Saturday, June 4, 2011

Israel behind Fukushima?


Before I post this information, I want to establish a few facts that will preface what is about to come:
  1. The state of Israel has proven itself to be one of the most conniving, ruthless and murderous regimes this world has ever known.  It and it's international network of agents and proxies have staged numerous false flag terrorist attacks and other offensive acts of war, including the famed Lavon Affair in 1954, the attack on the USS Liberty in 1967, and 9/11 to name just a few.  
  2. The Israelis and their Zionist agents around the world (sayanim) have a penchant for espionage, theft of classified information and technology (especially military technology), sabotage and infiltration of strategic military and industrial networks in other countries.  In fact, an Israeli security company, which likely has ties directly to the Israeli military and intelligence apparatus, provided security at Fukushima.
  3. It has been confirmed by knowledgeable sources that Israel and the United States are behind the development of the Stuxnet computer worm, which is designed to infect and ultimately take over the computer control systems designed by Siemens used to operate industrial facilities, nuclear power plants, and other critical infrastructure in an advance nation.  The Stuxnet worm was used to sabotage Iran's lawful Bushehr nuclear reactor in an attack in June 2010, and was also discovered in Japan as early as July 2010- months before the disaster at Fukushima.  It is speculated that Stuxnet played a roll in what occurred at Fukushima.  
  4. The United States, along with other countries around the world, including Israel, have developed and researched numerous biological, chemical, nuclear and even ecological weapons capable of altering weather patterns and inducing storms, earthquakes and other natural phenomenon.  Former U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen confirmed these ecological weapons in 1997: "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves."
  5. Dmitri Khalezov, a former nuclear specialist in the Soviet military, has testified about his first hand knowledge of advanced nuclear weapons devices that have been used in false flag attacks around the world, including on 9/11.
  6. Benjamin Fulford has reported that Japan was threatened with an ecological weapon prior to the Fukushima disaster.  

    Keep those facts in mind while reading Jim Stone's article (radio show here and corresponding article with links here) about what really caused the Fukushima disaster, and what didn't.  I am republishing the article with minor updates here on this blog with the aim of spreading this information to as many as possible.  It is time that humanity puts an end to the state of Israel and International Zionism before they put an end to all of us.  

    *     *     *     *

    Jim Stone, Freelnce Journalist, Updated Friday June 3, 2011

    This is a massive report. If you have troubles understanding it, just look at THIS picture of the vanished reactor, THIS picture of the destroyed facility and THIS picture, of Magna BSP's camera. Then scroll down to the photos of the NON EXISTENT quake damage and seismic charts which prove there was no 9.0 and therefore the very real tsunami could not have been natural. The fact that what happened in Japan did not occur naturally has been very well documented by a skilled investigator, who spent hundreds of hours getting to the bottom of this story. Archive and POST!

    NEW INFO: Japan offered to enrich uranium for IRAN!

    HERE ARE THE LINKS: Ynet news... Inside Japan News Network...The New American...Rianovosti news...Hindustan Times...Zee News


    This report uses classified leaked high resolution photos of the destruction of Fukushima originally posted on Pink Tentacle to support it's claims.

    They are,

    1. Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who has claimed anything about pressures, temperatures, containment, ect about reactor 3 after March 14 are lying and people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive extent of the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open to a repeat event.

    2. Reactor 4 is building 7, demolished by explosives. Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud, yet blew it's containment anyway. That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert, and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure leaving it in danger of falling over. Overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and won't be present in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate it's hydrogen by losing it's oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods. The rods will prefer the free oxygen in the air and burn long before attempting to claim the oxygen in whatever humidity there might be. The fact that the rods can catch fire only enforces the fact that they cannot release hydrogen in open air the way they can in a reactor. If you entertain the fantasy that they could, another problem against buildup presents itself - the hydrogen would be safely burned the moment it was created on the surface of the superheated rods. There would be no buildup. Fuel rods are many orders of magnitude below incapable of going supercritical also, even if totally melted down. The explosion at #4 was flatly impossible.

    Reactor 4's dome was removed for defueling. Drone photos prove it. This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's explosion. Some people have said that this reactor was secretly in operation to enrich plutonium. This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated. Tepco is going out of it's way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4, because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result, they are giving reasons that cannot happen, just to say something. They need to see this post and get the Arava perspective(Arava is a district surrounding Dimona).

    3. That the destruction of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons. Hydrogen produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the "official" story. If hydrogen blew the place apart (still many times beyond impossible, even if sealed off), it should be laying around in large pieces, with very little dust. Dust is much of what you see in the wreckage at Fukushima. If many tons of C4 had been brought into the place and set off, it could destroy it also, but remember that in a nuclear facility you have to keep what you are doing hidden if you intend to destroy it, so even at a thousand pounds a gun type nuke would be far more appropriate, especially when you have successfully duped the plant operators into believing it is only a security camera. If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility, I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns at least 15 feet thick. Fukushima was built with the Mark 1 containment design, but beyond Mark 1 standards which was a common upgrade(reference is the included photos, it is obvious). It is true that gas explosions can be very destructive, but only in facilities that were not designed to handle them. Even the basic mark 1 containment was many times beyond capable of withstanding the worst hydrogen blast.

    4. That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract this year by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.) Their "security cameras" weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of gun type nuclear weapons.The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. They have creatively called them bi-scopic so when you search on google their monstrous cameras are the only thing that comes up (outside of Dj lighting and a gun scope) Try it. Type "Biscopic camera" into google images,(without the quotes) it's a hoot! This helps marketing I guess. The need for such a large stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. Other manufacturers have units appropriate for indoor focal lengths which are only twice the size of ordinary monocular security cameras. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway. Magna does make passive radar systems which require a large body, but the owl could accomplish it's claimed function with two small lightweight cameras (5 or so lbs, not tiny) and the processor in a modern laptop. Why this giant thing? note - a not yet produced graphical model is what you see most on Google, the ones produced thus far are ugly boxes.

    . . . . . . . . . .9/11, 4/11, 3/11? see a pattern? Let's not see a 6/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a difference.

    Due to the many positive e-mails about getting the truth out, rather than hold back I am going to put the original information back. It follows below.

    The quake was not what we were told.

    In fact, the quake was a bold faced lie, packing a political agenda. There is even more proof now, and it goes beyond the linked Japanese chart. This original seismic data is the smoking gun, however, I have something better. I finally suppressed the urge to vomit and analyzed the lies told by the USGS, and from them wrote this sad, sad story about how it really was, not what you will see in the video. Keep in mind that precise top speeds of flying debris cannot be determined with accuracy, but this story will at least be close to the numbers put out by the USGS.

    Meet Atsuo, Airi, and Akiyoshi. They were all the best and most dedicated people at the NHK newsroom, in Sendai Japan. Akiyoshi loved Airi, and Atsuo was the one who introduced them. Unfortunately, all 3 died in the quake. Akiyoshi got a severe cut and bled to death when he hit a display screen behind him at 44 miles an hour, and was then thrown out through a hole in a collapsed wall. Airi followed pretty much the same path, and died beside him in the rubble. Atsuo flew through the open door behind him, then crashed through a window and was crushed when he landed in a massive seismic crack in the road, which closed in on him. Others in the newsroom died also, but I never thought up names for them. At least, according to the official USGS charts. The laser printer was never found, but the table it was on ended up on top of the rubble, smashed to pieces, where one of the few survivors used a piece of the metal frame to splint his broken leg.

    The video below is the one I pulled the frames out of for the sad, sad story. It is a video of a newsroom at the hardest hit area in Japan, and it SAYS IT ALL. This is when the quake was happening live. They are alarmed there is an earthquake, but most people stay seated in their chairs.

    Some people even keep typing on their computers as the quake happens.

    Also, note that most of the stuff stays on the desks, at the end, a laser printer is still sitting on a cheap table, ect. some things fall but things return to normal quickly, all the while the English announcer is reading a script of devastation with all the pep of some paid fool who does not believe what he is saying in a cheezy infomercial. The quake was significant, but only in a 6.0 sense, as recorded by the seismographs. This is important footage, because it proves the earthquake measured at a 6.8 was an instrumentation based richter reading. Confusion between the Shindo and Richter scale is being used to cover this up . I chose this video because it's location is documented to have been the worst affected, and was recorded in a news room with a known fixed location.

    Remember that this video is proof of what really went on. This means there never were significant aftershocks, never was a natural tsunami, and if they lied about that, what else? This video is pivotal and vital to exposing the truth. Sure there was a quake, but at this newsroom it was not much over a six if it even was a six. I chose this video because the news room is within eyeshot of station MYG012, which was used by the USGS to make these graphs which represent an 8.8, as was stated in this (English) newscast and was probably used as a guide to fudge the lie due to the closeness of the newsroom to the seismic station. Looking at these charts, it is super easy to get a rough guess at how fast people would have flown. 44MPH to the North, and 28MPH to the East. Those are not precise numbers but the charts are proven wrong by the video because according to the charts people should have entered uncontrolled flight. Here is the full chart put out by the USGS. Of course, they offer no reading from MYG011, which was closest to the 9.0 "epicenter" by a long shot, because it only got a 5.63's worth of shaking. I will do that work for them. That map is below.

    I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami. All we have, all the pictures are tsunami damage. Let's see pictures of quake damage. The Kobe quake was a 6.9/7.2 depending on source. That makes this quake, at a 9.0 100X as powerful. Sendai was near the epicenter and would have been devastated if it really happened. Look at the earthquake photos of damage from the Kobe quake, and try to find ONE THING SIMILAR in SENDAI. Just try. They do not exist. Outside of the tsunami, the quake which supposedly hit Sendai with many times the power of the one in Kobe, did not damage a single building there. Sendai was only 48 miles from the epicenter of this "9.0" which would have devastated everything in an area 1,000 miles across if it was real. All of Japan would be toast. Try to find a photo of seismic damage in Sendai. I challenge you. Try to find it in any of the coastal cities, as little as 25 miles from the "epicenter". I looked for 5 hours, and except for some tanks that fell at a brewery not a single one exists. No pictures of collapsed skyscrapers or high rises equals NO 9.0. You will not find a single skyscraper photo where the windows got broken either. You will find no downed power poles, no flipped over cars, no uprooted trees, no derailed trains (except for one the tsunami hit), and the road damage is typical of even a 5.0. You will not find pictures of a single damaged multi story building or even a structurally damaged wood framed house outside the tsunami zone. In Sendai the quake messed up grocery stores and kitchens and that really is about it.

    And now, I will say it like I knew it had to be.

    I believe the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran. The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops. Bet on it. In the tsunami videos, the tsunami rips through pristine and undamaged cities, where business as usual is obvious and the tsunami is an ambush; not 9.0 earthquake ravaged debris. The quake is a paper thin story taped together by the undeserved trust of a gullible public. And the stories? The CIA did not hire a million people last year for nothing. If there is evidence of a 9.0 SHOW ME. A 9.0 will devastate an area over 1,000 miles across. That is how big a 9.0 is. The entire nation should be in ruins, especially judging from the damage the 6.9 Kobe quake did, and no where, no where outside the tsunami zone in the entire country is there a single damaged multi story building, a single collapsed bridge, a single structurally damaged wood framed house, or skyscraper. If a picture exists that can be definitively pinned to this quake, show me. The only collapsed structure in all of Japan was an old welfare shelter near station MYG004, the true epicenter.

    Take a look at these frame captures, and ask a question - Why is no one trying to run? Why are the cars all just parked peacefully as the tsunami arrived? Why was there no warning? Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived? Could it be that the people and the governement had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either?

    Question: Why are none of the roads packed with people trying to flee the approaching tsunami?

    Could it be that the people and government were not expecting one? Tsunami sirens blare only when it arrives, rather than 40 minutes before, which is how much warning they would have had if a real quake in the ocean had been detected. Consider that. Parking lots full of cars, everyone at work, no one trying to leave. AMBUSH!!.
    When people keep typing at their keyboards during the quake, it's obviously not what we were told.

    RUSH UPDATE, May 28

    When reviewing the seismic data for the supposed 9.0, I knew there were instead 3 small simultaneous inland epicenters. This made me suspicious right from the start that the quake was artificially triggered and used as seismic cover for a tsunami bomb. But I needed a reason to believe an artificial quake could have been done. I suspected that either Japan was testing nukes and Israeli intelligence was onto it and used the tests as the "start of clock" for their operation, or Israel managed to smuggle nukes into lava tubes and tunnels far underground to trigger earthquakes and contain the blasts. So I was hunting for tunnels and lava tubes near each of the three epicenters, and wanted to find them before writing this into this report. As it turns out, I did not need to. This military briefing with Secretary of Defense William Cohen, dated all the way back to 1997, shows that even then, Cohen knew about EM weaponry that could trigger quakes and set off volcanoes. I have ignored everything regarding this subject, I thought it was the realm of kooks. I thought EM weaponry would be effective in weather modification only, but I am not going to argue with the Secretary of Defense. There are obviously then, energy technologies which have never been publicized, such weaponry would need far more energy input than the electrical grid could provide. And the systems Cohen spoke of in 1997 would be outdated now.

    Cohen stated: "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important." - William S. Cohen, Secretary of Defense, April 28, 1997. Left unsaid by William Cohen is that such systems would be developed by DARPA and owned by America first!

    I would expect with 14 years of advancement that these technologies could now trigger devastating earthquakes in non-seismic zones. Benjamin Fulford, an experienced Journalist with a long history and a paid access site, is predicting that the floods along the Mississippi are in fact caused by Haarp, which will then be followed by a manmade earthquake along the New Madrid fault, and then a subsequent attack at 15 reactors in the nation's agricultural heartland. If this is so, it will make Fukushima look like a cake walk. I myself have verified that the Siemens SCADA system Stuxnet targets has been used to replace the old control systems at a majority of American nuclear facilities. It is therefore important for people to SPREAD THE WORD. They have already started with the flooding, which is phase 1. Phase 2 will be the earthquake, destroying levees and totally unleashing the raging Mississippi. Phase 3 will be a virus attack at nuclear facilities. THE ELITE ARE COWARDS. IF THE WORD IS SPREAD SUFFICIENTLY, THEY WILL NOT DARE TO PROCEED TO PHASE 2 AND 3. Mold grows best in the dark.

    The following picture is the strongest reading for this quake on any seismogram anywhere in Japan. This was before the lie machine got running smoothly. Early on there were a few sputters and this REAL chart got out. As you can see on this chart, it was a 6.67 on the Richter scale, (not shindo scale, confirmed by PGA reference) and was centered inland in a rural area. This would fit in with NO structural damage in Sendai and the level of shaking in the video.

    This quake was initially asessed a 6.8, and the seismic data will show anyone the epicenter was inland, not at sea. So it started a 6.8, then got upgraded to a 7.9, then got upgraded to an 8.4, then got upgraded to an 8.8, then got upgraded to a 9.0, and had the epicenter put out in the ocean. Now many are saying it was a 9.1 which would bump up MYG011's number to 1200 from 1070, and it is all based on tsunami effects, not seismic data.

    The following seismograms clearly show epicenters from 3 separate small quakes all occuring simultaneously. This is what would be expected of an attack, rather than a natural occurence.

    One problem with people grasping how big a 9.0 is, is exponential charts which will hide how much energy is really being released behind confusing gradient marking. To answer the need for clarity, I got out the calculator and produced a chart that shows you how big a 9.0 earthquake is on a linear scale. Make sure you expand and scroll it, it is 5,000 pixels tall. Due to its large verticle height it opens on the left side of the screen and is almost invisible until you expand it. Confusion over how GIANT a 9.0 really is has helped the elite scammers enormously in their lie. There is simply no way much of anything will remain standing, yet as the tsunami rolls in.

    *     *     *     *

    And now, I will bite. This is what I did not want to publish, but I know it has to be true. Call this creative journalism, because I never called Netanyahu, but here is the most rational conclusion I can draw, based on all info gathered so far including the original not faked seismic data.

    I honestly believe Japan is being held a nuclear hostage. It all makes sense.

    1. Japan offers to enrich uranium for Israel's GREAT SATAN, Iran.

    2. Immediately, Israel sets up front companies masquerading as security companies, and one of them succeeds in getting a security contract at a Japanese nuclear facility. 4 months later the Dimona Dozen shows up, and under the cover of a security contract gets unlimited access to the heart of Fukushima. They plant the virus, install real cameras outside the facility, and functional, poorly disguised nuke cameras inside the facility. In addition to this, they install an unauthorized data connection to allow control of all the guts of the facility via the virus. (They admitted to this connection, as discussed later on this page.)

    3. After installing Stuxnet and the nukes they scram.

    4. Israel waits for one of the many natural quakes in Japan to provide cover for a tsunami bomb, and they already have it at the bottom of the Japan trench. VLF communications are established with the bomb to penetrate the water. David in Dimona gets seismic reading from Japan. 6.67 in progress, BOOM. (New evidence shows the quake most likely was not natural.)

    Tsunami comes in, swamps Stuxnet infected power plant, direct video feed from legitimate cameras security company installed gets to David via totally unauthorized channel, and David knows just when to cut the generators off. Others on the team do all they can to counteract measures taken by the employees at Fukushima, who are unaware an attack is taking place and do not understand why everything is going crazy.

    5. Israeli Prime Minister calls Japan, and says TAKE THAT for offering help to Iran, and ya know, there are FIVE MORE NUKES in the ocean off the coast of Japan, and we are going to set those off and destroy your coastal cities if you do not forget that 6.67, and say it was a 9 to cover for tsunami effects. AND NOW we are going to make your people DEMAND you move away from nuclear power so you can NEVER threaten us like that again. We are BLOWING UP FUKUSHIMA DIIACHI and you are going to go along with whatever story we tell you to. SO THERE!!

    6. David and his pals close ALL valves to the reactors via the remote data link they admitted to installing, and put them full throttle, to melt them down while the virus keeps control room readouts displaying false info, like nothing is going on even though the place is coming apart. After enough mayhem ensues to provide plausibility, they set off planted nukes and blow the place sky high.

    And even if the quake was real, there are nukes that can reach an 8.4. Close enough. Though I have yet to work out the final details, I probably have enough to hang them because:

    1. I got the real seismic data that proves beyond a doubt the quake is not what we were told and was in fact an inland 6.8, (calculated higher than the seismogram due to the triangulated true epicenter being a little higher) which would get noticed but not feared in quake ridden Japan.

    2. Numerous referenced sources prove Stuxnet really was written by Israel.

    3. Japan really did offer to enrich Uranium for Iran, and Israel has been documented to have attempted to destroy the reactor in Iran, and probably did. Japan contributing to Iran's nuclear future would make them just as much an enemy to Israel as Iran. Israel would want them taken out.

    4. It is documented that a team from Israel, with a history consisting only of working in Israeli defense, got unlimited access to a Japanese nuclear facility, which then went boom.

    5. Reactor 4 had been defueled and proven disassembled, and therefore no explosion there was possible. What should have happened at reactor 4, if anything at all? The fuel pools should have melted down and caught fire once the water boiled off from lack of recirculation AT Worst, and badly contaminated the containment structure, NOTHING ELSE. NO explosions, NOTHING ELSE. Reactor 4 is building 7, PERIOD. Why did an explosion there happen that was so severe it blew the outer containment walls (4 feet thick) and inner containment walls that were much thicker? Reactor 4 is reportedly now in danger of falling over. HOW?

    6. The Japanese government is going along with the story of a scientifically proven false 9.0. There is a reason, and my guess is that Israel has made threats to wipe out Japanese coastal cities with additional tsunamis if the government of Japan speaks a word of what went on, there should be no reason for Japan to go along with this other than a continued threat.

    Is it not interesting this "quake" reportedly happened at the bottom of the Japan trench, which would be perfect for hiding an atomic bomb blast?

    Is the Department of Homeland Security trying to keep American industries (and nuclear facilities) in the dark about Stuxnet? After Fukushima fell victim to unwary operators, I would think such a conference would be a TOP priority here! The genie is out of the bottle. It is a fact that the writers of Stuxnet intend to use it. So cancelling a well researched conference about the vulnerabilities of the Siemens SCADA system to Stuxnet in the name of "keeping hackers from getting info" seems to me like an effort to keep the threat alive. Ignore the fluff at the beginning, and read the "About TakeDownCon" summary near the bottom so you know what they actually cancelled rather than settle for the no-panic fluff at the beginning. This is SERIOUS. I fear that by the time the Hacker Halted conference happens in October, the summer of disaster may have passed. And if it has not, I bet any discussion of Stuxnet at Hacker Halted will also be cancelled. Stuxnet is too good a toy for a very powerful group to let go of. Something is fishy here.

    Other publications picked up this story now, and are poo pooing the issue into the ground. They are obviously attempting to morph responsibility for Stuxnet style attacks away from Israel so that they can regain cover and use the weapon as a false flag tool to destroy internet freedom. This is where they are going to go with this - count on it, and when the disasters happen there will be a cozy blanket of lies shielding Israel from all blame. Never forget, THIS IS THEIR BABY, NEVER FORGET. Prior to them doing this, WE NEVER HEARD OF IT.

    This post has been greatly improved via input from readers. If you have information proving any points wrong, or think something should be clarified, as well as new info that can further solidify the case, contact me. Thanks!

    The article about Fukushima follows.

    *     *     *     *

    Fukushima was impossible. The swamping of the external generators by the tsunami was irrelevant, because the real emergency backup systems are driven by steam from the reactors themselves. No electricity is needed to operate three separate emergency systems at each reactor, each of which will keep a reactor safe even if only one works. Interesting it is then that all 9 non electrical backup systems across the three fueled reactors failed. This is technically impossible outside of willful intent, and was likely the result of a Stuxnet attack.

    Stuxnet was designed specifically to target Siemens SCADA controllers and is most effective at tampering with fluid control systems. The centrifuges it attacked in Iran were ideal. So are the fluid control systems at a nuclear facility. Oil refineries are equally at risk, Stuxnet is most dangerous when affecting a system which needs to control the flow of any liquid, be it hydraulic, for cooling, or combining chemicals. Stuxnet is documented to have been produced by the Israeli Defense Forces, for the purpose of destroying any industrial system that can be destroyed by improper fluid flow.

    Magna BSP, a Dimona based company with no history outside of IDF contracts prior to Fukushima has a suspiciously short domain history despite a 10 year claimed history. Magna BSP had a full time internet linked two way connection to the Fukushima reactor room(s) all the way through the disaster. They told TEPCO about that connection on March 15 (after everything blew sky high) via an article printed in the Jerusalem Post. Why did Manga BSP wait until everything was blown sky high to tell Tepco the data link existed, and then did not tell them face to face? I find it hard to believe that TEPCO would not have been interested in viewing a reactor that was about to explode. It seems impossible that Tepco would not have wanted to view the reactor, and probably did not ask because the link was kept a secret. It is a simple fact that internet connections are never allowed inside a reactor's containment. The connection was mentioned in the Jerusalem Post AFTER the destruction was finalized.

    Stuxnet has two modes, random and administrative. It can be administered to optimize the damage and can also transmit setup information and industrial system information to a remote computer. Once installed on the host system via a flash drive it causes that system to violate it's normal security protocols and internet administration becomes possible if a connection exists. Tampering is not visible on the control room readouts, because Stuxnet learns what "normal" looks like and keeps the temperature, pressure, and other readouts within normal limits so that the operators are oblivious to the destruction happening in secret. Stuxnet appeared in Japan in June of 2010, shortly after Magna BSP arrived. Remote administration mode can be adjusted on demand to suit any need. No doubt the people at Fukushima sat there in idle mode thinking all was well until something screamed or went boom and at that point it would be too late to do anything other than cry.

    I am a lifer in the types of control systems Fukushima and it's clone, TVA owned Browns Ferry have. BOTH have been upgraded to modern Siemens controllers running the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system Stuxnet was designed to attack; upgrades are the norm in any major facility. On many blogs people say the controls were old and therefore Stuxnet immune; they are out of touch or have no knowledge of industrial control systems. I actually ferreted it out.

    And now I will explain in detail why the problems before the explosions had to be sabotage.

    The diesel generators were not out in the open as we were led to believe, they were in fact located in the basements of the turbine buildings which were sealed off and never significantly flooded. One of them stayed running the entire time, but the electrical switch gear attached to it disconnected it for an unexplained reason which made it useless. Each of the backup generators at Fukushima were capable of running 14,000 households each, which means they had to be over ten megawatts each. It is obvious then that Fukushima was set up to survive on only ONE of 13 backup generators, and ONE did keep running. One would be many times larger than needed to run last ditch backup systems at all reactors, but would not keep business as usual. But that is not the real story, which is that even others which were high and dry stopped as well.

    I hypothesize that the ONE generator that kept running was kept as a lone reserve, never hooked up to a SCADA controller. Why did the switch gear disconnect a working generator? That is the type of thing Stuxnet was designed to do. On top of these things, emergency generators arrived on scene within 9 hours, before anything bad happened at all but were not able to provide power because the switch gear would not let them. This deceptively written report from the World Nuclear Association contains all this information, but it is presented in a way which will cause you to overlook these things if you are not careful while reading it. This report contains accurate information presented in a very misleading way, which will protect the liars who wrote it - they actually did speak the truth here but in a way it would be missed by virtually anyone. Study the facts presented here with the full ramifications of those facts in mind, not their shallow misleading conclusions.

    From this report you can get:

    1. The generators never got submerged - you have to connect the dot between them being in a contained area and the tsunami thereby not being able to get to them. Some water got into one of the the turbine buildings where several were located and flooded the lowest point in that building to a depth of 4 feet, which means that even if the generators were on the floor at the lowest point they likely would not have been swamped because they are too big - the water would not get past the footings. Perhaps a one megawatt generator would have swamped; certainly not one of the big diesels, which were, according to this report enough to run 14,000 homes each. In addition to this, there were several generators in a second location that never got flooded at all. One of these generators kept running but was not able to get power into the facility because the switchgear prevented it.

    2. You have to have watched the robot videos, which clearly show the switch gear that malfunctioned after the tsunami never got wet - there was a non tsunami reason for the failure. Also look at the high resolution photos referenced below. There is no switch gear for the diesel generators outside the facility, it is all indoors in areas higher than the water got. Remember that there was no emergency when the off site generators arrived, which means that they could work efficiently to get things up and running. With my experience in this area, Assuming it DID get soaked, a complete replacement of high capacity switch gear should only take an afternoon if done with an emergency attitude. A truck mounted crane or a forklift does all the heavy lifting and the stuff is modular. In every major facility there are spares galore. It is not that hard to make the terminations. A worst case scenario could have been addressed before things went horribly awry, that is, unless a virus did not let the new switch gear activate either. It would take days to conclude a virus was messing things up. You would not expect that. I am sure there is a LOT we never heard about.

    3. That batteries held, leaving only a one hour gap in time where there was no power present to run things before adequate off site power drove into the facility on the road all nice and ready to hook up, but was denied to by switch gear which this report says was swamped but that is likely an assumption because swamped switchgear could have been replaced even before the batteries died. The fact that the offsite generators were able to be driven into the facility also proves that other lies told about the earthquake in general - employees leaving only to find cracks in the road so bad they had to walk home; Why? Why lie like this? AT LEAST this report has some modicum of honesty.

    4. You have to look at the chart that shows the thermal output of the reactors 8 hours after the earthquake, which is when the batteries running the electrical cooling pumps died, the output at that time was less than 20 megawatts from each reactor, which means that they would not have had troubles before the off site generators were hooked up to restore power if it was not denied by what I suspect was stuxnet infected switch gear. The real critical time is in the first 3 hours after shutdown.

    5. Reactor 3 exploded entirely, yet this reactor had the most functional backup systems. At least this report says the explosion remains "unexplained". Perhaps those who wrote the report should take a look at this for an answer.

    6. The reactors are stated to be an "early 1960's design" apparently to mislead people into believing they were outdated even when installed. This was not the case. Their design was an early 60's concept but in fact a late 60's design, and since installation takes years, what more could you expect in the early 70's? The reactors were in fact a very safe design. This report at least states that the facility was very well updated. Identical reactors at TVA owned browns ferry have been certified safe and licensed to operate through the year 2035. These reactors were also converted over to run the Siemens Scada system. The reactors at Fukushima were not garbage. The fastest cars in production still function on a late 1800's concept.

    I hypothesize that the situation at Fukushima is not being properly assessed by facility controllers because STUXNET is STILL giving false readings to the control panels, readings which obviously have to be false because they show containment pressure when confidental leaked photographs prove beyond a doubt no containment exists AT ALL at reactor 3. There is not even a reactor there.

    This report is perfectly inaccurate with regard to reactor 3 containment. Perhaps the people who wrote this report have not actually looked at the facility or seen the confidential photographs.

    This report supports what I have said here entirely. It was written by an experienced reactor operator. I found this on May 10. I was absolutely right!

    Each reactor has 8 separate emergency backup systems, each capable of saving the reactor on it's own. Three are designed to function perfectly if all power is lost and even the generators fail. Fukushima did not need any electrical systems operating AT ALL to keep itself from blowing up, when power is lost steam from the reactors is automatically diverted from the generator turbines to two totally separate steam turbines connected to totally separate water pumps needing only reactor steam to power them. Even that backup system has dual redundancy, only one of the two is needed for the job. But the valves which have to activate to re-divert the steam, all 6 valves on a total of 3 fueled reactors, eventually failed to. At reactors 1 and 3 these systems worked, but switched off at reactor 1 within an hour and off at reactor 3 after running for more than two days. No one has been able to explain why these systems switched off all by themselves, when they need a powered command to switch off. At reactor 2 they were never allowed to activate. This can only happen if the control system tells them to shut off or stay off, absent intervention from the controller they automatically and seamlessly switch cooling modes to passive rather than electrical.

    Some readers may remember that the real issue at Fukushima was malfunctioning valves, and the need to get someone past the radiation to open them. These are the valves that were spoken of. Because Stuxnet kept the readouts normal, no one knew this system did not function until major problems happened as a result flooding the area where the valves are with radiation. This prevented last ditch efforts (running and cutting the wires). One automatic valve jamming and mechanically failing would be a surprise,6 failing can only be sabotage.

    In addition to this, another completely independent separately piped backup with an entirely different electronic decision tree which injects borated water at a pre charged 3,500 PSI into the reactor to irrevocably shut down all chain reactions (reactor rebuild required) also simultaneously failed at all 3 fueled reactors. The borated water systems have explosive operated valves so reliable that even one out of 3 failing would be a ten thousand to one possiblity, if that. The reliability of the borated water systems is technically theoretically assured. All three failing at the same time at Fukushima can only mean sabotage.

    High pressure in all of the reactors proves the quake did not damage any of the infrastructure at fukushima because any leaks would have let the pressure go. In addition to this, the seismic readings at Fukushima were 6.07 Fukushima was designed to handle being at the epicenter of an 8.

    The media keeps harping about how all the water went away. It only did because these three backup systems were prevented from cooling the reactor which caused the water to boil off and never be replaced. High pressures were talked about constantly in the press; This means beyond a doubt that all 6 steam powered backup systems were intact, and all 3 borated water systems were intact also because if they were not the pressure would have escaped through them. Absent emergency backup control power keeping the virus alive; (control power Magna BSP admitted was there the whole time by mistake when they said their cameras and supporting computers captured the explosions and maintained a data link) the valves which control these systems would have opened when the generators failed and there would have been no disaster. 3 worst case scenarios where all 9 automatic valves across 9 separate emergency backup systems are held shut by the controller when no power should have been present to prevent them from activating can only mean sabotage.

    A historical perspective of Fukushima shows the hydrogen blasts were bogus.

    Hydrogen blasts could not have damaged Fukushima so badly, this is a media fed lie. If hydrogen gas alone mixed with air could produce blasts strong enough to blow reactor containment buildings to pieces, which are among the strongest structures on earth (exceeded in strength only by ones like Hoover Dam,) then hydrogen gas filled bombs would be the prime military option. In reality, the Three Mile Island incident proved hydrogen ignition in open air after reactor meltdown is likely to only scare employees, while causing no damage at all to the facility, as was the case there. It is extremely important to know the differences between the boiling water reactor design and the design of Chernobyl. At Chernobyl, a hydrogen blast DID cause destruction of the facility, but it was because the reactor design caused hydrogen and oxygen at a perfect ratio to ignite at thousands of PSI inside the reactor pressure vessel. That's a big difference from hydrogen alone igniting in relatively oxygen starved open air at one atmosphere (14.5 PSI). The difference would be similar to the difference between a small firecracker and a case of dynamite; there were many orders of magnitude lower blast potential at Fukushima.

    Just to be absolutely safe after the Three Mile Island incident, many nuclear facilities installed hydrogen hard vent stacks hooked directly up to the relief valves on their reactors, and Fukushima was one of them. This was to prevent a hydrogen buildup in the containment building in the event of a core meltdown, which caused a minor explosion at Three Mile Island. These stacks are the tall white towers you see in the photographs of Fukushima, and they are effective in getting rid of hydrogen buildup, are directly piped, and vent completely outside. "Hard piped" means that the electrical failures would have had nothing to do with the blasts, because a hard vent is exactly that - no fan needed at all because the system is sealed. Even if the hard piping at all 3 fueled Fukushima reactors failed entirely, it should not have been any worse than Three Mile Island which did not have any hard venting to begin with. While hydrogen venting might be a problem if it ignited, it would not mean the death of a facility. It makes no sense that at Fukushima we got a nuclear weapon style mushroom cloud far in excess of the highest yield conventional bomb.

    Below are the classified photos.

    What then, caused the explosions? The containment walls were at their thinnest points in the lowest allowed General Electric design a minimum of 4 foot thick steel reinforced concrete, were likely to be a minimum of 8 feet thick, and were totally blown away. All concrete was stripped from the rebar, which was left dangling. Reactor 3 vanished entirely, as seen in the classified photo used to compare the destruction to the diagram, and reactor 4 appears to have been blown to pieces as seen in this classified photo. The yellow dome which should be sitting on top of reactor 4 can be clearly seen on the wrong side of the containment building. This type of destruction is is indicative of hard weaponry in use; a hydrogen air mix will not do that. Reactors are not made out of tinfoil. On top of this, there was no potential for an explosion at reactor 4 at all, it had been defueled. SO WHAT, PRAY TELL, BLEW IT APART? That's the dirty question no one is asking - how did that happen?

    To give you an idea of how big the reactors at Fukushima were, look at this. It's the top of the same make and model at Fukushima's American twin, TVA owned Brown's Ferry, and it is only the top. The yellow dome sits above this, and is even bigger (here the yellow dome has been removed for refueling). Over 150 feet of reactor sits below that cap. Hydrogen will not vaporize that, which appears to be what happened to #3, only a nuclear weapon would. Reactors are about 14 digits beyond incapable of going supercritical even with a complete core meltdown. The reactors did not explode, something placed in their vicinity did.

    Magna BSP had access to the reactors at this facility. They were based in Dimona, which is a military base that manufactures nuclear weapons. Stuxnet was made in their yard. They are stated to be a military company.

    There is extremely strong evidence that Dimona based Magna BSP placed nuclear weapons at the exploded or vanished reactors at Fukushima, possibly hidden inside one of their unbelievably GIANT stereoscopic cameras. These cameras were installed inside the reactor containment of Fukushima reactor 3 under the cover of a security contract in the year prior to the disaster. These cameras are identical in size and appearance to a gun type nuclear weapon. Since previous hydrogen explosions at boiling water reactors have never caused any sort of damage to equipment or buildings, even during complete meltdowns, it begs the question how on earth one at reactor 3 produced a mushroom cloud. Three Mile Island sits in the evidence pool against what we have been told about Fukushima. History does matter.

    One problem with the reporting in the mainstream media is that it failed to convey just how massive and strong the containment structures really were, as seen in this classified photo. A hydrogen explosion would only blow the sheet metal off the steel framed roof if it even did that, at Three Mile Island the hydrogen ignition did nothing at all. It just scared employees. Another thing the reporting failed to convey is the gravity of the disaster. Compare the containment diagram to the remains of reactor 3. It is painfully obvious that many tons of highly radioactive plutonium in the containment pools is nowhere to be found, the entire floor they were on is completly gone. We are getting lied to.

    That was a LOT more than a hydrogen blast, and as a result there are thousands of pounds of plutonium scattered everywhere. TEPCO was ridiculed for initially stating that the radiation from the facility was "immeasurable". I think they at first told the truth. Now they have this story about the Fukushima 50. Is it in fact a "wag the dog"? No one could be there and live. Why is remote controlled heavy equipment doing the cleanup? The official story is hydrogen blasts, not nukes, so the story line has to at least be within the far outer limits of what a hydrogen blast could actually accomplish; not missing reactors and entire fuel pools blown away.

    I suggest you ponder the pictures and materials presented and reach your own conclusion. A government issued training manual for the reactors at Fukushima is here.

    Now that Osama, who has been dead for 10 years is officially dead, Al Quaida is going to use a nuke, so they say; I strongly urge you to consider this article if a nuke actually does go off somewhere or if other nuclear facilities start acting like Fukushima.

    The only reason I believe the management at Fukushima is not telling it like it really was is because victim status has been so well asserted by the ethnic group in question that it is career suicide to point the finger at them, even when they try to kill you. I find it interesting that all 12 Non Japanese employees of Magna BSP returned to Israel a week before the tsunami . . . . .

    I might have understood the need for Stuxnet if it's use would have ended with Iran. Unfortunately that does not appear to be the case. I do hope this article breaks their toy.

    For those of you who are reluctant to re-post this because the wording is too strong, I ask you to consider this;

    The real answer came out of Fukushima. We have a member of the international community which has already done horrendous damage to a very advanced and (presently) innocent civilization and we simply cannot continue to tolerate it. Consider what ignoring this will cost you. Are you prepared to have a major disaster at the convenience of the couch; because you sat there watching TV rather than dragging your butt over to the computer to at least spread the word? Are your video games, ball games, 4x4 and porno really worth continuing to lose everything for? Is your religion going to keep you silent as well? We really need a serious wake up call. Please let this post be it, rather than some other unforseen disaster.

    I would love to chat with the criminal Magna BSP, all about how I am going down to Japan town to force this issue out in the open, and do anything else needed to bring those accountable to the table. You are not going to get away with false flag terror hidden under so-called environmental disasters for as long as I live. Threats made so far will not cut it; I am well prepared to meet my maker. I am well prepared to run for my life with only a laptop; eating out of dumpsters while begging for money to buy and burn CD's to hand out. Go for it. Indonesia was another one of your glory days, THAT no preamble nuclear triggered 6.4 earthquake with a 9.0 tsunami and GORGEOUS clean well refined EMP recorded both in Egypt and India (and by your nation, of course) was every bit as outrageous as this one. Your time is over, or I am dead. The world you want is not one I will live in. Enough is enough!

    Thank you to the many readers who pointed out flaws, gave tips, and suggested clarifications, you studied this indeed! My thanks also goes out to the radio hosts who have had me on the air and invited me to appear to discuss this subject. BTW, this article was written via code entry, without spell check. Consider that.

    These references included as e-mail compatible links. (source of high resolution photos)

    UPDATE: Jennifer Lake comes to similar conclusions in her post Fukushima: Faked Quake.  



      "Israel unloaded several white phosphorus bombs on Gaza in April (2011)" J.Azaziah

      My question: Is "israel" completely fucking barking-mad CRAZY to be killing Gaza children in front of the whole world?

      Fact: the country of "israel" IS a false flag. Their flag is the criminal goldsmith Bauer's red shield. The "country" of Rothschildlandia is as false as the Balfor "declaration" paper written and paid for by false-jew Khazarian Ashkenazis. This "country" is as fake as a three dollar bill.

      It is time to end the fakery, the madness, the murder.

      Dissolve "israel" before it samsonises the whole world as they did 9/11. Put Nathan and his whole criminal klan in prison (sic).

      Press restart and begin the civilised world again - without any usury or any fraction reserve banking. There is no other way - the system can never be fixed as it presently exists. Corruption exists at every single level in every single governing body in every single country everywhere in the world.

      If you love your children, if you love life, the above MUST occur worldwide!



    2. Stone's report has been getting a lot of coverage the last couple of days. Good!

      I wonder if anyone is trying to debunk any of his many points?

      I just sent WRH an email to see if Mike will link it.

    3. Israel and it's network of criminals worldwide that work to advance it's agenda must be put to a stop, once and for all.

      I'd be surprised if Rivero ran Stone's article. He is vehemently against anyone who raises these sorts of questions (HAARP/advanced nuclear weapons involvement) regarding Fukushima. Then again, Rivero is also vehemently against anyone who disputes that an airplane crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11! Go figure that one!!

      It's very strange. He puts out lots of good info, but certain topics he thinks should not be discussed. Or he at least refuses to discuss them, or allow others to do so on his radio show.

    4. Mike did respond to my question of what he thought of Stone's article and said:

      "Pathetic attempt to get GE off the hook for crappy reactor design."

      I'll have to admit that Stone's point #6 gave me pause when I first read it. I've never considered any of the plants to be 'safe' designs and Browns Ferry, which is not that far from where I live, being certified safe doesn't doesn't put my mind at ease.

      That said, Stone does raise some questions and speculations that we would like answers to but probably are not to come.

      Yes, Rivero's pentagon stance is funny to say the least.

    5. I am afraid my opinion on this one is a bit different from everyone else's. I think the stuxnet idea is to place Japan in the victim role and take the heat off GE and the industry in general. Japan was a submarine base on the cusp of where a war is being fought in the mideast. They had to move them to Guam.

      There is a lot of money to be made in those power plants.

      "that didn’t happen at Fukushima because the tidal wave, the tsunami, was so great that it overwhelmed their diesels and it overwhelmed something called “service water 2” But in any event, they couldn’t get any power to the big pumps"

      Even with stuxnet you can keep them running with a diesel. There was no diesel because of a tidal wave.


    7. Hey John Friend!

      apologies for the off topic comment, but, I left you a response at my place I just had to share because you got it.

      Thanks John Friend!

      You really understood where I was coming from with this post.

      I try not to hammer people over the head.

      But by pointing out the fact that having a "face of" is standard advertising or promotion. Or more accurately propaganda & management perception.

      By pointing out the patterns, people can read and connect the dots for themselves."

      I appreciated your comment and the fact you read the entire piece.

    8. Hey Penny! I heard you loud and clear!! The "revolutions" in the ME are clearly being managed and distorted by the Western media, and your post nailed it!

      What did you think of Stone's piece here? I know you've done a lot of looking into Fukushima, any thoughts? I may have missed it on your blog if you've already addressed it though! I'll check!

    9. Hey John!

      Someone left a link to this story at my place and I took a pass on it.

      I have some issues with some of the claims made.

      I had discussed this with james over at winterpatriot.

      The whole thing hinges on the fact that Japan offered to aid Iran.
      From there all the rest flows.

      I don't think that Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran would be upsetting in the least to Israel.

      Mr Friend: I went to find what I had previously written

      -"I for now am taking a pass on it, though I concede it is possible I am wrong.

      Here is why.

      from my response

      "If Japan did make the offer,which it appears they did.

      It would have been a dead end offer.

      Any uranium sent to Japan would have never been returned.

      Japan making this offer is the equivalent of the US making the offer.

      It was going no where. A dead end.

      I have seen some of the topics discussed previously such as the Israeli security agency involvement.

      Since the whole theory dies right at the beginning, this is one I would stay away from.

      That all said, I could be wrong but that is what I think." -

      So there it is,

      DM also brings up an interesting point about Stuxnet letting GE off the hook. Their reactors are garbage and they always were.

      I have some info here

      Though I won't dismiss Stuxnet outright..but the fact that Japan offered anything in the way of aid to Iran, for enrichment, was clearly to impede Iran on behalf of the US.

      You may be interested in this post

      I have written alot on Fukushima, it is a horrible, horrible holocaust.

    10. What was most interesting to me was the information Stone was presenting demonstrating that the earthquake and tsunami were not at all how they were presented in the media and generally understood by people. I think that is the most important point.

      Also, he says that Reactor 4 had been deactivated, but it exploded anyways, and that a hydrogen explosion is simply impossible, which is how the media played it.

      I don't know- I think he raises many issues that need to be addressed. And we know how psychopathic and ruthless the Israelis and their international crime gang are. To me, the story put out about Fukushima never really made sense from the beginning.

    11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    12. sorry garbled response.. deleted

      Hey John!

      "the earthquake and tsunami were not at all how they were presented in the media"

      that is almost par for the course with anything from the msm, never ever how it is presented.

      The media played the explosions as hydrogen to cover up for the fact the plants were in melt down. IMO.

      As for how ruthless the Israeli's are? (IDF, Mossad, Shin Bet and government in particular)

      But I am not so sure, in this case they are connected.
      If you wanna talk Syria, Egypt, Libya..Israel is connected.
      Pakistan- Israel is connected.

      As for Fukushima it gets more questionable.

      "To me, the story put out about Fukushima never really made sense from the beginning."

      Because it was a cover up from the start. TEPCO knew the plants were in meltdown immediately following the earthquake and they along with the Japanese government, the US and the IAEA connived to cover it up.

      That's why it makes no sense.

      Well that's my take on it anyway :)

    13. Quote from AH: Insofar as the Zionists have the world believe that their aims would be satisfied by the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine they have duped
      the Gojim once again in the vilest manner. They think not in the remotest way of building up a state in order to inhabit it and work the fields for their living. The sole reason why they want this state, with recognised rights of sovereignty, excluding the legal power monopoy of other nations, is to create an organisational centre for their international World-Frauds, a safe haven for unmasked criminals and a high school
      for trainee gangsters…

      Written 90 years ago, but could have been written yesterday!

    14. Penny, most people who have somehow escaped the main stream media brain washing activities know the difference between fraud- and pseudo-arguments and plain, straight language. The author of the above article has not only great technical knowledge, but he
      uses words that come across as straight and plain. He strikes me as sincere and I share his grave concern! Having said that I will refrain from classifying your representations, because I believe you should have the right to present them whatever. Insofar I would also criticise the blog holder for deleting one of your contributions. However, it is clear where you stand. You ignore the entire thread of concrete arguments of the writer and you concentrate yourself on ridiculing the negotiations between Japan and Iran regarding enriched uranium - ridiculing is a known method of those who cannot offer anything concrete! Have you anything more to offer than that? Yes, it seems so. Tepco caused the floodwave in order to destroy their own
      power plants. Brilliant!

    15. Anonymous:

      first of all, I deleted my own comment.
      Not John Friend.
      If you would have actually read my comment, you would have noticed I said that myself.

      "concentrate yourself on ridiculing the negotiations between Japan and Iran regarding enriched uranium"


      To each their own?

      I stated what is in my opinion an obvious fact. If Japan had offered to enrich uranium for Iran, it was only to ensure said uranium never got back to Iran.

      The fact that Japan offered really means nothing of any significance, it could easily have been a ruse to make Iran look incorrigible.

      Notice Iran didn't accept the offer?
      Why would that have been?

      ". Tepco caused the floodwave in order to destroy their own
      power plants."

      where exactly did I say that?
      Oh, yes I know...nowhere!

      You want to talk about using ridicule and smear?
      Take a look at the claptrap you have written.
      Putting words in the mouths of others is a classic bullshit move.

      That all said, your entitled to your opinion as I am entitled to mine.

    16. Reply to Penny June 8, 2011, 5,25 am

      I erroneously connected the word author to the author of the article under discussion. Thanks for pointing that out and it follows that I withdraw my criticism of the blog moderation.

      Now if you say the Japanese had made an offer to Iran, which they had ultimately no intention to keep you would imply the the Japanese, or at least their Government, are nothing else but
      a bunch of crooks.

      If on the other hand you mean that the Japanese have, in the last instance, no choice to act other than on orders from Usrael, the consequence would be that they are a slave country.

      Which of the two do you mean? And how can you come to the conclusion that your nebulous
      statements on some contacts between Japan and Iran would invalidate all and everything, which the author of the above article has said? And he did say a lot of things!

      It`s true that Iran hasn`t ultimately agreed to outsource any part of their nuclear activities. The reason is very simple: They are not a Zionist colony.

      Regarding TEPCO (and I quote you): “…TEPCO knew the plants were in meltdown immediately following the earthquake and they connived… cover it up…” That`s an
      allegation that TEPCO (you also include the Japanese Government) was party to a plan to make the Japanese population object of mass murder by radiation! You conveniently ignore the pointers of the article`s author that the TEPCO employees were for some time after the floodwave led up the garden path by false printouts due to the activation of Stuxnet. True enough, Penny, I have applied a small measure of polemics to your hilarious statements,
      but it seems in doing this I would have inadvertently and unexpectedly overtaxed you.

      The guiding thought of this blog is not to insult discussion partners, since one can never be quite sure if one might not be mistaken oneself. So far to your words “claptrap” and “bullshit”. Could it be that the synonym “Penny”, by any parameter and quite independent of gender, cannot relate to a Lady?

    17. The latest news has TEPCO admitting the plants were in meltdown even before the tsunami

      read all about it

      "That`s an
      allegation that TEPCO (you also include the Japanese Government) was party to a plan to make the Japanese population object of mass murder by radiation!"

      Yes, that is exactly what they did.
      Like the ptb's ever care about the people? Fukushima is radiating the entire planet, reading much about it in the msm?

      "Now if you say the Japanese had made an offer to Iran, which they had ultimately no intention to keep you would imply the the Japanese, or at least their Government, are nothing else but
      a bunch of crooks. "

      Yup, that is what I am implying.
      As are all governments

      Whatever about polemics and such, I don't suffer fools lightly.

    18. To anonymous

      I have blogged extensively on Fukushima, there are better then 30 posts there, imagine the research I did for all that information??

      Hours and hours and hours...

      If I have an opinion, a thought that is my own, it is based on a lot of information and research.

      I am under no obligation to agree with you as your are not with me.
      I leave it at that.
      And hope you will respect that?

    19. June 8th 2011, 11,58 am

      Thanks for calling me a fool. Didn`t your Mama teach you that you shouldn`t behave in such way to strangers? And allow me to apologize to you for having made you suffer!

      I recommend you watch the video of Benjamin Fulford as attached to the article. In a similar
      video some time earlier a Japanese politician of ministerial rank said Japan had lost the ability
      to act on its own perception as her Government had been threatened with an “earthquake machine”. Maybe that Japanese Minister is a Junkie and was, at the time of the interview, suffering from halluzinations!

      As for your pointer that the meltdown at Fukushima might have started a short while before the earthquake started I would not entirely exclude that, since an Israeli Security set up had free access to the plant. I suppose the important thing for them was that they caught their plane in time before it all started! It reminds me of the BBC announcing the collapse of “Building what?” some 20 minutes before it actually happened. Nobody is perfect.

      In view of what is known consider the position of TEPCO and the Japanese Government before you make grotesque allegations. I guess if your beloved ones were under threat of
      torture and death you would surely have no hesitation to sign a confession, if only you could save them in this way, that you are responsible for strangling 6 Million Jews with your own hands.

      I never occurred to me to force you to change your views. Fact is some of your earlier contributions on this thread had inspired me to provoke you a little to find out what you
      can come up with in comparison to the fascinating article, which is object of this thread.
      Now I know! Thanks again.

    20. "As for your pointer that the meltdown at Fukushima might have started a short while before the earthquake started"

      except I never said that!

      You have not really read anything I have posted. Not one word. From the beginning to now and have attributed false statements to me.

      John Friend, my sincerest apologies for commandeering your blog.

      As to you anonymous- you are just simply not worth anymore time.
      When I made the comment about suffering fools, I meant it.

      You cannot read, you don't comprehend anything I have posted.

      The good thing?

      It is all here, in black and white or blue and white in this case...
      It can be read by anyone who chooses to do so.

      Fare thee well

    21. Not a problem, I don't mind the back and forth! Haha!

      I really do think Stone is on to something here in this article though.

    22. Ah, your a good sport John!

      I realize you do agree with the article, but, I am not going to bash you over the head with my disagreement and I am so glad you do tolerate dissent.

      Because when it all comes down to it.
      We are in the same ship.(earth)
      With the same destination in mind (freedom from tyranny, lies and oppression).
      We may disagree from time to time on the route to take, or which way the wind blows, but mainly we need to stay on course.

      Thanks again John

      Oh I forgot to mention, I did link over to you in my latest, because your one post touched on Syria in a way that added to my post, which was a collaboration between myself, james at WP and NYSC at thenakedfacts

    23. Well thank you, I'll check it out now!

    24. Geez how the heck have I missed your blog until now? Kicks self. This is a dynamite report and, like so many others, has to get out there.

      Adding you to my ridiculously long and growing longer blog roll right now. Time to edit it anyhow, a few have to go ~ out with the old and in with the new sorta thing.

      Ty for your comments, btw at my humble place. Always thoughtful...

      As for this. I have pointed out with photos and film a few times that the "earthquake" did not seem to hit before the tsunami in many videos. A few weeks back a film surfaced taken from a dashboard and the driver; not one thing looked abnormal. People on the streets just ambling along normally, buildings tall and fine, etc.

      Just as with the Asian tsunami, the facts are self evident, Mother Nature had nothing to do with their creation although she may, eventually, take a large hand in the events these criminal elements persist in creating.

      Israel and America, ah, yes we know who runs the show. However, unless America throws the usurping zionists out on their asses, there is no difference between the two. The unsung coupe has resulted in two united nations whose leaders commit unthinkable crimes with equal impunity and the same goals. They may have different names, but the game is world domination. But what type of world will they inherit?

      Where I live, I am basically living indoors because of Fukushima. The fallout is very very high here, probably among the highest next to Japan itself and this crime affects my life directly. I have even suggested that my daughters not have children when the time comes and this is due to Fukushima, the crime that broke my tolerance level.

      I have read Fulford's stuff for quite a few months now but I am still unsure how to take him and wonder if he is all truth. This White Dragon stuff kind of seems too strange... I need proof before I come a believer so my mind is not closed, just apprehensive for now.

    25. Hey Noor, thanks for the kind words.

      Yeah, this Fukushima disaster is off the charts bad. Stone's research and perspective here raise a lot of very important questions, with some disturbing answers. I was really bummed that no one- literally, no one- in the "alternative media", including some of my favorites like Daryl Bradford Smith, Rivero, aangirfan, and many others, ran Stone's article or interviewed him. I will give credit to Feet to the Fire radio- they did an interview with Stone that was phenomenal, which is linked at the beginning of this post. Check it out if you haven't. Other than that, I don't know of anyone who reported on his work.

      I don't know what to do about this. I always try to eat healthy, drink safe/clean water, exercise and otherwise live a happy, healthy life. When all this first happened, I was pretty depressed for a while. Now, I figure I gotta just keep on movin', like Bob would say. I'm going to make the most of this give of life I was given, and not be afraid to speak the truth or my mind. I'm not afraid of death, in fact, it's only the end of the beginning of this journey we human beings are on.

    26. "A leading Japanese journalist recently made two incredible claims about the Fukushima power plant that suffered a nuclear meltdown in March 2011, sending shockwaves around the world.

      First, the former editor of a national newspaper in Japan says the U.S. and Israel knew Fukushima had weapons-grade uranium and plutonium that were exposed to the atmosphere after a massive tsunami wave hit the reactor.

      Second, he contends that Israeli intelligence sabotaged the reactor in retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state.

      According to Yoishi Shimatsu, a former editor of Japan Times Weekly, these nuclear materials were shipped to the plant in 2007 on the orders of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, with the connivance of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

      The shipment was in the form of warhead cores secretly removed from the U.S. nuclear warheads facility BWXT Plantex near Amarillo, Texas."


    Thanks for reading! Comments are welcome but are not guaranteed to be published. Please refrain from using curse words and other derogatory language. Published comments do not always reflect the views of this blog.