Sunday, October 14, 2012

People jumping from World Trade Center

Do you believe this is real?  Or is this a big PSYOP?  Hmm...

The official title of the YouTube video is People jumping from World Trade Center (Warning: Graphic) RIP Never Forget.



RIP Never Forget indeed. Who really died on 9/11? We're always told 3000 innocent Americans were murdered on 9/11, but who? Are they all frauds? Maybe not all, but certainly many "victims" are fraudulent.  Please see the Vicsim Report for all the details.  








12 comments:

  1. Wow, check out this propaganda piece:

    9-11 Photos The Networks Will NOT Show You!!! - Remembering The Jumpers

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Usltm7FSm38

    We have to understand this is all a big fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 9/11 Gelatin: The B Thing

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdJRXuIBheM

    ReplyDelete
  3. More....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz4LYQUjUdw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mZt8JagXIA

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uILPWPO_7cE

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't know about this.

    Were some of the tears faked? Likely. But, some of the videos are very unconvincing to me.

    I have seen pictures of Obama with MANY people at various locations and he looks damn near exactly the same in every one (same smile, same tilt of the head). It is entirely possible that people take a very similar pose when having their pics taken. So, I don't understand the nature of that particular video.

    I'll read more at the links to understand the significance and I hope the Vicsims people aren't disinfo or just callous assholes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The info about b-gelatin looks pretty incriminating. The jumpers all exiting from floors 90 or 91 also looks suspicious - the flames were above that point; why not just walk downstairs?

    ReplyDelete
  6. http://gelitin.net/books/ACB/

    B-thing

    Here's the link for gelatin. Scroll down at your own risk. A giant pink dead rabbit, lots of naked buts and other strangeness.

    http://gelitin.net

    ReplyDelete
  7. http://www.septemberclues.info/jumpers.htm

    9/11 Reflections Part 2: Interview with Simon Shack of September Clues - (Independent confirmation of the vicsims report)

    Salem News reporter: "I did an exhaustive check of the list of victims provided on the CNN website. What I found is that out of 2,970 people listed, only 446 appear in the Social Security death index. Of those only 249 have a confirmed death certificate on file. Of those, not a single one has a valid “last address of record” on file."

    http://www.salem-news.com/articles/september122010/911-reflections-ew.php

    small extra note to the 9-11 Actors video you posted:

    911 ACTORS - Simon Shack

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE

    SSDI = Social Security Death Index

    Neither of the first two people Bob McIlvaine and Marsh-O'Connor are sobbing over on multiple media channels in the above video are even on the social security death index, never mind the fact that they certainly do not have death certificates.

    Try putting the names of anybody you know that died (unique names are much easier to find, with a common name you'll have to go through thousands of names sometimes), anyone at all whether related to you or not, in the SSDI and see if doesn't come up:

    http://www.socialsecuritydeathindex-search.com/


    Why are the nearly 3,000 victims of 9/11 missing from an official federal registry of death?

    http://www.courierpress.com/news/2011/jul/09/30pt-hed1-15-inches-of-story-goes-herep/

    "Social Security Administration Commissioner Michael Astrue, who has declined requests for interviews with Scripps Howard, agreed in a letter to Maloney."

    "We cannot legally share all of our death information," said Astrue. "If we received the report of death from a source other than a state (or city) government, the name of a victim could appear on the public Death Master File."

    But there were special circumstances that prevented the 9/11 deaths from getting into the Death Master File."

    "In most cases there were no physical remains , so (private) funeral directors were not involved," said Steven Schwartz, vital-records registrar for New York City."

    What are these lying scumbags talking about ? 'Special Circumstances' ? What friggin 'special circumstances'? 'No Physical Remains' ? What ? Why the hell not ? Since when does a friggin building getting demolished on top of people's heads (if that is what supposedly happened to kill people since they sure as hell didn't die on any planes) completely obliterate all physical remains ? (Isn't this where Judy Wood & DEW come in to Psy-Op everybody that everything got nano-dusted, including all supposed 'remains' of dead people from inside the buildings & 'jumpers' as Wood claims are real in her book? )

    And how am I not surprised that the vital records registrar is a guy by the name of Steven Schwartz ?

    ~Negengtropic

    ReplyDelete
  8. Were Real Persons Murdered on 9/11? by Stewart Ogilby

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/29/were-real-persons-murdered-on-911/

    http://www.bigeye.com/911_missing_posters_of_disembodied_souls.htm


    "So what was the deal with those fliers? What sort of collective phenomena would have caused hundreds of families to reach for downtown Manhattan, on the evening of the tragedy, to plaster the city with “MISSING” fliers? If we are to have a rational discourse about this matter, we must first tackle one basic, elementary question: is this what people usually do when buildings collapse ? or even in the aftermath of earthquakes or other calamities? No. It is something you might (possibly) do when a stray kid is feared abducted, kidnapped or on the run. Even in such circumstances, families will prefer to rely on the authorities - not on fliers. Such neighborhood pamphlets are usually reserved for pets gone astray.

    This issue merits serious consideration and needs to be resolved once and for all: we cannot keep on pretending that it was all part of the natural order of things. Let’s face it, the whole idea of these “MISSING” fliers is preposterous in the extreme. It was one thing to swallow the “spontaneous” nature of this bizarre, collective behavior in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. It is another to accept it as such today. So do we have any lead to follow as to finding out who might have been behind this manifestly staged operation?" -- Simon Shack


    "It appears that NO PHOTOGRAPHY was allowed at Ground Zero, as of an official order signed by NY Mayor Giuliani. I am inclined to believe that this was actually the case (even though some may accuse me of choosing to believe only pictures that fit our theories...):

    http://www.septclues.com/SIMCITY/RUBBLE%20RESEARCH%20GROUND%20ZERO/NO_PHOTOGRAPHY_ALLOWED.jpg

    So, what sort of justification would such a menacing WARNING SIGN have? What kind of problem would anyone cause to anyone by snapping pictures of the premises of such a historically defining, public event? One official motivation given was that "it was a crime scene". Oh yeah - it sure was !...

    PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: If you have had your camera seized by the authorities around Ground Zero, please get in touch!

    For years, I 'knew' that only ONE photographer had access to Ground Zero.

    I thought it was time to remind everybody about this dude...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Meyerowitz

    the only photographer allowed unrestricted access to ground zero immediately following the attack":

    -- Simon Shack

    http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=489&hilit=faking+the+rubble


    ~Negentropic

    ReplyDelete
  9. Old Falling Man Thread at Clues Forums (needs to be updated, some photos & videos are missing)

    http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=501


    Shack on "Where Did the Towers Go?" by Judy Wood


    "I see that Judy Wood has published a new book. However, her research is based on fake pictures. The sole purpose of her existence is, imho, to provide 'a plausible explanation' for the very stupid-looking WTC 'pulverization' animations."

    http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=869


    'The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. . . The important thing is that [propaganda] is universal and continuous; and in its sum total it is regimenting the public mind every bit as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers.' - Edward Bernays 'Propaganda'.


    'At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this or that or the other, but it is 'not done.'. . . Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness. A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing, either in the popular press or in highbrow periodicals.' - George Orwell.

    ''You cannot hope to bribe or twist, thank God, a British journalist - But seeing what the man will do, unbribed, there's no occasion to." - Humbert Wolfe


    "Lies come first, and drag along the gullible. Truth limps in long afterward on the arm of time." - Balthazar Gracian.


    "The Internet poses a fundamental threat not only to the authority of the government, but to all authority, because it permits people to organize, think, and influence one another without any institutional supervision whatsoever.' - John Seabrook. American journalist at The New Yorker since 1993.



    Ricefoot's (Brian Staveley) The Real Truth Behind The Illusion Of 9/11 (great video done over a year ago but still very cutting edge):

    http://vimeo.com/30094696


    Delcroix interviews Dennis Fetcho - 10 / 19 / 2012

    http://www.awakeradio.co.uk/podcasts/delcroix%20show%20fetch19102012.mp3

    Hermetic Qaballa as explained by the Fetch - Qaballistic rituals and spells: the 9-11 Psy-Op; the Not-Sees vs. National Socialists Psy-Op, etc.

    This was a mind-numbingly wide-ranging and fascinating podcast. Fetch really knows this stuff inside and out.

    http://illuminatusobservor.blogspot.com/2010/09/crowley-gematria-and-qaballa-qabalah.html

    ~Negentropic

    ReplyDelete
  10. John Friend,

    Let me first clarify a few things...I have been a student of the truth for many years. I recently came across your blog and have since visited it regularly because I am in agreement with the information presented here i.e. jews being the driving force behind these problems. I have studied the 3rd Reich for many years and know that we were raised on lies about what they really stood for. I don't believe in the holocaust. I also agree about all the lies and deception regarding 911. Yes, I even agree with the no planes theory.

    So you see...if we were to have coffee together and a conversation, there wouldn't be anything for us to disagree on. I've come to the conclusion that a good portion of our world/reality is "fake" so to speak. Only a minority of people can truly peel back all the layers of this onion that we call the "truth".

    I have learned to keep a VERY open mind regarding the things I research...otherwise I fall into the trap of lies and deception created for the goyim sheeple. Through my journey I have learned that the enemy plants poison to deter you from the truth. They have their own "truthers" that add fake stories/theories..and believe me, there are more detractors than truthers out there. This is why many people can not get fully awaken because of all the detours and contradictions.

    However, I strongly disagree with this "fake victims" theory. This is an example of the poison I described. Could they use actors to add to the drama and drive the point further? Certainly, this is all a show after-all. BUT - are most/all of the victims fake? NO. I haven't lost any family members to 911 - but I did know a person that died during this event. My wife used to work for him and he was also our attorney. His name was Angel R. Pena from NJ. I kept such an open mind that I made my wife call someone to confirm this after I read your blog entry because I was willing to believe it was all fake instead of trusting what I already knew to be true. I let my guard down because I was with all of the information presented on your blog thus far...shame on me.

    I also did a search here:

    http://savejersey.com/2012/09/jerseys-911-victims/

    and

    http://www.voicesofseptember11.org/dev/memorial_biography.php?idbio=1258815983

    Also note that the SS death index does not have an entry so I can see why its easier for people to buy into this "fake victim" theory. I assure you that he is a REAL person.

    So the point is: Be very careful of what you "sign your name to" unless you have fully checked it out. I expect better from you John since you are an example that many people will come to for help peeling away at that onion I described. This ruins your credibility and makes your research look juvenile. It looks as if you were jewtube-truthing instead of putting some real research and logic into this like you have done with your past blog entries.

    You have lost my faith and I am now skeptical about you. I know, you don't care...but your readers should. Do the right thing and remove this blog entry on fake victims all together and earn back the respect that you deserve...otherwise - adios.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I never said that all the victims are faked. But many of them are. Phil Jayhan and Larry McWilliams did a radio program with Dr. Fetzer and they described a number of different categories the 9/11 "victims" may fit into. Some of them may be complete fakes, totally made up individuals. Some may have been real people that were in fact killed. Some may have been government insiders who faked their death and assumed a different identity. Who really knows all the details? My point is that we should be open to the idea of there being faked victims on 9/11, and I think there definitely were fakes.

      See this YouTube vid I made of Fetzer, Jayhan, and McWilliams' discussion on this subject:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM8zOkhlN9o&list=UUuHDGviOGC1ytrdHADjKg6Q&index=11&feature=plcp

      Delete
  11. Holy shit John ! LOL

    It's hilarious how fast these guys will give you a straight-up ULTIMATUM & then bid you an ADIOS! Adios amigo, either straighten up or else.

    All without even checking out any of the information.
    Hey, at least the guy's a no-planer which is a lot better than most people brainwashed by the Alex Jones / loose-change crowd.
    What these guys have to realize is that a significant portion of the truth movement and especially its most popular segment is controlled opposition.

    Most of the people who oppose that segment with regard to WHO was behind the event, still push the 'planes' and 'no media fakery' disinfo originated from them.

    A guy like Sabrosky comes out later to put the blame on Mossad and here's this former head of the army war college and apparently a very smart guy and EVEN HE can't figure out the completely obvious and conclusive evidence for no-planes and media fakery ? ha ha hee hee ho ho, excuse me if I have a good laugh.

    Same thing with Bollyn. His research on the 'who' is solid but based on the wrong story, the same story of 'planes' and 'no media fakery' pushed by Alex Jones / Loose Change. Bollyn says Jews and names them, AJ says everybody elite and doesn't name them.

    So after all these years Bollyn can't figure out something as simple as media fakery on 9-11 ? Sorry but I find it hard to believe that any plane-hugging case, especially one by a high-level researcher, can possibly be an honest accident or mistake.

    This 'adios ultimatum' guy and others like him need to be completely skeptical and STOP BELIEVING A SINGLE THING on any mainstream news channel EVER AGAIN.

    If there is any lesson to be learned from the events of the past 10 years, shit! , from the events of the past 45 years going back to the faked moon landings, it is that control of mainstream media worldwide is absolute and total. But beyond that there is the further lesson that control of the information on the internet is also much more widespread than people assume.

    It is absolutely irrelevant whether this control is achieved through useful idiocy, pressure through infiltration or directy agentry because the result is the same: the internet shillatocracy. The worst thing about this is that:

    Shill-proofing is a life-long ongoing process each person has to do on their own & shill-proofing yourself from others & from yourself goes hand-in-hand. Anybody who was more-or-less honest today could end up a shill tomorrow & yes, even long-time shills may come to realize the error of their ways every once-in-a-while & correct themselves into upstanding denizens of reality.

    I think I stumbled on a bit of truth there.

    Once those basic rules of the game are realized then any & all truth seekers that are still left need to spend a couple of hours & just watch this single video:

    Ricefoot's (Brian Staveley) The Real Truth Behind The Illusion Of 9/11

    http://vimeo.com/30094696

    After that here for their tour guide:

    Introductory Tour Guide to the September Clues research by Simon Shack - (updated on July 18 2011)

    http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=477

    Interview with Simon Shack of September Clues - Brian S Staveley, 04 / 08 / 2012

    http://www.therealnewsonline.com/uploads/6/5/2/9/6529494/4-8-12.mp3

    Does this mean Staveley is shill-proof ? No. Nobody is. I haven't seen Staveley expose the holohoax the way Shack has, for example etc. & Shack still has to realize that Hitler wasn't such a bad guy at all but a heroic figure who did his best under tremendous pressure. So we're back to the necessary on-going daily shill-proofing process.

    Now back to other areas of the internt so that the plane-hugging dufuses can call me mentally ill & the rest can call me a white soup-rahm-assist ! LOL !

    ~Negentropic



    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.