Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Ernst Zundel - Anti-German Propaganda (1981)

I found and downloaded this video from ZionCrimeFactory's excellent website.  God bless Ernst Zundel and all historical revisionists who have risked their lives and livelihoods to stand up and speak the truth!



12 comments:

  1. I don't know if you read Henry Makow but his latest writing might interest you.

    It details various facts (not that I have confirmed the claims, but for now I'll assume they are legitimate) to support the theory that Hitler was an Illuminati agent.

    The questions asked are: why did Hitler not move more quickly to dominate the war with nuclear weapons, why did he hold back certain developments or misdirect resources and why did he have so many left over jet planes, rockets etc?

    I came up with a few objections to Henry's reasoning, and some alternative explanations.

    - Nuclear weapons - Maybe Hitler didn't use nukes on people because he wasn't as inhuman as the allies. Maybe he didn't think it was important to win the nuke race because he doubted the other side would be crazy enough to use it. Notice the U.S. didn't drop one until they were sure there could no equivalent retaliation. Really, they didn't even drop it during the war, which was as good as over. Does this suggest that they didn't use it earlier because they didn't know if Germany had one too? That would contradict the 'completely orchestrated' idea.

    - unused jets and rockets - Why would they use all their resources at once if they didn't have to? If you think an operation can succeed with 20 jets, why use 100? With the twenty, if it doesn't succeed, you lose the minimum number of units. Kids who play rts games know that. I have read there was a fuel problem for the German side also, could this have been another reason to hold back on development or deployment of certain weapon types?

    Henry's seems to be a more refined version of the Hitler was a crypto thing, or maybe just the same with Illuminati stickers on it.

    Its only since discovering this blog that Ive started to notice just how much the Evil Nazi - Tyrant Hitler historical assumption is used within parts of the alternative scene. Maybe its like the old j-word thing used to be, and will help to separate out some crap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Germans did not have a delivery system. That was their number one problem. They had no long range bombers capable of delivering an atomic weapon. Little Boy was likely Hitler's bomb and was intercepted by the Yankis en route to Japan.

      The Yankis only had plutonium ready to use, and not enough enriched uranium. There was also enriched uranium on that U-boat destined for Japan (I think it was U-234 or 235, cannot remember), so that's where the US got that as well.

      This is supposed to be why Fat Man and Little Boy were so very different.

      As for Hitler's supposed nuclear weapons cache, Makow has no proof, only hearsay and speculation...AS ALWAYS. He's an assumer, not a scholar. He has nothing more than Joseph Farell and his Polish journalist source.

      Pure speculation.

      And is Makow really claiming that Hitler refused to allow atomic research because he was an Illuminati agent? If that's the case then way to go Illuminati. They aren't nuclear nutcases after all!

      And this doesn't explain how/why the Jewzis in America were the real pushers and "brains" behind America's atomic weapons program. Should we praise those Jewzis for actually using their bombs? Makow makes no sense because he covers for Jewzis. If you cover for Jewzis and excuse them, and blame the Jewzi-founded sect of Freemasonry called "the Illuminati" (founded by Jewzi Adam Weishaupt), then you too will run around in circles like Makow.

      And if Hitler was really a Jewzi Illuminist, then I'm converting. Because if that's the case, then there is ZERO HOPE for any of US...or even the rest of humanity for that matter. (And this may in fact be exactly what Makow wants you to think. Hello psyop? He's a trained psychologist after all.)

      Be careful who you listen to...

      Delete
    2. Makow is good on some subjects, but WWII, National Socialist Germany, and the alleged Jewish "Holocaust" are not among them. His work on feminism, promotion of homosexuality, the general perversion of our culture and similar subjects is good though.

      Delete
  2. As I have said before, I used to live down the street from Mr. Zundel, back in the late 1970's to early 1982. This was in a rather sketchy part of town and we lived on a very public thoroughfare. The architecture was dated, well kept and very elegant but much of it politely seedy. The winos and working girls added a colourful touch.

    The Carlton/Dundas Streetcar ran 24/7 every 15 minutes and kept a tight schedule. Now me, I knew the world was amiss at that time but I was still Jewish sensitive but not at all Holocausted (my age group was just ahead of the educational onslaught).

    Every Saturday, every single one, those streetcars and all other traffic were held up for ages at this little turn in the tracks because various Jewish groups, usually B'nai Brith led or ADL groups were filling the streets in front of Zundel's home.

    As we know they eventually bombed that house. Last time I saw it, before Mr. Z left Toronto, it looked like an armed fortress in attractive wrought iron and 2 young Aryan men walking about with a vigilant air.

    The few times I saw Mr. Z on the streets he nodded politely with a slight smile and seemed to come from a place of calm optimism. Little did I know at that time I was in the presence of a modern hero whom I would one day admire so deeply.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, what an interesting story Noor, thanks for sharing! I'll tell you what, Zundel is most definitely a modern hero! He is a champ, an honorable and righteous man. God bless him!

      Delete
  3. JEWS WANTED TO SILENCE ZUNDEL ON 9/11

    At approximately 3:30 is the below interview, Zundel explains how the issue of 9/11 was what really brought him grief.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBXsDtc5LBU

    “….It is important that you and your listeners realize that Sylvia is the one who presented most of my defense documents on 9/11. Most people don’t know that. I didn’t realize that this never was understood on the outside. 10 or 12 of the charges were directly or indirectly related to my publication on 9/11.”

    “That’s what broke my back.”

    After his arrest in the U.S. in 2003, he was deported to Canada, where he was kept in prison as “a threat to the national security” for two years. After deportation to Germany in March 2005, he was convicted and sentenced in 2007 to five additional years of imprisonment on charges of holocaust denial. He was finally released on March 1, 2010.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very interesting.... thanks for sharing. I didn't know that either, and I remember listening to that interview back in the day. I must have totally missed that bit. I don't have time to watch that entire video right now, but do you know what 9/11 info Zundel had that got him in (even more) trouble?

      Delete
    2. Zundel printed this essay in one of his newsletters:

      STRANGER THAN FICTION
      AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11 AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM

      By Anonymous

      http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-Jews/+Doc-Jews-911/+++BOOK-JewsWereBehind911/JewsWereBehind911-1.htm

      =============

      IN ZUNDEL'S OWN WORDS:

      (From: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/may012010/ernst-zundel-kz.php)

      HERE IS WHAT HAPPENED

      "Here is what happened, briefly: In the early months post-9/11 my wife, an avid Internetter, discovered a compelling research document entitled Stranger than Fiction: An Independent Investigation of 9/11 and the War on Terrorism by Anonymous, 11-11-02. She gave it to me over breakfast. I read it, found it interesting, and ran a few copies off on my printer for people on my mailing list. I did not write that lavishly footnoted paper. I did not research it. I merely copied it. Somebody must have concluded that I, with my background of thorough forensic investigations in other areas, showed more than ordinary interest in 9/11 as a potential political false flag common in intelligence agency operations!

      During my trial in Mannheim, ostensibly for “Holocaust Denial”, portions of my monthly newsletter, where I mentioned this booklet and the 9/11 topic, were referenced by the prosecution as criminal offenses. Only after it became clear that I welcomed the opportunity to have my attorneys present forensic evidence of a potential 9/11 cover-up were those portions of the accusation against me hastily dropped, and my trial became a “Holocaust Denial” show trial in the traditional Stalinist mode, “… accuse wildly but don’t allow a defense!”

      ===========

      Delete
    3. ERNST'S WIFE, INGRID TELLS MORE:

      (From: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/24/a-modern-kidnapping-on-u-s-soil/)

      MISSED 9/11

      "We very seldom watched TV, so we missed the 9/11 morning drama until our meter man told us. Later, we were sitting in the kitchen, stuffing letters for our supporters. An iron fist got hold of my heart, and I could feel my face getting hot. After what seemed an eternity, Ernst said in a voice that was not his voice:

      “That was a coup. Henceforth, this will no longer be a kinder, gentler nation.”

      Ernst is a horse-and-buggy man. He has never, to this day, sent an email. He wouldn’t know what to do with a website. I used to run off articles for him that he would read at breakfast.

      On the other hand, and this needs to be said and understood, Ernst has an infallible radar for things that are not of this world – that are, to use a fancy term, preternatural. I have often heard him say: “Why do I know these things? Where does this knowledge come from?”

      WHY SO MUCH DUST?

      About two weeks after the attack, Ernst started brooding on “the dust.” He used to ask three, four times a day: “Why so much dust? Somebody ought to analyze that dust…”

      He talked about the dust, again and again, weeks and then months after the Twin Towers shattered.

      He knew instinctively that there was something wrong with the official story – this long before there was a 9/11 Commission, before there were suspicious citizens groups, years before there was aggressive alternative media.

      THE "ANONYMOUS" ARTICLE

      I printed out an article. It was written by “Anonymous” who blamed the Chosenites. Recall that, in the early days, all talk was of the Arabs. Today we know who wrote that lengthy, meticulously researched essay – a fellow by the name of Albert D. Pastore, Ph.D. But then, we didn’t know – and neither did the New World Order guys who somehow got wind of what Zundel had read.

      Not written, mind you! Merely read! Not even officially published. Ernst merely ran off some 50 or so copies amid the clutter in our garage on our second-hand copier, gave it a blue cover, and sent it to some friends.

      Ernst kept obsessing on “the dust.” It was at hand to think of Fred Leuchter, whom Ernst had sent to Auschwitz as a forensic sleuth, and who might be enticed, Ernst told me casually, to go and see if there was something he might find that would explain “the dust”.

      Maybe our phone was bugged. Maybe Ernst sent that booklet to Fred – and maybe it was intercepted. He doesn’t remember he did, and I don’t recall details either.

      Somebody must have clear freaked out. Remember the collapse of the official Holotale right in the court room in Toronto in 1988? Was Zundel unto something again? He had that reputation.

      Several years later, after Ernst had already been taken into custody, a friend of ours who is a European diplomat with contacts within the UN, called me one merry morning and told me: “It was the blue booklet that did it!”

      “They kept watching him,” explained our friend. “After you guys moved to the hills of Tennessee, they watched him. They were biding their time. When Ernst published that blue booklet, that was the last straw! That’s when it was decided to take him out for good.”

      “Who decided?”

      “Somebody at the State Department. At the highest level.”

      “Who? At what ‘highest level’”?

      “At the VERY highest level,” our friend told me, and that is all he ever said to me, though I pushed him and pushed him for details.

      “Colin Powell? Dick Cheney? Maybe even Bush? Who?”

      He wouldn’t say. He hasn’t told me to this day. He only added: “I have already said too much.”

      You be the judge as to how it was done. Here are a few of the documents I have since secured and squirreled away. You judge for yourself what went on.

      =========

      Delete
  4. Zundel printed this essay in one of his newsletters:

    STRANGER THAN FICTION
    AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11 AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM

    By Anonymous


    http://www.voxfux.com/features/stranger_than_fiction.htm

    =======

    This link is better than the one appearing above. If you compare the two you will see that the earlier posted link lead to a version of the article that has been "edited" and is incomplete.

    For example, when you click on "go to part 2", it takes your straight to the Jew Shill Rivero's site.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that!

      Here's a list of key State Department principals and chiefs from 2003, tons of Jews and other scum bags.

      *Grossman, Marc Isaiah (1951-)
      Executive Secretaries (1993-1994)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Turkey (1994-1997)
      Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs (1997-2000)
      Director General of the Foreign Service (2000)
      Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs (2001-2005)
      Career Ambassador (2004)

      Ensenat, Donald Burnham (1946-)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Brunei (1992-1993)
      Chief of Protocol (2001-2007)

      Dobriansky, Paula J. (1955-)
      Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights (2001-2009)

      *Kurtzer, Daniel Charles (1949-)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Egypt (1997-2001)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Israel (2001-2005)

      Haass, Richard Nathan (1951-)
      Director of the Policy Planning (2001-2003)

      *Edelman, Eric S. (1951-)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Finland (1998-2001)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Turkey (2003-2005)

      Farish, William S. (1939-)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, uk (2001-2004)

      *Boucher, Richard A. (1951-)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Cyprus (1993-1996)
      Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs (2000-2005)
      Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs (2006-2009)
      Career Ambassador (2008)

      *Negroponte, John Dimitri (1939-)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Honduras (1981-1985)
      Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (1985-1987)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Mexico (1989-1993)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Philippines (1993-1996)
      Representative of the U.S.A. to the United Nations (2001-2004)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Iraq (2004-2005)
      Deputy Secretary of State (2007-2009)

      Khalilzad, Zalmay (1951-)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Afghanistan (2003-2005)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Iraq (2005)
      Representative of the U.S.A. to the United Nations (2007)

      Green, Grant S. (1938-)
      Under Secretary of State for Management (2001-2005)

      *Neumann, Ronald E. (1944-)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Algeria (1994-1997)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Bahrain (2001-2004)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Afghanistan (2005-2007)

      Leach, Howard H. (1930-)
      Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, France (2001-2005)

      http://history.state.gov/departmenthistory/people/by-year/2003

      Delete
  5. THE LESSON

    The Holy Hoax Lie and 9/11 have much in common.

    The approach to these two issues should NOT center on small specific issues.

    The approach to these two issues should center on 'WHO DID IT - AND WHY".

    Jewish criminals want you to wasted your time arguing over small points, such as "what kind of devices exploded the towers", etc.

    Jewish criminals will tolerate you discussing those things.

    Jewish criminals DO NOT want you to focus on THEM.

    WHY?

    Because focusing on them threatens them.

    Focusing on them could unseat them.

    Let's focus on the enemy.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.