Saturday, June 16, 2012

Rethinking Hitler & National Socialism

I suppose it would eventually come to this: all the reading, investigating, and research I’ve done since discovering the truth about 9/11 would lead to a re-examination and re-learning of much of history, especially the mainstream version of WWI and WWII history. Since I began looking into 9/11, I’ve explored all sorts of “conspiracy theories”, but lately, largely as a result of following the work of Deanna Spingola, ZionCrimeFactory, Carolyn Yeager, Veronica Clark, and others, I’ve began to delve deeper and deeper into revisionist history and what Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) really stood for. And today I’d like to share some of my thoughts with you about this subject.

I’ve mentioned before that I once bought into Jim Condit, Jr.’s thesis about Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP, namely, that Hitler and many of the top Nazi leaders were either Jews themselves, or puppets of the international bankers and Jewish crime network, operating as part of the bankers controlled opposition in order to facilitate the establishment of the illegitimate, terrorist state of Israel as a safe haven and central headquarters for the global Jewish mafia, in the process fulfilling messianic Jewish prophecy in order to advance what is commonly known as “The New World Order”, whose foundations are laid out in detail in the supremacist Jewish Talmud. However, I’ve always kept an open mind about this and many other subjects, and only recently (i.e., the past six months or so) began to really explore it in greater detail. And I’m now firmly convinced that Condit and others that promote this ridiculous theory about the NSDAP being puppets of the Rothschilds are 100% wrong in their assessment. I’ve concluded that all the other ridiculous theories and outright slanders against Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany are merely attempts to divert people’s attention away from what Hitler and his movement actually stood for, what they represented, what they actually said, and what they actually did. By the way, Deanna Spingola and Veronica Clark refute many of these outlandish theories in a recent interview for those interested.

One thing I want to make clear here: Hitler and the National Socialist movement were most definitely “anti-Semites”, and used “anti-Semitism” in their political propaganda and messaging. After all, even critics of Hitler and the NSDAP recognize that their propaganda was based on truth, and in our ass-backwards, Jew-run world, the truth is fundamentally “anti-Semitic”. So let’s not get caught up in this childish meme of “Hitler and the Nazis were evil, racist anti-Semites’” nonsense, and simply refuse to investigate objectively what they stood for. Look at what they said, did, wrote about, and represented, and you will come to the obvious conclusion that I have: that this movement was the greatest threat the world has ever known to the parasitic, subversive, and destructive nature of the international Jewish criminal cabal largely controlling the West, pushing for their “New World Order” on every front imaginable.

This is why Hitler and National Socialist Germany had to be destroyed. This is why Hitler and the NSDAP are constantly demonized, slandered, and blamed for every evil in the world. This is why the mass media, Hollywood and our educational system projects the crimes that the Jew-run Allies (the U.K., U.S. and Soviet Union) actually committed on to Hitler and National Socialist Germany. The Jews have completely flipped the script, blaming Hitler and the NSDAP for a fake “Holocaust” of European Jews and countless other alleged atrocities when in fact the Allies were responsible for the real holocausts and other crimes against humanity during WWII.  Organized international Jewry, the primary network behind the push for a “New World Order”, understand and recognize how dangerous Adolf Hitler and National Socialist ideology was – and potentially remains – to their totalitarian plan for world domination and subjugation.

As Veronica Clark explains in her must read article titled, Demystification of the Birth and Funding of the NSDAP, Hitler sought to overcome the class antagonism prevalent throughout Germany (and much of Europe) by establishing a political and social order based on merit, rather than class or wealth, and sought to unify German society around their common German heritage and Nordic race.  Consider the following quote from Hitler, which underscores how he felt about the capitalist system that prevailed in Europe, Britain, and the United States:
We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.
How true does that statement ring to you, especially in light of the criminal bailout of Wall Street and the absurd bonuses all the big shots were doling out for themselves and their crooked henchman following the (still on-going) financial collapse initiated in 2008?

National Socialist ideology did have opinions about and openly discussed race and the "Jewish Problem", but it's far more nuanced than the mainstream version of history.  For starters, National Socialism was more pro-German, pro-Aryan than anti-other races - except the Jewish "race". They cherished and sought to preserve their German race and identity, recognizing the destructive and subversive nature of Jewry, and their innate ability to corrupt society. They said and wrote some "extreme" things by today's Orwellian standards - but truthful things. The National Socialists were just being honest about the nature of organized Jewry, and their threat to Gentile societies.

For instance, consider this excerpt from a 1935 bulletin published by the Reichspropagandaleitung, the Nazi Party's Central Propaganda office:
Some believe that we are using methods in this battle that are too harsh. We reply that our attacks and methods in this battle cannot be determined by our way of thinking, by whether we find them ugly or harsh, but rather we must use methods in our attacks that are appropriate for the opponent that we are attacking. One cannot battle the Jews with the politeness of the noble Aryan soul, for which he as no understanding. We need only think back on the methods that the Jew used against our movement during the period of struggle. No lie or slander was too crude to be used, to be seized and passed on by the Jews and their Jewish lackeys with eagerness, enthusiasm, and Satanic joy. We would have had little success replying then with refined arguments. It is just as impossible today to combat this creeping, subterranean danger with methods that the Jew would only laugh at.

The Führer’s contribution has been to make the Jewish Question a matter for the entire people. The efforts völkisch groups, organizations, etc., made in the past to spread knowledge about the world enemy were never of great significance, since only a very limited circle was reached. With his movement, Adolf Hitler created an instrument that went far beyond these groups and made the nation see that the solution to this question was a prerequisite to changing Germany’s fate. In answer to his brave act, all the powers at the command of the Jewish world were called on, including the mobilization of parties, of the press, of the radio, of finance, and of bloody terror. [...]
I also recommend reading Those Damned Nazis, written by Joseph Goebbles in 1932, which explains National Socialist ideology in greater detail.  Here are some excerpts that stand out to me:
Why Are We Socialists?

We are socialists because we see in socialism, that is the union of all citizens, the only chance to maintain our racial inheritance and to regain our political freedom and renew our German state.

Socialism is the doctrine of liberation for the working class. It promotes the rise of the fourth class and its incorporation in the political organism of our Fatherland, and is inextricably bound to breaking the present slavery and regaining German freedom. Socialism, therefore, is not merely a matter of the oppressed class, but a matter for everyone, for freeing the German people from slavery is the goal of contemporary policy. [...]

Why a Workers’ Party?

Work is not mankind’s curse, but his blessing. A man becomes a man through labor. It elevates him, makes him great and aware, raises him above all other creatures. It is in the deepest sense creative, productive, and culture-producing. Without labor, no food. Without food, no life.

The idea that the dirtier one’s hands get, the more degrading the work, is a Jewish, not a German, idea. [...]

We call ourselves a workers’ party because we want to rescue the word work from its current definition and give it back its original meaning. Anyone who creates value is a creator, that is, a worker. We refuse to distinguish kinds of work. Our only standard is whether the work serves the whole, or at least does not harm it, or if it is harmful. Work is service. If it works against the general welfare, then it is treason against the fatherland. [...]

Why Do We Oppose the Jews?

We oppose the Jews because we are defending the freedom of the German people. The Jew is the cause and beneficiary of our slavery. He has misused the social misery of the broad masses to deepen the dreadful split between the right and left of our people, to divide Germany into two halves thereby concealing the true reason for the loss of the Great War and falsifying the nature of the revolution.

The Jew has no interest in solving the German question. He cannot have such an interest. He depends on it remaining unsolved. If the German people formed a united community and won back its freedom, there would be no place any longer for the Jew. His hand is strongest when a people lives in domestic and international slavery, not when it is free, industrious, self-aware and determined. The Jew caused our problems, and lives from them.

That is why we oppose the Jew as nationalists and as socialists. He has ruined our race, corrupted our morals, hollowed out our customs and broken our strength. We owe it to him that we today are the Pariah of the world. He was the leper among as long as we were German. When we forgot our German nature, he triumphed over us and our future.

The Jew is the plastic demon of decomposition. Where he finds filth and decay, he surfaces and begins his butcher’s work among the nations. He hides behind a mask and presents himself as a friend to his victims, and before they know it he has broken their neck.

The Jew is uncreative. He produces nothing, he only haggles with products. With rags, clothing, pictures, jewels, grain, stocks, cures, peoples and states. He has somehow stolen everything he deals in. When he attacks a state he is a revolutionary. As soon as he holds power, he preaches peace and order so that he can devour his conquests in comfort.

What does anti-Semitism have to do with socialism? I would put the question this way: What does the Jew have to do with socialism? Socialism has to do with labor. When did one ever see him working instead of plundering, stealing and living from the sweat of others? As socialists we are opponents of the Jews because we see in the Hebrews the incarnation of capitalism, of the misuse of the nation’s goods.

What does anti-Semitism have to do with nationalism? I would put the question this way: What does the Jew have to do with nationalism? Nationalism has to do with blood and race. The Jew is the enemy and destroyer of the purity of blood, the conscious destroyer of our race. As nationalists we oppose the Jews because we see the Hebrews as the eternal enemy of our national honor and of our national freedom.

But the Jew, after all, is also a human being. Certainly, none of us doubts that. We only doubt that he is a decent human being. He does not get along with us. He lives by other laws than we do. The fact that he is a human being is not sufficient reason for us to allow him to subject us in inhumane ways. He may be a human being — but what kind of a human being is he! If someone slaps your mother in the face, do you say: “Thank you! He is after all a human being!” That is not a human being, it is a monster. Yet how much worse has the Jew done to our mother Germany, and is still doing today! [...]

Finally, consider Adolf Hitler's political testament he dictated shortly before he committed suicide:
More than thirty years have passed since 1914 when I made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the First World War, which was forced upon the Reich.

In these three decades love and loyalty to my people have guided all my thoughts, actions and my life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions ever to confront mortal man. In these three decades I have spent my strength and my health.

It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the limitation and control of armaments, which posterity will not be cowardly enough always to disregard, for responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be placed on me. Nor have I ever wished that, after the appalling First World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America. Centuries will go by, but from the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred of those ultimately responsible will always grow anew against the people whom we have to thank for all this: international Jewry and its henchmen. [...]
Hitler and the National Socialist movement in Germany, from what I can tell after honestly assessing the situation, were leaders and statesmen in the truest sense. They were true patriots that cared deeply about their country and their people, unlike the puppets, sell-outs and traitors in the West today that do nothing but lie to the people they allegedly represent, all the while serving a foreign criminal cabal. The National Socialists were honest with their fellow Germans, and treated them with respect by and large, certainly compared to governments in the West today.

Is it any wonder then that Hitler specifically, and National Socialist Germany generally, are so demonized, slandered, and hated by the Jews, and thus much of Western society due to their control over the mass media and educational system? Hitler and the National Socialists not only spoke openly and honestly about important subjects, clearly identifying the enemy of all humanity – international Jewry – they made serious moves against this destructive, parasitic network of criminals that had wrecked their country and sought to destroy their people. Hitler and National Socialism were the anti-thesis to Jewish Communism and Jewish plutocratic capitalism, and it's time we recognize this fact.

81 comments:

  1. Well Done and you messed with the hornet's Nest most decide is too difficult to deal with. I, too, have been "going there".

    Some of my observations: I can find many instances in Jew writing (Talmud and others) that call outright for atrocities of goyim. It is obvious in deed and action that Jews think of themselves (most I have dealt with, anyway) as Superior and don't mind breaking laws or conducting themselves in the most immoral ways.

    Yet, when you read and search about the "evils" of Hitler and his "henchmen" one cannot find calls for murder or the same immoral conduct that Jews display.

    Here is the rub for me (and I shared this with ZCF in an email), my Mother was born in Germany in 1943. Recently I have had the opportunity to drive her fairly long distances to get some dental work done, giving me the opportunity to discuss these things with her.

    She started in on the "Hitler is a Jew" deal and she was adamant about how she was correct and she "knew" this becasue she was taught it in school (or somewhere). When I tried to tell her that it was not true from my research, she refuses to acknowledge.

    ZCF describes this as propaganda (brainwashing and re-education). She is convinced that Hitler and the Nazis did kill MILLIONS of Jews, but when I ask about why they keep revising the numbers at the "death camps", she was unaware.

    "My Mother told me that she didn't know that they were killing all the Jews at the time, but they must have been."

    Earlier in the conversation she had told me about how ruthless in business Jews were and that they would take advantage of anyone and everyone.

    I suggested that Jews had also overtaken the US government and control everything we do, just like they were doing prior to WWII in Germany. I went thru the list of bankers, Hollywood moguls, AIPAC hitters, etc.

    Her reply?

    "You should hate God's Chosen People."

    Some people are beyond re-re-education.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had wondered about things and have doubted "revisionist" reports but when I find so may links no longer work, and when I, myself, had posted them and they used to work, I can only conclude that most of what is said is true, and that our "vested interests" do not want us to know the truth.
      I fear the real Holocaust has been committed by "the allies", and those of us who sit and do nothing are accomplices to these heinous crimes.

      Delete
  2. @BuelahMan,

    Don't you mean "shouldn't hate Gods Chosen People"?
    It is the failure of Christian pastors and the Catholic Church to properly teach their flock that Jews are NOT God's Chosen. Otherwise, Jews would not be using the race or religion card for the past two thousand years!! Now that Jews have a country to propagate their racist anti-Christian ideology, it is time Jesus comes back to see them either convert or lose everything again. The Book of Revelation explains it all quite well.
    -Markus

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Catholic Church has always taught that the Jews (Hebrews) were God's once-chosen people -- up to their saying "We have no King but Ceasar" when they called from the freeing of Barabas and the Crucifixion of Christ. --- The Vatican was taken over by top Rothschild-Judeo-Masonic agents on October 26, 1958 -- see realnews247.com/crisis_in_the_church.htm -- five articles there on the takeover of the Catholic Church in 1958. Since then the Vatican and all Catholic structures have been under enemy control, via the anti-popes -- John XXIII to today's Benedict XVI. These enemy agents confuse the issue and say the Old Covenant is still in effect. According to a wide body of Catholic Prophecies, the enemy will eventually be evicted from the Vatican, a true Pope will be restored, and the Catholic Church will regain control of its structures. - Many alive only know the counterfeit Church, so assume that today's Vatican positions are the positions of the Catholic Church. Jim Condit Jr.

      Delete
  3. Oops!

    Her reply?

    "You shouldn't hate God's Chosen People."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey B'Man, I've discovered it's almost impossible to convert family members and close friends to our side. I have way more success with random people I meet, new friends, ect. So I totally hear you man... at least you're trying. But we all have to understand that some people - even our beloved family and friends - don't want to know, or can't handle, the truth. And that's fine I suppose, not everyone is intellectually, morally, spiritually, or psychologically capable of engaging in this struggle for truth and justice. It does get annoying though...

      Your observations about Jews and NS Germany are spot on my friend, at least from my perspective.

      Delete
  4. We are nationalists because we see in nationalism, that is the union of all citizens, the only chance to maintain our cultural inheritance and to regain our political freedom and renew our American state.

    Nationalism is the doctrine of liberation for the working and middle classes. It promotes the rise of the lower class and its incorporation in the political organism of our homeland, and is inextricably bound to breaking the present slavery and regaining American freedom. Nationalism, therefore, is not merely a matter of the oppressed class, but a matter for everyone, for freeing the American people from slavery is the goal of contemporary policy.

    Work is not mankind’s curse, but his blessing. A man becomes a man through labor. It elevates him, makes him great and aware, raises him above all other creatures. It is in the deepest sense creative, productive, and culture-producing. Without labor, no food. Without food, no life.

    The idea that the dirtier one’s hands get, the more degrading the work, is a Zionist, not a American, idea.

    We call ourselves a worker's party because we want to rescue the word work from its current definition and give it back its original meaning. Anyone who creates value is a creator, that is, a worker. We refuse to distinguish kinds of work. Our only standard is whether the work serves the whole, or at least does not harm it, or if it is harmful. Work is service. If it works against the general welfare, then it is treason against the homeland.

    We oppose the Zionists because we are defending the freedom of the American people. The Zionists are the cause and beneficiary of our slavery. They have misused the social misery of the broad masses to deepen the dreadful split between the right and left of our people, to divide America into two halves thereby concealing the true reason for the Great Wars and falsifying the nature of the revolution.

    The Zionists have no interest in solving the American problem. They cannot have such an interest. They depend on it remaining unsolved. If the American people formed a united community and won back its freedom, there would be no place any longer for the Zionists. Their hand is strongest when a people lives in domestic and international slavery, not when it is free, industrious, self-aware and determined. The Zionists caused our problems, and lives from them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. con't

    That is why we oppose the Zionists as nationalists. They have ruined our culture, corrupted our morals, hollowed out our customs and broken our strength. We owe it to them that we today are the Pariah of the world. They were the lepers among as long as we were American. When we forgot our American nature, they triumphed over us and our future.

    The Zionists are the plastic demons of decomposition. Where they find filth and decay, they surface and begin their butcher’s work among the nations. They hide behind a mask and present themselves as a friends to their victims, and before one knows it they have broken one's neck.

    The Zionists are uncreative. They produce nothing, they only haggle with products. With rags, clothing, pictures, jewels, grain, stocks, cures, peoples and states. They have stolen everything they deal in. When they attack a state they are revolutionaries. As soon as they hold power, they preach peace and order so that they can devour their conquests in comfort.

    What does anti-Zionism have to do with nationalism? I would put the question this way: What do the Zionists have to do with nationalism? Nationalism has to do with labor. When did one ever see them working instead of plundering, stealing and living from the sweat of others? As nationalists we are opponents of the Zionists because we see in them the incarnation of vulture capitalism, of the misuse of the nation’s goods. Nationalism has to do with culture. The Zionists are the enemy and destroyer of the purity of a nation, the conscious destroyer of our culture. As nationalists we oppose the Zionists because we see them as the eternal enemy of our national honor and of our national freedom.

    But the Zionists, after all, are also a human beings. Certainly, none of us doubts that. We only doubt that they are decent human beings. They do not get along with us. They live by other laws than we do. The fact that they are human beings is not sufficient reason for us to allow them to subject us in inhumane ways. They may be human beings — but what kind of a human beings are they! If someone slaps your mother in the face, do you say: “Thank you! He is after all a human being!” That is not a human being, it is a monster. Yet how much worse has the Zionist done to our homeland America, and is still doing today!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zionism is but an ideological branch of international Jewry. Zionism, Communism, Plutocratic Capitalism - all perverted, destructive, and exploitative ideologies of JEWS - not "Zionists". There is a fundamental distinction here.

      It's taken me some time to get over using the word "Zionist" when I really meant Jew. Don't be afraid to call a spade a spade. Like Hitler and the NSDAP did.

      Delete
  6. Greetings John. Thank you for this informative post.

    Whether it is Goebbles 1932 about Germany or right now 2012 about America, someone has got to WAKE THE FLOCK UP about the subverted nation.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Excellent work John.
    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks Mouser and Anon, much appreciated. Couldn't agree more with you Mouser, it's past time for all of us to wake up.

    ReplyDelete
  9. bravo, JRF!

    hitler and national socialist germany - the litmus test for today's so-called 'truth movement' (can truth actually move?.. who's moving it and why?). hitler's national socialist germany provides for humanity the blueprint to understanding and solving the jewish problem. these are some choice quotes you provide here, john; they speak to the noble heart. there is good reason that the jews reserve a special hate-place in themselves just for germans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey brian, well put.

      And let's all remember, the Jews called for the destruction of Germany and the German people, NOT the other way around. After reading and learning about what the NSDAP said and did, it's pretty clear why the Jews would want to destroy the Germans.

      http://www.ihr.org/books/kaufman/perish.html

      Delete
    2. Yes that's right, the Jews called for the destruction of Germany and that is exactly what they achieved with their Puppet Hitler in place. Would have they achieved it if they didn't have one of their own puppets their to guarantee the outcome?

      Delete
    3. OK, your statement is just garbage man, I don't have the time or energy to address it. I'll just say you are 100% wrong, and you clearly have not done your homework on this subject.

      Delete
    4. Anon Jew writes: "Yes that's right, the Jews called for the destruction of Germany and that is exactly what they achieved with their Puppet Hitler in place."

      How can you not see the illogicality in this idiotic statement? Why would the Jews wish to destroy Germany if they had a "puppet in place" ruling the country? They would have been praising Germany if Hitler really was one of their puppets, you freaking moron.

      Delete
    5. Geesus ZCF, you scream like a JIDF bitch with all your name calling, is it possible for you to discuss an issue without screaming "jew lover" if someone disagrees with you?


      Zionazi crime factory wrote:
      "How can you not see the illogicality in this idiotic statement? Why would the Jews wish to destroy Germany if they had a "puppet in place" ruling the country?"

      Tell me this then clown why are they destroying America when they have had puppet after puppet since Kennedy as President?

      It is the German people they wanted to destroy and they did just like they are doing in america by using a Puppet. Does NDAA ring a bell? They shouldn't have to do that if they had a puppet is your stupid argument!
      --

      Here you go dipshit, John has this quote right at the very top of his site, but I don't think you have the brains to work out the meaning by the sounds of things!

      “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through...all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

      For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

      - Marcus Tullius Cicero

      Delete
    6. RPO, Reed, and virtually everyone who has seriously looked at the jew has been driven to the conclusion that they are possessed by a blind unreasoning impulse to destroy.

      The notion that AH was anyone's puppet is imbecile.

      Delete
  10. Fairly well written John.

    But in any investigation I have ever undertaken in terms of ferreting out the men behind the curtains . . . I have always looked first at the money trail.

    The money trail is usually indisputable, and concrete. One cannot argue with the money trail. And here, we can go back in time and find out who supported Hitler - what kind of people would prop up Hitler? It's not like these leaders actually rise up all by themselves wholesale . . . the RIGHT people are chosen by the controllers, and directed upward. Just like, if Hitler had been the WRONG person as chosen by the controllers, he would have been stifled or killed.

    That is a premise I cannot ignore. And from what I have read up on in the past . . . there was a fair bit of Jewish money that supported Hitler. And propped him up. And, in the end . . . those jewish communists, who were so powerful? They never touched him.

    So, in the end John, I still fail to see how the idea of a Rothschild supported Hitler - part Rothschild himself, or jewish, or 100% hun, it matters not - is such a ludicrous idea?

    Didn't they get 100% EXACTLY what they wanted, John? And if Hitler was a totally independent man working against the aims of jewry . . . why was he nurtured, and allowed to brought into power, becoming the protagonist for the creation of Israel?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bang! right on queue, shlomo!

      litmus test already coming in handy..

      Delete
    2. Hey slozo, Veronica Clark explains the birth and founding of the NSDAP in great detail here:

      http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2011/volume_3/number_3/demystification_of_the_birth_of_the_nsdap.php

      It was also linked in the post. Give it a read, it clears a lot of these misconceptions about Hitler being funded by Jews, or the Rothschilds, ect.

      "Didn't they get 100% EXACTLY what they wanted, John? And if Hitler was a totally independent man working against the aims of jewry . . . why was he nurtured, and allowed to brought into power, becoming the protagonist for the creation of Israel?"

      Hitler and the NSDAP struggled tirelessly for over 10 years to build their political movement and gain power. It was a long, hard fought battle, and even when they did finally legitimately gain power, they still had backstabbers, traitors, and hostile forces working against them, both inside Germany and certainly outside Germany.

      What "they" got in Hitler and the NSDAP was a political movement that spoke the truth, cared about their country and people, took major steps to correct the economy and build an honorable, meritocratic political and social system. And the Jewish dominated Allies, the UK, US, and Soviet Union, basically ganged up on him and destroyed his movement and country in WWII. We must remember that Hitler and the NSDAP were a very popular, widely accepted political movement, especially after he came to power. So it wasn't like "the bankers" or "the establishment" simply put the man in power. He and his party dedicated their lives to their movement, and won over large segments of German society (and even other nationalist-minded political movements around the world).

      Delete
    3. you're awesome, john!
      knowledgeable, eloquent and patient but not unreasonably tolerant. it shames me in my little one liner drive-by comments..

      brian morrison

      Delete
    4. Brian, if that's all you got, it's not much of a counter argument.

      John,
      But in fact, I DID read that article. And it certainly is well written in places, but not in the places it needs to be. It does not go through the funding in detail whatsoever - it glosses over some of the jewish contributions as minor or "late" to the NSDAP.

      Which is to say, Veronica Clark doesn't make much of an argument in terms of proving her thesis about the financial backing of Hitler, and then states afterward that it is compelling. Which, it isn't.

      Why not go into detail about EXACTLY which corporation, which people, backed hitler, and exactly when. Add in the unknown stuff, the speculations/rumours of who might have funded him - based on some circumstantial evidence. THEN, let the reader form an opinion.

      Because I remember myself John, doing a bit of this research myself back in the day . . . and from my memory, I came up surprising amount of jewish folk in terms of funding and support and assistance. And, most didn't come right at the beginning - which makes sense, as you only start the real funding when it looks like it's a horse you can run in the big race, if you catch my drift.

      Even in Veronica's article, she admits to some jewish funding from the Rothschild, but states it's only after a certain year . . . WHEN IT WAS VERY CLEAR WHO HITLER WAS AND WHAT HE WAS ABOUT. That, to me, is a pretty clear indication of support of SOME agenda, no?

      I know you'll do the hard research, John. :)

      Delete
    5. it's not a counter-argument, shlomo... it's me calling you out as a jewish operative. the law of the excluded middle demands it. it's much more of a declarative statement than an argument. as in 'you failed the hitler litmus test'. that's pretty simple for all to see. and you continue to fail it with each flailing post to try and divert more attention with more false argument. ain't it a bitch when the goy start to make decisions and judgments of their own and no longer want to engage in never-ending jew arguments? which only serve as distraction to keep the goys from ever recognizing or coming to believe in the more noble truths they are seeking. ain't it a bitch when we aren't afraid to name the jew?

      i'll say this again:
      hitler's national socialist germany provides for humanity the blueprint to understanding and solving the jewish problem.

      hey shlomo - this is fact and not argument. there is no arguing facts... only accepting or dissembling. i can hear sam cook now - oh yes, you're the great dissembler. (well... not that great).

      brian morrison

      Delete
    6. @ slozo

      What "money-trail" are you talking about? Your making alot of blanket statements.

      Jews funded Hitler? Lets dissect that statement. The NSDAP had no open ended check book during their struggle to power. There was no magic Jewish bank filled with marks that they could run to and buy their way into power. All it takes is a little looking yourself into the history of the NSDAP.

      Hitler didn't just buy his way into power or be "propped up" by anyone...Goddamn you have a simple ass view of history...Do you really know anything of the period? Or do you just read the bold print on blogs?

      Hitler had to fight for what he got; his will was tremendous...And you try to cover that fact, by (incorrectly) degrading him saying : ohh, he was just propped up and bought off yadda yda yada...

      As far as the "redshields" ZCF did a fine job at pointing out some of the inaccuracies in the "Hitler was a jew" scene.

      http://zioncrimefactory.com/2012/04/05/the-nazis-gave-rothschild-bankers-the-boot/

      Also, are you saying it is rare for a redshield to have money in all dogs in the race? That is what you are implying...

      It is said some Zionist organizations donated to the NSDAP.... Hmmm I wonder what would a NAZI and a Zionist have in common?.. Think... Could it be because the NSDAP wanted Jews out of Germany, and Zionist wanted a Jewish state, hence needed allot of Jews to leave Europe? Anyways, you can read all about the affairs and the disappointments of the Zionist groups, when: none of the promises were being followed through with; in http://www.amazon.com/51-Documents-Zionist-Collaboration-Nazis/dp/1569802351

      Blaming Hitler for defeat, and claiming his guilt is proven through his loss is insanity...So I guess in your mind, a troll like you who visits blogs and slaps keys on his keyboard will never have anything to worry about, since you never enter the fight, you never have to worry about defeat, and having your name drug through the mud.

      And lastly... As if the Jews didn't already have their hands around the collective throat of Europe before WW2. Mind you, the NSDAP saved Germany (even if only for a short period of time) from Jews...The Jewish bolvs already had Russia; the capitalist kikes had the West...So WTF?

      The statements you made about so and so being bought by Jews and whatnot are completely lacking in historical reality... It may be time to expand your mind a bit, or get a better troll game.

      Delete
  11. One thing I would like to know is, what evidence is there that Hitler killed himself in the so called bunker? If he did die why is the only evidence given Russian (back then Jew controlled) heresay and if he didn't die in the bunker where the hell did he go?

    ReplyDelete
  12. From what I gather, after listening to the podcast linked below with Carolyn Yeager and Severus, the best evidence that Hitler did indeed commit suicide comes from sources in the bunker that day. I believe his secretary and some other individuals wrote memoirs and books about their first hand experience, confirming he did indeed commit suicide. Plus, after re-examining and trying to understand Hitler and where he was coming from, it really does make a lot of sense that he committed suicide in the face of defeat by the Allies. He would not allow himself to be captured and taken prisoner. Also, I highly recommend reading his entire political testament, which is linked and excerpted in this post above. He stayed true to his convictions until the very end, like the true warrior he was.

    Here is a summary of the podcast:

    The ten days between Hitler's 56th birthday on April 20, 1945 until his suicide on April 30 in the Führerbunker in Berlin are detailed. Carolyn also reads his Political Testimony which he dictated on April 29. In the 2nd hour, her special guest Severus brings his expertise and commentary to the subject. Discussion centers around:

    -The certainty that Hitler did not "escape" the bunker;
    -Hitler's reasons for suicide and the traditional view of it;
    -Hitler's mental and physical strength (or not) at the end;
    -The reasoning behind "fighting to the death;"
    -Blaming the war on International Jewry;
    -Expelling Göring and Himmler from the party;
    -Mentioning the laws of race at the end of his Testament; and more.

    http://carolynyeager.com/heretics-hour-death-and-political-testament-adolf-hitler

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not mentioned here is that:
      - Hitler's followers were fanatically loyal, and would routinely fabricate things like where he was and what he was doing (for his own protection)
      - Hitler had doubles - there is a fair amount of circumstantial evidence for this
      - as mentioned, the main thrust of the repetition of Hitler's suicide comes from Russian, communist jews

      I myself do not think Hitler committed suicide. The whole situation just doesn't ring true, but that's just my opinion - no real way to know.

      Delete
    2. There is always some fanatical Jew-lover like Shlomo aka Slozo here who will pop his kike head out of the closet when anything positive about Hitler is being stated.

      If Hitler did not die in the bunker, and did indeed escape, as you and other Jew-lovers claim, then why did the Jews and their Allied stooges, who certainly would have been aware of this, not go looking for Hitler, yet they went on a frantic and frenzied "Nazi-hunt" spanning decades following WWII wherein they tried to track down other NS officials who did escape like Eichmann and Mengele, and even average Germans and Eastern Europeans who these rat-bastard Jews falsely accused of "war crimes"?

      Delete
    3. What is it with this jew lover freaking nonsense? You sound like a Jew yourself screaming "anti semite" when anything is questioned.

      Maybe they weren't looking for Hitler because he fucking worked for them clown! Oh and BTW they did a DNA test on supposedly Hitler's skull in 2010 that was in russian hands and guess what, it wasn't hitler, it was the skull of a women, so why didn''t the Jews go nuts then?

      Why did they track down any German officers? Same as they tracked down Gaddafis officers and body guards, maid etc and murdered them, killing the fucking witnesses that knew exactly the truth.

      Seriously dude the Hitler died in a bunker crap is JEW propaganda PERIOD! freaking surprised you go nuts when people question it

      Delete
    4. Oh and another thing, Hitler had the British defeated at Dunkirk but he stopped the attacks so the British could escape and come and kick Germany's ass later. So what the hell does that tell you?

      Delete
    5. I'm obviously not going to convince you. All I can recommend is that you check out the sources I've cited. Veronica Clark and Deanna Spingola have destroyed all these lies about Hitler and the NSDAP in countless interviews on RBN. Check it out if you're interested. Also, listen to that Carolyn Yeager show that I posted. She explains in detail the suicide of Hitler.

      Regarding Dunkirk, see here:

      http://archive.org/details/DeannaSpingola-TheTruthAndLiesAboutTheBattleAtDunkirk

      Delete
    6. Wow,
      I must have touched a nerve. All they can resort to is calling me names, inferring that I am jewish, and accusing me of being a jew lover. lol

      All because I disagreed with John, and have the opinion that . . . it was actually certain jews that funded Hitler.

      Um, you guys will have to explain to me, in twisted logic fashion of course, how exactly that makes one a "jew-lover"?

      rofl

      John, we'll have to agree to disagree. I see no destruction - only a demeaning of hard evidence that no matter what, jews like Rothschild DID support Hitler, and in fact, they did it when it was very clear he was a possible threat to established jewry, and, that by supporting him, he might eventually gain real power.

      Delete
    7. Jew Slozo writes: "jews like Rothschild DID support Hitler"

      Riiiight, and Rothschild (Which one eh?) told their "agent" Hitler to do this right, pffft? http://zioncrimefactory.com/2012/04/05/the-nazis-gave-rothschild-bankers-the-boot/

      You're such an obvious Jew subversive. Your propaganda is so petty and illogical.

      Hey look Slozo, openly Jewish supremacists agree with you about Hitler: http://zioncrimefactory.com/2012/06/14/jew-agents-push-kosher-canards-about-hitler-which-illustrates-their-fraudulence/

      What does that tell you about how utterly KOSHER your regurgitated rhetoric is?

      Jews financed Britain, France, the USA and Soviet Russia to destroy Germany. Why would Jews "support Hitler" just to destroy him?

      "Zionist Israel" wasn't formed until three years after Hitler was dead, with the help of England, the USA and the Soviets, you moron. Palestinian collaborators did more to help the Jews take over their land than Hitler ever did.

      Delete
    8. Jew Slozo writes: "and have the opinion that . . . it was actually certain jews that funded Hitler."

      Courtesy Wotan on my site, answer the following simple questions about your claim of Jewish financing of Hitler. If you cannot answer these questions with a certain degree of accuracy, then you have no basis to make the assertion and thus expose yourself as a Jewish propagandist pushing wild fables to demean Hitler for the benefit of your tribe.

      Please let us
      1) When was the loan given?
      2) Who was the stated creditor?
      3) Who was the recipient in Germany?
      4) Currency of the loan?
      5) Amount of the loan?
      6) How was the money transferred from creditor to recipient?
      7) What were the repayment terms?

      If you want to maintain the assertion, do not state any nebulous references, just answer the questions above. If you cannot answer these questions you should not make the assertion!

      Delete
    9. ZCF . . . since you've started namecalling, I will call you Zionist Cock Fellator.

      So, without the imaginary 6 million dead, without the world feeling sorry for every jew, there is no way that Israel would have ever garnered the public support it did get (not an overwhelming amount, I might add) to create it's nation in someone else's (Palestine). No. Way.

      Does that answer your assinine question? As if no one reading here has thought about how the nation of Israel was created, and who really benefitted from the imaginary holocaust of the jews?

      And for me to assert that . . . making me zionist, is impossible for anyone not utterly brain dead to believe, so it leaves me with this:

      I truly touched a nerve. Because for one irregular poster such as myself to get called names, get attacked by multiple pseudonyms in exactly the same way and style as a zionist, and get the exact MO and smear job from you as I would from any yid troll (and get called a yid troll in the process, naturally) . . . this tells me I am right, and that this information is dangerous and not friendly to the cause of Israel and its controllers.

      I applaud you for falling into the trap of incriminating yourself through your poorly worded diatribes and attacks that are so easy to see through. Bravo, and thanks!

      Oh, and by the way, I won't visit your links from my computer . . . I know that trick, Zionist Cock Fellator. Nice try though!

      Delete
    10. welcome to shlomo's mouse wheel... doesn't really have to make sense... it just has to go round and round and never stop. keeping it going is the trick. so come on in everybody and be amazed by non-logic and half truths. be dizzied by irrational ramblings and answers for questions that were never asked. feel your heart grow old in the never ending, yet never beginning discourse. as your mind is forever diverted away from conclusions of its' own! it's part hegelian dialectic- part devil's advocate. but all bullshit! and it's FREE!. all you have to PAY is your attention without even giving a thought!

      shlomo at least you left your moniker/alias/stage-name on this comment... but your concurrent posting times tell tales! i know i'm putting 2 and 2 together. yeah - that equals 4. in the end you're an anonymous chump whatever lie of a name you use (or don't).

      ---

      for anyone reading the comments to/at this point... it's probably a good idea to go back and read john friend's post about hitler and national socialism. it's at the top of this page. keep john's post in mind! this silly game the jews make us play in the comment section is to detract attention from important issues - in this case, the fact that hitler provided a successful alternative to the jew way AND he acted decisively on it AND was successful to the point to where 59 jew run countries had to declare war on national socialist germany to put an end to the successful alternative to the jew way. to blot it our of existence. shlomo's mouse wheel is part of the continued blotting. it's a slow and painstaking process. no shining examples may remain. that's why they can never let the truth about hitler to ever be known.

      and that truth is... drum roll please shlomo...

      hitler's national socialist germany provides for humanity the blueprint to understanding and solving the jewish problem.

      Delete
  13. Like I said john that is just hearsay without evidence. And seeing it was the jews that controlled Russia were the ones pushing the story that adolph topped himself then I would auto call it bullshit seeing that everything tnat comes from jews in always lies. After almost 6 decades of the jews in russia saying they had hitlers skull retrieved from the bunker that also turned out to be just jew crap. Like I said there is no evidence that ah killed himself, just hearsay.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Even if you could prove that AH didn't kill himself and went off and lived out his days somewhere under a different identity, what friggin difference would it make? Would that prove then that he was just another puppet in the omnipotent and omniscient hands of international finance? That they let their 'boy' get away after he was done with their insanely convoluted 20 year plan of German and European destruction, starting from before Hitler with Mussolini ? Only if you think that such absurd omnipotence and omniscience exists in the world. It doesn't.

      Power exists, sometimes an insane amount of concentrated power; but power is just strength from natural inequality. 'Evil' does not exist in the animal kingdom because moral choice has to exist first, animals don't have moral choice or even the concept of it, they have instinct that sometimes mimics 'moral choice' in willful humans.

      Evil or that which harms humans & nature or forestalls the vigilant attainment of the perpetually-in-need-of-renewal yin-yang balance of dark-&-light that creates a state of prolonged temperance called 'happiness' or spiritual health in tune with the physical & not in conflict with it, only exists when power is perverted by human will-power to create injustice, tipped scales and gross imbalance that does not exist in nature, a state of entropy, when the mechanism of deception & fraud steps in.

      All humans employ this mechanism to a certain degree but the experts at this mechanism throughout human history have been the Jews followed by the anglo-saxons trailing right behind who do their bidding willfuly. This is what Hitler and Hess failed to realize about the British due in part to their own racialist delusions about their racial 'brethren.'

      All this stuff about the compatiblity of Jeffersonian ideals and certain Fascist ideals is not really new. Ezra Pound already had all this stuff down in 1935 when he wrote the book

      Jefferson And/Or Mussolini

      which can be read in its entirety here:

      http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/pound_ezra/jeffmuss.html

      just zoom the page for easier reading

      Pound is not easy reading as he has a tendency to jump all over the place and give too many references instead of just linearly advancing his arguments but essential reading nevertheless, especially considering the fact that the gist of his argument remains valid to this day.

      negentropic

      Delete
  14. Congrats John on the graduation to the another level of the greater truth. You seek and you will find.


    As for Slozo, aka slomo the yid, you tactics of controlled dissent are no longer going to work here any longer and quite frankly you adamant attempts all along to undermine the truth have become quite apparent. I used to have tons of you yid trolls on my site until I didn't tolerate it anymore and like Raid on roaches, they by gone!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You sir are the yid troll.

      I am merely replying to you for the others reading: again, my contention - one that John disagrees with - is that despite his links here, that jews did indeed fund Hitler, and, supported him. All for a "zionist" (Israel) cause.

      How that makes me a yid troll is beyond me, but go away - attack, attack, attack with utterly useless slander and baseless accusations.

      You only reveal yourselves further in your veracity to do so.

      Delete
  15. Facinating that Hitler's death in the bunker in Berlin is disputed on lack of physical evidence. There is no physical evidence that he died there other than the word of people whom were inside his inner circle and so a very biased-perhaps ordered witness account of course, but where is the remains?

    Interesting there are also people of the Third Reich military service whom witnessed his escape from Berlin to wherever?? I cannot prove conclusively either and have read up about this for quite some time so I am left to decide in hindsight the highest probability taking several things into account.
    The Anglo/Americans and their Bolshevik Allies wanted him dead to announce to the public that their enemy number one is dead. For them that would make sense considering the brutality of their war against the German people with Hitler as the perfect excuse plus the amount of propaganda deceit they used on their people.
    Did Hitler have doubles? Probably!, so it would make this then an even deeper mystery. At this time Germany had technology that just could not be allowed to fall into the hands of tyrants and was successfully evacuated and what could not be removed was effectively destroyed obviously to stop the tyrants gaining access to it.

    Hitler in my point of view escaped Berlin with selected other Third Reich personnel and many high ranking others were deliberately left behind for good reason. Hitler escaped because he could and it would not make much sense to stay and die in vain despite the last written will and testament being issued. Perhaps Hitler wanted his enemies to consider him dead and so when a double was shot his inner circle went with this version yet still no physical evidence of any body - just words. No DNA proof Zero! Nothing but eyewitness accounts and we all know about the lack of credibility of eye witness accounts with people whom have obvious bias for whatever agenda. People such as Carolyn Yeager truly have my utmost respect and she is a tireless worker for truth and justice, but on this subject I must agree to disagree with her most politely.

    It is of course just my own conclusions over time as it is also fact that selected members of the Third Reich did escape to a safe haven base(s) at the end of the war and obviously silence is in itself an important weapon- these people were hardly going to advertise themselves considering what the Anglo-Americans and their Bolshevik allies did to Germany as per agenda of WW2. Ever since as we know Germany the nation has become an indirect puppet state to the strings attached to Washington.

    It is indeed one heck of a mystery either way and people are free to come to their own conclusions and it sure is no problem for anyone whom will disagree with me on this but Adolf and the select few escaped as planned and silence ever since have remained their biggest weapon of all and for very good reason.

    There are books on this subject of course and one of interest to some of you would be 'German Flying Saucers', by WW2 Wehrmacht veteran Rudi Stiebritz.. It gives an incredible insight into this very subject from someone whom lived through it all and has followed his own investigations and goes into detail where I offer mere concluded opinion after a decade of curiosity.

    Also=> May I write keep up the good work with this blogging Mr Friend :) You have some fascinating information and very worthy insight Sir. Your reflection of the Third Reich is highly accurate and as it mostly really was in its reality.

    Thank You.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I am very convinced that Hitler died in the bunker that day with Evan Braun they just took a lot of care to hide their remains. Also why would Hitler's number 2 man Joseph Goebbels one of the most fanatic followers Hitler had committ suicide that day if they were going to 'escape'. I think that like it says in the testament, Hitler was committed since the speech he made in 1939 during the invasion of Poland that he would rather be dead than to see the fall of Germany. Hitler didn't have anything to live for after dedicating his whole life to his people and country and watching it get destroyed so he decided to commit suicide and die as a martyr. He was a man of honor and after being a soldier himself and escaped death so many times in WWI he would prefer to follow the same fate of millions of German soldiers rather than escaping like a coward.

    ReplyDelete
  17. From another source:
    __
    If Hitler wasn’t “in bed” with the leading Jews, why did they let him get in power and parade around the Reich, standing in an open car or ranting hysterically about anti-Semitism on a platform, without putting a bomb under him or a bullet in him? He was a sitting duck for most of his career—much more so than JFK ever was in the back seat of the limo in Dealey Plaza; but his own people, and not the leading Jews, tried to take him out; and the best of the Germans, like Erwin Rommel, knew he was a madman.

    The leading Jews are this world’s master assassins, but they didn’t want Hitler dead before the time, because his “anti-Semitism was essential for the management of their lesser brethren” …

    What did Hitler achieve? He destroyed Germany, devastated most of Europe, wiped out about 70 million Gentiles, most of them white Christian Europeans, and got the Jews back into Palestine. Quite apart from the mega bucks he made for the leading Jews and their corporate buddies during and after the war

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 'another source' - same dissembling jewish cowardice.

      HASBARA HELPFUL GUIDELINE #7.. .always try to top off the comments with the last word... even if you sound like the parasitic jew coward you are.

      Delete
    2. JIDF Handbook -
      Always attack the messenger not the message.
      --

      Why don't you discuss the facts stated instead of name calling b morrison?

      Delete
  18. an anonymous joker trying to 'flip the script'. there's a fact for you.

    why don't i discuss the facts stated? do you hear how ridiculous that sounds? i'll leave a fact alone to speak for itself. they were presented quite nicely by mr. friend throughout the post. now, here in the comments section we have to do a little mopping up as the jewish anonymous cowards ply their trade. there's some more fact for you right there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know what it is with the Hitler fan club and their loss of rational thought when it comes to the "Hitler can do no wrong" attitude.

      The first thing you should look at is 'CUI BONO" who the hell benefited from Hitler?

      There are 7 million Khazars now terrorizing Palestinians because of Hitler. If it wasn't for Hitler there would be no Israel today. Hitler is the founder of Israel, those sick Khazars should be building monuments of Hitler in Occupied Palestine because Hitler created their stolen state.

      SO who benefited?

      oh and another quote of what Hitler did:

      “Every time anyone says that Israel is our only friend in the Middle East, I can’t help but think that before Israel, we had no enemies in the Middle East.”
      — John Sheehan, S.J.

      Delete
  19. more nonsensical script flipping... with a nuanced touch of sympathy for the plight of palestinians... and i smell the khazar conundrum conversation coming. who are the true jews anyway?!.. pretty worn-out stuff, achi. but maybe it's the oldies but goodies that suffice the best. you would know. whatever the case, NEVER let hitler be seen in the true light. right? your present game hinges on this. you ask the silly question - "cui bono" who the hell benefited from hitler?- the obvious answer is about 80 million germans from 1933 until somewhere in early 1945 when you would have us believe 59 jewish controlled countries declared war on germany to destroy their own *ALREADY-IN-POWER* pawn adolph hitler. that's quite a punchline! from a nonsensical jewish dissembler that is here to muddy the waters and sow confusion. AND take up time... like you're doing now. geesh..

    ---

    i'll say this again:
    hitler's national socialist germany provides for humanity the blueprint to understanding and solving the jewish problem.

    ---

    AH came much too close to the jugular and the wound remains fresh. it's the AH in each of us, the noble man in each of us that the jew fears. he fears it with a throbbing pain in his neck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then why did the Jews promote him in 1932?
      __

      In 1932, Fox Helped Make Propaganda Films for Hitler

      In 1932, the German newsreel subsidiary of Fox News Channel’s corporate ancestor, Fox Films, intervened in national elections in Germany.

      The candidate Fox supported was Nazi leader Adolf Hitler.

      Delete
    2. Oh and BTW Brian you making out by the term "nuanced" that I only pretend to give a shit about the Palestinians is a freaking insult. I have seen pictures of Palestinians murdered by these fucking psychopathic Jews and their insides emptied of organs so these Jew fuckers can sell them.

      Don't you dare make out I don't care what these sick fucks are doing to innocent people in Palestine. Whether you like it or not, whether by deliberate means or by accident, it is because of Hitler that these sick fuck Khazars are able to do this to Palestinians!

      Delete
    3. you're an anonymous jew chump here to dissemble and sow confusion because mr. friend has presented hitler in a true light. your 'distractionary' palestinian crocodile tears are seen for what they are. here's a tissue for your issue. keep it. hey brozo - you've 'seen pictures' of palestinians? wow. you're mother theresa. i've lived in the so-called 'holy land' and let me tell YOU, the pictures pale in comparison. but enough with Hasbara Helpful Guideline #11 - change the subject when the truth about hitler is presented.

      chew on this chump:
      hitler's national socialist germany provides for humanity the blueprint to understanding and solving the jewish problem.

      Delete
    4. Don't know what planet you are living on chump but it was because of Hitler why Israel was created, and to blindly ignore the fact that Hitler allowed the British to escape at Dunkirk when the Germans were on the brink of defeating the British, seems like Hitler was i\put in place to me.

      Oh and the German army was advancing so fast into Russia that the Russians did not know what hit them, so what did Hitler do? He stopped the advance and sent Rommel to Africa allowing the Russians to re-iniforce their defences.

      Still don't think Hitler was a Jew puppet?

      Oh and how come Hitler escaped after Germany lay in ruins?

      I am amazed at how you ignore the holes in the Hitler script, seriously dude your Hitler Messiah wasn't such a God he was the cause of Germany's defeat.

      Delete
    5. Oh and another little thing you seem very quiet about Brian, what about Hitler and the transfer agreement? where your messiah Hitler in agreement with the Rothschilds (who stole Palestine)only allowed Jews to go to Palestine.

      You still don't think he was a Jew puppet? Gee you think Hitler directly carrying out Rothschilds plans may give you a clue, but no Hitler is GOD to you.

      Man you are so freaking brainwashed with bullshit and sticking your fingers in your ears to anything negative about Hitler I have only seen extreme cult member act like you.

      Delete
  20. Excellent! Very well articulated. Very sound reasoning. This is a gem that could very well bring down the glass house of lies.

    I loved the excerpts from Goebbles' "Those Damned Nazis." I will have to get that, if I can. Such sound reasoning.

    Thanks for writing this. I hope it gets wide reading. I'm dreaming, but I would so love to see this as a letter to the editor in my Sunday morning newspaper. Then, I would know the end of the reign of the liars would be just around the corner.

    Again, this is a gem that could bring down the glass house of lies. Thanks again for writing it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Rick,

      What was the gist of what Goebbles meant when he said that. Very interesting as I have never heard that before.

      Thanks

      Delete
  21. I was referring to the excerpts from Goebbles' piece "Those Damned Nazis."

    I'm sure the title is sarcasm... and mimicking what the jews may have been saying/thinking about them.

    ReplyDelete
  22. David Irving relates in his book “Hitler’s War” that Hitler wouldn’t let anyone see him naked, not even medical personnel. (A circumcised man in pre-WW II Germany would stand out as Jewish?)

    from many sources one can verify that Hitler not only had a half-Jewish lawyer throughout the Third Reich, but a Jewish Doctor (Dr. Bloch) since childhood and through much of the Third Reich, a Jewish cook, a part Jewish head of the SS (Reinhard Heydrich). Come on – I must stop now. But I hope your curiosity is piqued, at least.
    --

    Get a clue Brian (then you probably do and don't want the truth out protecting the Jew spiel about Hitler)

    ReplyDelete
  23. here's my clue.
    you're another (or the same?) jewish dissembler up to more run-around sue topics. the jewish spiel about hitler indeed! or was this not the clue you were hoping i'd 'get'?

    hitler will never be left alone by the jews. this posting by JRF is a microcosmic example of that truth. hitler was too successful in beating the jews at their own game... to think he would somehow never deal with jews in his life is an absurd, diversionary notion put forth to confuse and sow discord about who hitler really was. it is put forth by jews and their operatives to detract from the example hitler provided of how to deal successfully with the jewish problem.

    i'm afraid i'll have to leave you and mr. irving alone with your fantasies of wanting to get into hitler's pants...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Me thinks you maybe a sayanim troll making sure no one finds out the truth that Hitler may have been a Jew puppet by the looks of things!

      Of course the Jews want the Hitler narrative to remain unchanged, it has served them well for 70 years. They don't want people to realize that Hitler is the founder if Israel and that Hitler was doing as the Rothschilds requested, to send the Jews to Palestine.

      Oh and another thing the Jews benefited from with the Hitler boogieman was the the reinstatement of their failed League of Nations (the UN). Gee dude still can't see that everything the Jews wanted Hitler made sure they got it!

      Delete
    2. "Haj Mohammed Effendi Amin el-Husseini (Arabic: محمد أمين الحسيني‎, Muhammad Amin al-Husayni;[1] born between 1895 and 1897;[2][3] died July 4, 1974) was a Palestinian Arab nationalist and Muslim leader in the Mandatory Palestine.

      Al-Husseini was an ambitious Arab nationalist and following the end of the First World War positioned himself in Damascus, as a supporter of the Arab Kingdom of Syria. However, following the fiasco of the Franco-Syrian War, his positions on pan-Arabism shifted to a form of local nationalism for the Arabs of Palestine and he moved back to Jerusalem. From as early as 1920, in order to secure the independence of Palestine as an Arab state he actively opposed Zionism, and was implicated as a leader of a violent riot that broke out over the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine.[4] From 1921 to 1937[5] al-Husseini was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, using the position to promote Islam and rally Arab nationalism against Zionism.

      His opposition to the British peaked during the 1936–1939 Arab revolt in Palestine. In 1937, evading an arrest warrant, he fled Palestine and took refuge in, successively, the French Mandate of Lebanon and the Kingdom of Iraq, until he established himself in Italy and finally Germany. During World War II he actively collaborated with both Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, meeting Adolf Hitler personally and asking him to back Arab independence. He requested, as part of the Pan-Arab struggle, Hitler's support to oppose the establishment in Palestine of a Jewish national home. He was promised the leadership of the Arabs after German troops had driven out the British.[6] He helped recruit Muslims for the Waffen-SS. At war's end, he came under French protection, and managed to slip away to Cairo to avoid eventual prosecution. At around this time, the British head of Palestine’s Criminal Investigation Division told an American military attaché that the Mufti might be the only person who could unite the Palestinian Arabs and 'cool off the Zionists'.[7]

      During the 1948 Palestine War, Husseini represented the Arab Higher Committee and opposed both the 1947 UN Partition Plan and King Abdullah's entente with Zionists to annex the Arab part of British Mandatory Palestine to Jordan. In September 1948, he participated in establishment of All-Palestine Government. Seated in Egyptian ruled Gaza, this government won a limited recognition of Arab states, but was eventually dissolved by Gamal Nasser in 1959. After the war and subsequent Palestinian exodus, his claims to leadership, wholly discredited, left him eventually sidelined by the Palestine Liberation Organization, and he lost most of his residual political influence.[8] He died in Beirut, Lebanon, in July 1974. Husseini was and remains a highly controversial figure. Historians dispute whether his fierce opposition to Zionism was grounded in nationalism or antisemitism or a combination of both

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni "

      You didn't know this did you, mr. me-thinks-Rothchilds-run-even-their-fiercest-enemies-plus-the-ant-kingdom dingleberry man?


      Yeah right!

      Hitler was giving the Jews who declared War on Germany in 1933 everything they wanted by allying with a fierce anti-Zionist Palestinian Nationalist and accepting over 60,000 Muslim volunteers into the Waffen SS !

      You can Joogle the photos of Al-Husseini with Hitler & Himmler if you want


      My suggestion: Stick to the 'no-one ever saw Hitler's pecker' meme to pull the gullible suckers in. That one should work good for you since you have David Irving's hard-earned reputation to back it up with.

      Negentropic

      Delete
    3. Are you freaking serious quoting a wikipedia article?

      People worked out years ago that wikipedia is a Jew propaganda site. FFS they even totally removed the word "sayanim" from their site, which is who exactly runs wikipedia.

      Now I know you clowns are total fools believing in Jew written crap!

      Delete
    4. Says the bozo believing in the absurd Jew-written crap about 'Hitler was a Zionist Agent.'

      The Wiki entry is a short, basic bio that you can easily verify independently on a bunch of other sites, including

      http://photospalestine.free.fr/


      Did I issue the order to joogle the photos or not ? Go to it boy !


      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/fez10.jpg

      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/6cze4q10.jpg

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1987-004-09A%2C_Amin_al_Husseini_und_Adolf_Hitler.jpg

      http://photospalestine.free.fr/mufti_himmler1.JPG

      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/bundes10.jpg
      Husseini Handschar Waffen SS

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bd/Bundesarchiv_Bild_101III-Mielke-036-23%2C_Waffen-SS%2C_13._Gebirgs-Div._%22Handschar%22.jpg

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1973-116-11%2C_Waffen-SS%2C_13._Gebirgs-Div._%22Handschar%22.jpg


      Waffen SS Handcshar Division Islamic troops firing an artillery piece.
      Himmler was fascinated by the Islamic faith and thought Muslims to be fearless soldiers

      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/srebha10.jpg

      http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzj0ljnUh71qz9tkeo1_500.png

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d7/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1977-137-20%2C_Bosnische_SS-Freiwillige_beim_Gebet.jpg

      Bosnian SS-volunteers during prayer (November 1943),

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Haj_amin_el-Husseini_and_Heinrich_Himmler_2.jpg

      Haj amin el-Husseini and Heinrich Himmler


      Actually, the sayanim like yourself working the spin on the other side of this history, as they do both sides of all issues of any historical significance in order to control it into channels favorable to themselves, have no reason to twist this part of WWII history too much since THEY WANT to tie in Hitler's name with the so-called birth of 'Islamo-fascism' they talk about so much today.

      However, this also smacks their diametrically opposed 'Hitler-was-a-Zionist-Agent' theory right back in their faces & out of existence.

      By the way, anyone that doesn't know how to read Wikipedia or the BBC or Reuters or any mainstream site with a bullshit detector doesn't belong in this troofer game. I suggest you develop the skill.

      ALL information is propaganda because as soon as it reaches another person it has the power to influence that person one way or another. It doesn't mean it can't be true or have a high percentage of truth . Some info is valid regardless of, in fact, even more valid, BECAUSE of the source it comes from.

      Perfect example "Secret Relationship between Jews & Blacks" by Nation of Islam, which gives all the information about Jewish ownership of slave ships from Jewish sources.

      In your deliberately absurd & retarded way of thinking, the Jewish sources would invalidate that info completely, whereas in reality they VALIDATE it even more since THEY THEMSELVES researched this & admitted it, not the so called 'anti-seemites.'

      negentropic

      Delete
    5. Says the bozo believing in the absurd Jew-written crap about 'Hitler was a Zionist Agent.'

      The Wiki entry is a short, basic bio that you can easily verify independently on a bunch of other sites, including

      http://photospalestine.free.fr/

      http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_mandate_grand_mufti.php
      And David Irving's site directs you to this document:
      Hitler, according to the official German Foreign Office record of the interview, told Haj Amin, "enjoining him to lock it in the uttermost depths of his heart" that:
      At the some moment which was impossible to set exactly today but which in any event was not distant, the German armies would in the course of this struggle reach the southern exit from Caucasia. As soon as this had happened, the Führer would on his own give the Arab world the assurance that its hour of liberation had arrived. Germany's objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power. (Documents on German Foreign Policy 1918-1945, Series D, Vol. XIII no. 515).

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Mufti251141.html

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Judenfrage/Mufti_memoirs.html



      Did I issue the order to joogle the photos or not ? Go to it boy !


      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/fez10.jpg

      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/6cze4q10.jpg

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1987-004-09A%2C_Amin_al_Husseini_und_Adolf_Hitler.jpg

      http://photospalestine.free.fr/mufti_himmler1.JPG

      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/bundes10.jpg
      Husseini Handschar Waffen SS

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bd/Bundesarchiv_Bild_101III-Mielke-036-23%2C_Waffen-SS%2C_13._Gebirgs-Div._%22Handschar%22.jpg

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1973-116-11%2C_Waffen-SS%2C_13._Gebirgs-Div._%22Handschar%22.jpg

      http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/81KLpZFHYfL.png

      Waffen SS Handcshar Division Islamic troops firing an artillery piece.
      Himmler was fascinated by the Islamic faith and thought Muslims to be fearless soldiers

      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/srebha10.jpg

      http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzj0ljnUh71qz9tkeo1_500.png

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d7/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1977-137-20%2C_Bosnische_SS-Freiwillige_beim_Gebet.jpg

      Bosnian SS-volunteers during prayer (November 1943),

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Haj_amin_el-Husseini_and_Heinrich_Himmler_2.jpg

      Haj amin el-Husseini and Heinrich Himmler


      Actually, the sayanim like yourself have no reason to bullshit about this part of WWII history since THEY WANT to tie in Hitler's name with the so-called birth of 'Islamo-fascism' they talk about today. However, this also smacks their diametrically opposed 'Hitler-was-a-Zionist-Agent' theory right out of existence.

      By the way, anyone that doesn't know how to read Wikipedia or the BBC or Reuters or any mainstream site with a bullshit detector doesn't belong in this troofer game. I suggest you develop the skill.

      ALL information is propaganda because as soon as it reaches another person it has the power to influence that person one way or another. It doesn't mean it can't be true or have a high percentage of truth . Some info is valid regardless of, in fact, even more valid, BECAUSE of the source it comes from.

      Perfect example "Secret Relationship between Jews & Blacks" by Nation of Islam, which gives all the information about Jewish ownership of slave ships from Jewish sources.

      In your deliberately absurd & retarded way of thinking, the Jewish sources would invalidate the info completely, whereas in reality they VALIDATE it even more since THEY THEMSELVES researched this & admit it, not the so called 'anti-seemites.'

      Delete
    6. Says the bozo believing in the absurd Jew-written crap about 'Hitler was a Zionist Agent.'

      The Wiki entry is a short, basic bio that you can easily verify independently on a bunch of other sites, including

      http://photospalestine.free.fr/

      http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_mandate_grand_mufti.php
      And David Irving's site directs you to this document:
      Hitler, according to the official German Foreign Office record of the interview, told Haj Amin, "enjoining him to lock it in the uttermost depths of his heart" that:
      At the some moment which was impossible to set exactly today but which in any event was not distant, the German armies would in the course of this struggle reach the southern exit from Caucasia. As soon as this had happened, the Führer would on his own give the Arab world the assurance that its hour of liberation had arrived. Germany's objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power. (Documents on German Foreign Policy 1918-1945, Series D, Vol. XIII no. 515).

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Mufti251141.html

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Judenfrage/Mufti_memoirs.html



      Did I issue the order to joogle the photos or not ? Go to it boy !


      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/fez10.jpg

      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/6cze4q10.jpg

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1987-004-09A%2C_Amin_al_Husseini_und_Adolf_Hitler.jpg

      http://photospalestine.free.fr/mufti_himmler1.JPG

      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/bundes10.jpg
      Husseini Handschar Waffen SS

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bd/Bundesarchiv_Bild_101III-Mielke-036-23%2C_Waffen-SS%2C_13._Gebirgs-Div._%22Handschar%22.jpg

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1973-116-11%2C_Waffen-SS%2C_13._Gebirgs-Div._%22Handschar%22.jpg

      http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/81KLpZFHYfL.png

      Waffen SS Handcshar Division Islamic troops firing an artillery piece.
      Himmler was fascinated by the Islamic faith and thought Muslims to be fearless soldiers

      http://i16.servimg.com/u/f16/11/36/59/74/srebha10.jpg

      http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzj0ljnUh71qz9tkeo1_500.png

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d7/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1977-137-20%2C_Bosnische_SS-Freiwillige_beim_Gebet.jpg

      Bosnian SS-volunteers during prayer (November 1943),

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Haj_amin_el-Husseini_and_Heinrich_Himmler_2.jpg

      Haj amin el-Husseini and Heinrich Himmler


      negentropic

      Delete
    7. @ Anynymous shill who wrote: "Are you freaking serious quoting a wikipedia article?

      People worked out years ago that wikipedia is a Jew propaganda site."


      Actually, the sayanim like yourself have no reason to bullshit about this part of WWII history since THEY WANT to tie in Hitler's name with the so-called birth of 'Islamo-fascism' they talk about today. However, this also smacks their diametrically opposed 'Hitler-was-a-Zionist-Agent' theory right out of existence.

      By the way, anyone that doesn't know how to read Wikipedia or the BBC or Reuters or any mainstream site with a bullshit detector doesn't belong in this troofer game. I suggest you develop the skill.

      ALL information is propaganda because as soon as it reaches another person it has the power to influence that person one way or another. It doesn't mean it can't be true or have a high percentage of truth . Some info is valid regardless of, in fact, even more valid, BECAUSE of the source it comes from.

      Perfect example "Secret Relationship between Jews & Blacks" by Nation of Islam, which gives all the information about Jewish ownership of slave ships from Jewish sources.

      Hitler, according to the official German Foreign Office record of the interview, told Haj Amin, "enjoining him to lock it in the uttermost depths of his heart" that:

      At the some moment which was impossible to set exactly today but which in any event was not distant, the German armies would in the course of this struggle reach the southern exit from Caucasia. As soon as this had happened, the Führer would on his own give the Arab world the assurance that its hour of liberation had arrived. Germany's objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power. (Documents on German Foreign Policy 1918-1945, Series D, Vol. XIII no. 515).

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Mufti251141.html

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Judenfrage/Mufti_memoirs.html


      In your deliberately absurd & retarded way of thinking, the Jewish sources would invalidate the info completely, whereas in reality they VALIDATE it even more since THEY THEMSELVES researched this & admit it, not the so called 'anti-seemites.'

      ~Negentropic

      Delete
    8. Thank you Negentropic, your comments are always very much appreciated.

      Delete
  24. All the questions about the funding of NSDAP have already been answered in detail in the following article:

    Demystification of the Birth and Funding of the NSDAP

    Veronica Kuzniar Clark

    http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2011/volume_3/number_3/demystification_of_the_birth_of_the_nsdap.php

    Anyone with an interest in understanding Germany under Hitler who has not read this article in detail is an ignorant imbecile.


    Negentropic

    ReplyDelete
  25. Lucky for you,you dont live in Germany,or Canada or the like,it is too late for them. Thought crime and Jewish victimization is an everyday event. It is lucky here in America we can still look for the truth,. In the meantime let's reflect with a sad holocaust tale...

    Little Misha was on 7 years old when her parents where taken from her in Belgium. Misha armed herself with a knife, and walked 3,000 miles across war torn Europe in search of her parents.

    While in the forest, Misha was adopted by a pack of friendly wolves. Misha would babysit the pups while the parents hunted. The wolves brought Misha food, and kept her warm at night.

    7 year old Misha got into a knife fight with an adult Nazi, and stabbed him to death in self defense.

    To survive, Misha ate mud. Poor Misha..

    http://www.xoeditions.com/Surviving-With-Wolves

    ReplyDelete
  26. OK, I haven't been able to post for a few days now, but after re-reading the comment thread, the Hitler defenders are DESTROYING the anonymous and slozo Hitler bashers.

    Mark Weber explains that Hitler was NOT some Zionist stooge for the Jews and their agenda in detail here:

    http://reasonradionetwork.com/20120611/the-stark-truth-conspiracy-theories-versus-facts

    I don't agree with much of Weber's overall analysis, especially regarding 9/11 and the Protocols, but he does a good job debunking many of these "Hitler was a Zionist!" claims.

    Question to anyone hating on Hitler: what other leader in history can you point to that called the Jews out and made moves against them? There have been some, JFK was even one of them, although he didn't go NEARLY as far as Hitler did.

    The Jews have been at war against the rest of us for centuries now, Hitler understood that and took major steps to counteract this parasitic, destructive force. And people want to call him a puppet of the Jews? Or a Rothschild? Or a Zionist stooge? WTF? Are you kidding me?

    Read what this man wrote. Read NS pamphlets and other literature. These guys were for real. Unlike most of the brainwashed cowards we see amongst us today.

    http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ww2era.htm

    ReplyDelete
  27. BTW - the new url for this blog is:

    http://johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  28. I address all of the ridiculous accusations against Hitler here:

    http://johnfriendsblog.blogspot.com/2012/06/more-thoughts-about-adolf-hitler-and.html

    ReplyDelete
  29. A commenter named Pat left the following comment:

    LIES ABOUT HITLER
    Was Hitler a Rothschild Agent? Was Hitler was serving jewish interests? To formulate an opinion on this matter, it is instructive to investigate the roles played by the Wermacht, the S.A. and the S.S.

    POLITICAL VIOLENCE
    As you know, leftists and communists have a habit of violent interruption of meetings of people that they don’t agree with. Hitler had to deal with this too.

    TO PROTECT AGAINST COMMUNIST VIOLENCE, HITLER FORMED THE S.A.
    The S.A. was the Saalschutz Abteilung which translates to “Security Guard Department. They are also called the (hall defense detachment) the Storm Detachment or Assault Division, or Brownshirts.

    They were rank and file members of the National Socialist Workers Party but certainly not an army.

    Their main function was to protect party candidates from Communist violence. And the violence was murderous indeed: more than five hundred National Socialists were murdered by the communists. Thousands were grievously injured.

    Once Hitler was elected, he could no longer rely on the S.A. directly. He had to work within the already existing political and bureaucratic systems.

    THE REGULAR GERMAN ARMY (THE WERMACHT) WAS LED BY “ARISTOCRATIC” GERMANS WITH DIRECT TIES TO JEWISH CAPITALISM
    There was a tremendous amount of conflict between the regular German Army leadership and the S.A. The conflict can be traced directly to the fact that German aristocratic society did not want to see an erosion of their “status”. In fact, most of the leadership in the regular German Army were from aristocratic families.

    THERE WAS MASSIVE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE S.A. AND THE REGULAR GERMAN ARMY
    The feud between the SA and the army was coming to a head. His old comrade, Ernst Roehm, Chief of the SA wanted to follow Stalin’s example and physically eliminate the army brass. The showdown resulted in the death of Roehm, either by suicide or murder, and many of his assistants, with the army picking up the pieces and putting the SA back in its place.

    THE S.S. WAS HITLER’S PERSONAL GUARD FORCE AND NUMBERED ONLY 180 MEN
    At this time the only SS to be found in Germany were in Chancellor Hitler’s personal guard: one hundred eighty men in all. They were young men of exceptional qualities but without any political role. Their duties consisted of guarding the Chancellory and presenting arms to visiting dignitaries.

    ReplyDelete
  30. (Continued)


    HITLER KNEW THAT THE WERMACHT BRASS WOULD NEVER SUPPORT HIS SOCIAL REFORMS
    After Hitler was compelled to acknowledge the superiority of the army he realized that the brass would never support his revolutionary social programs. It was an army of aristocrats.

    Hitler realized that if his social reforms were to proceed free of sabotage he needed a powerful lever, a lever that commanded respect.

    Hitler still did not confront the army but skillfully started to build up the SS. He desperately needed the SS because above all Hitler was a political man; to him war was the last resort. His aim was to convince people, to obtain their loyalty, particularly the younger generation. He knew that the establishment-minded brass would oppose him at every turn.

    And he was right. Through the high ranking officers the establishment plotted the overthrow of the democratically elected Hitler government. Known as the Munich Plot, the conspirators were detected in time. That was in 1938.

    On 20 July 1944, Hitler almost lost his life when aristocratic officers planted a time bomb underneath his desk.

    HITLER THEN BUILT UP THE S.S.
    The S.S. was the “Real German Army”, while the regular Army (the Wermacht) was not really loyal to Hitler.

    Looking at the obvious components of the political realities that Hitler faced at the time, any astute investigator would want to know more about high ranking German officers in the Wermacht who were collaborating with the Allies in hopes that they could maintain their social and financial positions after the war……that they would help Germany to lose.

    Obviously, Hitler was neither a Rothschild agent, nor was he serving jewish interests.

    However, the same cannot not be said for the leadership in the Wermacht.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I think schlomo's questions, were asked, and eloquently answered by a number of men here on this thread, and certainly within the links provided by them. Why must we endure these jews trying to insert the same nonsense wherever White men gather? Witness the White man who dares to question the jews motives or actions, for he will be set upon with a whirlwind of hate like you cannot believe. He will feel the vicious wrath of every every jew within earshot. It's funny to see the oh so predictable arguments by the jews on every single blog that discusses issues that expose the jews. Jews can only, evade, evade, evade; in other words, LIE, LIE, LIE. As a very famous man once said, "The Truth is not in them".

    ReplyDelete
  32. For some stupid reason my wordpress id is not working. This is allovertheplace.

    Thanks for the article, JF. It is a beauty.

    The kikes MOs are dissention, dissolution and destruction. These are their means and their end. At no point do kikes accomplish good to achieve a bad end. If they are doing good, it is an illusion or a cover.

    Shlomo knows you don't need to doubt, you just need to have a kernal of doubt. A kernal of doubt means no faith. Shlomo encourages you to, as someone said, run around the mouse wheel. Shlomo doesn't mind. Shlomo has all day. Shlomo is a paid JIDF agent and things have been going his way. All Shlomo has to do in hold you off, preoccupy you until his fellow cabal members operating in upper political spheres accomplish complete subversion.

    Of course people are waking up. If anyone asks themselves, Is this what we want? The answer can only be no. It is patently obvious that yhr infractions against Americans and their mores, traditions and ideals have gone WAY, WAY beyond the infractions of king George.

    A great writer associated with William Pierce claimed there is only one way, and that is to go straight at the jew. Elerything else is going somewhere else. Maybe then, the jew will split.

    As well, JF, do you know a person going by the name of "Pat" who comments over at Incog Man (like I do) a lot. Pat is attempting to network with me, which is fine, except that I've had some question about Pat's authenticity due to the fact that he has kind of dispensed rhetoric that could be construed as encouraging persuit of a red cape in lieu of the matador. Pat is a good writer and I do hope he is legit...thanks for your word. I'll check back. Or perhaps you could drop me a comment at American Alliance, my wordpress blog?

    Freedom!

    ReplyDelete
  33. The trouble with these comments and many more that I read is that all are using incorrect nomenclature, all you'all are using the terms supplanted by the Kikels for what is really meant. For example, most apply the term "Semite" to mean a Kikel, I use Kikel - meaning a twister from the previous noun circle - because they twist everything around. No wonder the true Semites, the white western peoples are truly confused! The Kikes are anti-Semitic or more properly put anti Shemites themselves. Herod was an Edomite, meaning of Esau and his offspring have been waging hateful warfare to regain their inheritance ever since. That was too difficult to understand, now was it?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Thank you so much for this article. Hitler is the only White man who has tried to take on the Jews and free us.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.