Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Flight 77 did NOT hit the Pentagon

The official government and media conspiracy theory says that American Airlines Flight 77 was hijacked by 5 fanatical Islamic terrorists on 9/11, and flown into the Pentagon, killing all 64 people on board along with 125 people in the Pentagon.  From Wikipedia:
American Airlines Flight 77 was American Airlines' morning, daily scheduled transcontinental flight, from Washington Dulles International Airport, in Dulles, Virginia to Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, California. On September 11, 2001, the aircraft flying this route—a Boeing 757-223—was hijacked by five al-Qaeda terrorists and deliberately crashed into the Pentagon, as part of the September 11 attacks. 
Less than 35 minutes into the flight, the hijackers stormed the cockpit and forced the passengers to the rear of the aircraft. Hani Hanjour, one of the hijackers who was trained as a pilot, assumed control of the flight. Unknown to the hijackers, passengers aboard were able to make telephone calls to loved ones and relay information on the hijacking. 
The aircraft crashed into the western side of the Pentagon at 09:37 EDT. All 64 people on board the aircraft, including the hijackers, were killed, as were 125 people in the building. Dozens of people witnessed the crash and news sources began reporting on the incident within minutes. The impact severely damaged an area of the Pentagon and ignited a large fire. A portion of the Pentagon collapsed; firefighters spent days trying to fully extinguish the blaze. The damaged sections of the Pentagon were rebuilt in 2002, with occupants moving back into the completed areas on August 15, 2002. 
The 184 victims of the attack are memorialized in the Pentagon Memorial adjacent to the Pentagon. The 1.93-acre (7,800 m2) park contains a bench for each of the victims, arranged according to their year of birth, ranging from 1930 (aged 71) to 1998 (aged 3).
Upon further investigation, there is no evidence to support any of these claims.  For starters, let's have a listen to what CNN Pentagon correspondent Jamie McIntyre had to say about what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11:

From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.

The only site, is the actual side of the building that's crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.

Even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately. It wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.
After the U.S. Justice Department released the rather pathetic photos supposedly showing Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, Jamie McIntrye had a change of heart:

McIntrye's rather Orwellian about face should not surprise anyone.  9/11 was a hectic day, and not everyone had their script in front of them, including McIntyre.  After all, it's been common knowledge for years now that the CIA has completely infiltrated the major corporate-owned media in this country, and that Pentagon psychological warfare specialists have conducted major operations via the corporate-owned media, including operations directed at the American public.  Former CIA director William Colby has been quoted as saying, "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media."

Below, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now, a major leftist limited hangout/disinformation outlet which refuses to address the overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence proving 9/11 was an inside job, interviews Col. Sam Gardiner and Peter Hart, who have exposed the Pentagon's successful propaganda efforts in recent years using the major media of this country.  Criminal elements of the media clearly were and remain involved in the 9/11 deception and cover up.

In Enver Masud's "Pentagon Transcripts, Official Records Belie 'The 9/11 Commission Report'," we learn:
I live less than a mile from the Pentagon, and began examining this issue in early 2002. The first question I asked when I looked at the Pentagon shortly after that tragic day in 2001 was, “where’s the plane?”

I began to suspect the official account of 9/11 when I learned that the U.S. war on Afghanistan was apparently planned prior to September 11, and possibly after U.S. negotiations with the Taliban for a pipeline broke down.

According to the BBC (September 18, 2001), Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October. [...]

Writing in “9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out,” Kwiatowski noted, “a strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense, who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a ‘missile’.”

Pentagon employee April Gallop, whose “desk was roughly 40 feet from the point where the plane allegedly hit the outside wall” stated in a sworn complaint (before the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York): “As she sat down to work there was an explosion, then another; walls collapsed and the ceiling fell in. Hit in the head, she was able to grab the baby and make her way towards the daylight showing through a blasted opening in the outside wall. There was no airplane wreckage and no burning airplane fuel anywhere; only rubble and dust.”

Barbara Honegger, military affairs journalist, reported in her personal capacity that a pilot sent by Gen Larry Arnold (NORAD) “reported back that there was no evidence that a plane had hit the building.” She added, “Multiple standard-issue, battery-operated wall clocks . . . stopped between 9:31 and 9:32-1/2 on September 11.” [...]
Masud emphasizes the importance of the September 12th and September 15th, 2001 Pentagon news briefings, and what they revealed:
At the September 12, 2001, Dept. of Defense (DoD) News Briefing by Assistant Secretary of Defense, Victoria Clarke, Ed Plaugher (fire chief of Arlington County), and others, “American Airlines”, “Flight 77″, “Boeing 757″ were not even mentioned.

How significant is this?

With the world’s news media assembled at the Pentagon on the day after the alleged attack on the Pentagon by Arab hijackers flying American Airlines Flight 77 — a Boeing 757 — “American Airlines”, “Flight 77″, “Boeing 757″ were not considered important enough to mention at the Pentagon News Briefing the day after the alleged attack!

Fire chief Ed Plaugher was asked by a reporter, “Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?” Plaugher responded, “there are some small pieces of aircraft … there’s no fuselage sections and that sort of thing.”

When asked, “Chief, there are small pieces of the plane virtually all over, out over the highway, tiny pieces. Would you say the plane exploded, virtually exploded on impact due to the fuel”, Plaugher responded “You know, I’d rather not comment on that.” [...]

At the September 15, 2001, Dept. of Defense (DoD) News Briefing by Mr. Lee Evey, Pentagon Renovation Manager, Rear Adm. Craig R. Quigley, deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, and others, it was apparent that there were lingering doubts about what had struck the Pentagon on September 11.

When Mr. Evey said, “the nose of the aircraft broke through this innermost wall of C Ring”, a reporter asked, “One thing that’s confusing — if it came in the way you described, at an angle, why then are not the wings outside? I mean, the wings would have shorn off. The tail would have shorn off. And yet there’s apparently no evidence of the aircraft outside the E Ring.” Evey replied, “Actually, there’s considerable evidence of the aircraft outside the E Ring. It’s just not very visible.”

Apparently, no one asked how “the nose of the aircraft” (a relatively weak component of the aircraft) remained sufficiently intact to penetrate the C Ring — the E Ring is the outermost ring.
Dr. James Fetzer has explained in detail the fact that a Boeing 757, even piloted by an experienced and well-trained pilot (which was not the case with Hani Hanjour, the alleged Arab hijacker that flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon), could not possibly perform the feats described by the official government conspiracy theory:
The probability that a real Boeing 757 could have hit the Pentagon and not left debris from its wings and tail or even its engines-not to mention bodies, seats, and luggage-is zero. The probability that the alleged trajectory could have been flown in violation of the laws of aerodynamics is even less than zero-since violations of these laws is not physically possible. The probability that the trajectory, if it were possible, could have left a smooth, green, unblemished lawn is zero. The probability that debris would have been planted or that smoke would have been simulated, had this event involved the crash of a real Boeing 757, is likewise extremely low. That all of these things would have occurred if the alleged impact were contrived, however, is very high. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine any reasonable alternative. [...]

The conclusion that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon appears to have been established beyond a reasonable doubt.

Despite all of this overwhelming evidence, one of my favorite radio hosts, Mike Rivero of, insists that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, and that those of us out here actually looking at the evidence and fully exposing all aspects of 9/11 are basically loons.  Greg Bacon has already thoroughly addressed this nonsense coming from Rivero (who is great on most other issues), but I'd like to make a couple points myself.

Rivero constantly makes two primary arguments to justify his unshakable stance on Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.  His first argument goes like this: the real perps behind 9/11 had to get rid of the passengers and planes on 9/11 anyways, so why not crash them into the Pentagon (and presumably, the World Trade Center Towers)?  And it's sort of ironic- Rivero likes to talk a lot about "belief" and how people should not just simply "believe" or go along with something, but should rather use logic and common sense in all areas of life.  You know, critical thinking and all that.  Rivero is throwing his own logic out the window when it comes to Flight 77.  If he'd take a look at the evidence, there'd be no reason for him to support the conclusion that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon like the government and media said and continue to say.  So, his first argument is based solely on believe, not on logic or critical thinking.  Go figure that one.

For his second argument, he brings up the extremely naive belief that 100s of eye witnesses saw Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.  Once again, this argument is based in naive belief, rather than a solid analysis of the available evidence and information, which clearly shows that Flight 77 could not hit the Pentagon as described by the official government conspiracy theory.  Further, what Rivero fails to understand is the fact that the Bureau of Traffic Statistics have no record of Flight 77 (or Flight 11 that supposedly struck the North WTC) taking off on 9/11.  Rivero surely knows that there are many problems with eye witness testimony anyways.

Both of his arguments are based on mere belief and blind faith in a critical aspect of the fraud that was 9/11.  Both of his arguments are bogus when it comes to the Pentagon.

The most obvious aspect of the Pentagon deception, in my opinion, was when former Solicitor General and major criminal Ted Olson went on Larry King Live shortly after 9/11 and either made up an entire story or was duped into believing his wife had really called him while Flight 77 was being hijacked.

It's been conclusively proven that in-flight phone calls were impossible in 2001.  Why did Ted make up this story?  Or, who told him to tell these lies?  Where is Barbara now?

Is it apparent to you by now that the media is a major part of the crime gang that pulled off 9/11? Are you aware that Zionist Jews with a particular agenda own most of the major corporate media and entertainment productions in this country?

Are Mike Rivero and others incapable of contemplating the fact that the "hijackings", planes, videos, and many of the victims on 9/11 were a major fraud, just like the rest of the official government conspiracy theory?  It seems rather obvious to me that this is indeed the case.  We still don't know exactly what happened on 9/11, so it would be wise to keep an open mind about everything.  Right, Mike?  

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Arrest Donald Rumsfeld immediately!

Alert to all FBI agents and other law enforcement reading this: arrest Donald Rumsfeld immediately!!

Monday, August 29, 2011

Sunday, August 28, 2011

The media has been lying about Libya

Video found at

Addressing 9/11

Yesterday, I posted some excerpts of responses that I've sent to friends and others that I've had conversations with regarding my political perspective. I'd like to follow up with one more excerpt relating to a subject that I cover here all the time: 9/11.

Addressing 9/11, the overwhelming documented evidence suggesting the Israeli Mossad and military were instrumental in the events in New York City that day, and the crime network involved in 9/11:

It is an indisputable fact that the official government conspiracy theory surrounding the 9/11 attacks is completely fraudulent. Would you agree with that statement?

The article I cited over at Info Underground is one of the best sources documenting the obvious and blatant role Israel and criminal Zionists in the U.S. government, private sector and media had in carrying out, facilitating and covering up 9/11. I specifically pointed out 3 solid pieces of evidence that point in the direction that Israel was behind 9/11, the arrest of the "dancing Israelis" (who are confirmed Mossad agents) being one of them. The police report is available at my website under "Israel did 9/11." Other Israelis were arrested on the George Washington bridge with explosives in their possession on 9/11, and Dan Rather even reported it that day. All of these men (and others) were released and sent back to Israel at the behest of the U.S. federal government (probably with some behind-the-scenes prodding from Israel), specifically Zionist and dual Israeli-American citizen Michael Chertoff (who happens to have a family history of involvement with Israeli intelligence) of the U.S. Justice Department. You seem to be simply dismissing these facts. Are they not relevant? Is pointing them out irrational or flawed logic? If so, how exactly?

As for the "hamfisted argumentation" (I'm not sure what that means exactly) and "manipulative use of imagery (juxtaposing gigantic stars of david over the Jewish members of the Bush administration strikes me as pretty primitive)" in the article I cited: so what? Does that offend you? If it does, I suppose it should offend you every time you see Muslims and bin Laden being portrayed the way they are on TV and in the media, right? 

The facts and evidence are what counts. That is what I'm concerned about. And the evidence is all there, in that post, and in many other articles and documentaries you can find on my blog and on the internet. 

You specifically said that the "website features nothing but a number of tired and cliched (and mostly false) anecdotes about Israeli/Jewish involvement in the attacks and marshals them as incontrovertible evidence." If you are going to make that statement, please be more specific. What exactly is "tired and cliched" about exposing the criminals in the Bush administration (virtually all of whom that were in key positions of power to facilitate and cover up 9/11 were Jews with ties directly to Israel), the Israeli Mossad guys arrested on 9/11, the loooooong history of Israeli involvement in false flag attacks (including the King David Hotel bombing, the Lavon Affair, the USS Liberty to name a few), the fact that Israel is an illegitimate state founded on lies, criminality, terrorism and murder, the fact that the owners of the towers and their associates were Jewish with ties directly to Israel (not to mention the fact that they took out a major insurance policy right before 9/11, netting Silverstein BILLIONS of dollars after the attack), the fact that al-Qaeda and other "fundamentalist terrorist" groups are virtually all infiltrated and manipulated, if not outright run, by Israeli/American/British intelligence, and all the other overwhelming evidence presented incontroveritibly documenting who was really behind 9/11?

Saturday, August 27, 2011






Addressing some critics

I love discussing all of the stuff I write and post about here on my blog.  I think it's very important that we all start talking about these subjects. Over the past year or so, I've tried to raise these issues with friends, family members and other acquaintances, and continue to do so.  I've had a few e-mail exchanges with some very good friends of mine, and I'm going to be excerpting some key segments of those email exchanges in this post.  All of the excerpts will be of responses that I sent to back up my geopolitical perspective and outlook.  I have provided links where appropriate that were not in the original email response.  I think others will find them interesting and thought provoking.  Let me know what you think in the comment section below.

Addressing whether or not my perspective is muddled because I'm raising issues with Jewish power and the Jewish religion:

Well, I'm just speaking candidly, because the crime network that has the most influence in our political/economic/media system is Jewish in nature. The major mainstream corporate media (NYT, Wash Post, Rupert Murdoch, ect.) are all either outright owned by Jews or are controlled by a non-Jew that is clearly in the Zionist, pro-Israel camp.

Take a look at our Congress. 81 of them are vacationing in Israel to get their indoctrination right now, and all this is paid for by AIPAC. Netanyahu came over here and every last member of Congress save Ron Paul (I think, I can't really confirm this), bowed down and kissed his feet while he sat up there and spewed absolute bullshit to our faces.

Many of the most influential members of Congress are Jews. Many of the top positions in the White House, State Department, US Treasury, Pentagon, and "czars" that Obama has appointed are Jews. And some of them are dual-citizens of the state of Israel, which is basically a rogue, criminal, terrorist nation state. So what we have here is a situation in which Israel and the crime gang behind it's founding actually have control of all the major levers of power in the US, and can just operate out in the open because everyone that would check their power is compromised. [...]

I just think it's important to start talking about these subjects now so when 2012 rolls around it's mainstream, and we can get Ron Paul on board. I think his victory is inevitable, and if they try rigging it or not allowing it, some shit is about to go down. A lot of people are waking up to this stuff.

What follows is a more thorough response explaining my position on Jewish power versus the Jewish religion, what the word "Jew" means, and why it's important to talk about Jewish influence versus "white" influence in our government, media and banking system:

I've really tried to be very specific about what I'm saying and presenting, so I'm a bit confused what exactly is muddled about my argument. I specifically said that when I describe someone as a Jew or something as Jewish, I am using it as an adjective, not strictly in a religious sense. The criminals that I talk about all the time identify as Jews (whether in an ethnic, cultural or religious sense), and it's an important distinction to make, because they aren't necessarily "white," although almost all of them are white (they are, after all, descendants of the Khazars, who were white people who converted to Judaism from southern Russia, the Ukraine, and Georgia back in the day). 

When we say "white" people, we are generally talking about mainstream, non-Jewish, Christian WASP/Catholic segments of the population (which as a proportion of our total population is shrinking). When we want to talk about Jews, we say Jews. Are you trying to make the argument that there is no distinction between Jews and white people? Because most Jews would make a distinction between themselves and "white" people, or non-Jews/Gentiles (also known as goyim to many right-wing racist, supremacist Jewish factions).

When you say, " never makes sense to categorize people that way," what exactly do you mean? I'm not categorizing anyone. I'm simply accurately describing the criminal network and the individuals that make it up, and their ethnic/religious/cultural background, because it's extremely important to recognize. As I've stated many times, many of these people do in fact have dual citizenship with Israel, have served in the Israeli military, and have strong ties to the state of Israel. 

There have been so many cases of American Jews actually covertly working for Israel, engaging in espionage, theft of classified military, intelligence, diplomatic, and economic information, nuclear secrets, blackmail operations, political sabotage and other shenanigans. It has been documented that AIPAC has a complete lock on our US Congress, and that many Jewish Americans with ties to Israel have control over many (if not all) important levers of power in the US government (key posts in the White House, Justice Department, Treasury Department, State Department, Federal Reserve, Congressional committees, ect.). The mainstream corporate owned media and Hollywood is basically run by Jews, and Jews even say this themselves. Google "Stein Hollywood Jews LA Times" and read that article. I've featured it on my blog before, but just so you know some Jews brag about their influence and ownership of the media/entertainment industry. 

Of course we know that this criminal network that has control of the government, media and banking system is not exclusively under the control of individuals that identify as Jewish, but many (if not most) of them are in fact Jewish, and I'm pointing that out, because it's important (especially if they have ties to Israel or are dual-citizens).

We can talk in generalizations about black people, gay people, females, males, Muslims, Arabs, Chinese, whatever, but it's a cultural taboo to do so about Jews. Why is that? 

Perfect example: that disgustingly horrific song called "Arab Money" or whatever by Busta Ryhmes (I think). I'm sure you know the song I'm referring to. Could you imagine if they instead sang, "We're gettin' Jewish money!!"? What would your reaction be? What would the average person's reaction be? Why is it OK for these guys to rap about "Arab money" and no one cares (and many in fact enjoy it), yet people raising the subject of Jewish power and influence, Zionism, the fact that 9/11 was done by these people, ect. are demonized, scapegoated, and not taken seriously?

Our country would be a lot better off if we started actually enforcing the rule of law and were honest with ourselves about the level of blatant criminality, tyranny, and deception we are currently seeing. If we did that, yes, "Jews" would lose a lot of their power, because the criminal Jewish network that has control of the government, media and banking system is responsible for many (if not all) of these crimes. And yes, Israel would be placed in the dust bin of history if there was any justice after all they've done to this country.

Addressing the structure of the international political economy, "free market capitalism," and Jewish financial/banking power:

We’ve never really had true free market capitalism, in my opinion, especially not on a global or even national scale. The deck as always been stacked, from the beginning. I’m not one to get bogged down in these (nonsensical in my opinion) economic debates...

I'm more interested in the who, what, when, why, where and how of international finance, not pie-in-the-sky theories that are pushed by the academia (which are largely a distraction from the facts).

I am concerned with the Jewish financial (should be read: Jewish plutocracy) aspect of the international political economy for a number of reasons, all of which are primarily historical in nature. First off, anyone seeking to understand the true machinations of the international political economy must be familiar with the House of Rothschild. There are many great sources available online for free. Here are a few:

Read this book online here.  

Read this book online here.  

What we have here is a history of Jewish financial capital, centered around the Ashkenazi Jewish Rothschild family in Europe and England primarily (but certainly not exclusively), that has developed a monopoly on the banking industry, in particular the fiat money based debt system that is causing all of the "debt" problems today. 

In a nutshell, the Rothschilds began as one of the leading Jewish banking families in Europe. They set up banking networks throughout Europe, starting in Germany (Frankfurt), expanding to France (Paris), Italy (Florence, I believe), and England (London). They were the personal bankers for Kings, monarchs and the aristocracy throughout Europe, and, over time, essentially developed a lock on the banking industry. 

We all know, in order to engage in commerce, banking plays a huge role, so these people had a lot of influence. They were usuriously loaning money (i.e., making money off loaning money or loaning money at interest) to governments, monarchs, and the aristocracy in order to pay for wars and other conquests the "state" or political entity at the time (kingdom, fiefdom, ect.) was engaged in. They intermarried with royal families and the aristocracy, and are very much connected to the political establishment in Europe and even in the US today. 

The Rothschilds had other people working with them, many of them Jews (Warburg, Oppenheimer, Hoenig, ect.), but I think it’s safe to say the network was centered around the Rothschilds. In fact, the Balfour Declaration, which we both know was the original document declaring the Crown's approval for a Jewish state in Palestine, was addressed to Lord Rothschild, and many streets and civic institutions are named Rothschild in Israel today. This network made lots of money, became very powerful, and further cemented their power over time. They even founded the Bank of England and Federal Reserve System in this country, or at least had a large role in their founding, and we know how criminal and out of control these private central banks are

They are heavily involved and/or control the following organizations/industries: the IMF, World Bank, UN, Bank of International Settlements in Switzerland, the gold market, the diamond market, the drug business, the human organ trade, nuclear weapons and other chemical, biological, and ecological weapons trade, the sex trafficking industry, the pornography industry, the media, Hollywood and the entertainment industry (read: brainwashing industry), academia, politics, the military and intelligence agencies and blackmail operations (often sexual in nature). Some of them are into pedophilia, Satanic shit like sacrificing and molesting children and other very horrible and disgusting stuff. But it's true, and we have to deal with it. We could sit here and debate the details of what I just laid out, but those are the general facts. You can find them in the books I just cited above, and you can find even more information on this subject on my blog and other websites.

So that is why I am concerned with Jewish financial capitalism. The history is very important when studying these subjects, and trying to understand where we're at today. 

For instance, the Federal Reserve is a private (Jewish) bank. Every single Chairman save one has been a Jew. Is that a mere coincidence? Is it a mere coincidence that Wall Street is dominated by Jews? Or the media is dominated and owned by Jews with a particular agenda? To me, no it is not a coincidence. It is part of a strategy and plan laid out by the top level Jews many, many years ago, which has come to fruition in very obvious ways today.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

A message to Ron Paul

I've called into Mike Rivero's radio program the past couple days now to talk about Ron Paul.  We've had some disagreements, and I'd like to clarify a few things here.

If I had to vote for president today, I would vote for Dr. Paul.  He is literally the only sane candidate we have running for president in the limelight right now.  That being said, I do have some valid criticism's of Dr. Paul and his campaign.  I recently wrote this comment on an article posted on Ron Paul's Facebook page:
John Friend- To Ron Paul and his staff: please, please stop perpetuating the official myth of 9/11. We all KNOW it was an Israeli operation, facilitated by criminal traitorous elements of the US government, media and private sector. Please go all the way. The revolution is starting, and it all starts with the official myth of 9/11 being destroyed. If you aren't going to address this issue, your efforts are wasted. It's time to start arresting these criminals in the White House, Congress, and Knesset.  Sunday at 11:20pm · Like · 4 people
I also recently signed the Ron Paul 2012 Grassroots Petition, and left this comment with my signature:
"The first thing Ron Paul should do once he's elected President of the United States is immediately order his Attorney General to arrest the criminals responsible for 9/11 and the Wall Street mortgage-backed securities fraud that wrecked the economy, end all foreign aid, especially to the criminal state of Israel (who was behind 9/11) and end all these criminal, fraudulent wars based on lies and deception." 
5789: John Friend
Ron Paul and his supporters like to talk about "blow back," a CIA-coined limited hangout term used to confuse the compassionate, yet extremely naive, segment of the American population.  Which is essentially any individual in this country that has a heart and brain to understand our foreign policy consists of our government ordering our military to attack, murder and otherwise destroy various nations around the world in order to plunder their resources, and destroy their culture and future generations, all the while "rebuilding America's defenses" and "securing the realm" for Israel.  I mean, we have been doing this stuff so blatantly for such a long time now, you'd think most people would recognize these facts at this point.

Anyways, these naive yet compassionate people that base their arguments off of the "blow back" theory, rather than on the understanding that covert black operations and psychological operations (through the media and entertainment industry) are pulled off all the time by criminal elements of the U.S. government and military, along with a certain illegitimate country in the Middle East that has a long history of engaging in these sorts of false flag style operations, and that these fascists even target their own populations (on 9/11, 7/7, the Madrid train bombings, the Mumbai massacre, ect.), are not confronting all the facts.

Thus, this "blow back" view and criticism of the foreign policy of the United States of America is inaccurate.

Also, as you can tell in the video above, Dr. Paul is simply misinformed in a number of areas when it comes to the history and nature of U.S. foreign policy.  For instance, right around the 3 minute mark in the above video, Dr. Paul dishes out a big scope of disinformation when he says that 15 of the alleged 19 hijackers on 9/11 came from Saudi Arabia, when in fact there is absolutely no evidence to support that statement (see here).  

Do Muslims and other people that our government orders our military to bomb get mad at us for murdering their family members, children and loved ones?  Yes.  Do some of them organize to fight back, in whatever little way they can?  Probably, but not very effectively.  Are there Mossad-CIA-MI6 terrorist groups out there engaging in sabotage, espionage, political and media subversion, assassinations, false flag attacks, and other dirty deeds?  Absolutely.

And we need to recognize this fact, otherwise the criminal elements that have control of the global power structure will continue to do what they do.  We need to start arresting these people, immediately.  And we need to start saying these things outright, including Ron Paul and other patriotic Americans.  

I suppose this is a rather radical concept for most people to accept, probably even Ron Paul and most of his staff.  But seriously, this upcoming 2012 election may be the last shot we have at taking these psychopathic Zionist pawns out of power here in the U.S.  If anyone other than Ron Paul or James Laffrey of The Equal Party wins the presidency, Iran will be invaded within one year, if we haven't already attack them by then. At this point in our history, we need courageous leaders and individuals to take a stand, speak the truth and not be afraid to do so.  If we're really going to over throw the Zionist Power Configuration that has complete and absolute control over this country, it's media, and banking system, we cannot base our arguments on half-truths at best, and disinformation at worst.  And we certainly won't over throw them if we don't enforce the rule of law.

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Part II: Approaching the Puzzling Destruction of WTC 7 a presentation by Dwain Deets

Approaching the Puzzling Destruction of WTC 7 a presentation by Dwain Deets

This past Sunday, August 14th, Dwain Deets gave the following presentation to the San Diegans for 9/11 Truth.  Here is the brief description of the event:
World Trade Center 7 has received considerable attention by the 9/11 Truth community, including a David Ray Griffin book The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7 and two New York City TV advertising campaigns. However, there are puzzling items of evidence that have not been mentioned by most “Mainstream 9/11 Truth” spokespeople.

Former NASA engineering executive Dwain Deets will approach the problem in an all-inclusive manner. All serious hypotheses by independent 9/11 investigators will be included in this assessment. These include a range from somewhat conventional controlled demolition approaches, to directed energy and nuclear devices. Further, the possibility of multiple methods being deployed simultaneously will be addressed.
And here is a brief background on Mr. Deets:
Mr. Dwain A. Deets... [is the former] Director, Aerospace Projects Office at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, CA, Center Director Kenneth J. Szalai announced recently.

Before this appointment, Deets became Director, Research Engineering Division in March 1994 and served as acting division chief from 1990 to 1994. In that position, he directed the research and engineering aspects of the flight research programs at Dryden.

Deets has had several special assignments since September 1994 that took him away temporarily from the Research Engineering Division responsibilities. He led the preparation of the Dryden response to the NASA Federal Laboratory Review. He was Chairman of the NASA Non-Advocate Review of the Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) program in 1995, and will again serve in the capacity for the 1996 review. Among the programs Deets has been associated with at Dryden during his NASA career are the F-8 Digital Fly-By-Wire aircraft, the X-29 Forward Swept Wing technology demonstrator aircraft, the F-16 Advanced Fighter Technology Integration (AFTI) aircraft and the Highly Maneuverable Aircraft Technology (HiMAT) aircraft.

In 1986 Deets completed a special assignment at NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C., where he led an effort to define the needs for flight research and flight testing within NASA. He then headed development of a flight research strategy for what was then NASA's Office of Aeronautics and Space Technology, now called the Office of Aeronautics. This effort led to a major increase in emphasis on flight research by NASA.

In 1986 Deets received the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics Award. Among his other awards are the NASA Exceptional Service Award, presented in 1988. He was included in "Who's Who in America" for 1990-91 and "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" from 1993 to the present.

He was the 1988-90 chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. He has also been a member of the AIAA technical committee on Society and Aerospace Technology from 1990 to 1995.

He is a 1961 graduate of Occidental College, Los Angeles. He earned a master of science degree in physics from San Diego State College in 1962 and then a master of science degree in engineering, as part of the Engineering Executive Program, at UCLA in 1978.
Enjoy.  This is the first video I've ever recorded, and it turned out pretty good!  I will be conducting an interview with Mr. Deets in the near future, and it will be uploaded shortly thereafter.  Stay tuned.

Not sure what to make of this...

kenny's sideshow pointed out the videos below, the first of which was found at David Icke's website:

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

This is getting really old now...

The United States Congress is completely controlled by Israel and organized Jewish interests world-wide.  The people in the picture above are traitors, and do not represent the American people.  

Some of my friends and readers wonder why I am constantly talking about Israel, Zionism and Jewish power, be it economic, political, or cultural (media, entertainment, education).  Well, in order to understand who is calling the shots, and which political faction in the global power elite is the most dominant, one has to take into consideration Jewish power and international Zionism, the elephant in the room so to speak.  Any rational person paying attention to current affairs will understand this.

Today we learned about yet another manifestation of the complete Zionist domination of the United States of America.  From Mark Glenn's extremely valuable and informative website The Ugly Truth, we learn courtesy of the Jerusalem Post:
The current economic crisis in the US will have no impact on US financial assistance to Israel, US Congressman Steny Hoyer (D-Maryland) said Wednesday. [...]

Hoyer said he wanted to “make it clear” that the financial challenges confronting the US will not “have any adverse effect on America’s determination to meet its promise to Israel in the form of aid for its qualitative [military] superiority, or for its economic security.”

Hoyer said he did not believe America’s financial challenges would have “any adverse effect on the economic relationship, or assistance, that we give to Israel.”

Hoyer said this assessment was bipartisan, and that a similar message will be brought to Israel next week when House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (RVirginia) will head up two Republican delegations, numbering 55 congressmen, to the country.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, in a meeting he had with the delegation Wednesday, thanked Hoyer and the congressmen for US security assistance and for supporting earlier this year – in a tough economic climate in Washington – the allocation of $200 million for the Iron Dome anti missile system.
Yes America, we will continue to give billions of dollars of your tax dollars to the Israeli government, easily the most fraudulent, lawless, rogue nation on the face of the earth, whose military and intelligence agencies, in conjunction with it's active agents in the U.S. government, media and private sector, were and remain the prime suspects in the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB hoax on 9/11.  Your representatives, be they Republican or Democrat, are complete and total slaves to these people, and it's absolutely pathetic.

As usual, it gets worse:
Netanyahu also said that if an agreement was reached with the Palestinians, it would entail a significant investment in Israel’s security infrastructure, something that will necessitate additional allocations from Congress.
So there you have it folks.  Israel can either continue to genocide and destroy the Palestinian people and our traitorous Zionist occupied government will provide political and economic support for their criminality, or they can "make peace" with the Palestinians, and we'll have to fork over even more money.  Looks like we're stuck between a rock and a hard place when it comes to these people...

That is, until enough people get sick and tired of this nonsense and organize to do something about it.  I'm ready to start the revolution.  Are you?

Monday, August 15, 2011

Is Warren Buffett preping us for massive cuts to Social Security and other services?

Warren Buffett has an interesting Op-Ed in the New York Times titled, "Stop Coddling the Super-Rich."  He makes some legitimate points about the tax rates in this country, with the super-rich paying virtually no income taxes, but then adds this in at the end regarding the Super Congress:
Job one for the 12 is to pare down some future promises that even a rich America can’t fulfill. Big money must be saved here.
Is Warren Buffett implying here that we must cut Social Security, Medicare and all the other meager social services we've already paid taxes for?  It sure seems that way...

He's trying to set the narrative: be a good American and share in the burden of reducing the budget. The media and people like Mr. Buffett are trying to make it seem patriotic to give up the extremely modest and dysfunctional social services we've already paid specific taxes for, including Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. And what exactly is the government using all of our tax dollars on? We literally spend all of that money on murdering the people of the Muslim world, military technology, weapons, Israel, and bailing out Wall Street criminal bankers.

We have a very fundamental structural economic problem, namely a private central banking system (the Federal Reserve) loaning fiat money at interest to governments, private corporations, and individuals. They've committed numerous documented crimes, and they are engaging in fraud. Until we address this issue, we will remain modern day serfs in a neo-feudal fascist economic system.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Israeli art students, Mossad and 9/11

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified.  I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gather.  It is classified information."
-- Anonymous U.S. investigator quoted by Carl Cameron of Fox News shortly after 9/11

We've heard all about the mysterious Israeli art student/spy ring scandal that was unravelled and exposed leading up to 9/11, but I often hear it left out of discussion of 9/11.  In May of 2002, Christopher Ketcham wrote a lengthy, detailed article for, an "anti-conspiracy theorist" mainstream propaganda rag employing one of the most cunning disinfo agents out there, summarizing the Drug Enforcement Agency report surrounding this spy ring:
In January 2001, the security branch of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency began to receive a number of peculiar reports from DEA field offices across the country. According to the reports, young Israelis claiming to be art students and offering artwork for sale had been attempting to penetrate DEA offices for over a year. The Israelis had also attempted to penetrate the offices of other law enforcement and Department of Defense agencies. Strangest of all, the "students" had visited the homes of numerous DEA officers and other senior federal officials.

As a pattern slowly emerged, the DEA appeared to have been targeted in what it called an "organized intelligence gathering activity." [...]

Agents of the DEA, ATF, Air Force, Secret Service, FBI, and U.S. Marshals Service documented some 130 separate incidents of "art student" encounters. Some of the Israelis were observed diagramming the inside of federal buildings. Some were found carrying photographs they had taken of federal agents. One was discovered with a computer printout in his luggage that referred to "DEA groups."

In some cases, the Israelis visited locations not known to the public -- areas without street addresses, for example, or DEA offices not identified as such -- leading authorities to suspect that information had been gathered from prior surveillance or perhaps electronically, from credit cards and other sources. One Israeli was discovered holding banking receipts for substantial sums of money, close to $180,000 in withdrawals and deposits over a two-month period. A number of the Israelis resided for a period of time in Hollywood, Fla. -- the small city where Mohammed Atta and three terrorist comrades lived for a time before Sept. 11.

Officials began dealing more aggressively with the "art students." According to one account, some 140 Israeli nationals were detained or arrested between March 2001 and Sept. 11, 2001. Many of them were deported. According to the INS, the deportations resulted from violations of student visas that forbade the Israelis from working in the United States. (In fact, Salon has established that none of the Israelis were enrolled in the art school most of them claimed to be attending; the other college they claimed to be enrolled in does not exist.) After the Sept. 11 attacks, many more young Israelis -- 60, according to one AP dispatch and other reports -- were detained and deported. [...]

The document detailing most of this information was an internal DEA memo: a 60-page report drawn up in June 2001 by the DEA's Office of Security Programs. The document was meant only for the eyes of senior officials at the Justice Department (of which the DEA is adjunct), but it was leaked to the press as early as December 2001 and by mid-March had been made widely available to the public. [...]

...reporter Carl Cameron of the Fox News Channel was beginning an investigation into the mystery of the art students that would ultimately light the way into altogether different terrain. In a four-part series on Fox s "Special Report With Brit Hume" that aired in mid-December, Cameron reported that federal agents were investigating the "art student" phenomenon as a possible arm of Israeli espionage operations tracking al-Qaida operatives in the United States. Yes, you read that right: a spy ring that may have been trailing al-Qaida members in the weeks and months before Sept. 11 -- a spy ring that according to Cameron s sources may have known about the preparations for the Sept. 11 attacks but failed to share this knowledge with U.S. intelligence. One investigator told Cameron that "evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

According to Cameron, some 60 Israeli nationals had been detained in the anti-terrorism/immigrant sweeps in the weeks after Sept. 11, and at least 140 Israelis identified as "art students" had been detained or arrested in the prior months. Most of the 60 detained after Sept. 11 had been deported, Cameron said. "Some of the detainees," reported Cameron, "failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States." Some of them were on active military duty. (Military service is compulsory for all young Israelis.) Cameron was careful to note that there was "no indication that the Israelis were involved in the 9/11 attacks" and that while his reporting had dug up "explosive information," none of it was necessarily conclusive. Cameron was simply airing the wide-ranging speculations in an ongoing investigation. [...]
However, Intelligence Online and then France's newspaper of record, Le Monde, came to a much more definite -- and explosive -- conclusion. This was the jackpot, they concluded, a proven spy ring run by the Mossad or the Israeli government. Thus you had Intelligence Online leading its Feb. 28 piece with the statement that "a huge Israeli spy ring operating in the United States was rolled up," and you had Le Monde trumpeting on March 5 that a "vast Israeli spy network" had been dismantled in the "largest case of Israeli spying" since 1985, when mole Jonathan Pollard was busted selling Pentagon secrets to the Mossad. Reuters that same day went with the headline "U.S. Busts Big Israeli Spy Ring," sourcing Le Monde s story. [...]

Six of the "students" were apparently carrying cell phones purchased by a former Israeli vice consul to the United States. According to Le Monde, two of the "students" had traveled from Hamburg to Miami to visit an FBI agent in his home, then boarded a flight to Chicago and visited the home of a Justice Dept. agent, then hopped a direct flight to Toronto -- all in one day. According to Intelligence Online, more than one-third of the students, who were spread out in 42 cities, lived in Florida, several in Hollywood and Fort Lauderdale, Fla. -- one-time home to at least 10 of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers. In at least one case, the students lived just a stone's throw from homes and apartments where the Sept. 11 terrorists resided: In Hollywood, several students lived at 4220 Sheridan St., just down the block from the 3389 Sheridan St. apartment where terrorist mastermind Mohammed Atta holed up with three other Sept. 11 plotters. Many of the students, the DEA report noted, had backgrounds in Israeli military intelligence and/or electronics surveillance; one was the son of a two-star Israeli general, and another had served as a bodyguard to the head of the Israeli army. [...]

...there were "art student" encounters in Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, Detroit, El Paso, Los Angeles, Miami, Orlando, New Orleans, Phoenix, San Diego, Little Rock, Seattle, Washington, D.C., Arlington, Texas, Albuquerque, and dozens of other small cities and towns.

"Their stories," the DEA report states, "were remarkable only in their consistency. At first, they will state that they are art students, either from the University of Jerusalem or the Bezalel Academy of Arts in Jerusalem. Other times they will purport to be promoting a new art studio in the area. When pressed for details as to the location of the art studio or why they are selling the paintings, they become evasive."

Indeed, they had reason to be nervous, because they were lying. Salon contacted Bezalel Academy's Varda Harel, head of the Academic Students' Administration, with a list of every "student" named in the DEA report, including their dates of birth, passport numbers, and in some cases military registration numbers. Not a single name was identified in the Bezalel database, either as a current student or as a graduate of the past 10 years (nor had any of the "students" tried to apply to Bezalel in the last ten years). As for the University of Jerusalem, there is no such entity. There is the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, but Heidi Gleit, the school's foreign press liaison, told me that Israelis commonly refer to the school as Hebrew University, not the University of Jerusalem. (Hebrew University, she said, does not release student records to the public.) 
Here is Carl Cameron's four part investigation into the Israeli spy ring relating to 9/11.

You'll notice that in the final video both war criminal and former Secretary of state Colin Powell and Zionist Jew and former Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer refer all questions from reporters to the Justice Department for questions regarding the Israelis arrested.  Guess who was in charge of the U.S. Justice Department's Criminal Division on 9/11, responsible for investigating these individuals?  Zionist Jew Michael Chertoff
...the Assistant Attorney General on 9/11, and in charge of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. Chertoff allowed over one hundred Israeli spies who were arrested prior to and on 9/11 to return to Israel on immigration violations.

Chertoff helped write the Patriot Act, then became the first Secretary of the newly created Department of Homeland Security. This despite the fact that he is a “dual citizen” of the US and Israel.

The Chertoffs are one of the founding families of the state of Israel. His mother was one of the first agents in the Mossad, his father and an uncle are ordained rabbis and teachers of the Talmud. 
Here is Democracy Now!'s coverage of the Israeli spy ring and 9/11:

The man from the The Jewish Daily Forward in the above interview is clearly covering for the Israelis.  

I think it's pretty clear that the Israelis and their undercover spies were involved in carrying out the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB on 9/11.  

Here are the official DEA reports documenting this spy ring.  And below is the East Rutherford Police Department report on the 5 Israelis arrested on 9/11, who later went on Israeli TV to talk about their experience.
Police Report

There were even art students connected to this Israeli spy ring living in the World Trade Center Tower 1 just before 9/11. 

To my knowledge, Jonathan Elinoff broke the story of the art students connected to the Israeli spy ring living in the World Trade Center before 9/11.  Did they have a role in the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB on 9/11, and the media/video manipulation many researchers have exposed?  

Here is Kevin Barrett interviewing Jonathan Elinoff, and some excerpts below:
Well, basically, there was a group of art students that I came across, somebody had sent me a lead on a story, and I wasn’t quite sure about it. I got the New York Times article and looked into it, and apparently these arts students were a part of the Lower Manhattan Cultural Arts Program. Now, the Lower Manhattan Cultural Arts Program was on floors 90 and 91 in World Trade Center Tower 1.

…I don’t have any evidence of criminal activity, other than that they were living in the actual towers in tents, which was against their contract, and that they had a World Trade Center construction pass and a few other images that I got from my source that are not available in the book they released, which would suggest that what they did is illegal, which is why the World Trade Center security denied that the report of these guys in there to begin with was because removing a window and bringing a deck out, which is what the art stunt was, was illegal against New York building codes…so, that got them a World Trade Center construction pass obviously someone on the inside was a part of this conspiracy to remove the window and then wield the deck out just for the name of art.

…one of those art students, his name is Hernan Serfaty. Now that gentleman was in the Lower Manhattan Cultural Arts Program…if you go back to the Lower Manhattan Cultural Arts Program the list of a lot of those guys is not there anymore. The DEA original arresting report shows that information. Why the Lower Manhattan Cultural Arts Program doesn’t show this anymore is a mystery to me, but the DEA report shows it, that he was a member of that program. Well that’s interesting, because he’s an Israeli military intelligence officer, who rented two Hollywood apartments close to the mail drops and apartment of Mohamed Atta while he was in Los Angeles at the very same time.

This man Hernan Serfaty was carrying bank slips showing more than $100,000 deposited from December 2000 to the first quarter 2001. Other bank slips showed withdrawals for about $80,000 during the same period. Serfaty’s apartment, serving as cash pad, was also for at least 2 other arts students, who were located… where? Allegedly [where] lead hijacker Mohammed Atta’s mail drop was. And they were also, both Atta and Marwan al-Shahi, were renting an apartment two blocks away from Hernan Serfaty when he was in Florida at the very same time!

So, DEA agents, and the reason why they found all this out by the way was because they were tracing these guys as a part of an Israeli art student/spy program. There was about 140-200 Israeli art students that were penetrating military bases… these guys penetrated DEA, IRS, Pentagon, military bases, you name it, ATF. And they did because they claimed to be art brokers and art students… The DEA report found all this out because they were tracking an ecstasy trafficking ring, they were tracking drug runners… when they came across the fact that these guys were ex-Israeli military and they were spying and they were certain of this, the investigation was put into a top secret compartmentalized report

…these guys are connected to the Lower Manhattan Cultural Arts Program.

…this is an intelligence operation, down to the very “T”, with MI5, Mossad, and CIA at the heart of it. No question about it, there is absolutely no evidence that this thing [9/11] came from outside the country.

…if we can say Mossad instead of Jew, that’s a little more accurate. But then again there’s also CIA involvement, there’s MI5 involvement. Why was the money wired from Pakistani ISI chief? Well, I found out that he got those orders from the United Arab Emirates CIA station chief… there’s an original report talking about the station chief meeting with bin Laden, if you remember that, at the Dubai airport… I have an original report… talking about how GID and ISI connections to 9/11 are actually on behalf of MI5, Mossad and CIA requests to frame them.

This is how the intelligence apparatus works for the Western establishment. If you go to Britain, their front offices are called MI5. If you go to the U.S., their front offices are called CIA. If you go to Israel, their front offices are called Mossad. Does that mean that they are different agencies? Yes, they can be compartmentalized and operated differently, but the controllers of that agency are international. The behavior is international… There are joint operations because it’s all a part of the same apparatus.

If I was the CEO of a big company, and I had 100 departments underneath me, those departments are going to be working separately from each other. But as the CEO, I have the ability to pull one department and another department and another department and to start an operation with these three departments, and all the other departments still working separately don’t know. And that’s how an intelligence operation is done. And when you’re high enough up in the system, you can actually pull someone from MI5, somebody from Mossad, and somebody from the CIA at your own leisure and use them in a separate operation in a black operation. Does that mean that those agencies are all working together? No, they’re still separate. But the controllers have the ability to utilize anything at their dispense, and remember ISI and GID were set up by the CIA and MI5. So, seeing their involvement in 9/11 actually really still points to the same Zionist empire, and that’s a more accurate term.
Wayne Madsen has reported that British intelligence confirmed in February 2002 that the Israeli Mossad had infiltrated and manipulated the Arab "hijacker" terrorist cells prior to 9/11, something they seem to be particularly good at:
British intelligence reported in February 2002 that the Israeli Mossad ran the Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the U.S. government's 9/11 Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. WMR has received details of the British intelligence report which was suppressed by the government of then-Prime Minister Tony Blair.

A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian- and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated "Al Qaeda" cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New Jersey on 9/11.

The Mossad infiltration team comprised six Israelis, comprising two cells of three agents, who all received special training at a Mossad base in the Negev Desert in their future control and handling of the "Al Qaeda" cells. One Mossad cell traveled to Amsterdam where they submitted to the operational control of the Mossad's Europe Station, which operates from the El Al complex at Schiphol International Airport. The three-man Mossad unit then traveled to Hamburg where it made contact with Mohammed Atta, who believed they were sent by Osama Bin Laden. In fact, they were sent by Ephraim Halevy, the chief of Mossad.

The second three-man Mossad team flew to New York and then to southern Florida where they began to direct the "Al Qaeda" cells operating from Hollywood, Miami, Vero Beach, Delray Beach, and West Palm Beach. Israeli "art students," already under investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration for casing the offices and homes of federal law enforcement officers, had been living among and conducting surveillance of the activities, including flight school training, of the future Arab "hijacker" cells, particularly in Hollywood and Vero Beach.

In August 2001, the first Mossad team flew with Atta and other Hamburg "Al Qaeda" members to Boston. Logan International Airport's security was contracted to Huntleigh USA, a firm owned by an Israeli airport security firm closely connected to Mossad — International Consultants on Targeted Security – ICTS. ICTS's owners were politically connected to the Likud Party, particularly the Netanyahu faction and then-Jerusalem mayor and future Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. It was Olmert who personally interceded with New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani to have released from prison five Urban Moving Systems employees, identified by the CIA and FBI agents as Mossad agents. The Israelis were the only suspects arrested anywhere in the United States on 9/11 who were thought to have been involved in the 9/11 attacks.

The two Mossad teams sent regular coded reports on the progress of the 9/11 operation to Tel Aviv via the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC. WMR has learned from a Pentagon source that leading Americans tied to the media effort to pin 9/11 on Arab hijackers, Osama Bin Laden, and the Taliban were present in the Israeli embassy on September 10, 2001, to coordinate their media blitz for the subsequent days and weeks following the attacks. It is more than likely that FBI counter-intelligence agents who conduct surveillance of the Israeli embassy have proof on the presence of the Americans present at the embassy on September 10. Some of the Americans are well-known to U.S. cable news television audiences.

Friday, August 12, 2011

Dylan Ratigan goes off

It's always refreshing seeing someone with access to mainstream elements of society actually speak some truth for once.  I don't think Mr. Ratigan is giving us the full story, or telling us who is behind the criminality we're seeing, but his recent rant was definitely encouraging to see, and worth watching.

Thanks to BuelahMan's Revolt for pointing this video out.

Orwell lives

In one of the more Orwellian press releases I've read lately, the Anti-Defamation League has endorsed a recent presidential order barring war criminals from entering the United States:
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today welcomed an executive order issued by President Barack Obama that enhances America's ability to prevent and respond to mass atrocities. The presidential directive also bars perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity and other serious human rights violators from legally entering the United States.

According to the Aug. 4 Presidential Study Directive/PSD-10, "Preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States."

Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director and a Holocaust survivor, issued the following statement: 

"We are pleased that President Obama has made averting genocide and mass atrocities a core part of American policy and launched a process to assemble a comprehensive set of tools toward that vision.

As a community that experienced first-hand the indifference of a world that failed to avert Hitler's genocidal campaign, we know that if responsible governments had mobilized the full range of diplomatic, economic and humanitarian tools, the outcome could have been very different.

The president's announcement is all the more poignant in the face of an ongoing and violent Syrian crackdown against its own population."
You know, people who do things like this, this, thisthisthis, and this would never be able to enter the United States, at least not legally, right Mr. Foxman?  


We would never allow war criminals and human rights violators to enter the United States and give speeches before our Congress, right?