million martyrs. According to an article of faith of this religion Hitler ordered and planned the methodical slaughter of all European Jews; in so doing he committed a crime without precedent, a specific crime, later called genocide. Then, in order to commit this specific crime, he had a specific weapon developed, a weapon of mass destruction, the gas chamber, operating especially with a powerful insecticide, Zyklon B, whose active ingredient was hydrogen cyanide. Finally, the result of this enormous crime was the death of six million European Jews. The Auschwitz-Birkenau camp was the focal point, the apogee, the Golgotha of that horror. After the war a whole propaganda developed around this holy trinity of “the Holocaust”, a whole industry of “the Holocaust”, a whole business: the “Shoah Business”. In the United States the film industry has fed on this belief and spread it throughout the Western world. It is especially since 1978 that such propaganda has been developed, particularly with the four episodes of the U.S. miniseries Holocaust recounting the saga of the Weiss family. It is no exaggeration to say that the showing of that series became, as of 1979, practically mandatory in an entire portion of the world. It triggered a torrent of films including, by Steven Spielberg, Schindler's List, by Roberto Benigni, Life is Beautiful, by Roman Polanski, The Pianist. In France, in 1985, Claude Lanzmann honoured us with a documendaciary running for over nine hours: Shoah. The number of Emmy Awards, Oscars and other prizes given to films like these is staggering. A mogul of the Entertainment Industry, Andrew Wallenstein, once stated in The Hollywood Reporter: “Let’s just say it: the real reason we see so many of these movies is that they’re awards bait.” It is such observations that have given rise to the saying “There's No Business Like Shoah Business,” inspired by the refrain of the song, sung by Liza Minnelli amongst others, “There’s No Business Like Show Business.”


3. Revisionism is an antidote to the poison of Hollywoodism



Revisionism is not an ideology but a remedy for the temptation of ideology. It is a method. Whether in matters of literature, science, history, the media or any human activity whatsoever, it prescribes that the reality of a fact be established prior to any considerations on that fact. One must again see, hear, read what is believed to have been seen, heard or read. One must be wary of first impressions, of emotions, rumours, and must not rely on anything or anyone until one’s own thorough investigation has been conducted, all the more if one is studying a war rumour for – let us not forget –, in wartime the first casualty is the truth.

In the little time I have left here I cannot, unfortunately, describe how and at what price in fifty years of research I, along with a good number of other revisionists, have come to the conclusion that “the Holocaust” is decidedly but a gigantic imposture, as I was able to convince myself after a few years. Already on December 17, 1980 I had summarised this conclusion in a sentence of sixty French words of which I do not see a single one that needs removing today. Here is the English translation: “The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”

To get an idea of the spectacular victories won against that imposture thanks to the revisionists’ work, one may refer to two studies appearing in my blog: “The Victories of Revisionism” (conference paper for Tehran, December 11, 2006) and “The Victories of Revisionism (continued)” (September 11, 2011). It is no exaggeration to say that currently, in France and elsewhere, the authors who used to defend the “Holocaust” thesis are in complete disarray. The trouble is that censorship and repression still prevent the general public from becoming aware of this good news, but with the Internet, times are changing, and quickly.



Conclusion



The general belief on the part of the Western world in “the Holocaust” has long been the sword and shield of Zionism. But today Revisionism is putting this belief in peril. This conference on Hollywoodism will mark, I think, one more step in our common struggle, a struggle for the rights of all – especially the Palestinians –, a struggle for the whole world to free itself from a tyranny based on the Greatest Lie of modern times.

Tehran, February 3, 2012

The Jews project their own crimes onto their enemies

As ZionCrimeFactory has so brilliantly pointed out, organized Jewry has historically projected their own crimes onto their enemies. International Jewry's primary enemy today is Iran (they've basically destroyed the rest of the Muslim world), and they are constantly demonizing and accusing Iran of crimes that they themselves commit. Take a look at this obvious example courtesy of Mitchell Bard, Executive Director of The American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise and publisher of Myth & Facts Online:
MYTH

"Terrorism against Jews is limited to attacks in Israel and the Palestinian territories."

FACT

The terror war against Israel and the Jewish people is not confined to the Middle East. For years PLO terrorists attacked Jewish targets around the world, hijacked airplanes, murdered Olympic athletes and targeted diplomats. This worldwide terror campaign appears to be escalating again with the support of Iran, aided by its proxy Hezbollah. As events of early 2012 show, terrorism against Jews is neither a byproduct of “occupation” nor a response to specific Israeli actions but is bred out of wanton incitement to kill Jews wherever they are.

In February 2012, terrorists attacked official Israeli representatives abroad in India and Georgia, while in Thailand, security officials were able to prevent Iranian and Lebanese cells from carrying out their planned strikes. Thai security officials arrested several Iranian men who likely were trying to attack Israelis in Bangkok. These incidents came on the heels of the January arrest of three Iranian men in Azerbaijan who had planned to kill two Israeli religious emissaries in Baku.

In response, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated unequivocally that Israel holds Iran responsible for the string of attacks. “In recent months we have witnessed several attempts to attack Israeli citizens and Jews in several countries,” he said. “Iran and its proxy Hezbollah were behind all of these attempted attacks … Iran is behind these attacks; it is the largest exporter of terrorism in the world.”

These are just the latest atrocities perpetrated by Iran and its allies. Argentina's Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires was bombed in 1992, long before any tensions over Iran’s nuclear program. That bomb killed 29 and injured more than 250. Among the victims were Israeli diplomats, children, clergy from a church located across the street and other passersby. Two years later, the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires was bombed, killing 85 and wounding 300.

“Just as we have seen in the past, the Jews are the convenient first target for crazy dictatorships, but not the last,” Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman said.

For now, Jews are the targets, but if steps are not taken to stop Iran’s nuclear program, the entire world may face the perilous threat of Iranian-sponsored global terrorism buttressed by a nuclear capability.
LMAO! Of course, we all know Mitchell Bard is feeding us a big pile of steaming bullshit. Jews actually invented and have mastered the practice of terrorism, often setting up patsies and dupes to take the blame for their crimes. The recent spate of "attacks" in India, Georgia, and Thailand all appear to be typical Mossad organized false flag attacks blamed on Iran.

We're constantly told Muslim extremists did 9/11, and that they are waging a war against the West, when in fact Jews did 9/11 and have completely subverted and destroyed all Western nations. The only threat to humanity is Israel and her international network of Jewish criminals hellbent on controlling the world and its resources. You'd be a fool to think otherwise.


Another Jewish child-sex abuse case

It's interesting that The Jewish Daily Forward and other Jewish publications written by and for Jewish audiences actually expose Jewish crimes, while the Jewish-owned Western press rarely covers Jewish crimes, at least not in any substantial way.

Remember all those front page stories of pedophilia and child abuse committed by Catholic priests? Why isn't this story, similar in nature, on the cover of the New York Times? Is it because the Jewish-owned Western press has an agenda and is primarily concerned with propagandizing and brainwashing it's largely non-Jewish readership, in addition to covering for crimes committed by Jews around the world? Is this child sex-abuse story not worthy of coverage in the Western press because Jews are implicated in depraved, abhorrent behavior?

It seems Jews must be portrayed in a positive light at all times in the Western press.

May all child molesters and pedophiles BURN IN HELL!

A child sex abuse scandal in Australia’s Jewish community has spilled into America, as a pending extradition, arrests in Australia and a slew of cover-up allegations put that community’s response to molestation under scrutiny.

Australian police are seeking to extradite convicted child molester David Kramer, currently in jail in Farmington, Mo., on suspicion of having abused children at a Chabad school in Melbourne during the 1990s.

Kramer, who was reportedly spirited out of Australia by one of Melbourne’s Chabad leaders following abuse allegations, is halfway through a seven-year prison sentence for sodomizing a 12-year-old boy in St. Louis.

According to members of the Australian community, he is not the only molester to end up in the United States after Australian community leaders failed to report them to legal authorities. Other molesters fled the country more recently as suspicion of abuse fell on them, community members say. [...]

Sexual abuse is difficult enough for many victims to report, but Orthodox Jewish survivors and their families often find it much harder, because of the tight-knit nature of their communities and because of concerns that they are violating religious laws such as mesirah, which prohibits reporting on a fellow Jew to secular authorities. Many are also worried about committing a chilul Hashem, a desecration of God’s name. [...]

Chabad institutions have taken a more liberal approach. A beit din, or religious court, in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn issued a ruling around the time that the Melbourne scandal broke, telling followers who suspect abuse that they are not violating religious laws by reporting their suspicions to the police.

Nevertheless, many survivors and their families fear being kicked out of synagogues and schools, or ruining marriage opportunities because of the taint of an abuse allegation.

Thursday, February 16, 2012

One of the only patriots on TV AXED from Fox News

Whatever you think of Judge Napolitano, he was one of the ONLY commentators in the mainstream media that stood up for the Constitution and American values.  His show was recently cancelled, probably because of the things he said in the videos below.







Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Israel betrays America into war with Iran




Occupy Wall Street studied at American universities

It has recently been reported that the Occupy Wall Street movement is being studied at universities around the United States:

Chicago, IL -- The Occupy movement is starting to set up camp in university course catalogs, syllabuses and classrooms. There are new course offerings and a new focus in older ones.

Professor Jeff Edwards, who is teaching "Occupy Everywhere" at Roosevelt University in Chicago this semester, said a third of the political science majors are enrolled in the course.

Edwards said Roosevelt allows professors to teach a class one time before the official approval process as long as the department approves it. He says the Occupy movement, which started in September near New York's Wall Street as a protest against economic inequality, is having enough of an impact on American culture to stand alone in its own course.

"This movement is playing out in front of us and I thought it would be negligent if I didn't create a space for our students to evaluate it," Edwards said.

Several other universities have also moved quickly to fashion Occupy courses this semester:

•Brown University's visiting assistant professor Derek Seidman created a seminar: "The Occupy Movement in Historical Context" after an Occupy teach-in at the University in October attracted about 600 people.

•Channa Newman, a professor at Point Park University in Pittsburgh, teaches "Wealthy White Males," where "the 99% vs. the 1% is the premise for the course." Newman started teaching the course 10 years ago, but this year she has changed it to include the Occupy movement.

•UC San Diego professor Ivan Evans' course "Social Movements" is zeroing in on the Occupy movement this semester. "Now we focus on the organization and structure of social movements because of Occupy's unique model," Evans says.

•New York University is offering "Cultures and Economies: Why Occupy Wall Street? The History and Politics of Debt and Finance" taught by professor Lisa Duggan.
Channa Newman's course got me thinking: here we have a Jewish woman teaching a course for the past ten years analyzing "Wealthy White Males," where "the 99% vs. the 1% is the premise for the course." That's all well and good, but...

Could you imagine the outrage if a professor taught a course which focused on wealthy, powerful Jews and their history in American government, finance, media, crime, and culture (including the slave trade)? Would that be allowed at any university in this country? If we can study "Wealthy White Males," why can't we study international Zionism, Jewish crime, and Jewish power? Are these not important subjects for inquiry and analysis?

*     *     *     *

Everyone should listen to, or read, the speech Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review gave last year titled, "The 'Jewish Question' Today." Maybe Mark Weber could teach a class on the "Jewish Question" and the history of anti-Semitism at a major university?

Some excerpts below:

“I think anti-Semitism exists for the same reason that Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, says it exists, and he laid out in his book, The Jewish State. He said that anti-Semitism exists as a natural consequence of the fact that Jews live in non-Jewish societies, but that Jews think of themselves and act as a separate people and promote their own group interests, and that these group interests often conflict with those of the people they live among.” That’s pretty obvious, I think. And in fact, that’s historically accurate.


Theodor Herzl felt that this conflict is inevitable as long as Jews live as a separate group — as a nation, he called them: a “Volk” in German – as a nation among other people, and that the solution to this, he believed – in fact in his diary he called it “the final solution of the Jewish Question” – was for Jews to become a normal people by living in a country of their own. [...]


... whereas in the past, the Jewish Question was an issue or a tension or a problem that existed in a particular region, or a particular country, or a city, and was usually followed by expulsion from that place, and then later, I think in the 1930s and ’40s became a continental-wide Question; today it is a global Question. It’s a global issue. Because the power of the organized Jewish community: the Jewish Lobby, the Israel Lobby, whatever you call it, is one that has a particular grip here in the United States, the most powerful country in the world, certainly the one with the biggest military, and is fortified by having a base of support in a country of their own, Israel, that is supplemental in addition to the power that already exists here in the United States: the one feeds off the other. [...]


There is no group in America, no single ethnic/religious group that has more power than the organized Jewish community. There is no significant policy carried out by our government that’s contrary to the interests and the will of the organized Jewish community. That’s not true of any other group, whether it’s fundamentalist Christians or Catholics (who make up something like 40% of the population.) [...]


And on all sorts of issues, time and time again, Jewish sensibilities and Jewish interests are paramount, absolutely paramount, nowhere more so of course than in our foreign policy, where our political leaders whether Democratic or Republican insist and swear by their defense of Israel under any circumstance, they absolutely pledge to their security, guaranteeing their security, and also in addition emphatically guaranteeing their support for Israel not really as a state or a nation, but as a specifically Jewish state, something the United States doesn’t do for any other country. [...]


For Jews, and organizations like the Anti-Defamation League, insist that Israel must be a specifically Jewish ethnic religious state. And that underscores the essential double standard, the essential hypocrisy. Not only in this regard, which is dangerous for the white race and indeed for all races, but underscores the double standard that prevails in American society, in political life, our cultural life, our social life, across the board. Because an appearance or a support of the interests and the agenda of the Jewish Zionist group, of that Jewish Zionist power means a betrayal of the interests of every other group in every other way.


I put it this way: if you are a sincere liberal, or if you are a sincere conservative, you must reject this Jewish Zionist power. If you are a sincere liberal, and you are consistent about the importance of egalitarian societies or justice, then your support for a state which has institutionalized discrimination against its non-Jewish population, which has violated numerous security council resolutions, which is the only state in the Middle East that occupies territory of its neighbors, is one that every liberal should understand and reject for that reason. And anyone who is a sincere conservative should equally be appalled by an organization or an organized community that promotes slogans, that promotes an agenda, that promotes policies that mean the destruction of everything worth conserving, everything worth holding on to. [...]


If there’s anything that needs to be stressed it’s this essential point that in our society no group has as much power – has the decisive power – as the organized Jewish community. We live in a society that is in the grip of this Jewish Zionist power. I know that a lot of Americans find that very disturbing. If you even talk about Jews as a separate group, that’s considered very, very dangerous. Because the ideology of America is that people come here and they all join in and we all become Americans. But the obvious untruth of that statement is that the Jewish community itself regards itself as a separate group with separate interests.


And the proof of that is that almost all Jews — in the United States or around the world, but almost all Jews in America – regard themselves as Zionists, as followers of Zionism. The essence of Zionism is Jewish Nationalism. It’s based on the premise that Jews are a separate and distinct nation, a distinct people, and therefore the Jews should and must have a primary loyalty to this nation-state, this group, this people. And to say then therefore that there’s no Jewish Question, is to ignore a reality that Jewish leaders themselves say. [...]


We have a tremendous opportunity to make tremendous impact by merely stating the truth, merely stating the reality. And these points that we’re making in this conference here this weekend, and the points that we try to make over and over again, are truthful, they’re real, they’re based on reality. And they need to be said over and over again.

Monday, February 13, 2012

Never recognize Israel!

The Protocols explained

Anonymous, a group that tends to be pretty popular with the Occupy Wall Street crowd, uses Dr. William Pierce to explain the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in the video below.  This is the sort of information that has typically been suppressed by most in the Occupy movement because it's "racist" or "anti-Semitic" or "distracting".  

Maybe Anonymous will help break the Occupy movement's reluctance to address the issue of Jewish power and supremacy?  I remain skeptical, but who knows?



Saturday, February 11, 2012

The Onion nails it

The Onion, a satirical news outlet, had quite an insightful headline and article the other day:

TEHRAN—Amidst mounting geopolitical tensions, Iranian officials said Wednesday they were increasingly concerned about the United States of America's uranium-enrichment program, fearing the Western nation may soon be capable of producing its 8,500th nuclear weapon. "Our intelligence estimates indicate that, if it is allowed to progress with its aggressive nuclear program, the United States may soon possess its 8,500th atomic weapon capable of reaching Iran," said Iranian foreign minister Ali Akbar Salehi, adding that Americans have the fuel, the facilities, and "everything they need" to manufacture even more weapons-grade fissile material. "Obviously, the prospect of this happening is very distressing to Iran and all countries like Iran. After all, the United States is a volatile nation that's proven it needs little provocation to attack anyone anywhere in the world whom it perceives to be a threat." Iranian intelligence experts also warned of the very real, and very frightening, possibility of the U.S. providing weapons and resources to a rogue third-party state such as Israel.
Although satirical, this article paints an accurate picture of the current situation facing the world.  The Jewish controlled media, as always, distorts every situation and historical event to suit their agenda, regardless of the facts.  And it is no different when it comes to Iran.

On a related note, since it's been admitted that Israel is officially a state sponsor of terrorism (something we have known for quite a long time now), isn't it about time to invade and destroy that country? And arrest the U.S. officials and media whores that constantly shill for Israel and her agenda?  Shouldn't these officials be prosecuted for providing material support for terrorism, based on our own laws?

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Deanna Spingola interviews ZionCrimeFactory

Deanna Spingola, one of the most fearless truth tellers out there, interviewed the outstanding researcher, writer, and historian ZionCrimeFactory today on her radio show, Spingola Speaks. I called in to commend ZionCrimeFactory for his excellent work and website, and to make a few comments. I come on at roughly the twenty minute mark in the second video.

Please take the time to listen to this entire interview if you haven't already. These facts need to be understood by as many people as possible if we are ever going to overcome the criminal Jewish crime network that has control over our country, media, and banking system. We cannot let their lies and propaganda dominate the political discourse of the Western world any longer.


Occult ritual abuse and pedophilia

In the early 1990s, John DeCamp wrote The Franklin Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska, which detailed a pedophile ring used to service and blackmail politicians and other elites, engage in Satanic rituals, and other illegal, disgusting behavior.


This pedophile ring was centered in my hometown of Omaha, Nebraska, but was linked to politicians and other high-profile individuals all across the country, even in the White House.


How prevalent is Occult ritual child abuse, Satanism, and pedophilia? These operations are often very well organized, involving elements of the government, police, judicial system, and other elites and (supposedly) respected members of the community, like teachers. Many participants, especially the high level ones, in these disgusting activities seem to be protected by the media and law enforcement agencies.

Yesterday, in the Jeruaelem Post, we read:

Police rearrested nine people involved in a well-known Jerusalem Breslov cult suspected of sexual and emotional abuse of cult members, after the head of the cult attempted to interfere with the investigation by hiding some of the state’s witnesses, police said Monday.

Four of the men were ordered held in remand by the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court Monday, and five more suspects will be remanded on Tuesday. The four men were remanded for five days while police continue their investigation. They are suspected of harassment of witnesses and intention to commit a crime, in addition to multiple counts of sexual abuse, child abuse, slavery, rape and imprisonment from their treatment of the women and children.
In Los Angeles, two teachers have recently been arrested for child sexual abuse:

A second teacher has been arrested at a Los Angeles school after a fellow staff member was charged with taking bondage-style photographs of children.

Martin Springer, 49, is suspected of sexually abusing young children at the Miramonte elementary school over the past three years.

The arrest, on Friday, comes four days after teacher Mark Berndt was charged with committing lewd acts on 23 children at the same school.

Captain Mike Parker of the Los Angeles county sheriffs said the two cases were not thought to be connected. Springer was being held on $2m (£1.27m) bail.

Berndt, who worked at the school for 32 years, was charged with committing lewd acts on 23 children, aged 6 to 10, between 2005 and 2010. It is alleged he photographed and sexually abused the children while they were blindfolded.
Same story, again and again.  Check out Jeff Rense's interview with Linda Stone for more information regarding Satanic ritual abuse and Linda's personal experience with it:





Monday, February 6, 2012

Truth and justice are dead concepts in America

What really got me to start this blog was coming to the realization that the official government conspiracy theory explaining 9/11 was, how shall I say, not exactly an accurate reflection of reality. I had come to the conclusion that truth and justice were completely dead concepts in America after re-examining that event and many others throughout history. The sad thing is that these concepts have been dead for some time now. I, as an individual, was merely waking up to this sad state of affairs.

Today I was reminded, yet again, of just how backwards this place really is.

The message is loud and clear. Go after justice for 9/11 in the courts, and not only will you lose, you’ll be punished.

That’s what April Gallop and her lawyer, William Veale, found out as their lawsuit against former vice-president Dick Cheney, former secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld, and former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Richard Myers concluded with a final slap in the face. This came in the form of a $15,000 fine levied against Veale for filing a “frivolous” appeal (the appeal had already been turned down in April of last year).

The decision was handed down by a three-judge panel headed by Justice John M. Walker, who just happens to be George W. Bush’s cousin – proving that the American justice system has a twisted sense of humour at times.

In March 2010, a lower court threw the original case out, stating that it was based on “cynical delusion and fantasy.”
Does April Gallop's case sound like it is based on "cynical delusion and fantasy" to you?


Since 9/11, we've seen a complete destruction of core Western concepts of jurisprudence, largely as a result of the false narrative put forth explaining that event. Evil Muslim terrorists attacked us and can do so at any time; we need to completely upend the Constitution in order to fight this new Terrorist threat, is the basic line of thinking. Further underscoring this point, Glenn Greenwald recently wrote:
The U.S. really is a society that simply no longer believes in due process: once the defining feature of American freedom that is now scorned as some sort of fringe, radical, academic doctrine. That is not hyperbole. Supporters of both political parties endorse, or at least tolerate, all manner of government punishment without so much as the pretense of a trial, based solely on government accusation: imprisonment for life, renditions to other countries, even assassinations of their fellow citizens. Simply uttering the word Terrorist, without proving it, is sufficient.
George Orwell couldn't have explained things more succinctly when he wrote in his famous novel, 1984:
And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.
Although a fictional novel, the parallels one can draw from 1984 to our current situation are apparent throughout the book. And the above quote highlights one of the fundamental reasons we have failed so miserably in challenging the New (Jew) World Order in any organized, meaningful way: we have let lies, fabrications, and distortions of history dominate and control our lives.

The Big Lies of history, namely the Holohoax, the JFK assassination, and 9/11, completely dominate the political and societal discourse in the Western world, which has led to an end of any pretense of truth and justice.  I see very few willing to stand up and challenge these Big Lies, and the New (Jew) World Order forces behind them. Until we're ready, as a society, to do just that, the tyranny and injustice you experience, witness, and read about on a daily basis will continue unabated.  

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Chem trails in San Diego?

I took this short video of what appeared to me to be a massive chem trail near my house in San Diego today:



Here are some more pictures from today:






Alan Roland recently published an article in Veterans Today titled, "Numbing Out Of America - Public Apathy Explained," arguing that a combination of chemicals sprayed in the atmosphere, in conjunction with GMO foods and fluoridated water, are hindering the vast majority of Americans from waking up to the New (Jew) World Order and their agenda. He writes:
Let’s get something straight, what the global financial elite fear more than terrorism or any foreign threat, is the people armed with the truth. What better way to keep the masses at bay than spraying them with immune system weakening aerosol, sedating them with fluorides and finally slowly weakening them with genetically modified Foods ~ which are foods derived from genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
I'd add that the constant barrage of propaganda in the media, entertainment, music, and school system has essentially vaccinated many Americans from even understanding the basic truths of this world, like the obvious fact 9/11 was an inside job done by Israel and an international network of (mostly) Jewish criminals that has control of this country.

Check out this excellent documentary for more on chem trails:



Another Israeli false flag around the corner?

ABC News is reporting:

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

Israeli facilities in North America -- and around the world -- are on high alert, according to an internal security document obtained by ABC News that predicted the threat from Iran against Jewish targets will increase.

"We predict that the threat on our sites around the world will increase … on both our guarded sites and 'soft' sites," stated a letter circulated by the head of security for the Consul General for the Mid-Atlantic States. Guarded sites refers to government facilities like embassies and consulates, while 'soft sites' means Jewish synagogues, and schools, as well as community centers like the one hit by a terrorist bombing in Buenos Aires in 1994 that killed 85 people.

The head of Shin Bet, Israel's internal security service, told an audience at a closed forum in Tel Aviv recently that Iran is trying to hit Israeli targets because of what it believes are Israeli attacks on it nuclear scientists. Yoram Cohen said that Iran's Revolutionary Guard, the same militant wing of the government linked to the recent alleged plot against the Saudi ambassador to the U.S., is working tirelessly to attack Israeli and Jewish targets abroad in order to deter Israel.
From The Independent, February 1, 2012:

Israel has set up a specialist commando unit designed to carry out missions deep inside enemy territory amid growing consensus in government circles that military strikes must be contemplated if economic sanctions do not halt Iran's nuclear programme.

The "Depth Corps" has been organised with the aim of co-ordinating deep penetration operations in other countries at a time when the defence ministry acknowledges that the number of covert Israeli operations abroad has increased significantly in the last year.

The unit, headed by Major General Shai Avital, a former head of an elite reconnaissance squad, was ordered by the head of Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) to focus on undercover work. Defence ministry officials in Tel Aviv insisted that it was not "Iran specific" and is needed to co-ordinate a range of duties.
Could it be any more obvious that Israel is preparing some sort of staged, false flag attack in order to get the United States to invade Iran? Maybe Israel strikes first, then launches a false flag attack in the U.S., which is of course blamed on Iran, to get us involved?

The Vancouver Hearings


This should be an interesting event:

The Vancouver Hearings
The Denman Theatre, 15-17 June 2012
Organizers: James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., and Joshua Blakeney

PROGRAM: 5 PM—Doors Open. 6-10 PM—Speakers, Discussion, and Debate

Friday, 15 June 2012:

Master of Ceremonies: Jack Etkin
6:00-7:00 PM: Orientation and Keynote Address: Splitting the Sky
7:00-9:00 PM: Session 1: How were the Twin Towers destroyed?
  • *Charles Boldwyn, “Conventional Explosives and Nanothermite?” (40 minutes)
  • *Kurt Miller, “Mini-Nukes or Directed Energy Weaponry?” (40 minutes)
  • *Dwain Deets, “Alternative Theories about the Twin Towers” (40 minutes)
9:00-10:00 PM: Discussion and Debate

Saturday, 16 June 2012:

9:00-11:00 AM: Session 2: Video Fakery and Planes/No Planes
  • *Morgan Reynolds, “Some Problems with the Plane Stories” (40 minutes)
  • *Mike Sparks, “What did and didn’t happen at the Pentagon” (40 minutes)
  • *Jim Fetzer, “Fakery and Fraud in the ‘official account’ of 9/11” (40 minutes)
11:00-Noon: Discussion and Debate
Noon-1:30 PM: Lunch on the town
1:30-4:30 PM: Session 3: The Hijackers, the Phone Calls, and the Passengers
  • *Elias Davidsson, “There is no proof hijackers were on those planes” (40 minutes)
  • A.K. Dewdney, “The phone calls from the planes were faked” (40 minutes)
  • *Dean Hartwell, “If there were no planes, were there passengers?” (40 minutes)
4:30-5:30: Discussion and Debate
5:30-7:00: Dinner on the town
7:00-9:00 PM: Session 4: Who was responsible for 9/11 and why?
  • *Kevin Barrett, (40 minutes)
  • *Joshua Blakeney, (40 minutes)
  • James Petras, (40 minutes)
9:00-10:00 PM: Discussion and Debate

Sunday 17 June 2012:

9:00-11:00 AM: Session 5: The Media and the Intelligence Agencies
  • *Anthony Hall, (40 minutes)
  • Barrie Zwicker, (40 minutes)
  • Webster Tarpley, (40 minutes)
11:00-Noon: Discussion and Debate
* Speakers are confirmed.
_____________________________________

I am extremely delighted to see a 9/11 Truth Conference that addresses the more controversial aspects of 9/11, namely video fakery, the role of Israel and a wider network of Zionist Jews in carrying out the attacks, and alternative explanations as to how the towers were destroyed.  I'm a bit disappointed that brilliant researchers like ZionCrimeFactory, Daryl Bradford Smith, Chris Bollyn, and the producers of 9/11 Missing Links are not on the list of speakers. These are the sources, in my opinion, who have thoroughly and incontrovertibly proven beyond any reasonable doubt that Israel and an international network of Zionist Jews carried out, covered up, and benefitted from 9/11 more so than any other entity or organization.

That being said, this may be the most comprehensive 9/11 Truth Conference ever. I know I'm going to need a vacation this summer, and I've never been to Vancouver... road trip anyone?

I would really encourage everyone to read this Open Letter to the 9/11 Truth Community written by the organizers of this conference and published at Veterans Today.  Some brief excerpts:

After considering mixed feedback from prominent members of the 9/11 Truth community, we have decided to revise our proposal for The Vancouver Hearings, to be held at Vancouver’s Denman Theater on 15-17 June 2012. Upon reflection, we believe that our preliminary proposal, which called The Toronto Hearings “acutely disappointing,” was a mistake. Our aim in holding the Vancouver Hearings is not to belittle The Toronto Hearings. On the contrary, we appreciate the efforts of those who organized The Toronto Hearings and agree that the overall evidence presented there does amount to a convincing case against the US government’s version of what happened on 9/11.

The purpose of The Vancouver Hearings instead is to critique and supplement the Toronto Hearings, not undermine or dismiss them. The Vancouver Hearings will feature experts who will analyze and question certain aspects of the evidence presented at The Toronto Hearings—as well as other experts who will argue in favor of The Toronto Hearings’ evidence. [...]

The Vancouver Hearings is designed to expand the range of inquiry in relation to the issues addressed at The Toronto Hearings. Those hearings limited themselves to presenting what the organizers considered the “best evidence” against the official version of 9/11, without considering questions of who actually perpetrated the attacks and why. [...]

The five areas in which we believe a supplemental conference of this kind can make a constructive contribution include especially these:

(1) how the Twin Towers were destroyed through a comparison of the explanatory power of alternative theories of conventional explosives, exotic accelerants including nano-thermite, mini-nukes and directed energy devices;

(2) the role of the planes in these events, where there is a noticeable absence of debris of the kinds and quantities expected at all four of the alleged “crash sites”–and where there are even indications that some kind of video fakery may have occurred in New York;

(3) the absence of proof that the alleged “hijackers” were aboard any of the planes, that the purported “phone calls” were faked, and that even the passenger manifests are suspect and cannot be taken to be authentic;

(4) who was responsible and why it was done, including an evaluation of evidence that implicates neo-cons in the Department of Defense and other—surprisingly extensive—indications that the Mossad had an important role in this; and,

(5) the role of the media in collaboration with the intelligence agencies in covering up what really happened, typified by Jane Standley’s early report that WTC-7 had collapsed, when the building was visible over her shoulder and would not occur for nearly 30 minutes more.

For these and other reasons, we believe that a follow-up conference like this one, which addresses both the accomplishments and the limitations of The Toronto Hearings, will be a worthwhile exercise. We invite those who disagree with us on any of these issues to submit suggestions of names for potential speakers at The Vancouver Hearings. We have a tentative line-up representing alternative positions, but we are open to additional participants representing alternative points of view. [...]