Monday, September 17, 2012

Slogging through the pit of lies by Jim Stone

I rarely post articles by others on my personal blog, but I do make exceptions.  I posted Jim Stone's "Israel behind Fukushima" article when it first came out because I thought he was on to something, and no one - NO ONE - in the alternative media was covering his info.  From what I can tell, he has the latest media PSYOP figured out regarding the anti-Islam hysteria, the latest Muslim "uprisings", and the phony Libyan ambassador murder.  Check out the excerpt of the article titled, "Slogging through the pit of lies" below and decide for yourself.

One thing is clear to me at this point: we cannot trust anything the Jewish owned mainstream corporate mass media tells us about anything.  Videos, photos, eye-witness testimony, and even entire news reports (look at the phony "Holocaust survivor" testimony and images, the Apollo Moan hoax, or all the fakery involved on 9/11 for examples) are scripted PSYOPS now days, so please, turn off the Talmudvision and do some critical thinking.

Slogging through the pit of lies

9/15/12 Updated 9/17/12

The no Benghazi consulate article is below this one, but this one gives a little more insight and is not done yet.

This will evolve throughout the day

After spending hours on the topic of the "Islamic uprising", I have hit a wall of frustration. The conflicting B.S. coming out of the media with regard to this topic has made it impossible to get a solid stab at the monster. Here is what I know for sure at this time:

1. There is no great Islamic uprising occuring, especially over a movie which is now proven to not exist. Remember when watching youtube to check the posting date. The one that was supposed to have caused all the trouble was posted before 911.

2. It appears from the photos of the Sydney prostest that it was staged. I am going to be making a few calls today to get what people on the ground there are saying.

3. There is no Benghazi consulate. Instead, someone rented a very nice home on the outskirts of town and trashed it. This would be Mossad all the way. None of the stories match and many different versions of this story are out there, even in the "official" press. It is obvious there is no root of truth to any of it. There are way too many obvious conflicts here to post and have people read through. They even screwed up and mapped the "consulate" to two different locations as linked below, an error obviously caused by the fact one does not exist.

A. The "embassy vehicle" is not an embassy vehicle. The Ambassador came from an embassy. The U.S. embassies, especially in hostile areas, (and Libya would be one) ALWAYS send diplomats around in armored cars with bullet proof glass. What is burned up in the photos is just an ordinary civilian car with normal glass. And if it is not the one the "diplomat" used to get there, where is his car?

B. I and others at this site managed to pull up articles related to the previous test run wag the dog regarding this "consulate". One of these articles stated that the "consulate" opened in 2011, yet no where on the Department of State web site was this "consulate" listed. And the press is being careful to label it as "temporary" so they can maintain the excuse that it is not in any record. But 2011? If it was there since 2011 according to an Australian newspaper, well, it's SEPTEMBER 2012 NOW, EXACTLY WHAT do they call "temporary?"

C. None of the photos show a consulate. They show a fancy house, and not just any fancy house. According to the scale provided by the Guardian, the house is approximately 10,000 square feet and has an additional 3,000 square foot annex. So at this "consulate", which as a "consulate" would need a maximum of 2,000 square feet to function, we have 13,000 square feet and a total of FOUR people who arrived in ONE car "staffing" it. YEAH RIGHT. Such an enormous size would spaciously employ at least 125 people in their own 100 square foot office. Where are the rest of them? If over 9 months is not enough to get people there to staff it, especially in a country where you would want it staffed, how much time is enough? Why would any "consulate" be so freaking huge? it's size alone is BULLSHIT.

D. In one of the stories we have mortars. In another we have "it burned to the ground" (a flat impossibility, it was concrete). In another story we have it got flamed. That definitely did happen, but what about the other two stories? Where are the holes in the concrete from it getting shelled?

E. And, why is there a washing machine thrown into the swimming pool? Why is there trash strewn everywhere? Where is the flag pole? Is 9 months not enough to put one in? Where is the consulate placard, that all consulates have? Would a mob take the time to trash the place thoroghly in such a way? Folks, there is not even a temporary flag holder on the front, a requirement for ANY embassy or consulate. There is no trashed office furniture, no smashed office equipment, and if the looters were there to steal, why is a fancy front load washer at the bottom of the pool? That alone proves the place did not get robbed, so where is the rest stuff it should have? It would not have burned in it's entireity, the governement uses too much metal office equipment, and what about the metal shells the computers would have had?

F: And then we have the location. This "consulate", which is supposed to perform ONE FUNCTION - handle paperwork so people can travel, had 13,000 square feet in a city of around 600,000 population and is located out in the middle of NOWHERE. From a functional standpoint, its placement is so stupid that by itself is a red flag. The appropriate arrangement for a consulate would be a 7/11 store sized rental unit on the third floor of an office building in the heart of the city.

On top of this, the various news agencies can't even get the location of the consulate straight, proof of a bullshit story.

The Daily Mail says it's here
And the Guardian says it's here (you have to click the little arrow that says next to make their animation work.

Since the consulate is a fiction, both pictures will do because NO ONE is going to be able to check up on the story anyway. Last I heard, the State Department is no longer answering questions with regard to the consulate, probably because people can't figure out where it really is.

I'll make a guess with regard to the "consulate" and what happened.

There was an affluent white guy who had sympathies for the Libyan people after America destroyed them and was going to help them. Sources state he was a Muslim. He had a nice pad built and perhaps was a billionaire. Because America and Israel hate such types, they raided and burned his home and murdered him and then paraded his body on camera in a filthy false flag. That's what I really think happened. But don't say I said it publicly because there is no way you will find this documented anywhere. That little story is a fiction, who cares. At least it is not a lie because I told you it was a guess.

But it's more accurate than the "official" story, because it at least explains why the car was a normal car, and why there was only ONE instead of 50. It also explains the lack of office equipment or anything else, for all I can perceive the place had just finished being built and had not had much furniture moved in yet. And the scamming media can't get in on that and say it now, that the consulate had just been built because they already said it was a rented house and at least one of them said it had been occupied since 2011. They can't agree on what neighborhood it was in.

As for the rest of the scam, the zionist media now has the Muslim world rebelling over a movie that never existed. So that lie has been bagged. This means that any "protests" are likely staged for the cameras and any video of mass protests is probably stock footage.

This begs the question then, WHY?

Why would the zionist media be pumping a phony story about protests happening everywhere, instigating violence, and filling the television screens with flaming B.S., to scare the American people and the rest of the Western world, while whipping the Western world into a state of hate?

I can tell you why. It's because there is a false flag terror event IMMINENT, which will probably happen on the 16th (coordinated universal time) or at some time surrounding that date because the 16th marks the end of the Jewish new year, and they may want to end the old year with a bang or start the new year with flames. I am not into predicting dates, but they HAVE TO make music now that the song is playing, before people get bored with the tune. They have a window of opportunity to use, and it won't be very wide. They already got busted for the cause of these uprisings being a pathetic fake, and the clock is ticking on how long it will take for the masses to figure it out. With this million page view a month web site getting over 4x the traffic as normal, I just hope the word spreads sufficiently to shut their act down.

Many people have figured out the false flag terror game, so the Zionists need to create a plausible believable environment to frame the next false terror event in to make people believe Muslims may actually have done it despite so many people having knowledge of false flags.

People won't realize that before all of this happened, that Israel had already mobilized their military in preparation for an attack on Iran. The Israeli soldiers have already visited the wailing wall to pay their last respects to God, and have already mobilized for a major conflict. WHY? And why does it coincide with a MASSIVE media lie campaign to turn world opinion against Muslims? [...]


  1. ...what he says makes a great deal of sense. The lamestream media cannot get its story straight!

  2. Henry Makow posted the original Jim Stone report and his commentary about it in January or so. Rense, who had for years always linked Makow's articles refused to link that article. They had some kind of dispute and Rense no longer links Makow at all.

    I do not know why Rense would not allow Stone's ideas to be explored but it reminds me of how 9-11 truth researchers who thought that other ideas ought to be explored and talked and written about other than the enforeced 9-11 "truth" orthodoxy of Dr. Steven Jones, Richard Gage and the entire nanothermite meme.

    Not only can we not trust A WORD the mainstream media tells us about anything of importance, we now cannot trust much of anything the so called hated phrase "9-11 truth movement" is telling us.

    Seems most prescient that Jesus in His Olivet prophecy first warns everyone to take care that they be not deceived. That is our major concern now. Even with the wonderful spread of knowledge and communication with the Internet, it is all so taken over by major deception and is proving to not be such a great thing after all.

    "Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, 'Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?' And Jesus answered and said to them: 'Take heed that no one deceives you'" (Matthew 24:3-4 [3] And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
    [4] And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.

  3. you are exactly right, JRF!

    the talmud-vision. the TEEVEE. the teLIEvision.

    the 4-6 hour per day watching average of TV is simply the daily biochemical addiction re-boot and upload session for all us servant-watchers. i challenge anyone (even those who say they don't watch that much TV *wink wink) to go 3 whole days! without looking at the teLIEvision . evaluate the state of your withdrawal at that point. see how TV is simply THE WINDOW of your world view? what would you and your neighbors/co-workers/family have to talk about if it wasn't for the TV reference uploads and macro programing? see how they have broken our psyche into countless shards of glass with the hammer and sickle of TV?! we're not meant to be thinking that much bullshit all the time. GET IT? we're not real people anymore. at best we're virtual-selves up walking around. anmd of course the point of view is coming from WITHOUT and not from WITHIN. see any problems there? so sadly funny, the wife's high school class CAN NOT communicate when the restriction of NO TV REFERENCES is in place! my my. is there any way out?

    you made it through 3 days?! great. after a binge on all your favorite ashkenazi jews - then try going 2 WHOLE WEEKS! this will be very difficult for you to do honestly. you will find yourself cheating... but hey TVs are everywhere. it wasn't your fault. * IF you do REALLY make it through the 2 whole weeks your eyelids may start to barely pry open. don't worry, the blinding light streaming in is just that from the opening of plato's cave.

    TV is an idiot box filled with some other man's thoughts for you to think. now who would that man be...


    i see there is a recent follow-up post to the bungle in benghazi. for now, it's on his front page:

    thanks, john friend!

  4. Agree with the no TV idea. I unsubscribed from cable one year ago and gave away two TVs and unplugged the one I have left, which I can't get a picture on anyway.

    It has been a very positive move in my life. TV really is all a big manipulative lie and mind control box. I think I see more and more people kicking TV, but I think lower income people still are quite a bit addicted to it and seem to keep the thing on almost 24 / 7.

    The next thing I hope to give up is a major credit card and eventually confine my Internet to using at the library which is about two blocks from my abode.


Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.