Saturday, July 7, 2012

Who really did 9/11? Join us to find out!

The official government conspiracy theory explaining the events of 9/11 have been thoroughly debunked by engineers, architects, scientists, pilots, veterans, professors, journalists and other professionals. If the official conspiracy theory is false, who was really behind the events of 9/11? This presentation will analyze who was actually arrested on 9/11, key individuals in the Bush administration and their connections, and other factors which suggest that 9/11 was a "false flag" black operation blamed on Osama bin Laden and "Muslim extremists" in order to launch the fraudulent and destructive "Global War on Terror". After hearing this presentation, led by 9/11 Truth activist John Friend, you will have a better understanding of who was really behind 9/11, and the agenda it has served. Join us for a discussion following the presentation!

Date: August 12, 2012

Time: Doors open at 6:00pm, presentation begins at 6:30pm

Where: Joyce Beers Community Center, 3900 Vermont Street San Diego, CA 92103


  1. I will probably not be blogging much until this event is over with. I hope to have a good quality video of the presentation and discussion afterwards, and will post everything once it's ready.

  2. May God bless you and strengthen you John in your work to bring the truth to the people. It is an honour to call you friend.

  3. Not much of a chance that you wont sully this presentation with the "no planes" disinfo that lets Israelis and Dov Zakheim off the hook is there? Oh well, hopefully you'll at least refrain from waxing fascist white supremacist dictator Hitlers pole during this presentation.

  4. James Thomas Laffrey:

    "Adolf Hitler. Hitler was expelling jews, not mass-executing jews. And Hitler was putting jews into work camps because Germany needed work done. Jews started World War 2 just as jews started our Civil War and World War 1. Germany needed work done in order to defend Germany from jewry. Jewry declared war on Germany in 1933. Look it up. Historical fact. But when did World War 2 begin? 1939, which is six years later. Germans were defending themselves since 1933, and they were intelligent enough to know what was coming.

    How would you defend your country if a minority of people inside your country were making war against you, and they were operating in concert with all their fellow jews outside your country, too?"

    It is the latter part of James' quote I want to comment on. Are we not under the very same thing as Germany was? 2% of the American citizenry have kidnapped the entire government policy - both domestic and foreign.

    According to the legal right of the people: abolish the present government, both parties and houses, and replace it with one representitive and constructive to the people.

    "these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights…that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; and, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it."

  5. You are an inspirational example of a person honestly pursuing and sharing truth, John!

    Thank you.

  6. Why anyone would suggest that the fabrication of the "crash sites" lets the Mossad "off the hook" is beyond me. Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled for flight that day. The planes used for Flights 93 and 175 were not de-registered (formally taken out of service) until 28 September 2005. So how can planes that were not in the air have crashed on 9/11 and how can planes that crashed on 9/11 have still been in the air 4 years later? Pilots has now established that Flight 93 was in the air but over Champaign-Urbana, IL, at the same time it was supposed to be crashing in Shanksville; and that Flight 175 was also in the air but over Pittsburgh, PA, at the same time it was effortlessly entering the South Tower. The evidence for these propositions is abundant and compelling--just as is the evidence of Israeli complicity on 9/11. How can the truth about "no planes" compromise the proof that the Mossad was involved in 9/11? Anonymous seems to have committed an intellectual blunder. Both are true.

  7. John, the trolls are a positive development.

  8. @ Anonymous 5:40 - get a life dude, and try doing some real research.

    Thanks Mouser, B'man, and Anonymous 12:43, much appreciated.

    And Jim, thanks for clarifying this "no planes" issue yet again, I don't know how many times we are going to have to explain this to people before they understand the basic facts. You are exactly right - Mossad involvement and "no planes" (ie, no Boeing 757/767s or official flights) are both true, and it's quite obvious if you actually look into it.

  9. MANY thanks for this early announcement, John. See you on 8/12; San Diego, here we come!

  10. It is a matter of extreme importance, of global interest, but unfortunately people think that is an issue of the American people ... then we have the problem of the Libyan people, the Syrian people, the Palestinian people and so on ... globalization does not unite people, but facilitates explore and dominate the weaker neighbor's yard. Congratulations - the truth sooner or later appears

  11. Go get 'em John! Good luck with your presentation!

  12. Sorry Fetzer, not buying it. No planes DOES let Israel/Mossad off the hook, and I fear thats the whole point. I can buy swapped planes a la Northwoods. I never thought the "original" planes were used. That doesn't mean "no planes" were used. It DOES let Dov and the boys off the hook in large part.

  13. One thing we can all agree upon is that 9/11 was a FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB pulled of by the WH and elements of the FBI, CIA, the Pentagon and Israel.

    The 'official' explanation is nothing more than perfumed fertilizer.

  14. With the Brothers Kurzberg et al arrested having posed for photos with cigarette lighters held aloft, there is no getting off the hook, plans or no planes.

    Throw in Lucky Larry's Jewish Lightning, A Clean Break-PNAC, Israeli airport security, etc, and All the Proof in the World remains and it points in the same direction (

  15. I agree that there is more than enough evidence that points at Israel. That said the SPC/Dov Zakheim remote flight connection makes sense and if true would be powerful evidence linking zionist jews to 9/11. Zakheim is connected to PNAC,connected to the Pentagon obviously and as comptroller was almost certainly directly responsible for the explosion in the Pentagon happening in the accounting section. He has deep ties to Israel and is a rabbi who believes in the zionist cause in all its bloodthirsty "glory". Erase the Zakheim connection and the case against Israel,while still powerful, loses some key components.

    Make no mistake, "they" wont stop there, they will chip away at the REAL truth as long as they have to. If that means co-opting the 9/11 truth movement with various forms of disinfo, sadly, they've proven they'll engage in that relentlessly.

    There were planes. They were not the planes we were told they were. Modified or swapped enough people saw planes. And if the perps were able to fake planes hitting the towers they easily could have done the same with the Pentagon(especially considering it was hit last). They didn't. Why not?

  16. NO PLANES ON 911 exposes the complicity AND active involvement of the so-called mainstream (jew run) media. israel is a state apparatus of international jewry. israel was created for the jews, by the jews and some jews even live there (not many though). 911 was a jew job. not israeli. not zionist. partisan jews blow stuff up and blame other people. it's what they do...and like john says - they flip the script!

    if you've got that one 'good jew' as a friend - go and have a talk about the holocaust and see how long your 'friendship' lasts!

    clearly - NO PLANES ON 911. the law of the excluded middle is found here:

    7:20 - 7:45 is all you really need to see. if this doesn't clear it up for you then just go have a happy meal and watch TV.

  17. "And if the perps were able to fake planes hitting the towers they easily could have done the same with the Pentagon(especially considering it was hit last). They didn't. Why not?"

    You seem pretty sure of yourself Brian Morrison. Maybe you can answer that question.

  18. like i said. happy meal, TV. that's the answer for you.

  19. So no answer then? Interesting.

  20. Here's my answer: the very idea of a large commercial aircraft hitting such a low target like the Pentagon is absurd, that's why they didn't fake a plane hitting it. They couldn't. It would be too obvious.

    They released some footage showing what appeared to be a missile hitting the Pentagon, and still tried convincing the public it was a plane. It's a joke.

    You say:

    "There were planes. They were not the planes we were told they were. Modified or swapped enough people saw planes."

    You may very well be correct, although there were all sorts of people who said they saw a missile, or a small drone-looking object, or a small plane, etc. Then there were planted witnesses, all of whom were connected to the media establishment, who came right out on 9/11 saying they saw a large commercial airliner crash into the building, basically promoting the official theory on the very day of 9/11. I don't think the eye witness testimony can be taken too serious, especially considering many of the witnesses' testimony is all over the place (some saw a missile, some didn't see anything, some saw a small plane, some [planted witnesses] saw a commercial airliner, etc.).

    My primary point regarding the planes has always been and remains that the official planes, flights 77, 11, 175, and 93, which were allegedly hijacked, were never in fact hijacked and were not crashed anywhere on 9/11. It's a complex subject, but there is good info out there if you want to pursue it. I would start with Dr. Jim Fetzer's work. All this is laid out in great detail here:

    Finally, here is a question for you. How do you explain what Col. George Nelson had to say regarding your beloved "special planes" or "modified planes" on 9/11? He was a former aircraft accident investigator, and is a member of Patriots Question 9/11. Surely you have a convincing answer for us, yeah?

    "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...

    The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. … "

  21. Lack of plane evidence? Thats easy-if the planes were swapped they would obviously not want investigators getting their hands on it. They destroyed it like they destroyed much of the twin towers evidence.

    Your answer for why they wouldnt fake a video of a plane hitting the Pentagon doesnt hold up to consistency. You say how impossible and absurd it is that planes "sliced through the towers like butter" or whatever. Well ok. Then why would they give a flying fuck if the Pentagon fake video looked just as absurd?

    Asd far as eyewitnesses, I agree there were a lot of plants, particularly at the Pentagon "crash scene". That doesnt mean ALL of them were plants, obviously enough people saw SOMETHING in NYC. Again, probably not the planes we were told they were but they saw something. They cant ALL possibly be lying. Try selling that theory to the uninitiated and watch them laugh in your face. Rightly so. You ever been to NYC?

  22. Re United Airlines 175, in its section on "Aftermath", for what it's worth, reports:

    Some debris from the aircraft were recovered nearly, including landing gear found on top of a building on the corner of West Broadway and Park Place, an engine found at Church & Murray Street, and a section of the fuselage landed on top of 5 World Trade Center."

    The only alleged passengers it mentions whose fragments were identified are Peter Hanson (a six inch piece of bone) and Lisa Frost (small bone fragments}.

    Re the aftermath of AA Fl. 11, reports:

    "Rescus workers at the WTC site began to discover body fragments from Flt 11 victims within days of the attack. Some workers found bodies strapped to airplane seats and discovered the body of a flight attneant with her hands bound, suggesting the hijackers might have used plastic handcuffs. Within a year, medical examiners had identified the remains of 33 victims who had been
    on board Flt. 11. They identified two other Flt 11 victimns including the lead flight attendant, Karen Martin, after body fragmen ts were discovered near Ground Zero in 2006."

    The only mention there made about flt.11 and 175 is that no flight recorders were found. About the alleged hijackers, it claims that the remains of two of them from that flt 11 were identified and removed from Memorial Park in Manhattan."

  23. Re AA Flight 77, only mentions a cockpit voice recorder as located remains from that plane, reportedly found at around 3:40am on 9/14 by a paramedic and firefigher who were searching through the debris of the impact site. It says that they called for an FBI agent. who in turn called for someone from the NTSB, which agency later claimed that they were found right where the plane came into the building, and also that no usable segments of tape were found inside.

    Re remains, this wikipedia entry states that investigators eventually identified 184 of the 189 people who died in the attack, but does not name any of those.

  24. Re AAFlight 93 reports that all of the people on board the plane were identified by Dec. 21. It does say that investigators located the flight data recorder on 9/13, and the cockpit voice recorder the following day, buried 25 feet below the crater, and that the FBI would not allow the public to hear it, but later on 4/18,02, let relatives of victims listen. Then after jurors for the Zacarias Moussaoui trial heard the tape, on 4/12/06, the transcript was publicly released.

    I don't know of anyone who has read or how to find it. Will investigate.

  25. marycatherine barton -
    these wikipedia entries seem odd. if you get back this way, would you mind clarifying?

  26. Hi, Brian. I just got to thinking about the comments here about the plane evidence, and realized I had never checked out what wikipedia was putting out about that. So, when I went there, and read all four entries I decided to share with all who read here what that encyclopedia site reported about the aftermath, re material evidence of damaged planes or other property, and the identity of human remains.

  27. marycatherine, thank you.

    i think it is important to point out, though obvious to many, that wikipedia is a wholly jewish enterprise. jimmy and jews in a room. this means we should always be circumspect in its use and depending on the issue at hand - down right suspicious. in all matters 911 wikipedia must be viewed as the enemy propaganda it is. this is NOT a trusted source. though with critical thinking skills it can be utilized in analyzing the tactics and strategy of the pan-judaic confidence trick.

  28. At TheSmokingGun website, there is a copy of a document that is entitled "United Airlines Flight #93 Cocpit Voice Recorder Transcript" file stamped as GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT P200056T 01-455-A (ID).

  29. I'm reading Ed Hendrie's book 9/11 - Enemies: Foreign and Domestic right now, and it's excellent (despite all the grammatical errors!). He has a very good discussion of the planes, scripted witnesses, faked phone calls and hijackings, video fakery, and other PSYOP aspects of 9/11. He also discusses the Israel/Jewish angle to 9/11, but I haven't read that far yet. It is an excellent book, I highly recommend it, especially for those that are still confused about the planes, video fakery, and other PSYOP aspects of 9/11.

    I discussed a lot of this stuff in a post here for those interested:

  30. John, I heard you on Jim Fetzer's show today. I was very impressed with your balanced intelligent presentation. I wish you the very best for your August presentation in San Diego that will for the first time broach the subject of Israelis and who did 9-11. It is about time that these "we are change" type city 9-11 truth groups discuss this subject.

    I have been a "truther" since 9-11-01 and have followed Dr. Fetzer's work extensively. I particularly like his work regarding "no planes" and video fakery. Dr. Fetzer today gave an almost exact same definition of "no planes" as you did in this thread...

    "flights 77, 11, 175, and 93, which were allegedly hijacked, were never in fact hijacked and were not crashed anywhere on 9/11."

    People who are more experienced in all of this know what "no planes" means but there are many many people who have a mental block on this subject, regardless of how much of a "9-11 truther" they claim to be, and I have no patience much anymore explaining what "no planes" means to these people as they are unable to discuss all possibilities and data and evidence when it comes to "no planes."

  31. Thanks JEANNON, I've seen your comments at the radio blog before, always very informative. Thanks for listening and thanks for the kind words. I think Dr. Fetzer is doing the best work on 9/11, especially figuring out how it was done. Like I said in the interview, it's quite apparent who did 9/11, who covered it up and spun it in the media, and who has benefitted. But, it's important to understand the other PSYOP aspects of 9/11, including the "planes", eye witnesses, (alleged) victims, videos, etc.

    Regarding your struggles with people that still refuse to face the fact that the planes are a major fraud and deception in this operation, I will quote Thomas Paine once again:

    "To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

    Truer words have never been spoken. Cheers, keep up the good work.

  32. I was recently informed that the San Diegans for 9/11 Truth group has officially cancelled this event. They had a meeting yesterday, and it was decided not to go forward with this presentation, I am awaiting an official written response, and will post it once I have it. I can't say I'm surprise at their decision... especially considering what happened at the Occupy protest in late October of last year.


Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.