Sunday, February 19, 2012

PSYOP aspects of 9/11

The are many ways to analyze the events of 9/11. On this blog, I've mainly focused on the crime network that benefitted from the events that day. Today, I'd like to focus on some of the PSYOP aspects of 9/11, which is an extremely important angle to consider and understand.

Major Ed Rouse explains the concept of a PSYOP quite well:

Psychological Operations or PSYOP are planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of organizations, groups, and individuals. Used in all aspects of war, it is a weapon whose effectiveness is limited only by the ingenuity of the commander using it.

A proven winner in combat and peacetime, PSYOP is one of the oldest weapons in the arsenal of man. It is an important force protector/combat multiplier and a non-lethal weapons system.

Psychological Operations (PSYOP) or Psychological Warfare (PSYWAR) is simply learning everything about your target enemy, their beliefs, likes, dislikes, strengths, weaknesses, and vulnerabilities. Once you know what motivates your target, you are ready to begin psychological operations.

Psychological operations may be defined broadly as the planned use of communications to influence human attitudes and behavior ... to create in target groups behavior, emotions, and attitudes that support the attainment of national objectives. The form of communication can be as simple as spreading information covertly by word of mouth or through any means of multimedia.

A psychological warfare campaign is a war of the mind. Your primary weapons are sight and sound. PSYOP can be disseminated by face-to-face communication, audio visual means (television), audio media (radio or loudspeaker), visual media (leaflets, newspapers, books, magazines and/or posters). The weapon is not how its sent, but the message it carries and how that message affects the recipient.
9/11 was a classic PSYOP, used to deceive the American public into believing that Muslim fundamentalists attacked their country, playing on their emotions, ignorance, and naivety.

I'd like to lay out some examples of the fakery and fabrications involved on 9/11, many of which are not properly understood, even by those in the 9/11 "truth" movement.

The Airliners and Flights Purportedly Involved on 9/11

Let's first take a look at the official government conspiracy theory we were told about the hijacked airliners:
The official theory holds that American 11 and United 175 struck the World Trade Center, north and south towers, respectively, and that American 77 hit the Pentagon. United 93 is said to have crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Flights 11 and 175 left from Boston with Los Angeles destinations. Flight 77 left from Dulles Airport in Virginia, also headed for Los Angeles. Flight 93 left from Newark for San Francisco.
This scripted story is false on virtually every account.  Col. George Nelson, retired U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and former pilot, has remarked:
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft.
Even more striking, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics did not even list American Airlines flights 11 or 77 as having taken off on 9/11:

Thus for September 11, 2001, and for Flights UA 93 and UA 175, the destination, tail number and departure time are the same as that given above. But for Flights AA 11 and AA 77 the situation is totally different — these flights are not scheduled at all. The implication is that Flights AA 11 and AA 77 did not exist on September 11, 2001.
After this fact was made public, the BTS altered the official records in 2004 to "correct" this major blunder on the part of those responsible for covering up 9/11.  As for flights 93 and 175, they were taken off the FAA list of active flights many years after 9/11:

Two of the 9/11 airliners were never 'deregistered' and remained on the 'active' flight list until Sept. 28. 2005, the classification officially changing only a month after two inquisitive flight researchers made repeated calls to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), inquiring about the strange irregularity.

The two planes in question were Flight 93 and Flight 175, both owned and operated by United Airlines and, according to the official story, both destroyed on 9/11, one in Shanksville, Penn., and the other crashing into the South Tower of the WTC.

Usually a normal procedure after an airliner is destroyed, why it took United more than four years to 'deregister' the airplanes and fill out the official FAA paperwork remains a mystery and never has been fully explained by the FAA, United or the government.
Andrew Johnson has analyzed the eye witness accounts on 9/11 in New York, and has shown that many of the witnesses did not see a large Boeing 767. The eye witness accounts are all over the place, with some reporting to have seen a small military aircraft or a missile. Bottom line: very few reported seeing a Boeing 767 crash into the WTC, and those that did appear to be planted witnesses reading from a script.

At this point, I think it is pretty well established that the airplanes and flights involved in the official government conspiracy are completely fraudulent. Besides, the maneuvers attributed to the airliners are not even physically possible by an experienced pilot, especially in regards to the alleged flights that hit the Pentagon and WTC.

Also, consider the following videos of mainstream media reports on 9/11:

The Alleged Hijackers and Phone Calls Involved on 9/11

If the airplanes and flights are fraudulent, what about the hijackers and the phone calls allegedly made on 9/11?

Mohammed Atta, one of the key hijackers on 9/11 according to the U.S. government, was still alive after 9/11, according to his father. From The Guardian, September 1, 2002:

The father of Mohammed Atta, the alleged ringleader of the September 11 attacks, said in an interview published yesterday that his son was still alive.

"He is hiding in a secret place so as not to be murdered by the US secret services," Mohammed el-Amir Atta, 66, told the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag. He also vehemently denied that his son - believed to have flown the first plane into the World Trade Centre - had taken part in the atrocities, blaming them instead on "American Christians".
Daniel Hopsicker has investigated Mohammed Atta and the other "hijackers" in Florida, and wrote a book titled, Welcome to Terrorland: Mohammed Atta & the 9/11 Cover-Up in Florida.

Hopsicker interviewed Atta's former girlfriend, Amanda Keller, who describes Atta as a jealous and violent drug addict, who may have been involved in drug running.

An Israeli spy ring was actually monitoring and surveilling Atta and his friends in Florida and New Jersey prior to 9/11, and Wayne Madsen has reported that, according to British intelligence, the Israeli spy ring was "running" or controlling the Muslim hijacker patsies.

Were there two Mohammed Attas?  Did the 9/11 perps set up Atta and the other alleged Muslim "hijackers" to take the blame?

Elias Davidsson has written a lengthy article showing that the U.S. government has not produced any credible evidence to back up its assertion that Muslim fanatics pulled off 9/11:

The United States government has alleged that 19 individuals with Arab names, deemed fanatic Muslims, hijacked four passenger planes on 11 September 2001 and crashed them in a suicide-operation that killed approximately 3,000 people. In this Report, the author shows that there is 8. For this reason, it is impossible to support the official account on 9/11. As the US government has failed to prove its accusations against the 19 alleged hijackers, the official account on 9/11 must be regarded as a lie.
Dean Hartwell has written, Facts Talk But the Guilty Walk: The 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and Its Indictment of Our Leaders.

His book contends:
[The book]... falls in the category of "no planes" in regards to 9/11 because it contends that none of the four purported flights, 11, 175, 77 and 93 crashed.

It also makes the case that no hijackings took place at all. Instead, the story of the hijackings was given by the media to the public via fake cell phone conversations and the false use of names and images of Arabs as perpetrators. [pg. 72]
In an article titled "Total Number of Hijackings on 9/11: ZERO," Hartwell explains:
There is also no credible evidence that any planes were overtaken by anyone. The "evidence" given to the public of hijackings came through the phone calls, which have been proven to have been made under false pretenses. Furthermore, no credible videotape of any of the so-called "hijackers" at any of the airports in question has ever surfaced (a 2004 tape purportedly of hijackers at Dulles has been challenged widely for its lack of date and time of recording), nor has any independent authority ever established the finding of the remains of any of them at the crime scenes. And there is no record of any pilot taking a few seconds to punch in the emergency code that pilots are taught to use in hijackings.
Dr. David Ray Griffin has written extensively on the fake phone calls coming from the allegedly "hijacked" airliners and concludes:
... the main evidence provided to the general public has consisted of the hijack-describing phone calls reportedly received from passengers and flight attendants aboard the airliners. But when subjected to a detailed analysis, these alleged phone calls, far from supporting the war-justifying story, lead to a very different conclusion: that these alleged calls were faked. This analysis thereby suggests that the entire 9/11 story used to justify the US-led wars is a lie.
Professor A.K. Dewdney confirms Dr. David Ray Griffin's conclusions:

Below, Alice Hogland is being interviewed about her son, Mark Bingham, who supposedly died on Flight 93. Is this a scripted PSYOP meant to reinforce the 9/11 narrative of Muslim "hijackers" attacking America?

Video Fakery 

It's important to note that there is a historical precedent of video fakery in monumental events, including the assassination of President Kennedy. Dr. Jim Fetzer, amongst others, has concluded that the Zapruder film, supposedly capturing President Kennedy's assassination in real time, was altered:
The editor of Assassination Research, James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., has announced the discovery of new proof that the home movies of the assassination of JFK known as the Zapruder film and a second known as the Nix film are fakes. (The Nix film was taken from the opposite side looking toward “the grassy knoll.”) Both were subject to extensive alteration to fabricate evidence of the crime and keep the truth about the sequence of events in Dealey Plaza from the American people. Fetzer, McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota, observed that the films are authentic only if the visible events they record correspond to the actual sequence of events at the time. “This proof is based upon the convergent testimony of motorcycle patrolmen, members of the Secret Service, and the Dallas Chief of Police. That it contradicts the official account of the assassination recorded in the films qualifies as a major breakthrough.”
Below, John Costella offers a brief explanation of the Zapruder film fakery:

In a brilliant article, Killtown points out that the technology to alter live video feeds was developed long before 9/11, and is an important aspect of PSYOPs.  

From "Information Warfare," by Professor George J. Stein:
Let us take just one example of how current technologies could be used for strategic-level information warfare. If, say, the capabilities of already well-known Hollywood technologies to simulate reality were added to our arsenal, a genuinely revolutionary new form of warfare would become possible. Today, the techniques of combining live actors with computer-generated video graphics can easily create a "virtual" news conference, summit meeting, or perhaps even a battle that would exist in "effect" though not in physical fact. Stored video images can be recombined or "morphed" endlessly to produce any effect chosen. This moves well beyond traditional military deception, and now, perhaps, "pictures" will be worth a thousand tanks.
From "When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing," Washington Post, February 1, 1999:
Digital morphing — voice, video, and photo — has come of age, available for use in psychological operations. PSYOPS, as the military calls it, seek to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations to pursue national and battlefield objectives.

To some, PSYOPS is a backwater military discipline of leaflet dropping and radio propaganda. To a growing group of information war technologists, it is the nexus of fantasy and reality. Being able to manufacture convincing audio or video, they say, might be the difference in a successful military operation or coup.
Is it really that far fetched to conclude that what we "saw" on 9/11 was TV fakery?

Carl Bernstein has written about how the CIA basically controls the media, so is it really that difficult to conclude the media played a major role in facilitating the events of 9/11, especially in New York City.  

What About the Victims on 9/11?

We're constantly told that 3,000 people were murdered on 9/11.  But why are almost all victims not on the Social Security Administration's official list of deceased Americans?

A New York congresswoman who represents Manhattan wants answers to why nearly 3,000 victims of the 9/11 terrorists attacks weren’t reported in the Social Security Administration’s official list of deceased Americans.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., said her staff started making inquiries after the errors in the federal Death Master File (DMF) were detected by Scripps Howard News Service. The file is a public record intended to protect families of the deceased from identity theft and other types of fraud.

“While nearly 3,000 individuals were killed on Sept. 11th, the list does not show an increase in numbers from the typical DMF daily average,” Maloney said. “A sampling of those names did not yield any matches in the DMF and confirms their apparent absence.”

She said her staff has contacted the Social Security Administration, the New York State Department of Health and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, only to receive “conflicting answers as to why there is a lack of reporting on this matter.”
Take a look at these videos that suggest many of the victims on 9/11 may be fraudulent:

Was 9/11 Scripted?

Take a look at this video:

Was 9/11 a scripted PSYOP on the American people?  It appears that in virtually every single aspect, the official government conspiracy theory explaining the events of 9/11 is fraudulent, including the flights, passengers, hijackings, phone calls, videos, and victims.  


  1. Good work John.

    Shorter version.

  2. So, when do the News people get rounded up for their conspiracy to cover up treason and murder?

    Do you think that their family members will come to watch them hang or shot before a US military firing squad?

  3. all scripted, john.

    it's anecdotal, but the harley guy is enough proof to see what was being unfurled that day... i'm sure you noticed the matrix agents managing the intersection? 'i cannot say what capacity i am here in..." almost comical! no. absolutely comical.

    'september clues' raises issues that cannot be denied. it is a MUST watch. no planes and a centralized broadcast from all four major networks with a 17 second delay. this means the 'media' that day were more than complicit... they were active.
    who runs the media, anyway?

    the victims movement charade is most difficult to come to terms with... but is important to do so. there were incidental (and actual) casualties, to be sure, but the myth of the 3,000 is just that, a myth created from the stage managed operation. but it's fun to pretend john o'neill actually went to work that day!

    yep, 911 - a colossal false flag - top to bottom. alas, soon to be outdone...

  4. 3,000 or 6,000,000 - whats the difference? All the lies need to come out.

  5. Number One, I'm still the only person I'm aware of in this country who has stated that neither of the two airlines has ever filed loss claims over any of those "flights."

    Number Two, since nothing else about the official 9/11 conspiracy theory is true, how do we know that 3,000 people died in those towers? Maybe that's why there are so few names on the list?

  6. Hey everyone, thanks for dropping by.

    brian, it's so obvious to me this entire thing was scripted. The "matrix agent" you mentioned is so funny! When I saw that, I couldn't believe it! Totally scripted! That entire video scene! All actors or dupes involved in establishing the official 9/11 myth.

    I completely agree with you about September Clues. Their info cannot be denied in my opinion either.

    I think many of the victims were frauds, but I'm sure some people did actually die. Who though? And what about their families? BTW- did you check out that Tania Head video? WTF?! You have to be shitting me! Her story is so ridiculous!

  7. @ Anon 8:39: interesting stuff, I have heard that the airlines never filed loss claims. Makes sense - the entire thing was a fraud, a Hollywood PSYOP on the American and world public.

    I agree with your second point, which is why I never say 3000 people died like all the other 9/11 Truth people. How the hell do we know WHO died? Perpetuating the 3000 victims lends legitimacy to a major aspect of the 9/11 fraud.

  8. Please see Jim Fetzer's latest article over at Veterans Today addressing Planes/No Planes and Video Fakery:

  9. I have seen that video before. sephardic jew from politically connected family called in for special op. it's a jaw dropper for sure. reminded me in ways of the vanunu capture operation. american jewish girl turned israeli spy does the deed. the tania head operation was put into place to do what? controlled opposition? for sure. no pesky, unanswerable questions ever put to rudy and the guys. another possibility - her fraud delegitimizes the victims movement as a whole (assuming there are any real victims!) decreasing any public sympathy for the relatives plight. but more pointedly i think it shows us how the whole of the victims movement - even tania's critic from within - is one big fraud. layer after layer of peeling lies.

    like nietzsche says (paraphrased from memory)
    there is only what is apparent. the story of reality has been lyingly added

    thanks for directing us toward what is apparent, jf.


  10. A commenter at left the following comment on the Chuck Baldwin v Morgan Reynolds debate thread, and it makes a lot of sense to me: and collectively have built a very strong case that:

    1. Commercial airliners filled with hijackers and victims were NOT involved in any of the day's four major explosions.

    2. The "3,000" victim list is fraudulently populated with a very high percentage of non-existent identities and illustrated (at memorial sites) with a large number of Photoshop-faked obituary pictures.

    3. The Twin Towers were incomplete structures from the beginning, with many floors sealed off and never finished.

    4. By the time of their scheduled-and-necessary destruction, these doomed, asbestos-filled shells were even emptier than before, as most legitimate tenants had already left after the 1993 bombing, only to be replaced (in an elaborate insurance-fraud scheme) by non-existent divisions of several big-time financial-trading firms in on the scam.

    5. A large portion of the photo and video record of the Pentagon and WTC's explosions AND aftermath/cleanup has been grossly contaminated by digital alteration and outright concoction -- starting with the CGI-faked, pre-recorded crash-and-collapse NYC footage shown "live" on the ever-compliant TV networks.

    6. Some, if not all, of the "grieving/heroic 9/11 survivors" who make media appearances (and it always seems to be the same, small coterie)are actually paid actors playing scripted roles -- and that even includes some supposed "first responders," whose ranks appear to have been thinned, at least in part, of colleagues who never existed in the first place.


Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.