Saturday, February 26, 2011

Zionists in firm control

I am aware how almost impossible it is in this country to carry out a foreign policy [in the Middle East] not approved by the Jews...... terrific control the Jews have over the news media and the barrage the Jews have built up on congressmen...... I am very much concerned over the fact that the Jewish influence here is completely dominating the scene and making it almost impossible to get congress to do anything they don't approve of.  The Israeli embassy is practically dictating to the congress through influential Jewish people in the country.
                       -Former Sec. of State John Foster Dulles

I've written briefly about the Zionist-occupied U.S. government, but the video below will give readers a more detailed accounting of the control Zionist forces have over the U.S. government.  It's important to remember who is calling the shots, especially in light of the latest U.S. veto of a UN resolution condemning illegal Israeli colonization of stolen Palestinian land.

Who invented terrorism?

It's worth remembering who invented modern terrorism.  The video below sheds some light on this issue.  I'll give you a hint-- it's not the Arabs or Muslims!



Remembering Gaza

The criminal state of Israel and the Zionist leaders behind it's founding have a long history of outrageous crimes against humanity, employing deceit and skullduggery unfathomable to the average person.  They have committed murder, staged false flag terrorist attacks against innocent civilians in order to advance their agenda, and are the driving force behind the current wars against the Muslim world.

Israeli air forces attacked the USS Liberty in 1967, an assault covered up at the highest levels of the U.S. government, which killed 34 American crewmen and wounded scores more.  The Israeli Mossad and an international network of Zionists are the prime conspirators behind the false flag attack on 9/11, and are alleged to be behind other terrorist attacks in recent years. The Israeli armed forces have even attacked civilian ships carrying humanitarian supplies to the population in Gaza, killing innocent human rights activists in the process, including an American citizen.

In late December 2008, Israeli armed forces prosecuted a ruthless and murderous attack on the civilian population of Gaza, known as Operation Cast Lead.  Richard Goldstone, a South African judge of Jewish descent, was appointed by the U.N. to lead a fact finding mission into the attack, and produced a report harshly criticizing the Israeli government (and Palestinian fighters, it should be noted) for their indiscriminate and wanton killing of innocent Gazans and targeting of civilian infrastructure.  Below is a video, originally found at Timster's How Dare I blog, unabashedly showing the true devastation of this attack.

Understanding various "revolutions" and uprisings, past and present

The role of nongovernmental organizations, or NGOs, and government-funded "democracy promoting" organizations such as USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy must be factored in when analyzing the various "revolutions" and uprisings taking place around the world today, and throughout history.  Below is a short video from RT to help us understand the forces at work fomenting and manipulating the very real frustrations felt by oppressed peoples across the globe.

Is there a particular agenda being pushed?  Who is benefiting from these developments?

Originally found at aangirfan:




Thursday, February 24, 2011

Winning hearts and minds

Michael Hastings, who writes for the Rolling Stone, has uncovered yet another all-too-familiar story these days, in which U.S. Army Lt. Gen. William Caldwell ordered a team of soldiers specializing in psychological operations to target influential members of the U.S. government, including prominent members of Congress and other officials that met with him, in an effort to secure more funding and troops for the fraudulent war in Afghanistan.  As we know, the war in Afghanistan was initiated based on the false flag attack of 9/11, and has resulted in countless deaths, human rights violations, and other horrible atrocities.  Hastings' aptly titled article "Another Runaway General: Army Deploys Psy-Ops on U.S. Senators," begins this way (bold mine):
The U.S. Army illegally ordered a team of soldiers specializing in "psychological operations" to manipulate visiting American senators into providing more troops and funding for the war, Rolling Stone has learned-- and when an officer tried to stop the operation, he was railroaded by military investigators.  
The orders came from the command of Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, a three-star general in charge of training Afghan troops-- the linchpin of U.S. strategy in the war.  Over a four-month period last year, a military cell devoted to what is known as "information operations" at Camp Eggers in Kabul was repeatedly pressured to target visiting senators and other VIPs who met with Caldwell.  When the unit resisted the order, arguing that it violated U.S. laws prohibiting the use of propaganda against American citizens, it was subjected to a campaign of retaliation.  
"My job in psy-ops is to play with people's heads, to get the enemy to behave the way we want them to behave," says Lt. Colonel Michael Holmes, the leader of the IO unit, who received an official reprimand after bucking orders.  "I'm prohibited from doing that to our own people.  When you ask me to try to use these skills on senators and congressman, you're crossing a line."
Alex Pareene at Salon offers his take on this story, and the New York Times reports today that U.S. General David Petraeus will order an investigation into the matter.  


It seems rather obvious that the U.S. military would want to influence the people who provide the funding, cover, and justification to the public for their continued operations overseas, but to my knowledge the folks they are trying to manipulate using their infamous psy-ops tactics are already on board with their agenda.  Indeed, as the Times article linked above quotes one of those targeted individuals, Senator Carl Levin, as saying, "I have never needed any convincing on this point.  Quite the opposite, my efforts have been aimed at convincing others of the need for larger, more capable Afghan security forces."


So, if virtually everyone is already on board, especially those in the most influential positions, when it comes to the fraudulent, illegal, and immoral wars against the Muslim world, why the psy-ops?  Why risk being exposed for this blunder, when your agenda is virtually locked up?  Could it be because it doesn't matter if the military commanders that ordered this illegal activity are exposed, as the rule of law in the U.S. does not apply to the upper echelons of the political, economic, and military establishment? 


It appears that most members of Congress, including the recently elected "fiscally conservative" Republican Senators-- always worried about balancing the budget and reducing the deficit-- are in favor of the war policies being prosecuted, and even expanded, under the Obama administration  The seemingly never-ending war in Afghanistan will be continuing until 2014, at least, and in all likelihood even beyond that date.  


As the U.S. government continues to spend enormous amounts of money on things like this and this, and squanders even more on ridiculous things like this, causing destruction, mayhem and death on an unimaginable scale, unleashing sheer evil on innocent people around the world, I have to wonder when the madness will stop.  When will decent, honest, respectable people refuse to accept the propaganda, the lies, and distortions thrown at them by their elected officials and media?  When will the people have the courage to stand against this anti-human, anti-freedom agenda?

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

New facts (at least for me) regarding the FALSE FLAG attack on 9/11

Kevin Barrett, author, radio host and founder of Truth Jihad, has an extremely interesting and thought provoking interview with Gordon Duff, editor of Veterans Today, and Dmitri Khalezov, a former Soviet intelligence officer specializing in nuclear technology.  Suffice it to say, Khalezov's testimony will shock even the most knowledgeable 9/11 researchers out there.



The author of the blog Revelations brought to my attention a post that went up yesterday related to Khalezov's assertions and information he shared during the interview above.  Unfortunately, I still haven't had time to go through all of this information, but I do find it credible, and worth looking into.  For now, I'll let my readers take a look at the testimony put forth and draw their own conclusions.

Update: James Laffrey of The Equal Party Blog brought to my attention this article by Scott Creighton at his website, American Everyman, which refutes, challenges, and dismisses Khalezov and Duff's claims in the interview above.  Also worth considering.

Update II:  Kenny's Sideshow has a post from Monday, February 21st related to this that is worth reading as well.  

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Alex Jones, disinfo, and JFK's assasination

When I first discovered that the official story of 9/11 was a complete farce, I quickly stumbled upon the work of radio host Alex Jones, and began listening to his radio programs and frequenting his website, Infowars.com.  I was pulled into Jones, I will admit, but rather quickly discovered new information and bits of history that Jones either fails to address, or outright misleads his audience about.  I began following the work of Daryl Bradford Smith, whose website www.iamthewitness.com is a phenomenal source of information.  Smith has countless podcast interviews with various guests, posts important news articles, and has over 30 books written by authors from a diverse background, which can be downloaded and read by anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the Zionist crime network that has wrapped its greedy hands around the throat of America, and much of the world.

Jones resorts to scare tactics, fails to address the real crime network, and largely ignores the issue of Zionism altogether.  His constantly invoked "New World Order" meme is largely meaningless, as he refuses-- willingly, based on my assessment-- to accurately describe the forces behind the push for global tyranny, war, and domination of peoples, natural resources and strategic geopolitical geographies.  While Jones does in fact bring many important truths to light, he misses the bigger picture, and leaves out vital details which are necessary to understand for anyone seeking a deeper comprehension of the problems facing mankind, and the criminal cabal behind them.  Jones' tactics amount to a type of disinformation, or limited hangout, in which crucial details of important historical and current events, and the reality of the global power structure, are ignored, downplayed, or dismissed.

I am certainly no expert on the JFK assassination, however, I have read a good deal about the subject and can state without hesitation that our 35th president was indeed murdered in a sophisticated assassination operation, and that Lee Harvey Oswald was a mere patsy and not the "lone gunmen," which is constantly pounded into the heads of Americans in school, the media and (mainstream) history books.  Michael Collins Piper, whose work I have cited in the past, wrote a provocative book called Final Judgement, alleging that the prime conspirator in the JFK assassination was the Israeli Mossad.

Below is the first part in a video, originally found at Mark Glenn's The Ugly Truth website, which highlights much of what I have written here, and is worth watching.  Needless to say, for those out there seeking a true understanding of the global power structure, and an accurate analysis of important historical and current events, Alex Jones is not the person to turn to.  

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Simple, and straightforward

Originally found at Daryl Bradford Smith's site, www.iamthewitness.com:



Let's stop playing games and obfuscating here.  The true criminal network exposed itself for the world to see on 9/11.  It's not about the Democrats, Republicans, conservatives, liberals, Muslims, blacks, whites, or Arabs.  It's about the Zionist criminal network.  They've been lurking behind the scenes for years now, and they've been outed for the world to see.


Thursday, February 17, 2011

Imagine this...

Originally found at Kenny's Sideshow:



Imagine for a moment the slaves in the South back in the day (many of whom were brought to the Good ol' U.S.A. by the same group who are the prime conspirators behind the false flag attack on 9/11 and the wars in the Middle East) cheering and congratulating their owners while they receive shiny metals and accolades for keeping them in bondage.  That's the spectacle that has become mainstream America.


Chris Hedges has been writing and speaking about a subject that relates to this.  It really explains how so much criminality, lawlessness, and tyranny can manifest itself right out in the open, yet no one seems to care, or even notice.  Even worse, many people seem to enjoy it, mindlessly praising the very people who are committing all the crimes, as evidenced by the video above and in so many other instances.  

Hedges was interviewed on Anti-War Radio the other day, and had this to say:
...we used to have this debate between George Orwell's 1984 and Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and I think what we've seen is that in essence we've got both.  First we've got Huxley, a society entranced by entertainment and spectacle, captivated by technology, seduced by wasteful consumption, and, in essence, anesthetizing a population as they embrace their own oppression.  Once they were stripped, once credit dried up, once jobs dried up, once those cheap manufactured goods were no long affordable, we get Orwell.  So they're both right. 

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Good ol' U.S.A.

From Color Of Change:



In other news, Ray McGovern has been assaulted for daring to turn his back on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  A statement from Partnership for Civil Justice:
As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave her speech at George Washington University yesterday condemning governments that arrest protestors and do not allow free expression, 71-year-old Ray McGovern was grabbed from the audience in plain view of her by police and an unidentified official in plain clothes, brutalized and left bleeding in jail.  She never paused speaking.  When Secretary Clinton began her speech, Mr. McGovern remained standing silently in the audience and turned his back.  Mr. McGovern, a veteran Army officer who also worked as a C.I.A. analyst for 27 years, was wearing a Veterans for Peace t-shirt.  
Blind-sided by security officers who pounced upon him, Mr. McGovern remarked, as he was hauled out the door, "So this is America?"  Mr. McGovern is covered with bruises, lacerations and contusion inflicted in the assault.  
Mr. McGovern is being represented by the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF).  "It is the ultimate definition of lip service that Secretary of State Clinton would be trumpeting the U.S. government's supposed concerns for free speech rights and this man would be simultaneously brutalized and arrested for engaging in a peaceful act of dissent at her speech," state attorney Mara Verheyden-Hilliard of the PCJF.
Mr. McGovern now works for Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in the Adams Morgan neighborhood of Washington, D.C.

Middle East agenda

It appears as if there are deeper forces at work in the "Revolutions" taking place in the Muslim world.  False flag attacks have been instigated at the behest of the CIA-Mossad-MI6 axis in numerous Muslim countries in recent months.  The New York Times has suggested that the Stuxnet computer worm, used to attack Iran's nuclear power reactors, was the work of the Israelis and Americans.
The Dimona complex in the Negev desert is famous as the heavily guarded heart of Israel's never-acknowledged nuclear arms program, where neat rows of factories make atomic fuel for the arsenal.  
Over the past two years, according to intelligence and military experts familiar with its operations, Dimona has taken on a new, equally secret role-- as a critical testing ground in a joint American and Israeli effort to undermine Iran's efforts to make a bomb of its own.  
....
Though American and Israeli officials refuse to talk publicly about what goes on at Dimona, the operations there, as well as related efforts in the United States, are among the newest and strongest clues suggesting that the virus was designed as an American-Israeli project to sabotage the Iranian program.
There have been reports of American and Israeli involvement in the attempted assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists.

aangirfan: CIA Plots in Egpyt

aangirfan: CIA & Al Qaeda's Plans for Egypt

With the upheaval taking place in countries across the Muslim world, often instigated and manipulated by outside forces, including the CIA and Mossad, what can we expect in coming weeks?  The Zionist owned American mainstream media has already cemented in the heads of millions of their viewers that these upheavals could lead to the rise of fundamental Islamic regimes that would threaten poor Israel and her prized colony, America.  You can bet that the Zionist forces will work overtime to ensure their puppets return to power in Egypt, Tunisia, and any other Muslim country.  Let's hope the people of the Muslim world prevail.

Jeff Gates, who writes at Criminal State, had this to say in his January 25th article titled "Israel Strikes Back":
Americans do not yet grasp that we have long been the target of capital crimes.  Zionist know that our continued ignorance is the key to their continued impunity.  With knowledge comes the power to prosecute those complicit.  Therein lies the challenge.  
Aware of the future that awaits them, Zionist are becoming desperate and even more dangerous.  An escalation of violence is assured until the full force of international law is turned on those who have long flaunted the law in pursuit of their extremist agenda. 
Our continued ignorance and indifference to these criminals allows this unprecedented crime spree to continue.  

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Quick question for Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald is a great writer, media critic, and civil liberties advocate.  He makes many good points, including this one the other day, in regards to objective journalism and the lack thereof in America today:
"Objectivity" does not require refraining from pointing out the falsity of government claims.  The opposite is true; objectivity requires that a journalist do exactly that: treat factually false statements as false.  "Objectivity" is breached not when a journalist calls a lie a "lie," but when they refuse to do so, when they treat lies told by powerful political officials as though they're viable, reasonable interpretations of subjective questions.  The very idea that a journalist is engaged in "opinion-making" or is "taking sides" by calling a lie a "lie" is ludicrous; the only "side" a journalist is taking is with facts, with the truth.  It's when a journalist fails to identity a false statement as such that they are "taking sides"-- they're siding with those in power by deceitfully depicting their demonstrably false statements as something other than lies.
Well said.  Could not agree more.


Glenn also wrote this in regards to Part I of the series of articles titled "Top Secret America" Dana Priest and William Arkin wrote for the Washington Post:
Virtually every fact Priest and Arkin disclose underscores this point.  Here is their first sentence: "The top-secret world the government created in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, has become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how many programs exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work."  This all "amounts to an alternative geography of the United States, a Top Secret America hidden from public view and lacking in thorough oversight."  We chirp endlessly about the Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, the Democrats and Republicans, but this is the Real U.S. Government: funtioning in total darkness, beyond elections and parties, so secret, vast and powerful that it evades the control or knowledge of any one person or even any organization. 
If Greenwald really was the type of "Objective" journalist that he writes so eloquently about, why would he let the demonstrably false narrative of the 9/11 attacks put forth by Priest and Arkin-- "...in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001,[...]"-- go unchallenged?  Why would he let his readers assume-- falsely-- that the official story of 9/11 put forth by the U.S. government, amplified by Priest and Arkin without the slightest bit of skepticism or real reporting, and assumed to be factually accurate by Greenwald, is the truth?  Why wouldn't he point out the numerous flaws, inconsistencies, omissions, and outright fabrications in the official 9/11 conspiracy theory?  If he was truly an "Objective" journalist, he most certainly would.


If we are ever going to expose, bring to justice, and eliminate the crime network that has wrapped it's tentacles around the throat of the U.S. government, we have to know the truth.  And we need our best writers, journalists and thinkers to expose the truth.  About everything.


Some are doing a good job of that.  When it comes to the most important event in modern history, that was schemed and implemented by the very forces that are committing the crimes people like Greenwald expose on a daily basis, he is uncharacteristically silent.  Not only silent, but complicit in the evils that event has unleashed.  Greenwald admitted this himself in the first article I cited:
It's when a journalist fails to identity a false statement as such that they are "taking sides"-- they're siding with those in power by deceitfully depicting their demonstrably false statements as something other than lies.
So, which side are you on Glenn?   

What's a "Fusion Center?"

Sunday, February 13, 2011

A few quick points

I was listening to Mark Glenn's January 19th interview with Jonathan Azaziah, writer of Mask of Zion, the other day, and this remark by Azaziah pretty much sums it all up:
There is no other issue, no other issue, in the world, other than international Zionism.  Every problem in the world, from banking to war to the genetic modification of the food, to the fraudulent medical industry, to the destruction of religion to the destruction of the family, drugs, and arms, all the way around, it all connects to Zionism.  So my personal opinion is, if you're not taking the time to expose Zionism and the Talmudic Jewish criminals at the very top tear of it, that are controlling it, uh, then you are doing something very wrong or you're missing the big part of the picture or, even worse, you could be collusive or you could be a gatekeeper.  
International Zionism is not just the major force and influence in international relations, but also in American domestic politics.  It is the issue, the driving force in the global power structure.  History and current events have proven this fact, yet no one wants to talk about it.

What is International Zionism?  A network of individuals, corporations and other interested groups tied to the racist, imperialist agenda of the state of Israel, hell bent on controlling the Middle East and it's natural resources, pursuing a genocidal policy against much of the Muslim world.  The network originated in Europe, spread to America, and soon had it's tentacles throughout the world, controlling vital industries, major financial institutions, governments and media outlets.  They have largely written history to their own likening, regardless of facts, and either pretend people don't notice or put them in jail when they do.

These are the folks setting the agenda through their media, think tanks, and policy organizations.  These are the people raising the money, funding their puppets in government.  They are the ones conniving behind the scenes, stealing secrets and getting the dirt on their enemies and pawns in positions of power that actually have to face the public.  It's not the Democrats, it's not the Republicans, although they (and most of the federal government) are complicit, if not outright assets and participants in this crime network.

Let's stop being so politically correct about things, and call a spade a spade.  For those of you still stuck on the whole Jewish thing, I have this to say-- not all Jews are Zionists, and, alternatively, not all Zionists are Jews.  It's not a Jewish thing.  It's a criminal thing.  Let's not get hung up on semantics here.

Azaziah is interviewed again today on Glenn's podcast program, and it is well worth a listen to.

**********************************************************************************

Glenn Greenwald's latest article details a particularly interesting, and revealing, set of circumstances he finds himself in.  Apparently, their is, or at least was, an active campaign to attack Wikileaks and it's supporters, including Greenwald, which was concocted by a computer security firm at the behest of Bank of America through it's outside law firm.  I'd really encourage all to read his piece, but it really highlights a subject I wrote briefly about on Thursday.  Greenwald writes:
But the real issue highlighted by this episode is just how lawless and unrestrained is the unified axis of government and corporate power.  I've written many times about this issue-- the full-scale merger between public and private spheres-- because it's easily one of the most critical yet under-discussed political topics.  Especially (though by no means only) in the worlds of the Surveillance and National Security State, the powers of the state have become largely privatized.  There is very little separation between government power and corporate power.  Those who wield the latter intrinsically wield the former.  The revolving door between the highest levels of government and corporate offices rotates so fast and continuously that is has basically flown off its track and no longer provides even the minimal barrier it once did.  It's not merely that corporate power is unrestrained; it's worse than that: corporations actively exploit the power of the state to further entrench and enhance their power.  
He continues:
The exemption from the rule of law has been fully transferred from the highest level political elites to their counterparts in the private sector.  "Law" is something used to restrain ordinary Americans and especially those who oppose this consortium of government and corporate power, but it manifestly does not apply to restrain these elites.  
Some refer to this as the Revolving Door phenomenon of politics, in which individuals coming from the private sector use their connections to influence government policy in their favor, and vice verse.  I'd refer to it as fascism, in which private networks own and control the government and the organs of the state.

Private interests and corporations parasitically direct and manipulate the federal government, siphoning billions of hard-earned tax-payer dollars into the murderous, criminal military-industrial-surveillance state complex, justified by a clearly false narrative surrounding the events of 9/11 and the demonization of the Muslim world.  We are witnessing complete immunity from the law for the elites of the world-- in the public and private sector-- while the entire weight of the criminal justice system is thrown at the rest of us, often times for crimes in which there isn't even a victim.  You know you're living in a Banana Republic when other countries have to enforce the rule of law (or at least threaten to) for you.

**********************************************************************************

Just when I thought that our political discourse could not get any more absurd, Gabriel Herman, writing in the Israeli daily Ha'aretz yesterday, reminds me, yet again, of how ridiculous it all is:
"Morality isn't everything"
In considering candidates for supreme commander, it is necessary above all to look at their ability to win wars, and only then at their personal morality.   
That's the type of mindset the elites of this world have.  That's how they get away with it; the entire enterprise is run by pure debauchery, people that have no personal morality or dignity (see here and here for two small examples of the type of people we're dealing with), who could give a shit less about the decent people of this world.  Only murderous psychopaths could think in these terms.

And then there's this:
Osama bin Laden carried out one of the most surprising, daring and destructive attacks of our times.  He reached the top of Al-Qaida thanks to his religious fanaticism, which in this context means disregarding the usual constraints of morality, with the ends justifying the means.  For nearly a decade he has been evading captors while teasing and tricking generals who learned their craft at the best military academies in the United States and Europe and who command the world's most advanced armies.  
Wow.  They literally tell you the exact opposite of the truth.

Does this man think we are that naive?  That we believe bin Laden has been "teasing and tricking generals" for the past 10 years.  It's truly pathetic people fall for this type of garbage.

**********************************************************************************

I've been watching the events in Egypt closely the past few days, and if you were to take one look at the mainstream news, you'd think some dramatic revolution has taken place.  I don't mean to belittle the events that have unfolded, or downplay the truly amazing work and commitment the Egyptian people showed in their efforts to remove the long time dictator Hosni Mubarak from power.  Jeez, I wish my fellow countrymen and women would show 1/10 of the passion-- for any political cause-- that many Egyptians demonstrated during the struggle to remove Mubarak.  But let's be serious about this situation in Egypt for a moment.....

I'm no expert on Egyptian politics, but have been following the excellent work aangirfan has been doing covering the Egyptian uprising, and the forces behind the scenes.

First off, this entire Egyptian "revolution" appears to be directed and instigated, at least partially, by the U.S.  From The Telegraph January 28, 2011:
The American Embassy in Cairo helped a young dissident attend a US-sponsored summit for activists in New York, while working to keep his identity secret from Egyptian state police.  
On his return to Cairo in December 2008, the activist told US diplomats that an alliance of opposition groups had drawn up a plan to overthrow President Hosni Mubarak and install a democratic government in 2011.  
Hmmm.......interesting considering what Obama officials are telling Congress and the American people.

Secondly, I'd encourage all to take a close look at who the Obama administration and much of the Zionist-occupied Western world has been promoting to replace Mubarak: CIA-Mossad go-to-guy Omar Suleiman.  Please read The New Yorker's Jane Mayer's piece here, and Lisa Hajjar's piece at Al Jazeera here, for starters.

Finally, it's definitely not good when you've got individuals accused of things like this in the Egyptian regime.

aagirfan: Egyptian Psy Op

aangirfan: Another CIA Coup in Egypt?

aangirfan: Egyptians Working for the CIA-Mossad-NATO?

aangirfan: CIA and Muslim Brotherhood Versus Mubarak

There is a power struggle going on inside Egypt.  Let's hope the forces of peace, dignity and justice prevail, and the criminals and outside agitators and controllers come up empty handed.

**********************************************************************************

It's always nice hearing well spoken people explain things so thoroughly, so matter-of-factly.  Because these are the facts, and we can't ignore them.  Adrian Salbuchi is definitely one of those people.  Originally found at Daryl Bradford Smith's website, www.iamthewitness.com:



You hear a lot of people talk about "The New World Order" in these political circles that I find myself in, and I believe that term is useful to a certain extent.  Aldous Huxley, of Brave New World fame, explained perfectly in 1962 what "The New World Order" would look like:
There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears so to speak.  Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods.
That's, in a nutshell, what "The New World Order" is.  People passively submitting, not even questioning, the lies and criminality spewing out from our government and the Zionist network in control of it. 

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Gulf news

From www.bpoilslick.blogspot.com:




Funny how you don't hear about the oil spill anymore.

See Deborah Dupre's latest article at the Examiner for more.  

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Those brutal, corrupt, evil Egyptians

Two recent articles in the New York Times really underscore what is so wrong with the media in this country.  The first article I'd like to highlight details two journalists' encounter with the Egyptian secret police, the Mukhabarat.  The article begins:
We had been detained by Egyptian authorities, handed over to the country's dreaded Mukhabarat, the secret police, and interrogated.  They left us all night in a cold room, on hard orange plastic stools, under fluorescent lights.  
But our discomfort paled in comparison to the dull whacks and the screams of pain by the Egyptian people that broke the stillness of the night.  In one instance, between the cries of suffering, an officer said in Arabic, "You are talking to journalists?  You are talking badly about your country?"
The article continues:
Captivity was terrible.  We felt powerless-- uncertain about where and how long we would be held.  But the worst part had nothing to do with out treatment.  It was seeing-- and in particular hearing through the walls of this dreadful facility-- the abuse of Egyptians at the hands of their own government.  
For one day, we were trapped in the brutal maze where Egyptians are lost for months or even years.  Out detainment threw into haunting relief the abuses of security services, the police, the secret police and the intelligence service, and explained why they were at the forefront of complaints made by the protesters.  
Many journalists shared this experience, and many were kept in worse conditions-- some suffering from injuries as well.   
Sound familiar?
The CIA's secret interrogation program amounted to torture for some of the 14 "high-value detainees" held by the agency, according to published excerpts of an internal 2006 report by the International Committee of the Red Cross.   
Nowhere in this article is the reader informed that not only is the United States (among other governments and international institutions) intimately involved with the Egyptian security establishment, funneling billions of dollars of "foreign aid" for economic development clandestine operations per year to the Egyptian regime (virtually all of which goes to the military), but also engages in the exact same tactics-- and arguably worse-- described so painfully here in the Times article.



Don't hold your breath waiting for the Times to accurately describe what the US government and governments and institutions working on it's behalf have been engaging in, all in the name of fighting the fraudulent "Global War on Terror."

The second article I'd like to mention coming from the Times deals with the extravagant corruption emanating from and infesting the Egyptian government under Mubarak.  We read:
Hosni Mubarak's Egypt has long functioned as a state where wealth bought political power and political power bought great wealth.  While hard facts are difficult to come by, Egyptians watching the rise of a moneyed class widely believe that self-dealing, crony capitalism and corruption are endemic, represented in the public eye by a group of rich businessmen aligned with Gamal Mubarak, the president's son, as well as key government ministers and governing party members.
"The people around Gamal became the wealthiest group in the country," said Hala Mustafa, a political scientist who quit the ruling party years ago, saying it was not committed to political reform.  "They monopolized everything." 
Glenn Greenwald, as usual, was quick to point out just about everything wrong with this type of misleading journalism, and how it reflects typical coverage by the mainstream media which demonizes Evil, Corrupt regimes in other countries, while failing to apply those same standards to the U.S. government and political system.  The Times portrayal of Egypt, and other so-called developing countries, as unique in the fact that their political systems have been captured and manipulated by private economic interests is patently absurd and demonstrably false.  Western countries, and in particular, the United States, are subject to this same anti-democratic, tyrannical phenomenon.

This remains one of the central tenets of American political mythology: that somehow we are different, better, and superior to others because of our "free markets" and "representative democracy."  The idea that our political-economic arrangement is structured under the auspices of a free market, unfettered by interference from the state or political actors (or at least limited), operating smoothly and efficiently, benefitting and uplifting all who abide by the rules is pure fantasy.  The fact is, we've never had a free market system.  It's inevitable in any ordering of society that powerful political factions will come to dominate the apparatus of the state, and use that state power to enhance their profits and influence in the private sector and over society.  It's no different in Egypt than in the United States.  The only thing that's different is the propaganda and how it's presented to the public.

Simon Johnson has documented quite well how similar the United States is to so-called developing countries, especially in light of the economic collapse of recent years.  His article, "The Quite Coup," featured in the May 2009 issue of The Atlantic magazine, offers an important insight into the nature of the U.S. economy in light of the economic collapse which began in earnest in late 2008:
In its depth and suddenness, the U.S. economic and financial crisis is shockingly reminiscent of moments we have recently seen in emerging markets (and only in emerging markets): South Korea (1997), Malaysia (1998), Russia and Argentina (time and again).  In each of those cases, global investors, afraid that the country or its financial sector wouldn't be able to pay off mountainous debt, suddenly stopped lending.  And in each case, that fear became self-fulfilling, as banks that couldn't roll over their debt did, in fact, become unable to pay.  This is precisely what drove Lehman Brothers into bankruptcy on September 15, causing all sources of funding to the U.S. financial sector to dry up overnight.  Just as in emerging-market crises, the weakness in the banking system has quickly rippled out into the rest of the economy, causing a severe economic contraction and hardship for millions of people.  But there's a deeper and more disturbing similarity: elite business interests-- financiers, in the case of the U.S.-- played a central role in creating the crisis, making ever-larger gambles, with the implicit backing of the government, until the inevitable collapse.  More alarming, they are now using their influence to prevent precisely the sorts of reforms that are needed, and fast, to pull the economy out of its nosedive.  The government seems helpless, or unwilling, to act against them.  
It's no stretch to say that the U.S. government, similar to "emerging market" nations as Johnson calls them, is literally owned by the large financial institutions on Wall Street and Federal Reserve System.  And who owns and controls those banks, usuriously lending money to our (and others) government, engaging in fraud and criminality on an unimaginable scale, and which, in essence, controls and directs the actions (or inactions) of the state?  Take a look at what Eustace Mullins has written if you want to delve into that subject.

Just don't expect the Times to fill you in on the details.  

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Who wears the pants in this relationship?

Bernard Avishai has an article out in the recent New York Times Magazine entitled "A Plan for Peace That Still Could Be," which details the so-called "peace" proposals former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas made in 2008, which are (supposedly) still viable despite all the recent upheaval in the Middle East.  Avishai writes:
A viable plan exists: it is waiting to be forged from the far-reaching proposals that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority made to each other in 2008.  
Ali Abunimah has compiled some of the more relevant information regarding the so-called "Palestinian Papers," which were first leaked by Al Jazeera, and detail the meetings and negotiations between Abbas and Olmert.   Needless to say, the Palestinian Authority has not been portrayed in a positive light, and is rather weak and impotent in the face of Israeli and American pressure.  And then we have this rather revealing passage from Avishai's article in the Times Magazine:
In his pivotal Bar Ilan University speech of June 14, 2009, Olmert's successor, Benjamin Netanyahu, finally promised to work toward a Palestinian state and made much of his demand that Palestine be demilitarized.  But he must have know he was pushing on an open door: Olmert and Abbas had already come up with a series of principals that would leave Palestine demilitarized ("I agreed to the term 'nonmilitarized,'" Olmert told me) while preserving its sovereignty.   
Olmert's security principles were the following: Palestine would have a strong police force, "everything needed for law enforcement."  It would have no army or air force.  The Palestinian border with Jordan, through which missiles and heave armaments might be smuggled, would be patrolled by international forces, probably from NATO.  There would be a procedural guarantee that no foreign army would be able to enter Palestine, and its government would not be permitted to enter into any military agreement with a country that does not recognize Israel.  Israel, for its part, would have the right to defend itself beyond the borders of a Palestinian state-- say, against land forces massing on the eastern side of the Jordan River.  Israel expected to reserve the right to pursue terrorists across the new borders.  Israel would be allowed access to airspace over Palestine, and the Israel Defense Forces would have rights to disproportionate use of telecommunications spectrum (though commercial rights would be equalized under international law).  When I spoke with Abbas in Amman, I did not have to refresh his memory about these overarching principles.  "We don't need a Palestinian army," he said emphatically.  "We don't want an air force or tanks or rockets."  He insisted that the whole matter had been worked out with Gen. James Jones, who eventually became Obama's national security adviser.  Abbas confirmed that Israel could indeed negotiate permits regarding Palestinian airspace. 
So, to summarize the "far-reaching proposals" Olmert and Abbas made, the new "free" and "independent" Palestinian state would be completely demilitarized and have no army or air force.  The Palestinian state would not be allowed to secure it's own borders, leaving that job to international forces, "probably from NATO."  No foreign army could enter Palestine (except the Israeli army, duh!), and the Palestinian state could not enter into any military agreement with a country who refuses to recognize Israel (i.e., conduct it's foreign affairs and diplomacy as it saw fit).

Israel, of course, has the right to defend itself beyond the recognized borders of the Palestinian state (i.e., invade Palestine when it sees fit) and control the air space above Palestine.  (No need for the Palestinians to have access to their air space, they have no air force!)    To really rub it in, the IDF would have "rights to disproportionate use of telecommunications spectrum" in Palestine.  Some independent state, huh?

The threat that Israel and the Zionist network that sits atop of the global power structure poses to world peace and the free peoples of this planet cannot be underestimated.  These people have proven themselves to be ruthless murders, unwilling to compromise any aspect of their agenda, and it behooves all free thinking and freedom loving people across the planet to stand against this criminal cabal.  As I watch the Zionists continue to expand their colonies on stolen land, destroying historic landmarks and residences, my heart goes out to the Palestinian people.

May God bless them.  Long live Palestine!  

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Bread and Circuses

In order that the masses don't figure out what they are really doing we will further distract them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions, luxury homes.... Via the media, we shall soon begin to propose competitions in art, and in sport of all kinds: these interests will finally distract their minds from asking questions which we would definitely not want to answer.  
                                             -The Protocols of Zion  
                                                       From Protocol #13- Distractions

The term "Bread and Circuses," or maybe more appropriately called "Entertainment and Circuses" in this day and age, is an age old metaphor for superficial means of mass appeasement and a way for the powers that be to manufacture public approval.  The ultimate example was on display earlier this evening in Dallas at the Super Bowl halftime performance.




Watching the Black Eyed Peas perform a brief rendition of their hit "Where Is the Love?" while the United States government, and other murderous regimes around the world which it supports, continue to prosecute a fraudulent war against a faceless enemy based on the false flag attack of 9/11 is simply astonishing.  The crime and murder spree unleashed since 9/11 is arguably unprecedented in history, and most seem too distracted by the "Bread and Circuses" being offered up by the political establishment to notice, let alone care.  

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Understanding the Zionist-led criminal cabal

I was considering writing a piece that focused on the Royal Court and the Emperor's annual pronouncement, mindlessly analyzed and dissected by a sycophantic media establishment that refuses to address anything of substance, but I'll try tackling a more complex subject matter.  After all, listening to Obama talk about "economic recovery" by pointing to rising corporate profits and an upswing in the stock market, while millions remain unemployed, economic indicators continue to look bleak, and the international Jewish-led banking elite centered around the Federal Reserve system and other international financial institutions rape and pillage the general public, right in front of our faces, and get away with it is enough to make one sick from all the spin.  Kenny's Sideshow summed it up pretty well anyways.  And, as we know, anyone who fails to pass the 9/11 litmus test, as Obama once again demonstrated, is a treasonous criminal (i.e., the entire political and media establishment).

After recently reading Michael Collins Piper's 2004 aptly titled book The High Priests of War, published by American Free Press, which deals with the history of the neoconservative movement and it's rise to power during the George W. Bush administration, I'd like to offer my analysis of the Zionist-led criminal cabal that sits atop of the global power elite network.  I've found Piper to be a refreshing voice willing to address so-called taboo subjects-- Zionism and Jewish power-- other great writers and websites fail to grasp or address in any meaningful way.  The High Priests of War is a well documented, easily readable analysis of the neoconservative network that has infiltrated and manipulated-- quite successfully-- the U.S. government and media in order to promote their Zionist, Israel-first agenda. The book focuses largely on those responsible for leading the U.S. to illegally launch a brutal war of aggression on the sovereign state of Iraq, highlighting the history of the behind-the-scenes players whose loyalties could hardly be considered to be in the interests of the American public.  For anyone seeking a greater understanding of the situation we find ourselves in today, and how we got here, I'd advise starting with this short but sweet book.

In the Preface, Piper makes clear the existential threat posed by the neoconservatives and their operatives occupying key positions in the foreign policy-making establishment, Congress, White House, and military:
We must abandon the archaic rhetoric of the past and focus on the real threat to America-- and to the sovereignty of all nations and peoples: the power-mad imperial forces that are bent on using American resources and military might to enforce a global police state under the control of a select few: the international elite and their bought-and-paid-for politicians, unprincipled bureaucrats, and the media shrills who glorify and attempt to popularize the agenda of the would-be rulers of a Global Plantation that its proponents have stylized as the New World Order.  
He goes on to identify and explain the neoconservative network, centered around (but clearly not limited to) Richard Perle and William Kristol,  and its' rise to power in the Bush administration.  Piper details Perle's treacherous past, including his espionage activities on the behalf of Israel in the 1970s while working for former Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson, and his rise to power in the George W. Bush administration where he sat on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board.  Kristol's past is also critically examined, as Piper documents his role in the neoconservative movement through his associations with various think tanks, lobbying organizations, and media outlets.  Piper cites numerous sources, many of them the work of the very neoconservative criminal cabal he is describing, from a variety of viewpoints, including prominent Jewish newspapers and policy groups, in documenting the history and machinations of the neoconservative network and its' agenda.  The picture left with the reader is that a criminal cabal-- the neoconservative network-- whose primary interest lay with the Zionist agenda and promoting the well-being of the state of Israel by waging imperial wars of aggression using the blood, manpower, and purse of the American public, has firmly ensconced itself in the power structure of the U. S. government, to the detriment of the free people of the world.  President John F. Kennedy's April 27, 1961 speech at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York rings true today.  A brief excerpt:
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence-- on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerillas by night instead of armies by day.  It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. 
I'll let the reader ponder these statements and decide if there is any relevance in light of developments in recent years.  Either way, Piper's work is a step in the right direction in understanding how a tightly knit group, whose loyalties and agenda are first and foremost to the Zionist cause, consisting of influential and powerful individuals embedded throughout the power structure of America-- including the media establishment, think tanks, lobbying and policy organizations, virtually all federal agencies, Congress, and the military-- has largely taken control of the policy-making apparatus of the U.S. government.

In order to better understand the level of foreign espionage, manipulation, and outright occupation of the U.S. government, carried out primarily by the state of Israel, which has compromised virtually every federal agency, including the highest levels of the military, I'd recommend listening to this podcast interview, where Sibel Edmonds and Peter B. Collins interview John Cole and discuss his long career in the FBI as a Counterintelligence and Counterespionage Operations Manager (WARNING: these folks will not give you the full story, but do provide valuable information related to the subject matter being discussed here).  Cole makes clear not only the extreme politicization of the FBI, but also it's outright infiltration and manipulation by foreign powers, most prominently Israel.  This should come as no surprise to anyone, considering the long history of Israeli espionage committed by American Jews, including the notorious Jonathan Pollard case, perhaps the most damaging espionage operation conducted by our supposed "ally" in the history of the U.S.  Even more revealing is Israel's latest call for Pollard's release from prison, and the pressure being put on the Obama administration to do just that.

Also consider the recent controversy and outrage generated by Senator Rand Paul, who made the blasphemous suggestion that the United States government cut it's annual $3 billion plus welfare to Israel, not because it is a fraudulent state based on lies, criminality, and ethnic cleansing, but because the U.S. simply cannot afford it.  Senator Paul even parrots the typical line anyone in power in the U.S. government would ("I have a lot of sympathy and respect for Israel as a democratic nation, as, you know, a fountain of peace and a fountain of democracy within the Middle East."), but because he dared to call for eliminating U.S. aid to Israel, he was immediately savaged, putting his future political and leadership prospects in jeopardy for openly questioning the "decades-long bipartisan consensus on U.S. support for Israel."  Senator Paul is not the first person to feel the wrath of the Zionist network for daring to question the Jewish agenda.

Americans are subjected to a constant barrage of propaganda, distortions and outright fabrications of history and core principals of American justice and ideals, which are propagated and perpetuated by a media establishment that happens to be in the hands of the very criminal cabal sitting atop the global elite power structure (see here for a Jewish writer bragging about this widely known yet never mentioned fact; "But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street, or the government.  I just care that we get to keep running them.").  While I cannot excuse the general ignorance of the American public, I can at least understand it, which is why it is so imperative to speak out on these issues.  The Orwellian political discourse that has developed as a result of certain fabrications and distortions of history is free humanity's greatest enemy.  Not speaking frankly and truthfully, or choosing to ignore or downplay certain issues (read: Zionism and Jewish power) is the greatest asset of this New World Order.  Their control of information and spin on events-- both current and historic-- that has mentally inoculated the public from the truth is what we are fighting here.  They've already done a masterful job constructing and fabricating history to suit their interests and long term objectives (incredibly, an entire industry has emerged out of one particular fabricated and manufactured historical event, the Holocaust, which thrives to this very day).  They want us trapped-- psychologically enslaved-- in their bubble of political correctness, bipartisanship, and "pragmatism."

I, for one, have had enough.