Saturday, March 17, 2012

Then and now...

World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and fourteen was the year in which World War One broke out. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened? 
Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply facing her — and after that, starvation. 
At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed. 
Now Germany — not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.” 
Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously! They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.
...the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.” 
The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.” 
In other words, they made this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”



Despite popular belief, WWII did not start in September of 1939 with the British and French declaration of war against Germany; it actually started in 1933. In 1933, organized Jewry initiated a subversive economic war against Germany; a boycott of German goods designed to weaken and destroy Hitler’s National Socialist government. [...]
And now...


An excerpt from an article titled, "White man's burden," published in Haaretz:
The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.
An excerpt from an article titled, "Netanyahu is preparing Israeli public opinion for a war on Iran," also published in Haaretz:
Since his return from Washington, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has mainly been preoccupied with one thing: Preparing public opinion for war against Iran. [...] 
Netanyahu presented three examples in which his predecessors broke the American directive and made crucial decisions regarding the future of Israel: the declaration of independence in 1948, starting the Six Day War in 1967 and the bombing of the nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981. 
The lesson was clear: Just as David Ben-Gurion, Levi Eshkol and Menachem Begin said "no" to the White House, Netanyahu also needs not be alarmed by President Obama's opposition to an attack on Iran. Netanyahu believes that, as in the previous incidents, the U.S. may grumble at first, but will then quickly adopt the Israeli position and provide Israel with support and backing in the international community.
Despite virtually all major U.S. intelligence agencies concluding Iran is not in fact pursuing a nuclear weapon, international war criminal Henry Kissinger believes we should presume Iran is in fact pursuing a nuclear weapon, lending credence to the notion that a preemptive military strike is justifiable:


Am I wrong in saying that organized Jewry are the primary instigators and benefactors of both WWI/WWII and the current War on Terror? Given the facts laid out above, is it anti-Semitic, racist, or prejudice to come to that conclusion?  How much longer can we afford to cower in silence while these criminals destroy this planet?   

10 comments:

  1. Here's your non-confidence proclamation in one phrase:

    No more wars for Israel.

    The time of silence and cowering has ended - thank God.

    The zionist shackles are falling from our hands, our eyes, ears and minds are opening to the lies and murders committed by zionists and israel for over a hundred years.

    The truth is coming to light.

    NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL!

    ReplyDelete
  2. And there's Chaim Weizmann's letter to Churchill offering to bring the US into another world war if the Jews got what they wanted as they had with the Balfour. See, copy, archive, and package with Freedman's speech.

    Freedman and the issue of Jewish control is the litmus test. Not "Israeli" crimes, not "money junkies", not Reptiles, or Jesuits, or Illuminati,...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed - I used to constantly harp on Zionists and Zionism, but it's much deeper than that. We must focus on Jewish power, Jewish supremacism, Jewish tyranny, and Jewish lies. Zionist is simply a manifestation of Jewish power and tyranny.

      Thanks for that link to Weizmann's letter. These Jews are screwed man, we have them thoroughly exposed at this point. Their days of ruling the world for their own Satanic agenda are OVER!

      Delete
  3. Weizmann letter http://oi52.tinypic.com/98rmtt.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  4. another interesting fact in the end of the 1st world war is the figure 6 million, yep that again. according to jewish/zionist/israeli religious texts there has to be 6 million dead jews for them to get palestine. so 6 million dead jewish soldiers in ww1 & 6 million dead jews in ww2. that figure has been used for the past 2 hundreds years [at least] apparently to satisfy god because of a broken covenant

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good comment! Thanks for that info! I have read into this aspect of the Holohoax before, and ZionCrimeFactory has really exposed this in his essays over at his website. It really just shows how mystical and Satanic their agenda really is, huh?

      Thanks for pointing it out!

      Delete
  5. No, its not wrong to accuse the Jews of what has been done in their names. As my latest bitch session from the knee-jerk reactionaries at my place have shown, they refuse to acknowledge the truth.

    I have said many times that they (the secular Jews) better call the maniacs out before its too late. And I use the word "Jews" lightly, since most of them are not, but simply claim the mantle for their ill-gotten gain and murderous intentions.

    And whenever someone calls me an anti-Semite, I respond that they should ACTUALLY be a Semite to make that accusation. Those European Khazars are certainly not Jews, much less Semitic.

    I also warn them to either be Jew in religion or race, but a European Khazar is certainly not the same race as the original inhabitants of Palestine. They look nothing like them.

    And if they choose being "Jewish" as a religion, then they better understand that the Talmud is the most vile piece of shit book that was ever written and to understand what it means and how it brainwashes them if they claim to be atheist.

    I was recently told that secular Jews don't know anything about the Torah or Talmud. Its a crying shame that this dumb ole redneck knows more about their own Holy books than they do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that B'man, you really hit the nail on the head man!

      BTW, you may be a redneck, but you ain't no dumb ole redneck! An intelligent, honorable, and courageous redneck, but not dumb.

      I was up in San Francisco about a year ago, wearing my Nebraska Cornhusker jersey, and I got so much shit man! I had a girl walk up to me and call me a redneck right to my face! LOL! It was pretty damn funny man, too bad you weren't there! I'm drinkin' a PBR right now, does that officially qualify me as a redneck?

      Delete
  6. BuelahMan, that was outstanding! I'll be over shortly. Very well said.

    Roald Dahl, famous children's author, said, "I started out anti-Israel and I ended up anti-Semitic." I started out marginally pro-Squatter-stan and ended up in the same place.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.